Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Account
Menu
Find a journal Publish with us Track your research
Search
Saved research
Cart
  1. Home
  2. Journal of High Energy Physics
  3. Article

Top-quark mass effects in H+jet and H+2 jets production

  • Regular Article - Theoretical Physics
  • Open access
  • Published: 15 March 2022
  • Volume 2022, article number 96, (2022)
  • Cite this article

You have full access to this open access article

Download PDF
Save article
View saved research
Journal of High Energy Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript
Top-quark mass effects in H+jet and H+2 jets production
Download PDF
  • X. Chen1,2,3,
  • A. Huss4,
  • S. P. Jones5,
  • M. Kerner1,2,3,
  • J.-N. Lang3,
  • J. M. Lindert6 &
  • …
  • H. Zhang  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-7472-64673,7 

  • 701 Accesses

  • 22 Citations

  • 1 Altmetric

  • Explore all metrics

A preprint version of the article is available at arXiv.

Abstract

We present calculations of Higgs boson production via gluon-gluon fusion in association with one or two additional jets at next-to-leading order in QCD. The calculation of H+jet is exact in the treatment of the top-quark mass, whereas for the H+2 jets calculation the two-loop virtual amplitudes are approximated via a reweighting with leading-order mass effects, while keeping all top-quark mass effects in the real radiation contributions. For H+jet production, this study extends a previous calculation, revealing an error in the previous results. For total and differential cross sections, we present new results and compare the QCD corrections with the infinite top-mass limit, for which we find a strikingly good agreement if all amplitudes are rescaled by the leading-order mass dependence.

Article PDF

Download to read the full article text

Similar content being viewed by others

Heavy-quark mass effects in Higgs plus jets production

Article Open access 01 August 2016

Full mass dependence in Higgs boson production in association with jets at the LHC and FCC

Article Open access 23 January 2017

Exact quark-mass dependence of the Higgs-gluon form factor at three loops in QCD

Article Open access 28 May 2020

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, books and news in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.
  • High-Energy Astrophysics
  • Nuclear and Particle Physics
  • Particle Physics
  • Theoretical Nuclear Physics
  • Theoretical Particle Physics
  • Quantum Electrodynamics, Relativistic and Many-body Calculations

References

  1. C. Arnesen, I.Z. Rothstein and J. Zupan, Smoking Guns for On-Shell New Physics at the LHC, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103 (2009) 151801 [arXiv:0809.1429] [INSPIRE].

  2. A. Banfi, A. Martin and V. Sanz, Probing top-partners in Higgs+jets, JHEP 08 (2014) 053 [arXiv:1308.4771] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. A. Azatov and A. Paul, Probing Higgs couplings with high pT Higgs production, JHEP 01 (2014) 014 [arXiv:1309.5273] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. C. Grojean, E. Salvioni, M. Schlaffer and A. Weiler, Very boosted Higgs in gluon fusion, JHEP 05 (2014) 022 [arXiv:1312.3317] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. R.V. Harlander and T. Neumann, Probing the nature of the Higgs-gluon coupling, Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 074015 [arXiv:1308.2225] [INSPIRE].

  6. S. Dawson, I.M. Lewis and M. Zeng, Effective field theory for Higgs boson plus jet production, Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) 093007 [arXiv:1409.6299] [INSPIRE].

  7. U. Langenegger, M. Spira and I. Strebel, Testing the Higgs Boson Coupling to Gluons, arXiv:1507.01373 [INSPIRE].

  8. M. Grazzini, A. Ilnicka, M. Spira and M. Wiesemann, Modeling BSM effects on the Higgs transverse-momentum spectrum in an EFT approach, JHEP 03 (2017) 115 [arXiv:1612.00283] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. N. Deutschmann, C. Duhr, F. Maltoni and E. Vryonidou, Gluon-fusion Higgs production in the Standard Model Effective Field Theory, JHEP 12 (2017) 063 [Erratum ibid. 02 (2018) 159] [arXiv:1708.00460] [INSPIRE].

  10. M. Battaglia, M. Grazzini, M. Spira and M. Wiesemann, Sensitivity to BSM effects in the Higgs pT spectrum within SMEFT, JHEP 11 (2021) 173 [arXiv:2109.02987] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. ATLAS collaboration, Prospects for differential cross-section measurements of Higgs boson production measured in decays to ZZ and γγ with the ATLAS experiment at the High-Luminosity LHC, ATL-PHYS-PUB-2018-040 (2018).

  12. CMS collaboration, Sensitivity projections for Higgs boson properties measurements at the HL-LHC, CMS-PAS-FTR-18-011 (2018).

  13. ATLAS collaboration, Study of Higgs-boson production with large transverse momentum using the H → \( b\overline{b} \) decay with the ATLAS detector, ATLAS-CONF-2021-010 (2021).

  14. CMS collaboration, Inclusive search for highly boosted Higgs bosons decaying to bottom quark-antiquark pairs in proton-proton collisions at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV, JHEP 12 (2020) 085 [arXiv:2006.13251] [INSPIRE].

  15. K. Becker et al., Precise predictions for boosted Higgs production, arXiv:2005.07762 [INSPIRE].

  16. F. Campanario, T.M. Figy, S. Plätzer, M. Rauch, P. Schichtel and M. Sjödahl, Stress testing the vector-boson-fusion approximation in multijet final states, Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 033003 [arXiv:1802.09955] [INSPIRE].

  17. A. Buckley et al., A comparative study of Higgs boson production from vector-boson fusion, JHEP 11 (2021) 108 [arXiv:2105.11399] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. P. Artoisenet et al., A framework for Higgs characterisation, JHEP 11 (2013) 043 [arXiv:1306.6464] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. F. Maltoni, K. Mawatari and M. Zaro, Higgs characterisation via vector-boson fusion and associated production: NLO and parton-shower effects, Eur. Phys. J. C 74 (2014) 2710 [arXiv:1311.1829] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. A. Greljo, G. Isidori, J.M. Lindert and D. Marzocca, Pseudo-observables in electroweak Higgs production, Eur. Phys. J. C 76 (2016) 158 [arXiv:1512.06135] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. C. Degrande, B. Fuks, K. Mawatari, K. Mimasu and V. Sanz, Electroweak Higgs boson production in the standard model effective field theory beyond leading order in QCD, Eur. Phys. J. C 77 (2017) 262 [arXiv:1609.04833] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. A. Greljo, G. Isidori, J.M. Lindert, D. Marzocca and H. Zhang, Electroweak Higgs production with HiggsPO at NLO QCD, Eur. Phys. J. C 77 (2017) 838 [arXiv:1710.04143] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. J.Y. Araz, S. Banerjee, R.S. Gupta and M. Spannowsky, Precision SMEFT bounds from the VBF Higgs at high transverse momentum, JHEP 04 (2021) 125 [arXiv:2011.03555] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. M. Czakon, R.V. Harlander, J. Klappert and M. Niggetiedt, Exact Top-Quark Mass Dependence in Hadronic Higgs Production, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127 (2021) 162002 [arXiv:2105.04436] [INSPIRE].

  25. S.P. Jones, M. Kerner and G. Luisoni, Next-to-Leading-Order QCD Corrections to Higgs Boson Plus Jet Production with Full Top-Quark Mass Dependence, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 (2018) 162001 [arXiv:1802.00349] [Erratum ibid. 128 (2022) 059901] [INSPIRE].

  26. J.M. Lindert, K. Kudashkin, K. Melnikov and C. Wever, Higgs bosons with large transverse momentum at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B 782 (2018) 210 [arXiv:1801.08226] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. T. Neumann, NLO Higgs+jet production at large transverse momenta including top quark mass effects, J. Phys. Comm. 2 (2018) 095017 [arXiv:1802.02981] [INSPIRE].

  28. M. Kerner, Top mass effects in HJ and HH production, PoS RADCOR2019 (2019) 020 [INSPIRE].

  29. V. Del Duca, W. Kilgore, C. Oleari, C. Schmidt and D. Zeppenfeld, Higgs + 2 jets via gluon fusion, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87 (2001) 122001 [hep-ph/0105129] [INSPIRE].

  30. V. Del Duca, W. Kilgore, C. Oleari, C. Schmidt and D. Zeppenfeld, Gluon fusion contributions to H + 2 jet production, Nucl. Phys. B 616 (2001) 367 [hep-ph/0108030] [INSPIRE].

  31. T. Neumann and C. Williams, The Higgs boson at high pT, Phys. Rev. D 95 (2017) 014004 [arXiv:1609.00367] [INSPIRE].

  32. J.R. Andersen, J.D. Cockburn, M. Heil, A. Maier and J.M. Smillie, Finite Quark-Mass Effects in Higgs Boson Production with Dijets at Large Energies, JHEP 04 (2019) 127 [arXiv:1812.08072] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  33. L. Budge, J.M. Campbell, G. De Laurentis, R.K. Ellis and S. Seth, The one-loop amplitudes for Higgs + 4 partons with full mass effects, JHEP 05 (2020) 079 [arXiv:2002.04018] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  34. R. Frederix, S. Frixione, E. Vryonidou and M. Wiesemann, Heavy-quark mass effects in Higgs plus jets production, JHEP 08 (2016) 006 [arXiv:1604.03017] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  35. S. Borowka, G. Heinrich, S.P. Jones, M. Kerner, J. Schlenk and T. Zirke, SecDec-3.0: numerical evaluation of multi-scale integrals beyond one loop, Comput. Phys. Commun. 196 (2015) 470 [arXiv:1502.06595] [INSPIRE].

  36. S. Borowka et al., pySecDec: a toolbox for the numerical evaluation of multi-scale integrals, Comput. Phys. Commun. 222 (2018) 313 [arXiv:1703.09692] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  37. K. Kudashkin, K. Melnikov and C. Wever, Two-loop amplitudes for processes gg → Hg, qg → Hq and \( q\overline{q} \) → Hg at large Higgs transverse momentum, JHEP 02 (2018) 135 [arXiv:1712.06549] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  38. F. Wilczek, Decays of Heavy Vector Mesons Into Higgs Particles, Phys. Rev. Lett. 39 (1977) 1304 [INSPIRE].

  39. C. Anastasiou, C. Duhr, F. Dulat, F. Herzog and B. Mistlberger, Higgs Boson Gluon-Fusion Production in QCD at Three Loops, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114 (2015) 212001 [arXiv:1503.06056] [INSPIRE].

  40. F. Dulat, B. Mistlberger and A. Pelloni, Differential Higgs production at N3LO beyond threshold, JHEP 01 (2018) 145 [arXiv:1710.03016] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  41. L. Cieri, X. Chen, T. Gehrmann, E.W.N. Glover and A. Huss, Higgs boson production at the LHC using the qT subtraction formalism at N3LO QCD, JHEP 02 (2019) 096 [arXiv:1807.11501] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  42. B. Mistlberger, Higgs boson production at hadron colliders at N3LO in QCD, JHEP 05 (2018) 028 [arXiv:1802.00833] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  43. X. Chen, T. Gehrmann, E.W.N. Glover, A. Huss, B. Mistlberger and A. Pelloni, Fully Differential Higgs Boson Production to Third Order in QCD, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127 (2021) 072002 [arXiv:2102.07607] [INSPIRE].

  44. G. Billis, B. Dehnadi, M.A. Ebert, J.K.L. Michel and F.J. Tackmann, Higgs pT Spectrum and Total Cross Section with Fiducial Cuts at Third Resummed and Fixed Order in QCD, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127 (2021) 072001 [arXiv:2102.08039] [INSPIRE].

  45. R. Boughezal, F. Caola, K. Melnikov, F. Petriello and M. Schulze, Higgs boson production in association with a jet at next-to-next-to-leading order in perturbative QCD, JHEP 06 (2013) 072 [arXiv:1302.6216] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  46. X. Chen, T. Gehrmann, E.W.N. Glover and M. Jaquier, Precise QCD predictions for the production of Higgs + jet final states, Phys. Lett. B 740 (2015) 147 [arXiv:1408.5325] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  47. R. Boughezal, F. Caola, K. Melnikov, F. Petriello and M. Schulze, Higgs boson production in association with a jet at next-to-next-to-leading order, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 (2015) 082003 [arXiv:1504.07922] [INSPIRE].

  48. R. Boughezal, C. Focke, W. Giele, X. Liu and F. Petriello, Higgs boson production in association with a jet at NNLO using jettiness subtraction, Phys. Lett. B 748 (2015) 5 [arXiv:1505.03893] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  49. X. Chen, J. Cruz-Martinez, T. Gehrmann, E.W.N. Glover and M. Jaquier, NNLO QCD corrections to Higgs boson production at large transverse momentum, JHEP 10 (2016) 066 [arXiv:1607.08817] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  50. J.M. Campbell, R.K. Ellis and G. Zanderighi, Next-to-Leading order Higgs + 2 jet production via gluon fusion, JHEP 10 (2006) 028 [hep-ph/0608194] [INSPIRE].

  51. H. van Deurzen et al., NLO QCD corrections to the production of Higgs plus two jets at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B 721 (2013) 74 [arXiv:1301.0493] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  52. G. Cullen et al., Next-to-Leading-Order QCD Corrections to Higgs Boson Production Plus Three Jets in Gluon Fusion, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 (2013) 131801 [arXiv:1307.4737] [INSPIRE].

  53. G. Bozzi, S. Catani, D. de Florian and M. Grazzini, Transverse-momentum resummation and the spectrum of the Higgs boson at the LHC, Nucl. Phys. B 737 (2006) 73 [hep-ph/0508068] [INSPIRE].

  54. D. de Florian, G. Ferrera, M. Grazzini and D. Tommasini, Transverse-momentum resummation: Higgs boson production at the Tevatron and the LHC, JHEP 11 (2011) 064 [arXiv:1109.2109] [INSPIRE].

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. T. Becher, M. Neubert and D. Wilhelm, Higgs-Boson Production at Small Transverse Momentum, JHEP 05 (2013) 110 [arXiv:1212.2621] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  56. W. Bizon, P.F. Monni, E. Re, L. Rottoli and P. Torrielli, Momentum-space resummation for transverse observables and the Higgs p⊥ at N3LL + NNLO, JHEP 02 (2018) 108 [arXiv:1705.09127] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  57. X. Chen et al., Precise QCD Description of the Higgs Boson Transverse Momentum Spectrum, Phys. Lett. B 788 (2019) 425 [arXiv:1805.00736] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  58. W. Bizoń et al., Fiducial distributions in Higgs and Drell-Yan production at N3LL + NNLO, JHEP 12 (2018) 132 [arXiv:1805.05916] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  59. E. Re, L. Rottoli and P. Torrielli, Fiducial Higgs and Drell-Yan distributions at N3LL′ + NNLO with RadISH, arXiv:2104.07509 [INSPIRE].

  60. H. Mantler and M. Wiesemann, Top- and bottom-mass effects in hadronic Higgs production at small transverse momenta through LO + NLL, Eur. Phys. J. C 73 (2013) 2467 [arXiv:1210.8263] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  61. M. Grazzini and H. Sargsyan, Heavy-quark mass effects in Higgs boson production at the LHC, JHEP 09 (2013) 129 [arXiv:1306.4581] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  62. A. Banfi, P.F. Monni and G. Zanderighi, Quark masses in Higgs production with a jet veto, JHEP 01 (2014) 097 [arXiv:1308.4634] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  63. K. Melnikov, L. Tancredi and C. Wever, Two-loop gg → Hg amplitude mediated by a nearly massless quark, JHEP 11 (2016) 104 [arXiv:1610.03747] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  64. J.M. Lindert, K. Melnikov, L. Tancredi and C. Wever, Top-bottom interference effects in Higgs plus jet production at the LHC, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 (2017) 252002 [arXiv:1703.03886] [INSPIRE].

  65. K. Melnikov, L. Tancredi and C. Wever, Two-loop amplitudes for qg → Hq and \( q\overline{q} \) → Hg mediated by a nearly massless quark, Phys. Rev. D 95 (2017) 054012 [arXiv:1702.00426] [INSPIRE].

  66. F. Caola, J.M. Lindert, K. Melnikov, P.F. Monni, L. Tancredi and C. Wever, Bottom-quark effects in Higgs production at intermediate transverse momentum, JHEP 09 (2018) 035 [arXiv:1804.07632] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  67. F. Caola, S. Forte, S. Marzani, C. Muselli and G. Vita, The Higgs transverse momentum spectrum with finite quark masses beyond leading order, JHEP 08 (2016) 150 [arXiv:1606.04100] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  68. R.V. Harlander, T. Neumann, K.J. Ozeren and M. Wiesemann, Top-mass effects in differential Higgs production through gluon fusion at order \( \mathcal{O} \)(\( {\alpha}_s^4 \)), JHEP 08 (2012) 139 [arXiv:1206.0157] [INSPIRE].

  69. T. Neumann and M. Wiesemann, Finite top-mass effects in gluon-induced Higgs production with a jet-veto at NNLO, JHEP 11 (2014) 150 [arXiv:1408.6836] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  70. J.M. Campbell, R.K. Ellis, R. Frederix, P. Nason, C. Oleari and C. Williams, NLO Higgs Boson Production Plus One and Two Jets Using the POWHEG BOX, MadGraph4 and MCFM, JHEP 07 (2012) 092 [arXiv:1202.5475] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  71. K. Hamilton, P. Nason, C. Oleari and G. Zanderighi, Merging H/W/Z + 0 and 1 jet at NLO with no merging scale: a path to parton shower + NNLO matching, JHEP 05 (2013) 082 [arXiv:1212.4504] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  72. M. Buschmann, D. Goncalves, S. Kuttimalai, M. Schonherr, F. Krauss and T. Plehn, Mass Effects in the Higgs-Gluon Coupling: Boosted vs Off-Shell Production, JHEP 02 (2015) 038 [arXiv:1410.5806] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  73. N. Greiner, S. Höche, G. Luisoni, M. Schönherr and J.-C. Winter, Full mass dependence in Higgs boson production in association with jets at the LHC and FCC, JHEP 01 (2017) 091 [arXiv:1608.01195] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  74. F. Maltoni, E. Vryonidou and M. Zaro, Top-quark mass effects in double and triple Higgs production in gluon-gluon fusion at NLO, JHEP 11 (2014) 079 [arXiv:1408.6542] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  75. A. Gehrmann-De Ridder, T. Gehrmann and E.W.N. Glover, Antenna subtraction at NNLO, JHEP 09 (2005) 056 [hep-ph/0505111] [INSPIRE].

  76. A. Gehrmann-De Ridder, T. Gehrmann and E.W.N. Glover, Gluon-gluon antenna functions from Higgs boson decay, Phys. Lett. B 612 (2005) 49 [hep-ph/0502110] [INSPIRE].

  77. A. Daleo, T. Gehrmann and D. Maître, Antenna subtraction with hadronic initial states, JHEP 04 (2007) 016 [hep-ph/0612257] [INSPIRE].

  78. A. Daleo, A. Gehrmann-De Ridder, T. Gehrmann and G. Luisoni, Antenna subtraction at NNLO with hadronic initial states: initial-final configurations, JHEP 01 (2010) 118 [arXiv:0912.0374] [INSPIRE].

  79. E.W. Nigel Glover and J. Pires, Antenna subtraction for gluon scattering at NNLO, JHEP 06 (2010) 096 [arXiv:1003.2824] [INSPIRE].

  80. A. Gehrmann-De Ridder, E.W.N. Glover and J. Pires, Real-Virtual corrections for gluon scattering at NNLO, JHEP 02 (2012) 141 [arXiv:1112.3613] [INSPIRE].

  81. A. Gehrmann-De Ridder, T. Gehrmann and M. Ritzmann, Antenna subtraction at NNLO with hadronic initial states: double real initial-initial configurations, JHEP 10 (2012) 047 [arXiv:1207.5779] [INSPIRE].

  82. A. Gehrmann-De Ridder, T. Gehrmann, E.W.N. Glover and J. Pires, Double Virtual corrections for gluon scattering at NNLO, JHEP 02 (2013) 026 [arXiv:1211.2710] [INSPIRE].

  83. J. Currie, E.W.N. Glover and S. Wells, Infrared Structure at NNLO Using Antenna Subtraction, JHEP 04 (2013) 066 [arXiv:1301.4693] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  84. F. Cascioli, P. Maierhofer and S. Pozzorini, Scattering Amplitudes with Open Loops, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 (2012) 111601 [arXiv:1111.5206] [INSPIRE].

  85. F. Buccioni, S. Pozzorini and M. Zoller, On-the-fly reduction of open loops, Eur. Phys. J. C 78 (2018) 70 [arXiv:1710.11452] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  86. F. Buccioni et al., OpenLoops 2, Eur. Phys. J. C 79 (2019) 866 [arXiv:1907.13071] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  87. J.-N. Lang et al, OTTER: On-The-fly Tensor Reduction, in preparation.

  88. R. Frederix et al., Higgs pair production at the LHC with NLO and parton-shower effects, Phys. Lett. B 732 (2014) 142 [arXiv:1401.7340] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  89. S. Catani, The Singular behavior of QCD amplitudes at two loop order, Phys. Lett. B 427 (1998) 161 [hep-ph/9802439] [INSPIRE].

  90. M. Grazzini et al., Higgs boson pair production at NNLO with top quark mass effects, JHEP 05 (2018) 059 [arXiv:1803.02463] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  91. A. Denner, S. Dittmaier and L. Hofer, Collier: a fortran-based Complex One-Loop LIbrary in Extended Regularizations, Comput. Phys. Commun. 212 (2017) 220 [arXiv:1604.06792] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  92. A. van Hameren, OneLOop: For the evaluation of one-loop scalar functions, Comput. Phys. Commun. 182 (2011) 2427 [arXiv:1007.4716] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  93. A. von Manteuffel and C. Studerus, Reduze 2 — Distributed Feynman Integral Reduction, arXiv:1201.4330 [INSPIRE].

  94. Z. Li, J. Wang, Q.-S. Yan and X. Zhao, Efficient numerical evaluation of Feynman integrals, Chin. Phys. C 40 (2016) 033103 [arXiv:1508.02512] [INSPIRE].

  95. S. Borowka, G. Heinrich, S. Jahn, S.P. Jones, M. Kerner and J. Schlenk, A GPU compatible quasi-Monte Carlo integrator interfaced to pySecDec, Comput. Phys. Commun. 240 (2019) 120 [arXiv:1811.11720] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  96. J. Baglio, F. Campanario, S. Glaus, M. Mühlleitner, M. Spira and J. Streicher, Gluon fusion into Higgs pairs at NLO QCD and the top mass scheme, Eur. Phys. J. C 79 (2019) 459 [arXiv:1811.05692] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  97. J. Baglio et al., Higgs-Pair Production via Gluon Fusion at Hadron Colliders: NLO QCD Corrections, JHEP 04 (2020) 181 [arXiv:2003.03227] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  98. J. Baglio, F. Campanario, S. Glaus, M. Mühlleitner, J. Ronca and M. Spira, gg → HH: Combined uncertainties, Phys. Rev. D 103 (2021) 056002 [arXiv:2008.11626] [INSPIRE].

  99. S. Amoroso et al., Les Houches 2019: Physics at TeV Colliders: Standard Model Working Group Report, in 11th Les Houches Workshop on Physics at TeV Colliders: PhysTeV Les Houches, (2020) [arXiv:2003.01700] [INSPIRE].

  100. J. Butterworth et al., PDF4LHC recommendations for LHC Run II, J. Phys. G 43 (2016) 023001 [arXiv:1510.03865] [INSPIRE].

  101. M. Cacciari, G.P. Salam and G. Soyez, The anti-kt jet clustering algorithm, JHEP 04 (2008) 063 [arXiv:0802.1189] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute for Theoretical Physics, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, 76131, Karlsruhe, Germany

    X. Chen & M. Kerner

  2. Institute for Astroparticle Physics, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, 76344, Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Germany

    X. Chen & M. Kerner

  3. Physik-Institut, Universität Zürich, CH-8057, Zürich, Switzerland

    X. Chen, M. Kerner, J.-N. Lang & H. Zhang

  4. Theoretical Physics Department, CERN, 1211, Geneva 23, Switzerland

    A. Huss

  5. Institute for Particle Physics Phenomenology, Durham University, Durham, DH1 3LE, UK

    S. P. Jones

  6. Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Sussex, Brighton, BN1 9QH, UK

    J. M. Lindert

  7. Institut für Theoretische Teilchenphysik, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, 76128, Karlsruhe, Germany

    H. Zhang

Authors
  1. X. Chen
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A. Huss
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. S. P. Jones
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. M. Kerner
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. J.-N. Lang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. J. M. Lindert
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. H. Zhang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H. Zhang.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

ArXiv ePrint: 2110.06953

Rights and permissions

Open Access . This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, X., Huss, A., Jones, S.P. et al. Top-quark mass effects in H+jet and H+2 jets production. J. High Energ. Phys. 2022, 96 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP03(2022)096

Download citation

  • Received: 27 October 2021

  • Accepted: 23 February 2022

  • Published: 15 March 2022

  • Version of record: 15 March 2022

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP03(2022)096

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • NLO Computations
  • QCD Phenomenology

Profiles

  1. A. Huss View author profile

Advertisement

Search

Navigation

  • Find a journal
  • Publish with us
  • Track your research

Footer Navigation

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Books A-Z

Publish with us

  • Journal finder
  • Publish your research
  • Language editing
  • Open access publishing

Products and services

  • Our products
  • Librarians
  • Societies
  • Partners and advertisers

Our brands

  • Springer
  • Nature Portfolio
  • BMC
  • Palgrave Macmillan
  • Apress
  • Discover

Corporate Navigation

  • Your US state privacy rights
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms and conditions
  • Privacy policy
  • Help and support
  • Legal notice
  • Cancel contracts here

Not affiliated

Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature