Abstract
The Standard Model Effective Field Theory (SMEFT) offers a powerful theoretical framework for parameterizing the low-energy effects of heavy new particles with masses far above the scale of electroweak symmetry breaking. Additional light degrees of freedom extend the effective theory. We show that light new particles that are weakly coupled to the SM via non-renormalizable interactions induce non-zero Wilson coefficients in the SMEFT Lagrangian via renormalization-group evolution. For the well-motivated example of axions and axion-like particles (ALPs) interacting with the SM via classically shift-invariant dimension-5 interactions, we calculate how these interactions contribute to the one-loop renormalization of the dimension-6 SMEFT operators, and how this running sources additional contributions to the Wilson coefficients on top of those expected from heavy new states. As an application, we study the ALP contributions to the magnetic dipole moment of the top quark and comment on implications of electroweak precision constraints on ALP couplings.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
LHCb collaboration, Test of lepton universality in beauty-quark decays, arXiv:2103.11769 [INSPIRE].
Muon g-2 collaboration, Measurement of the Positive Muon Anomalous Magnetic Moment to 0.46 ppm, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126 (2021) 141801 [arXiv:2104.03281] [INSPIRE].
W. Buchmüller and D. Wyler, Effective Lagrangian Analysis of New Interactions and Flavor Conservation, Nucl. Phys. B 268 (1986) 621 [INSPIRE].
I. Brivio and M. Trott, The Standard Model as an Effective Field Theory, Phys. Rept. 793 (2019) 1 [arXiv:1706.08945] [INSPIRE].
R. D. Peccei and H. R. Quinn, CP Conservation in the Presence of Instantons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 38 (1977) 1440 [INSPIRE].
S. Weinberg, A New Light Boson?, Phys. Rev. Lett. 40 (1978) 223 [INSPIRE].
F. Wilczek, Problem of Strong P and T Invariance in the Presence of Instantons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 40 (1978) 279 [INSPIRE].
L. Calibbi, F. Goertz, D. Redigolo, R. Ziegler and J. Zupan, Minimal axion model from flavor, Phys. Rev. D 95 (2017) 095009 [arXiv:1612.08040] [INSPIRE].
Y. Ema, K. Hamaguchi, T. Moroi and K. Nakayama, Flaxion: a minimal extension to solve puzzles in the standard model, JHEP 01 (2017) 096 [arXiv:1612.05492] [INSPIRE].
J. Bagger, E. Poppitz and L. Randall, The R axion from dynamical supersymmetry breaking, Nucl. Phys. B 426 (1994) 3 [hep-ph/9405345] [INSPIRE].
B. Gripaios, A. Pomarol, F. Riva and J. Serra, Beyond the Minimal Composite Higgs Model, JHEP 04 (2009) 070 [arXiv:0902.1483] [INSPIRE].
G. Ferretti and D. Karateev, Fermionic UV completions of Composite Higgs models, JHEP 03 (2014) 077 [arXiv:1312.5330] [INSPIRE].
P. W. Graham, D. E. Kaplan and S. Rajendran, Cosmological Relaxation of the Electroweak Scale, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 (2015) 221801 [arXiv:1504.07551] [INSPIRE].
B. Bellazzini, A. Mariotti, D. Redigolo, F. Sala and J. Serra, R-axion at colliders, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 (2017) 141804 [arXiv:1702.02152] [INSPIRE].
C.-R. Chen, P. H. Frampton, F. Takahashi and T. T. Yanagida, Probing Variant Axion Models at LHC, JHEP 06 (2010) 059 [arXiv:1005.1185] [INSPIRE].
K. Mimasu and V. Sanz, ALPs at Colliders, JHEP 06 (2015) 173 [arXiv:1409.4792] [INSPIRE].
J. Jaeckel and M. Spannowsky, Probing MeV to 90 GeV axion-like particles with LEP and LHC, Phys. Lett. B 753 (2016) 482 [arXiv:1509.00476] [INSPIRE].
S. Knapen, T. Lin, H. K. Lou and T. Melia, Searching for Axionlike Particles with Ultraperipheral Heavy-Ion Collisions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 (2017) 171801 [arXiv:1607.06083] [INSPIRE].
I. Brivio et al., ALPs Effective Field Theory and Collider Signatures, Eur. Phys. J. C 77 (2017) 572 [arXiv:1701.05379] [INSPIRE].
M. Bauer, M. Neubert and A. Thamm, LHC as an Axion Factory: Probing an Axion Explanation for (g − 2)μ with Exotic Higgs Decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 (2017) 031802 [arXiv:1704.08207] [INSPIRE].
M. Bauer, M. Neubert and A. Thamm, Collider Probes of Axion-Like Particles, JHEP 12 (2017) 044 [arXiv:1708.00443] [INSPIRE].
A. Mariotti, D. Redigolo, F. Sala and K. Tobioka, New LHC bound on low-mass diphoton resonances, Phys. Lett. B 783 (2018) 13 [arXiv:1710.01743] [INSPIRE].
N. Craig, A. Hook and S. Kasko, The Photophobic ALP, JHEP 09 (2018) 028 [arXiv:1805.06538] [INSPIRE].
M. Bauer, M. Heiles, M. Neubert and A. Thamm, Axion-Like Particles at Future Colliders, Eur. Phys. J. C 79 (2019) 74 [arXiv:1808.10323] [INSPIRE].
G. Alonso-Álvarez, M. B. Gavela and P. Quilez, Axion couplings to electroweak gauge bosons, Eur. Phys. J. C 79 (2019) 223 [arXiv:1811.05466] [INSPIRE].
M. B. Gavela, J. M. No, V. Sanz and J. F. de Trocóniz, Nonresonant Searches for Axionlike Particles at the LHC, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124 (2020) 051802 [arXiv:1905.12953] [INSPIRE].
D. Cadamuro and J. Redondo, Cosmological bounds on pseudo Nambu-Goldstone bosons, JCAP 02 (2012) 032 [arXiv:1110.2895] [INSPIRE].
M. Millea, L. Knox and B. Fields, New Bounds for Axions and Axion-Like Particles with keV-GeV Masses, Phys. Rev. D 92 (2015) 023010 [arXiv:1501.04097] [INSPIRE].
A. Payez, C. Evoli, T. Fischer, M. Giannotti, A. Mirizzi and A. Ringwald, Revisiting the SN1987A gamma-ray limit on ultralight axion-like particles, JCAP 02 (2015) 006 [arXiv:1410.3747] [INSPIRE].
J. Jaeckel, P. C. Malta and J. Redondo, Decay photons from the axionlike particles burst of type-II supernovae, Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 055032 [arXiv:1702.02964] [INSPIRE].
W. J. Marciano, A. Masiero, P. Paradisi and M. Passera, Contributions of axionlike particles to lepton dipole moments, Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016) 115033 [arXiv:1607.01022] [INSPIRE].
M. Bauer, M. Neubert, S. Renner, M. Schnubel and A. Thamm, Axionlike Particles, Lepton-Flavor Violation, and a New Explanation of aμ and ae , Phys. Rev. Lett. 124 (2020) 211803 [arXiv:1908.00008] [INSPIRE].
M. A. Buen-Abad, J. Fan, M. Reece and C. Sun, Challenges for an axion explanation of the muon g − 2 measurement, arXiv:2104.03267 [INSPIRE].
M. J. Dolan, F. Kahlhoefer, C. McCabe and K. Schmidt-Hoberg, A taste of dark matter: Flavour constraints on pseudoscalar mediators, JHEP 03 (2015) 171 [Erratum ibid. 07 (2015) 103] [arXiv:1412.5174] [INSPIRE].
E. Izaguirre, T. Lin and B. Shuve, Searching for Axionlike Particles in Flavor-Changing Neutral Current Processes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 (2017) 111802 [arXiv:1611.09355] [INSPIRE].
K. Choi, S. H. Im, C. B. Park and S. Yun, Minimal Flavor Violation with Axion-like Particles, JHEP 11 (2017) 070 [arXiv:1708.00021] [INSPIRE].
F. Arias-Aragon and L. Merlo, The Minimal Flavour Violating Axion, JHEP 10 (2017) 168 [Erratum ibid. 11 (2019) 152] [arXiv:1709.07039] [INSPIRE].
M. B. Gavela, R. Houtz, P. Quilez, R. Del Rey and O. Sumensari, Flavor constraints on electroweak ALP couplings, Eur. Phys. J. C 79 (2019) 369 [arXiv:1901.02031] [INSPIRE].
C. Cornella, P. Paradisi and O. Sumensari, Hunting for ALPs with Lepton Flavor Violation, JHEP 01 (2020) 158 [arXiv:1911.06279] [INSPIRE].
J. Martin Camalich, M. Pospelov, P. N. H. Vuong, R. Ziegler and J. Zupan, Quark Flavor Phenomenology of the QCD Axion, Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020) 015023 [arXiv:2002.04623] [INSPIRE].
S. Chakraborty, M. Kraus, V. Loladze, T. Okui and K. Tobioka, Heavy QCD Axion in b → s transition: Enhanced Limits and Projections, arXiv:2102.04474 [INSPIRE].
M. Bauer, M. Neubert, S. Renner, M. Schnubel and A. Thamm, Consistent treatment of axions in the weak chiral Lagrangian, arXiv:2102.13112 [INSPIRE].
M. Bauer, M. Neubert, S. Renner, M. Schnubel and A. Thamm, The Low-Energy Effective Theory of Axions and ALPs, JHEP 04 (2021) 063 [arXiv:2012.12272] [INSPIRE].
M. Chala, G. Guedes, M. Ramos and J. Santiago, Running in the ALPs, Eur. Phys. J. C 81 (2021) 181 [arXiv:2012.09017] [INSPIRE].
B. Grzadkowski, M. Iskrzynski, M. Misiak and J. Rosiek, Dimension-Six Terms in the Standard Model Lagrangian, JHEP 10 (2010) 085 [arXiv:1008.4884] [INSPIRE].
J. Elias-Miro, J. R. Espinosa, E. Masso and A. Pomarol, Higgs windows to new physics through d = 6 operators: constraints and one-loop anomalous dimensions, JHEP 11 (2013) 066 [arXiv:1308.1879] [INSPIRE].
E. E. Jenkins, A. V. Manohar and M. Trott, Renormalization Group Evolution of the Standard Model Dimension Six Operators I: Formalism and λ Dependence, JHEP 10 (2013) 087 [arXiv:1308.2627] [INSPIRE].
E. E. Jenkins, A. V. Manohar and M. Trott, Renormalization Group Evolution of the Standard Model Dimension Six Operators II: Yukawa Dependence, JHEP 01 (2014) 035 [arXiv:1310.4838] [INSPIRE].
R. Alonso, E. E. Jenkins, A. V. Manohar and M. Trott, Renormalization Group Evolution of the Standard Model Dimension Six Operators III: Gauge Coupling Dependence and Phenomenology, JHEP 04 (2014) 159 [arXiv:1312.2014] [INSPIRE].
H. Georgi, D. B. Kaplan and L. Randall, Manifesting the Invisible Axion at Low Energies, Phys. Lett. B 169 (1986) 73 [INSPIRE].
W. A. Bardeen, S. H. H. Tye and J. A. M. Vermaseren, Phenomenology of the New Light Higgs Boson Search, Phys. Lett. B 76 (1978) 580 [INSPIRE].
M. A. Shifman, A. I. Vainshtein and V. I. Zakharov, Can Confinement Ensure Natural CP Invariance of Strong Interactions?, Nucl. Phys. B 166 (1980) 493 [INSPIRE].
P. Di Vecchia and G. Veneziano, Chiral Dynamics in the Large N Limit, Nucl. Phys. B 171 (1980) 253 [INSPIRE].
A. Manohar and H. Georgi, Chiral Quarks and the Nonrelativistic Quark Model, Nucl. Phys. B 234 (1984) 189 [INSPIRE].
M. A. Luty, Naive dimensional analysis and supersymmetry, Phys. Rev. D 57 (1998) 1531 [hep-ph/9706235] [INSPIRE].
A. G. Cohen, D. B. Kaplan and A. E. Nelson, Counting 4π’s in strongly coupled supersymmetry, Phys. Lett. B 412 (1997) 301 [hep-ph/9706275] [INSPIRE].
V. Gherardi, D. Marzocca and E. Venturini, Matching scalar leptoquarks to the SMEFT at one loop, JHEP 07 (2020) 225 [Erratum ibid. 01 (2021) 006] [arXiv:2003.12525] [INSPIRE].
G. D’Ambrosio, G. F. Giudice, G. Isidori and A. Strumia, Minimal flavor violation: An effective field theory approach, Nucl. Phys. B 645 (2002) 155 [hep-ph/0207036] [INSPIRE].
J. Ellis, M. Madigan, K. Mimasu, V. Sanz and T. You, Top, Higgs, Diboson and Electroweak Fit to the Standard Model Effective Field Theory, JHEP 04 (2021) 279 [arXiv:2012.02779] [INSPIRE].
D. Atwood, A. Kagan and T. G. Rizzo, Constraining anomalous top quark couplings at the Tevatron, Phys. Rev. D 52 (1995) 6264 [hep-ph/9407408] [INSPIRE].
P. Haberl, O. Nachtmann and A. Wilch, Top production in hadron hadron collisions and anomalous top-gluon couplings, Phys. Rev. D 53 (1996) 4875 [hep-ph/9505409] [INSPIRE].
K.-m. Cheung, Probing the chromoelectric and chromomagnetic dipole moments of the top quark at hadronic colliders, Phys. Rev. D 53 (1996) 3604 [hep-ph/9511260] [INSPIRE].
CMS collaboration, Measurement of the top quark polarization and \( t\overline{t} \) spin correlations using dilepton final states in proton-proton collisions at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV, Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 072002 [arXiv:1907.03729] [INSPIRE].
CMS collaboration, Measurement of the top quark forward-backward production asymmetry and the anomalous chromoelectric and chromomagnetic moments in pp collisions at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV, JHEP 06 (2020) 146 [arXiv:1912.09540] [INSPIRE].
Z. Han and W. Skiba, Effective theory analysis of precision electroweak data, Phys. Rev. D 71 (2005) 075009 [hep-ph/0412166] [INSPIRE].
A. Pomarol and F. Riva, Towards the Ultimate SM Fit to Close in on Higgs Physics, JHEP 01 (2014) 151 [arXiv:1308.2803] [INSPIRE].
J. Ellis, V. Sanz and T. You, The Effective Standard Model after LHC Run I, JHEP 03 (2015) 157 [arXiv:1410.7703] [INSPIRE].
A. Falkowski and F. Riva, Model-independent precision constraints on dimension-6 operators, JHEP 02 (2015) 039 [arXiv:1411.0669] [INSPIRE].
L. Berthier and M. Trott, Consistent constraints on the Standard Model Effective Field Theory, JHEP 02 (2016) 069 [arXiv:1508.05060] [INSPIRE].
OPAL collaboration, Multiphoton production in e+ e− collisions at \( \sqrt{s} \)= 181 GeV to 209-GeV, Eur. Phys. J. C 26 (2003) 331 [hep-ex/0210016] [INSPIRE].
Belle-II collaboration, Search for Axion-Like Particles produced in e+ e− collisions at Belle II, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 (2020) 161806 [arXiv:2007.13071] [INSPIRE].
L. F. Abbott, The Background Field Method Beyond One Loop, Nucl. Phys. B 185 (1981) 189 [INSPIRE].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
ArXiv ePrint: 2105.01078
Rights and permissions
Open Access . This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
About this article
Cite this article
Galda, A.M., Neubert, M. & Renner, S. ALP — SMEFT interference. J. High Energ. Phys. 2021, 135 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP06(2021)135
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP06(2021)135