Abstract
In principle, observables as for example the sphaleron rate or the tunneling rate in a first-order phase transition are gauge-independent. However, in practice a gauge dependence is introduced in explicit perturbative calculations due to the breakdown of the gradient expansion of the effective action in the symmetric phase. We exemplify the situation using the effective potential of the Abelian Higgs model in the general renormalizable gauge. Still, we find that the quantitative dependence on the gauge choice is small for gauges that are consistent with the perturbative expansion.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
S.R. Coleman and E.J. Weinberg, Radiative corrections as the origin of spontaneous symmetry breaking, Phys. Rev. D 7 (1973) 1888 [INSPIRE].
L. Dolan and R. Jackiw, Symmetry behavior at finite temperature, Phys. Rev. D 9 (1974) 3320 [INSPIRE].
R. Jackiw, Functional evaluation of the effective potential, Phys. Rev. D 9 (1974) 1686 [INSPIRE].
L. Dolan and R. Jackiw, Gauge invariant signal for gauge symmetry breaking, Phys. Rev. D 9 (1974) 2904 [INSPIRE].
N. Nielsen, On the gauge dependence of spontaneous symmetry breaking in gauge theories, Nucl. Phys. B 101 (1975) 173 [INSPIRE].
R. Fukuda and T. Kugo, Gauge invariance in the effective action and potential, Phys. Rev. D 13 (1976) 3469 [INSPIRE].
I. Aitchison and C. Fraser, Gauge invariance and the effective potential, Annals Phys. 156 (1984) 1 [INSPIRE].
R. Kobes, G. Kunstatter and A. Rebhan, Gauge dependence identities and their application at finite temperature, Nucl. Phys. B 355 (1991) 1 [INSPIRE].
W. Buchmüller, Z. Fodor and A. Hebecker, Gauge invariant treatment of the electroweak phase transition, Phys. Lett. B 331 (1994) 131 [hep-ph/9403391] [INSPIRE].
W. Buchmüller, Z. Fodor and A. Hebecker, Thermodynamics of the electroweak phase transition, Nucl. Phys. B 447 (1995) 317 [hep-ph/9502321] [INSPIRE].
D. Metaxas and E.J. Weinberg, Gauge independence of the bubble nucleation rate in theories with radiative symmetry breaking, Phys. Rev. D 53 (1996) 836 [hep-ph/9507381] [INSPIRE].
K. Fujikawa, B. Lee and A. Sanda, Generalized renormalizable gauge formulation of spontaneously broken gauge theories, Phys. Rev. D 6 (1972) 2923 [INSPIRE].
S. Weinberg, Perturbative calculations of symmetry breaking, Phys. Rev. D 7 (1973) 2887 [INSPIRE].
M. Laine, The two loop effective potential of the 3D SU(2) Higgs model in a general covariant gauge, Phys. Lett. B 335 (1994) 173 [hep-ph/9406268] [INSPIRE].
M. Laine, Gauge dependence of the high temperature two loop effective potential for the Higgs field, Phys. Rev. D 51 (1995) 4525 [hep-ph/9411252] [INSPIRE].
J. Kripfganz, A. Laser and M.G. Schmidt, The high temperature two loop effective potential of the electroweak theory in a general ’t Hooft background gauge, Phys. Lett. B 351 (1995) 266 [hep-ph/9501317] [INSPIRE].
M. Shaposhnikov, Possible appearance of the baryon asymmetry of the universe in an electroweak theory, JETP Lett. 44 (1986) 465 [Pisma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 44 (1986) 364] [INSPIRE].
G.W. Anderson and L.J. Hall, The electroweak phase transition and baryogenesis, Phys. Rev. D 45 (1992) 2685 [INSPIRE].
P.B. Arnold and O. Espinosa, The Effective potential and first order phase transitions: Beyond leading-order, Phys. Rev. D 47 (1993) 3546 [Erratum ibid. D 50 (1994) 6662] [hep-ph/9212235] [INSPIRE].
K. Kajantie, M. Laine, K. Rummukainen and M.E. Shaposhnikov, The electroweak phase transition: a nonperturbative analysis, Nucl. Phys. B 466 (1996) 189 [hep-lat/9510020] [INSPIRE].
M. Carrington, The effective potential at finite temperature in the standard model, Phys. Rev. D 45 (1992) 2933 [INSPIRE].
U. Kraemmer, A. Rebhan and H. Schulz, Resummations in hot scalar electrodynamics, Annals Phys. 238 (1995) 286 [hep-ph/9403301] [INSPIRE].
E. Braaten and R.D. Pisarski, Soft amplitudes in hot gauge theories: a general analysis, Nucl. Phys. B 337 (1990) 569 [INSPIRE].
W. Buchmüller, Z. Fodor, T. Helbig and D. Walliser, The weak-electroweak phase transition, Annals Phys. 234 (1994) 260 [hep-ph/9303251] [INSPIRE].
W. Buchmüller and O. Philipsen, Abelian versus non-abelian Higgs model in three-dimensions, Phys. Lett. B 354 (1995) 403 [hep-ph/9504278] [INSPIRE].
A. Hebecker, The electroweak phase transition, hep-ph/9506418 [INSPIRE].
D. Bödeker, W. Buchmüller, Z. Fodor and T. Helbig, Aspects of the cosmological electroweak phase transition, Nucl. Phys. B 423 (1994) 171 [hep-ph/9311346] [INSPIRE].
J. Langer, Statistical theory of the decay of metastable states, Annals Phys. 54 (1969) 258 [INSPIRE].
S.R. Coleman, The fate of the false vacuum. 1. Semiclassical theory, Phys. Rev. D 15 (1977) 2929 [Erratum ibid. D 16 (1977) 1248] [INSPIRE].
A.D. Linde, Fate of the false vacuum at finite temperature: theory and applications, Phys. Lett. B 100 (1981) 37 [INSPIRE].
J. Kripfganz, A. Laser and M.G. Schmidt, Perturbative contributions to the electroweak interface tension, Z. Phys. C 73 (1997) 353 [hep-ph/9512340] [INSPIRE].
F.R. Klinkhamer and N. Manton, A saddle point solution in the Weinberg-Salam theory, Phys. Rev. D 30 (1984) 2212 [INSPIRE].
Z. Fodor and A. Hebecker, Finite temperature effective potential to order g 4 , λ2 and the electroweak phase transition, Nucl. Phys. B 432 (1994) 127 [hep-ph/9403219] [INSPIRE].
H.H. Patel and M.J. Ramsey-Musolf, Baryon washout, electroweak phase transition and perturbation theory, JHEP 07 (2011) 029 [arXiv:1101.4665] [INSPIRE].
C. Wainwright, S. Profumo and M.J. Ramsey-Musolf, Gravity waves from a cosmological phase transition: gauge artifacts and Daisy resummations, Phys. Rev. D 84 (2011) 023521 [arXiv:1104.5487] [INSPIRE].
C.L. Wainwright, S. Profumo and M.J. Ramsey-Musolf, Phase transitions and gauge artifacts in an abelian Higgs plus singlet model, arXiv:1204.5464 [INSPIRE].
J.E. Bagnasco and M. Dine, Some two loop corrections to the finite temperature effective potential in the electroweak theory, Phys. Lett. B 303 (1993) 308 [hep-ph/9212288] [INSPIRE].
Z. Fodor et al., Numerical simulations and the strength of the electroweak phase transition, Phys. Lett. B 334 (1994) 405 [hep-lat/9405021] [INSPIRE].
Z. Fodor, J. Hein, K. Jansen, A. Jaster and I. Montvay, Simulating the electroweak phase transition in the SU(2) Higgs model, Nucl. Phys. B 439 (1995) 147 [hep-lat/9409017] [INSPIRE].
F. Csikor, Z. Fodor, J. Hein and J. Heitger, Interface tension of the electroweak phase transition, Phys. Lett. B 357 (1995) 156 [hep-lat/9506029] [INSPIRE].
F. Csikor, Z. Fodor, J. Hein, A. Jaster and I. Montvay, Numerical tests of the electroweak phase transition and thermodynamics of the electroweak plasma, Nucl. Phys. B 474 (1996) 421 [hep-lat/9601016] [INSPIRE].
G.D. Moore and K. Rummukainen, Electroweak bubble nucleation, nonperturbatively, Phys. Rev. D 63 (2001) 045002 [hep-ph/0009132] [INSPIRE].
M.S. Carena, M. Quirós and C. Wagner, Opening the window for electroweak baryogenesis, Phys. Lett. B 380 (1996) 81 [hep-ph/9603420] [INSPIRE].
D. Delepine, J. Gerard, R. Gonzalez Felipe and J. Weyers, A light stop and electroweak baryogenesis, Phys. Lett. B 386 (1996) 183 [hep-ph/9604440] [INSPIRE].
M.S. Carena, M. Quirós and C. Wagner, Electroweak baryogenesis and Higgs and stop searches at LEP and the Tevatron, Nucl. Phys. B 524 (1998) 3 [hep-ph/9710401] [INSPIRE].
J.R. Espinosa, T. Konstandin and F. Riva, Strong electroweak phase transitions in the standard model with a singlet, Nucl. Phys. B 854 (2012) 592 [arXiv:1107.5441] [INSPIRE].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
ArXiv ePrint: 1205.3392
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 International License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
About this article
Cite this article
Garny, M., Konstandin, T. On the gauge dependence of vacuum transitions at finite temperature. J. High Energ. Phys. 2012, 189 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP07(2012)189
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP07(2012)189