Abstract
Compared to other neutrino sources, the huge anti-neutrino fluxes at nuclear reactor based experiments empower us to derive stronger bounds on non-standard interactions of neutrinos with electrons mediated by light scalar/vector mediators. At neutrino energy around 200 keV reactor anti-neutrino flux is at least an order of magnitude larger compared to the solar flux. The atomic and crystal form factors of the detector materials related to the details of the atomic structure becomes relevant at this energy scale as the momentum transfers would be small. Non-standard neutrino-electron interaction mediated by light scalar/vector mediator arises naturally in many low-scale models. We also propose one such new model with a light scalar mediator. Here, we investigate the parameter space of such low-scale models in reactor based neutrino experiments with low threshold Ge and Si detectors, and find the prospect of probing/ruling out the relevant parameter space by finding the projected sensitivity at 90% confidence level by performing a χ2-analysis. We find that a detector capable of discriminating between electron recoil and nuclear recoil signal down to a very low threshold such as 5 eV placed in reactor based experiment would be able to probe a larger region in parameter space compared to the previously explored region. A Ge (Si) detector with 10 kg-yr exposure and 1 MW reactor anti-neutrino flux would be able to probe the scalar and vector mediators with masses below 1 keV for coupling products \( \sqrt{g_{\nu }{g}_e} \) ∼ 1 × 10−6 (9.5 × 10−7) and 1 × 10−7 (8 × 10−8), respectively.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Super-Kamiokande collaboration, Evidence for oscillation of atmospheric neutrinos, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81 (1998) 1562 [hep-ex/9807003] [INSPIRE].
SNO collaboration, Direct evidence for neutrino flavor transformation from neutral current interactions in the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89 (2002) 011301 [nucl-ex/0204008] [INSPIRE].
KamLAND collaboration, First results from KamLAND: evidence for reactor anti-neutrino disappearance, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90 (2003) 021802 [hep-ex/0212021] [INSPIRE].
T2K collaboration, Indication of electron neutrino appearance from an accelerator-produced off-axis muon neutrino beam, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 (2011) 041801 [arXiv:1106.2822] [INSPIRE].
Double Chooz collaboration, Indication of reactor \( {\overline{\nu}}_e \) disappearance in the Double Chooz experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 (2012) 131801 [arXiv:1112.6353] [INSPIRE].
Daya Bay collaboration, Observation of electron-antineutrino disappearance at Daya Bay, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 (2012) 171803 [arXiv:1203.1669] [INSPIRE].
RENO collaboration, Observation of reactor electron antineutrino disappearance in the RENO experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 (2012) 191802 [arXiv:1204.0626] [INSPIRE].
P. Minkowski, μ → eγ at a rate of one out of 109 muon decays?, Phys. Lett. B 67 (1977) 421 [INSPIRE].
T. Yanagida, Horizontal gauge symmetry and masses of neutrinos, Conf. Proc. C 7902131 (1979) 95 [INSPIRE].
M. Gell-Mann, P. Ramond and R. Slansky, Complex spinors and unified theories, Conf. Proc. C 790927 (1979) 315 [arXiv:1306.4669] [INSPIRE].
R.N. Mohapatra and G. Senjanovic, Neutrino mass and spontaneous parity nonconservation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 44 (1980) 912 [INSPIRE].
R.N. Mohapatra and G. Senjanovic, Neutrino masses and mixings in gauge models with spontaneous parity violation, Phys. Rev. D 23 (1981) 165 [INSPIRE].
T.P. Cheng and L.-F. Li, Neutrino masses, mixings and oscillations in SU(2) × U(1) models of electroweak interactions, Phys. Rev. D 22 (1980) 2860 [INSPIRE].
R. Foot, H. Lew, X.G. He and G.C. Joshi, Seesaw neutrino masses induced by a triplet of leptons, Z. Phys. C 44 (1989) 441 [INSPIRE].
J. Schechter and J.W.F. Valle, Neutrino masses in SU(2) × U(1) theories, Phys. Rev. D 22 (1980) 2227 [INSPIRE].
Y. Chikashige, R.N. Mohapatra and R.D. Peccei, Are there real Goldstone bosons associated with broken lepton number?, Phys. Lett. B 98 (1981) 265 [INSPIRE].
G. Ballesteros, J. Redondo, A. Ringwald and C. Tamarit, Unifying inflation with the axion, dark matter, baryogenesis and the seesaw mechanism, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 (2017) 071802 [arXiv:1608.05414] [INSPIRE].
R. Barbieri, J.R. Ellis and M.K. Gaillard, Neutrino masses and oscillations in SU(5), Phys. Lett. B 90 (1980) 249 [INSPIRE].
Y. Grossman and M. Neubert, Neutrino masses and mixings in nonfactorizable geometry, Phys. Lett. B 474 (2000) 361 [hep-ph/9912408] [INSPIRE].
S.J. Huber and Q. Shafi, Seesaw mechanism in warped geometry, Phys. Lett. B 583 (2004) 293 [hep-ph/0309252] [INSPIRE].
K. Agashe, S. Hong and L. Vecchi, Warped seesaw mechanism is physically inverted, Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016) 013001 [arXiv:1512.06742] [INSPIRE].
R.N. Mohapatra, Mechanism for understanding small neutrino mass in superstring theories, Phys. Rev. Lett. 56 (1986) 561 [INSPIRE].
R.N. Mohapatra and J.W.F. Valle, Neutrino mass and baryon number nonconservation in superstring models, Phys. Rev. D 34 (1986) 1642 [INSPIRE].
J. Kersten and A.Y. Smirnov, Right-handed neutrinos at CERN LHC and the mechanism of neutrino mass generation, Phys. Rev. D 76 (2007) 073005 [arXiv:0705.3221] [INSPIRE].
A. Zee, A theory of lepton number violation, neutrino Majorana mass, and oscillation, Phys. Lett. B 93 (1980) 389 [Erratum ibid. 95 (1980) 461] [INSPIRE].
L. Wolfenstein, A theoretical pattern for neutrino oscillations, Nucl. Phys. B 175 (1980) 93 [INSPIRE].
A. Zee, Charged scalar field and quantum number violations, Phys. Lett. B 161 (1985) 141 [INSPIRE].
K.S. Babu, Model of ‘calculable’ Majorana neutrino masses, Phys. Lett. B 203 (1988) 132 [INSPIRE].
E. Ma, Pathways to naturally small neutrino masses, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81 (1998) 1171 [hep-ph/9805219] [INSPIRE].
E. Ma, Verifiable radiative seesaw mechanism of neutrino mass and dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 73 (2006) 077301 [hep-ph/0601225] [INSPIRE].
E. Ma and U. Sarkar, Revelations of the E6/U(1)N model: two-loop neutrino mass and dark matter, Phys. Lett. B 653 (2007) 288 [arXiv:0705.0074] [INSPIRE].
P.S.B. Dev and A. Pilaftsis, Minimal radiative neutrino mass mechanism for inverse seesaw models, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 113001 [arXiv:1209.4051] [INSPIRE].
Q.-H. Cao et al., New class of two-loop neutrino mass models with distinguishable phenomenology, Phys. Lett. B 779 (2018) 430 [arXiv:1707.05896] [INSPIRE].
B. Dutta, S. Ghosh, I. Gogoladze and T. Li, Three-loop neutrino masses via new massive gauge bosons from E6 GUT, Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 055028 [arXiv:1805.01866] [INSPIRE].
A. Ibarra, P. Strobl and T. Toma, Neutrino masses from Planck-scale lepton number breaking, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 (2019) 081803 [arXiv:1802.09997] [INSPIRE].
G. Cacciapaglia and M. Rosenlyst, Loop-generated neutrino masses in composite Higgs models, JHEP 09 (2021) 167 [arXiv:2010.01437] [INSPIRE].
L. Wolfenstein, Neutrino oscillations in matter, Phys. Rev. D 17 (1978) 2369 [INSPIRE].
L. Wolfenstein, Neutrino oscillations and stellar collapse, Phys. Rev. D 20 (1979) 2634 [INSPIRE].
S. Bergmann, The solar neutrino problem in the presence of flavor changing neutrino interactions, Nucl. Phys. B 515 (1998) 363 [hep-ph/9707398] [INSPIRE].
J.W.F. Valle, Resonant oscillations of massless neutrinos in matter, Phys. Lett. B 199 (1987) 432 [INSPIRE].
E. Roulet, MSW effect with flavor changing neutrino interactions, Phys. Rev. D 44 (1991) R935–R938 [INSPIRE].
P.I. Krastev and J.N. Bahcall, FCNC solutions to the solar neutrino problem, in the proceedings of Symposium on flavor changing neutral currents: present and future studies (FCNC 97), (1997), p. 259 [hep-ph/9703267] [INSPIRE].
O.G. Miranda and H. Nunokawa, Non standard neutrino interactions: current status and future prospects, New J. Phys. 17 (2015) 095002 [arXiv:1505.06254] [INSPIRE].
R. Foot, New physics from electric charge quantization?, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 6 (1991) 527 [INSPIRE].
X.G. He, G.C. Joshi, H. Lew and R.R. Volkas, New Z′ phenomenology, Phys. Rev. D 43 (1991) 22 [INSPIRE].
X.-G. He, G.C. Joshi, H. Lew and R.R. Volkas, Simplest Z′ model, Phys. Rev. D 44 (1991) 2118 [INSPIRE].
B. Dutta, S. Ghosh and J. Kumar, A sub-GeV dark matter model, Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 075028 [arXiv:1905.02692] [INSPIRE].
B. Dutta, S. Ghosh and J. Kumar, U(1)T3R extension of standard model: a sub-GeV dark matter model, in the proceedings of 2022 Snowmass Summer study, (2022) [arXiv:2203.07786] [INSPIRE].
COHERENT collaboration, Observation of coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering, Science 357 (2017) 1123 [arXiv:1708.01294] [INSPIRE].
COHERENT collaboration, COHERENT collaboration data release from the first observation of coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering, arXiv:1804.09459 [https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1228631] [INSPIRE].
COHERENT collaboration, COHERENT 2018 at the spallation neutron source, arXiv:1803.09183 [INSPIRE].
COHERENT collaboration, Sensitivity of the COHERENT experiment to accelerator-produced dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020) 052007 [arXiv:1911.06422] [INSPIRE].
COHERENT collaboration, First measurement of coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering on argon, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126 (2021) 012002 [arXiv:2003.10630] [INSPIRE].
COHERENT collaboration, First probe of sub-GeV dark matter beyond the cosmological expectation with the COHERENT CsI detector at the SNS, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130 (2023) 051803 [arXiv:2110.11453] [INSPIRE].
A.A. Aguilar-Arevalo et al., Fundamental neutrino physics at the Lujan center, https://p25ext.lanl.gov/lee/CaptainMills/Documentation/CCM_Proposal_Lujan_2018_V1.pdf, March 2018..
E. Dunton, Searching for sterile neutrinos with coherent Captain-Mills, Zenodo, November 2019.
CCM collaboration, First dark matter search results from coherent Captain-Mills, Phys. Rev. D 106 (2022) 012001 [arXiv:2105.14020] [INSPIRE].
JSNS2 collaboration, Proposal: a search for sterile neutrino at J-PARC materials and life science experimental facility, arXiv:1310.1437 [INSPIRE].
S. Ajimura et al., On-site background measurements for the J-PARC E56 experiment: a search for the sterile neutrino at J-PARC MLF, PTEP 2015 (2015) 063C01 [arXiv:1502.06324] [INSPIRE].
JSNS2 collaboration, Status report for the 20th J-PARC PAC: a search for sterile neutrino at J-PARC MLF (J-PARC E56, JSNS2), arXiv:1507.07076 [INSPIRE].
S. Ajimura et al., Technical Design Report (TDR): searching for a sterile neutrino at J-PARC MLF (E56, JSNS2), arXiv:1705.08629 [INSPIRE].
JSNS2 collaboration, Status of JSNS2 — J-PARC Sterile Neutrino Search at J-PARC Spallation Neutron Source, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 1468 (2020) 012176 [INSPIRE].
A.G. Beda et al., Gemma experiment: the results of neutrino magnetic moment search, Phys. Part. Nucl. Lett. 10 (2013) 139 [INSPIRE].
BOREXINO collaboration, Comprehensive measurement of pp-chain solar neutrinos, Nature 562 (2018) 505 [INSPIRE].
MINER collaboration, Background studies for the MINER coherent neutrino scattering reactor experiment, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 853 (2017) 53 [arXiv:1609.02066] [INSPIRE].
C. Buck et al., A novel experiment for coherent elastic neutrino nucleus scattering: CONUS, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 1342 (2020) 012094 [INSPIRE].
CONNIE collaboration, The CONNIE experiment, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 761 (2016) 012057 [arXiv:1608.01565] [INSPIRE].
D.G. Cerdeño et al., Physics from solar neutrinos in dark matter direct detection experiments, JHEP 05 (2016) 118 [Erratum ibid. 09 (2016) 048] [arXiv:1604.01025] [INSPIRE].
B. Dutta et al., Searching for dark matter signals in timing spectra at neutrino experiments, JHEP 01 (2022) 144 [arXiv:2006.09386] [INSPIRE].
R. Strauss et al., The ν-cleus experiment: a gram-scale fiducial-volume cryogenic detector for the first detection of coherent neutrino-nucleus scattering, Eur. Phys. J. C 77 (2017) 506 [arXiv:1704.04320] [INSPIRE].
J.B. Dent et al., Probing light mediators at ultralow threshold energies with coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering, Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) 095007 [arXiv:1612.06350] [INSPIRE].
XENON collaboration, The XENON1T dark matter experiment, Eur. Phys. J. C 77 (2017) 881 [arXiv:1708.07051] [INSPIRE].
XENON collaboration, Search for new physics in electronic recoil data from XENONnT, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129 (2022) 161805 [arXiv:2207.11330] [INSPIRE].
LZ collaboration, The LUX-ZEPLIN (LZ) experiment, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 953 (2020) 163047 [arXiv:1910.09124] [INSPIRE].
SENSEI collaboration, SENSEI: direct-detection results on sub-GeV dark matter from a new skipper-CCD, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 (2020) 171802 [arXiv:2004.11378] [INSPIRE].
K.S. Babu, G. Chauhan and P.S. Bhupal Dev, Neutrino nonstandard interactions via light scalars in the Earth, Sun, supernovae, and the early universe, Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 095029 [arXiv:1912.13488] [INSPIRE].
R. Harnik, J. Kopp and P.A.N. Machado, Exploring ν signals in dark matter detectors, JCAP 07 (2012) 026 [arXiv:1202.6073] [INSPIRE].
M. Escudero and S.J. Witte, A CMB search for the neutrino mass mechanism and its relation to the Hubble tension, Eur. Phys. J. C 80 (2020) 294 [arXiv:1909.04044] [INSPIRE].
M. Escudero, D. Hooper, G. Krnjaic and M. Pierre, Cosmology with a very light Lμ-Lτ gauge boson, JHEP 03 (2019) 071 [arXiv:1901.02010] [INSPIRE].
J.L. Bernal, L. Verde and A.G. Riess, The trouble with H0, JCAP 10 (2016) 019 [arXiv:1607.05617] [INSPIRE].
J. Alcaniz, N. Bernal, A. Masiero and F.S. Queiroz, Light dark matter: a common solution to the lithium and H0 problems, Phys. Lett. B 812 (2021) 136008 [arXiv:1912.05563] [INSPIRE].
S. Vagnozzi, New physics in light of the H0 tension: an alternative view, Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020) 023518 [arXiv:1907.07569] [INSPIRE].
R. Catena, T. Emken, N.A. Spaldin and W. Tarantino, Atomic responses to general dark matter-electron interactions, Phys. Rev. Res. 2 (2020) 033195 [arXiv:1912.08204] [INSPIRE].
S.M. Griffin et al., Extended calculation of dark matter-electron scattering in crystal targets, Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021) 095015 [arXiv:2105.05253] [INSPIRE].
Particle Data Group collaboration, Review of particle physics, PTEP 2020 (2020) 083C01 [INSPIRE].
K. Schreckenbach, G. Colvin, W. Gelletly and F. Von Feilitzsch, Determination of the anti-neutrino spectrum from 235U thermal neutron fission products up to 9.5 MeV, Phys. Lett. B 160 (1985) 325 [INSPIRE].
V.I. Kopeikin, Flux and spectrum of reactor antineutrinos, Phys. Atom. Nucl. 75 (2012) 143 [INSPIRE].
B. Dutta, R. Mahapatra, L.E. Strigari and J.W. Walker, Sensitivity to Z′ and nonstandard neutrino interactions from ultralow threshold neutrino-nucleus coherent scattering, Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 013015 [arXiv:1508.07981] [INSPIRE].
SNO collaboration, Combined analysis of all three phases of solar neutrino data from the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory, Phys. Rev. C 88 (2013) 025501 [arXiv:1109.0763] [INSPIRE].
Super-Kamiokande collaboration, Solar neutrino measurements in Super-Kamiokande-IV, Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016) 052010 [arXiv:1606.07538] [INSPIRE].
J.-W. Chen et al., Constraining neutrino electromagnetic properties by germanium detectors, Phys. Rev. D 91 (2015) 013005 [arXiv:1411.0574] [INSPIRE].
J.-W. Chen, C.-P. Liu, C.-F. Liu and C.-L. Wu, Ionization of hydrogen by neutrino magnetic moment, relativistic muon, and WIMP, Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 033006 [arXiv:1307.2857] [INSPIRE].
C.-C. Hsieh et al., Discovery potential of multiton xenon detectors in neutrino electromagnetic properties, Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 073001 [arXiv:1903.06085] [INSPIRE].
T. Emken, temken/DarkARC: DarkARC v1.0, Zenodo, December 2019 [https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.3581334].
C.F. Bunge, J.A. Barrientos and A.V. Bunge, Roothaan-Hartree-Fock ground-state atomic wave functions: Slater-type orbital expansions and expectation values for Z = 2–54, Atom. Data Nucl. Data Tabl. 53 (1993) 113 [INSPIRE].
R. Essig et al., Direct detection of sub-GeV dark matter with semiconductor targets, JHEP 05 (2016) 046 [arXiv:1509.01598] [INSPIRE].
T. Trickle and Kinzani, tanner-trickle/EXCEED-DM: EXCEED-DM-v0.3.0, Zenodo, February 2022 [https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.6097642].
S.M. Griffin et al., EXCEED-DMv0.2.8: DFT-computed electronic wave functions for Si and Ge, Zenodo, February 2022 [https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.6015637].
C.A. Klein, Bandgap dependence and related features of radiation ionization energies in semiconductors, J. Appl. Phys. 39 (1968) 2029.
P.W. Higgs, Broken symmetries and the masses of gauge bosons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 13 (1964) 508 [INSPIRE].
P.W. Higgs, Spontaneous symmetry breakdown without massless bosons, Phys. Rev. 145 (1966) 1156 [INSPIRE].
F. Englert and R. Brout, Broken symmetry and the mass of gauge vector mesons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 13 (1964) 321 [INSPIRE].
G.S. Guralnik, C.R. Hagen and T.W.B. Kibble, Global conservation laws and massless particles, Phys. Rev. Lett. 13 (1964) 585 [INSPIRE].
T.W.B. Kibble, Symmetry breaking in non-Abelian gauge theories, Phys. Rev. 155 (1967) 1554 [INSPIRE].
T.D. Lee, A theory of spontaneous T violation, Phys. Rev. D 8 (1973) 1226 [INSPIRE].
G.C. Branco et al., Theory and phenomenology of two-Higgs-doublet models, Phys. Rept. 516 (2012) 1 [arXiv:1106.0034] [INSPIRE].
B. Dutta, S. Ghosh and T. Li, Explaining (g − 2)μ,e, the KOTO anomaly and the MiniBooNE excess in an extended Higgs model with sterile neutrinos, Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020) 055017 [arXiv:2006.01319] [INSPIRE].
B. Dutta, S. Ghosh, T. Li, A. Thompson and A. Verma, in preparation.
P. Langacker, Grand unified theories and proton decay, Phys. Rept. 72 (1981) 185 [INSPIRE].
B. Dutta, S. Ghosh, T. Li, A. Thompson and A. Verma, in preparation.
P. Dunne, Latest neutrino oscillation results from T2K, Zenodo, July 2020 [https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.3959558].
A. Himmel, New oscillation results from the NOνA experiment, Zenodo, July 2020 [https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.3959581].
B. Dutta et al., A global analysis strategy to resolve neutrino NSI degeneracies with scattering and oscillation data, JHEP 09 (2020) 106 [arXiv:2002.03066] [INSPIRE].
P. Coloma et al., Constraining new physics with Borexino phase-II spectral data, JHEP 07 (2022) 138 [Erratum ibid. 11 (2022) 138] [arXiv:2204.03011] [INSPIRE].
I. Esteban et al., Updated constraints on non-standard interactions from global analysis of oscillation data, JHEP 08 (2018) 180 [Addendum ibid. 12 (2020) 152] [arXiv:1805.04530] [INSPIRE].
I. Esteban, M.C. Gonzalez-Garcia and M. Maltoni, On the determination of leptonic CP violation and neutrino mass ordering in presence of non-standard interactions: present status, JHEP 06 (2019) 055 [arXiv:1905.05203] [INSPIRE].
A.N. Khan, Global analysis of the source and detector nonstandard interactions using the short baseline νe and \( {\overline{\nu}}_e \) scattering data, Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 093019 [arXiv:1605.09284] [INSPIRE].
K. Cheung, C.J. Ouseph and T.C. Wang, Non-standard neutrino and Z′ interactions at the FASERν and the LHC, JHEP 12 (2021) 209 [arXiv:2111.08375] [INSPIRE].
P.B. Denton, A. Giarnetti and D. Meloni, How to identify different new neutrino oscillation physics scenarios at DUNE, JHEP 02 (2023) 210 [arXiv:2210.00109] [INSPIRE].
S.S.K. A. et al., Implications of first LZ and XENONnT results: a comparative study of neutrino properties and light mediators, Phys. Lett. B 839 (2023) 137742 [arXiv:2208.06415] [INSPIRE].
A.N. Khan, Light new physics and neutrino electromagnetic interactions in XENONnT, Phys. Lett. B 837 (2023) 137650 [arXiv:2208.02144] [INSPIRE].
J. Venzor, A. Pérez-Lorenzana and J. De-Santiago, Bounds on neutrino-scalar nonstandard interactions from big bang nucleosynthesis, Phys. Rev. D 103 (2021) 043534 [arXiv:2009.08104] [INSPIRE].
G.-Y. Huang, T. Ohlsson and S. Zhou, Observational constraints on secret neutrino interactions from big bang nucleosynthesis, Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) 075009 [arXiv:1712.04792] [INSPIRE].
P.B. Denton, Y. Farzan and I.M. Shoemaker, Testing large non-standard neutrino interactions with arbitrary mediator mass after COHERENT data, JHEP 07 (2018) 037 [arXiv:1804.03660] [INSPIRE].
S.-F. Ge and S.J. Parke, Scalar nonstandard interactions in neutrino oscillation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 (2019) 211801 [arXiv:1812.08376] [INSPIRE].
H. Neog et al., Phonon-mediated high-voltage detector with background rejection for low-mass dark matter and reactor coherent neutrino scattering experiments, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 1033 (2022) 166707 [arXiv:2006.13139] [INSPIRE].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
ArXiv ePrint: 2209.13566
Rights and permissions
Open Access . This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
About this article
Cite this article
Dutta, B., Ghosh, S., Li, T. et al. Non-standard neutrino interactions in light mediator models at reactor experiments. J. High Energ. Phys. 2023, 163 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP03(2023)163
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP03(2023)163