Abstract
It has been proposed that the coherent propagation of long-lived heavy neutrino mass eigenstates can lead to an oscillating rate of lepton number conserving (LNC) and violating (LNV) events, as a function of the distance between the production and displaced decay vertices. We discuss this phenomenon, which we refer to as heavy neutrino-antineutrino oscillations, in the framework of quantum field theory (QFT), using the formalism of external wave packets. General formulae for the oscillation probabilities and the number of expected events are derived and the coherence and localisation conditions that have to be satisfied in order for neutrino-antineutrino oscillations to be observable are discussed. The formulae are then applied to a low scale seesaw scenario, which features two nearly mass degenerate heavy neutrinos that can be sufficiently long lived to produce a displaced vertex when their masses are below the W boson mass. The leading and next-to-leading order oscillation formulae for this scenario are derived. For an example parameter point used in previous studies, the kinematics of the considered LNC/LNV processes are simulated, to check that the coherence and localisation conditions are satisfied. Our results show that the phenomenon of heavy neutrino-antineutrino oscillations can indeed occur in low scale seesaw scenarios and that the previously used leading order formulae, derived with a plane wave approach, provide a good approximation for the considered example parameter point.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
B. Pontecorvo, Mesonium and anti-mesonium, Sov. Phys. JETP 6 (1957) 429 [Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 33 (1957) 549] [INSPIRE].
Z. Maki, M. Nakagawa and S. Sakata, Remarks on the unified model of elementary particles, Prog. Theor. Phys. 28 (1962) 870 [INSPIRE].
R. Davis, Jr., D.S. Harmer and K. C. Hoffman, Search for neutrinos from the Sun, Phys. Rev. Lett. 20 (1968) 1205 [INSPIRE].
V. N. Gribov and B. Pontecorvo, Neutrino astronomy and lepton charge, Phys. Lett. B 28 (1969) 493 [INSPIRE].
R. G. Sachs, Interference phenomena of neutral K mesons, Ann. Phys 22 (1963) 239.
B. Kayser, On the quantum mechanics of neutrino oscillation, Phys. Rev. D 24 (1981) 110 [INSPIRE].
C. Giunti, C. W. Kim, J. A. Lee and U. W. Lee, On the treatment of neutrino oscillations without resort to weak eigenstates, Phys. Rev. D 48 (1993) 4310 [hep-ph/9305276] [INSPIRE].
M. Beuthe, Oscillations of neutrinos and mesons in quantum field theory, Phys. Rept. 375 (2003) 105 [hep-ph/0109119] [INSPIRE].
R. Jacob and R. G. Sachs, Mass and lifetime of unstable particles, Phys. Rev. 121 (1961) 350 [INSPIRE].
A. G. Cohen, S. L. Glashow and Z. Ligeti, Disentangling neutrino oscillations, Phys. Lett. B 678 (2009) 191 [arXiv:0810.4602] [INSPIRE].
G. Cvetič, C. S. Kim, R. Kogerler and J. Zamora-Saa, Oscillation of heavy sterile neutrino in decay of B → μeπ, Phys. Rev. D 92 (2015) 013015 [arXiv:1505.04749] [INSPIRE].
G. Anamiati, M. Hirsch and E. Nardi, Quasi-Dirac neutrinos at the LHC, JHEP 10 (2016) 010 [arXiv:1607.05641] [INSPIRE].
J. Gluza and T. Jeliński, Heavy neutrinos and the pp → lljj CMS data, Phys. Lett. B 748 (2015) 125 [arXiv:1504.05568] [INSPIRE].
P. S. Bhupal Dev and R. N. Mohapatra, Unified explanation of the eejj, diboson and dijet resonances at the LHC, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 (2015) 181803 [arXiv:1508.02277] [INSPIRE].
S. Antusch, E. Cazzato and O. Fischer, Resolvable heavy neutrino-antineutrino oscillations at colliders, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 34 (2019) 1950061 [arXiv:1709.03797] [INSPIRE].
M. Drewes, J. Klarić and P. Klose, On lepton number violation in heavy neutrino decays at colliders, JHEP 19 (2020) 032 [arXiv:1907.13034] [INSPIRE].
G. Cvetič, A. Das and J. Zamora-Saá, Probing heavy neutrino oscillations in rare W boson decays, J. Phys. G 46 (2019) 075002 [arXiv:1805.00070] [INSPIRE].
G. Cvetič, A. Das, S. Tapia and J. Zamora-Saá, Measuring the heavy neutrino oscillations in rare W boson decays at the Large Hadron Collider, J. Phys. G 47 (2020) 015001 [arXiv:1905.03097] [INSPIRE].
J. Zamora-Saa, Resonant CP violation in rare τ ± decays, JHEP 05 (2017) 110 [arXiv:1612.07656] [INSPIRE].
S. Tapia and J. Zamora-Saá, Exploring CP-Violating heavy neutrino oscillations in rare tau decays at Belle II, Nucl. Phys. B 952 (2020) 114936 [arXiv:1906.09470] [INSPIRE].
A. Das, P. S. B. Dev and R. N. Mohapatra, Same sign versus opposite sign dileptons as a probe of low scale seesaw mechanisms, Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) 015018 [arXiv:1709.06553] [INSPIRE].
S. Antusch et al., Probing leptogenesis at future colliders, JHEP 09 (2018) 124 [arXiv:1710.03744] [INSPIRE].
P. S. Bhupal Dev, R. N. Mohapatra and Y. Zhang, CP violating effects in heavy neutrino oscillations: implications for colliders and leptogenesis, JHEP 11 (2019) 137 [arXiv:1904.04787] [INSPIRE].
A. Denner, H. Eck, O. Hahn and J. Kublbeck, Feynman rules for fermion number violating interactions, Nucl. Phys. B 387 (1992) 467 [INSPIRE].
J.-L. Tastet and I. Timiryasov, Dirac vs. majorana HNLs (and their oscillations) at SHiP, JHEP 04 (2020) 005 [arXiv:1912.05520] [INSPIRE].
S. Antusch, E. Cazzato and O. Fischer, Sterile neutrino searches via displaced vertices at LHCb, Phys. Lett. B 774 (2017) 114 [arXiv:1706.05990] [INSPIRE].
LHCb collaboration, LHCb detector performance, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 30 (2015) 1530022 [arXiv:1412.6352] [INSPIRE].
J. Rich, The quantum mechanics of neutrino oscillations, Phys. Rev. D 48 (1993) 4318 [INSPIRE].
W. Grimus, S. Mohanty and P. Stöckinger, Neutrino oscillations and the effect of the finite lifetime of the neutrino source, Phys. Rev. D 61 (2000) 033001 [hep-ph/9904285] [INSPIRE].
W. Grimus, P. Stöckinger and S. Mohanty, The field theoretical approach to coherence in neutrino oscillations, Phys. Rev. D 59 (1999) 013011 [hep-ph/9807442] [INSPIRE].
J.-E. Campagne, Neutrino oscillations from pion decay in flight, Phys. Lett. B 400 (1997) 135 [INSPIRE].
A. D. Dolgov, Neutrino oscillations and cosmology, hep-ph/0004032 [INSPIRE].
S. Antusch and O. Fischer, Testing sterile neutrino extensions of the Standard Model at future lepton colliders, JHEP 05 (2015) 053 [arXiv:1502.05915] [INSPIRE].
S. Antusch, E. Cazzato and O. Fischer, Sterile neutrino searches at future e− e+ , pp, and e− p colliders, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 32 (2017) 1750078 [arXiv:1612.02728] [INSPIRE].
M. Malinsky, J. C. Romao and J. W. F. Valle, Novel supersymmetric SO(10) seesaw mechanism, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 (2005) 161801 [hep-ph/0506296] [INSPIRE].
S. Antusch, C. Hohl, S. F. King and V. Susic, Non-universal Z′ from SO(10) GUTs with vector-like family and the origin of neutrino masses, Nucl. Phys. B 934 (2018) 578 [arXiv:1712.05366] [INSPIRE].
S. Antusch, S. Blanchet, M. Blennow and E. Fernandez-Martinez, Non-unitary Leptonic Mixing and Leptogenesis, JHEP 01 (2010) 017 [arXiv:0910.5957] [INSPIRE].
M. B. Gavela, T. Hambye, D. Hernandez and P. Hernández, Minimal flavour seesaw models, JHEP 09 (2009) 038 [arXiv:0906.1461] [INSPIRE].
I. Esteban, M. C. Gonzalez-Garcia, A. Hernandez-Cabezudo, M. Maltoni and T. Schwetz, Global analysis of three-flavour neutrino oscillations: synergies and tensions in the determination of θ23, δCP, and the mass ordering, JHEP 01 (2019) 106 [arXiv:1811.05487] [INSPIRE].
NuFIT 4.1, www.nu-fit.org (2019).
C. O. Dib and C. S. Kim, Discovering sterile neutrinos ligther than MW at the LHC, Phys. Rev. D 92 (2015) 093009 [arXiv:1509.05981] [INSPIRE].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
ArXiv ePrint: 2012.05763
Rights and permissions
Open Access . This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
About this article
Cite this article
Antusch, S., Rosskopp, J. Heavy neutrino-antineutrino oscillations in quantum field theory. J. High Energ. Phys. 2021, 170 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP03(2021)170
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP03(2021)170