Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Account
Menu
Find a journal Publish with us Track your research
Search
Saved research
Cart
  1. Home
  2. Journal of High Energy Physics
  3. Article

Violations of quark-hadron duality in low-energy determinations of αs

  • JHEP 25TH ANNIVERSARY SPECIAL ISSUE
  • Open access
  • Published: 26 July 2022
  • Volume 2022, article number 145 (2022)
  • Cite this article

You have full access to this open access article

Download PDF
View saved research
Journal of High Energy Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript
Violations of quark-hadron duality in low-energy determinations of αs
Download PDF
  • Antonio Pich  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-8019-54631 &
  • Antonio Rodríguez-Sánchez2 
  • 652 Accesses

  • 19 Citations

  • 1 Altmetric

  • Explore all metrics

A preprint version of the article is available at arXiv.

Abstract

Using the spectral functions measured in τ decays, we investigate the actual numerical impact of duality violations on the extraction of the strong coupling. These effects are tiny in the standard αs(\( {m}_{\tau}^2 \)) determinations from integrated distributions of the hadronic spectrum with pinched weights, or from the total τ hadronic width. The pinched-weight factors suppress very efficiently the violations of duality, making their numerical effects negligible in comparison with the larger perturbative uncertainties. However, combined fits of αs and duality-violation parameters, performed with non-protected weights, are subject to large systematic errors associated with the assumed modelling of duality-violation effects. These uncertainties have not been taken into account in the published analyses, based on specific models of quark-hadron duality.

Article PDF

Download to read the full article text

Similar content being viewed by others

Quark-hadron duality violations and higher-order 1/mb corrections in inclusive semileptonic B decays

Article Open access 23 October 2024

Exploring new physics contributions to CP violation in \(\tau ^- \rightarrow K^-\pi ^0\nu _{\tau } \)

Article Open access 28 April 2021

Quark Hadron Duality in Unpolarized Structure Functions

Article 04 June 2018

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, books and news in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.
  • Experimental Nuclear Physics
  • Nuclear and Particle Physics
  • Particle Physics
  • Theoretical Particle Physics
  • Nuclear Physics
  • Quantum Physics

References

  1. A. Pich, Precision physics with inclusive QCD processes, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 117 (2021) 103846 [arXiv:2012.04716] [INSPIRE].

  2. E.C. Poggio, H.R. Quinn and S. Weinberg, Smearing the quark model, Phys. Rev. D 13 (1976) 1958 [INSPIRE].

  3. S. Moretti, L. Lönnblad and T. Sjöstrand, New and old jet clustering algorithms for electron-positron events, JHEP 08 (1998) 001 [hep-ph/9804296] [INSPIRE].

  4. S.D. Ellis, J. Huston, K. Hatakeyama, P. Loch and M. Tonnesmann, Jets in hadron-hadron collisions, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 60 (2008) 484 [arXiv:0712.2447] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. G.P. Salam, Towards jetography, Eur. Phys. J. C 67 (2010) 637 [arXiv:0906.1833] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. K.G. Wilson, Nonlagrangian models of current algebra, Phys. Rev. 179 (1969) 1499 [INSPIRE].

  7. M.A. Shifman, A.I. Vainshtein and V.I. Zakharov, QCD and resonance physics. Theoretical foundations, Nucl. Phys. B 147 (1979) 385 [INSPIRE].

  8. M.A. Shifman, A.I. Vainshtein and V.I. Zakharov, QCD and resonance physics: applications, Nucl. Phys. B 147 (1979) 448 [INSPIRE].

  9. M.A. Shifman, A.I. Vainshtein and V.I. Zakharov, QCD and resonance physics. The ρ-ω mixing, Nucl. Phys. B 147 (1979) 519 [INSPIRE].

  10. V.A. Novikov, M.A. Shifman, A.I. Vainshtein and V.I. Zakharov, Operator expansion in quantum chromodynamics beyond perturbation theory, Nucl. Phys. B 174 (1980) 378 [INSPIRE].

  11. S.I. Eidelman, L.M. Kurdadze and A.I. Vainshtein, e+e− annihilation into hadrons below 2 GeV. Test of QCD predictions, Phys. Lett. B 82 (1979) 278 [INSPIRE].

  12. R.A. Bertlmann, G. Launer and E. de Rafael, Gaussian sum rules in quantum chromodynamics and local duality, Nucl. Phys. B 250 (1985) 61 [INSPIRE].

  13. S. Narison and A. Pich, Semiinclusive τ decays involving the vector or axial-vector hadronic currents, Phys. Lett. B 304 (1993) 359 [INSPIRE].

  14. S. Bodenstein, C.A. Dominguez, S.I. Eidelman, H. Spiesberger and K. Schilcher, Confronting electron-positron annihilation into hadrons with QCD: an operator product expansion analysis, JHEP 01 (2012) 039 [arXiv:1110.2026] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. D. Boito et al., Strong coupling from e+e− → hadrons below charm, Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 074030 [arXiv:1805.08176] [INSPIRE].

  16. F. Jegerlehner, Muon g − 2 theory: the hadronic part, EPJ Web Conf. 166 (2018) 00022 [arXiv:1705.00263] [INSPIRE].

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. M. Davier, A. Hoecker, B. Malaescu and Z. Zhang, Reevaluation of the hadronic vacuum polarisation contributions to the Standard Model predictions of the muon g − 2 and α(\( {m}_Z^2 \)) using newest hadronic cross-section data, Eur. Phys. J. C 77 (2017) 827 [arXiv:1706.09436] [INSPIRE].

  18. A. Keshavarzi, D. Nomura and T. Teubner, Muon g − 2 and α(\( {M}_Z^2 \)): a new data-based analysis, Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) 114025 [arXiv:1802.02995] [INSPIRE].

  19. G. Colangelo, M. Hoferichter and P. Stoffer, Two-pion contribution to hadronic vacuum polarization, JHEP 02 (2019) 006 [arXiv:1810.00007] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. M. Hoferichter, B.-L. Hoid and B. Kubis, Three-pion contribution to hadronic vacuum polarization, JHEP 08 (2019) 137 [arXiv:1907.01556] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. M. Davier, A. Hoecker, B. Malaescu and Z. Zhang, A new evaluation of the hadronic vacuum polarisation contributions to the muon anomalous magnetic moment and to α(\( {m}_Z^2 \)), Eur. Phys. J. C 80 (2020) 241 [Erratum ibid. 80 (2020) 410] [arXiv:1908.00921] [INSPIRE].

  22. A. Keshavarzi, D. Nomura and T. Teubner, g − 2 of charged leptons, α(\( {M}_Z^2 \)), and the hyperfine splitting of muonium, Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 014029 [arXiv:1911.00367] [INSPIRE].

  23. T. Aoyama et al., The anomalous magnetic moment of the muon in the Standard Model, Phys. Rept. 887 (2020) 1 [arXiv:2006.04822] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. E. Braaten, QCD predictions for the decay of the tau lepton, Phys. Rev. Lett. 60 (1988) 1606 [INSPIRE].

  25. E. Braaten, The perturbative QCD corrections to the ratio R for τ decay, Phys. Rev. D 39 (1989) 1458 [INSPIRE].

  26. S. Narison and A. Pich, QCD formulation of the τ decay and determination of ΛMS, Phys. Lett. B 211 (1988) 183 [INSPIRE].

  27. E. Braaten, S. Narison and A. Pich, QCD analysis of the tau hadronic width, Nucl. Phys. B 373 (1992) 581 [INSPIRE].

  28. F. Le Diberder and A. Pich, The perturbative QCD prediction to Rτ revisited, Phys. Lett. B 286 (1992) 147 [INSPIRE].

  29. F. Le Diberder and A. Pich, Testing QCD with τ decays, Phys. Lett. B 289 (1992) 165 [INSPIRE].

  30. A. Pich, Precision τ physics, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 75 (2014) 41 [arXiv:1310.7922] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  31. P.A. Baikov, K.G. Chetyrkin and J.H. Kühn, Order \( {\alpha}_s^4 \) QCD corrections to Z and τ decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101 (2008) 012002 [arXiv:0801.1821] [INSPIRE].

  32. ALEPH collaboration, Measurement of the strong coupling constant using τ decays, Phys. Lett. B 307 (1993) 209 [INSPIRE].

  33. ALEPH collaboration, Measurement of the spectral functions of axial-vector hadronic τ decays and determination of αs(\( {m}_{\tau}^2 \)), Eur. Phys. J. C 4 (1998) 409 [INSPIRE].

  34. ALEPH collaboration, Branching ratios and spectral functions of tau decays: final ALEPH measurements and physics implications, Phys. Rept. 421 (2005) 191 [hep-ex/0506072] [INSPIRE].

  35. CLEO collaboration, Measurement of αs from τ decays, Phys. Lett. B 356 (1995) 580 [INSPIRE].

  36. OPAL collaboration, Measurement of the strong coupling constant αs and the vector and axial vector spectral functions in hadronic τ decays, Eur. Phys. J. C 7 (1999) 571 [hep-ex/9808019] [INSPIRE].

  37. M. Davier, A. Hocker and Z. Zhang, The physics of hadronic τ decays, Rev. Mod. Phys. 78 (2006) 1043 [hep-ph/0507078] [INSPIRE].

  38. M. Davier, S. Descotes-Genon, A. Hocker, B. Malaescu and Z. Zhang, The determination of αs from tau decays revisited, Eur. Phys. J. C 56 (2008) 305 [arXiv:0803.0979] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  39. M. Davier, A. Höcker, B. Malaescu, C.-Z. Yuan and Z. Zhang, Update of the ALEPH non-strange spectral functions from hadronic τ decays, Eur. Phys. J. C 74 (2014) 2803 [arXiv:1312.1501] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  40. A. Pich and A. Rodríguez-Sánchez, Determination of the QCD coupling from ALEPH τ decay data, Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016) 034027 [arXiv:1605.06830] [INSPIRE].

  41. O. Catà, M. Golterman and S. Peris, Unraveling duality violations in hadronic τ decays, Phys. Rev. D 77 (2008) 093006 [arXiv:0803.0246] [INSPIRE].

  42. O. Catà, M. Golterman and S. Peris, Possible duality violations in τ decay and their impact on the determination of αs, Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009) 053002 [arXiv:0812.2285] [INSPIRE].

  43. D. Boito et al., A new determination of αs from hadronic τ decays, Phys. Rev. D 84 (2011) 113006 [arXiv:1110.1127] [INSPIRE].

  44. D. Boito et al., An updated determination of αs from τ decays, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 093015 [arXiv:1203.3146] [INSPIRE].

  45. D. Boito, M. Golterman, K. Maltman, J. Osborne and S. Peris, Strong coupling from the revised ALEPH data for hadronic τ decays, Phys. Rev. D 91 (2015) 034003 [arXiv:1410.3528] [INSPIRE].

  46. A. Pich and A. Rodríguez-Sánchez, Updated determination of αs(\( {m}_{\tau}^2 \)) from τ decays, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 31 (2016) 1630032 [arXiv:1606.07764] [INSPIRE].

  47. A. Pich, τ -decay determination of the strong coupling, SciPost Phys. Proc. 1 (2019) 036 [arXiv:1811.10067] [INSPIRE].

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. D. Boito, M. Golterman, K. Maltman and S. Peris, Strong coupling from hadronic τ decays: a critical appraisal, Phys. Rev. D 95 (2017) 034024 [arXiv:1611.03457] [INSPIRE].

  49. D. Boito, M. Golterman, K. Maltman and S. Peris, Evidence against naive truncations of the OPE from e+e− → hadrons below charm, Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 074009 [arXiv:1907.03360] [INSPIRE].

  50. D. Boito, M. Golterman, K. Maltman, S. Peris, M.V. Rodrigues and W. Schaaf, Strong coupling from an improved τ vector isovector spectral function, Phys. Rev. D 103 (2021) 034028 [arXiv:2012.10440] [INSPIRE].

  51. M.A. Shifman, The case of αs: Z versus low-energies, or how nature prompts us of new physics, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 11 (1996) 3195 [hep-ph/9511469] [INSPIRE].

  52. B. Chibisov, R.D. Dikeman, M.A. Shifman and N. Uraltsev, Operator product expansion, heavy quarks, QCD duality and its violations, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 12 (1997) 2075 [hep-ph/9605465] [INSPIRE].

  53. B. Blok, M.A. Shifman and D.-X. Zhang, An illustrative example of how quark hadron duality might work, Phys. Rev. D 57 (1998) 2691 [Erratum ibid. 59 (1999) 019901] [hep-ph/9709333] [INSPIRE].

  54. M.A. Shifman, Quark hadron duality, in 8th international symposium on heavy flavor physics, volume 3, World Scientific, Singapore (2000), p. 1447 [hep-ph/0009131] [INSPIRE].

  55. I.I.Y. Bigi and N. Uraltsev, A vademecum on quark hadron duality, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 16 (2001) 5201 [hep-ph/0106346] [INSPIRE].

  56. M. Golterman, S. Peris, B. Phily and E. De Rafael, Testing an approximation to large Nc QCD with a toy model, JHEP 01 (2002) 024 [hep-ph/0112042] [INSPIRE].

  57. O. Catà, M. Golterman and S. Peris, Duality violations and spectral sum rules, JHEP 08 (2005) 076 [hep-ph/0506004] [INSPIRE].

  58. M. Beneke, G. Buchalla, M. Neubert and C.T. Sachrajda, Penguins with charm and quark-hadron duality, Eur. Phys. J. C 61 (2009) 439 [arXiv:0902.4446] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  59. M. Gonzalez-Alonso, A. Pich and J. Prades, Violation of quark-hadron duality and spectral chiral moments in QCD, Phys. Rev. D 81 (2010) 074007 [arXiv:1001.2269] [INSPIRE].

  60. M. Gonzalez-Alonso, A. Pich and J. Prades, Pinched weights and duality violation in QCD sum rules: a critical analysis, Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010) 014019 [arXiv:1004.4987] [INSPIRE].

  61. M. Beylich, G. Buchalla and T. Feldmann, Theory of B → K(*)ℓ+ℓ− decays at high q2: OPE and quark-hadron duality, Eur. Phys. J. C 71 (2011) 1635 [arXiv:1101.5118] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  62. M. Jamin, What two models may teach us about duality violations in QCD, JHEP 09 (2011) 141 [arXiv:1103.2718] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  63. I. Caprini, M. Golterman and S. Peris, Functional-analysis based tool for testing quark-hadron duality, Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) 033008 [arXiv:1407.2577] [INSPIRE].

  64. D. Boito, I. Caprini, M. Golterman, K. Maltman and S. Peris, Hyperasymptotics and quark-hadron duality violations in QCD, Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) 054007 [arXiv:1711.10316] [INSPIRE].

  65. W.J. Marciano and A. Sirlin, Electroweak radiative corrections to τ decay, Phys. Rev. Lett. 61 (1988) 1815 [INSPIRE].

  66. E. Braaten and C.-S. Li, Electroweak radiative corrections to the semihadronic decay rate of the τ lepton, Phys. Rev. D 42 (1990) 3888 [INSPIRE].

  67. J. Erler, Electroweak radiative corrections to semileptonic tau decays, Rev. Mex. Fis. 50 (2004) 200 [hep-ph/0211345] [INSPIRE].

  68. A. Pich, QCD tests from τ decay data, Conf. Proc. C 890523 (1989) 416 [INSPIRE].

  69. A.A. Pivovarov, Renormalization group analysis of the τ lepton decay within QCD, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 54 (1991) 676 [Z. Phys. C 53 (1992) 461] [Yad. Fiz. 54 (1991) 1114] [hep-ph/0302003] [INSPIRE].

  70. M. Beneke and M. Jamin, αs and the tau hadronic width: fixed-order, contour-improved and higher-order perturbation theory, JHEP 09 (2008) 044 [arXiv:0806.3156] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  71. M. Beneke, D. Boito and M. Jamin, Perturbative expansion of τ hadronic spectral function moments and αs extractions, JHEP 01 (2013) 125 [arXiv:1210.8038] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  72. D. Boito, P. Masjuan and F. Oliani, Higher-order QCD corrections to hadronic τ decays from Padé approximants, JHEP 08 (2018) 075 [arXiv:1807.01567] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  73. X.-G. Wu, J.-M. Shen, B.-L. Du, X.-D. Huang, S.-Q. Wang and S.J. Brodsky, The QCD renormalization group equation and the elimination of fixed-order scheme-and-scale ambiguities using the principle of maximum conformality, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 108 (2019) 103706 [arXiv:1903.12177] [INSPIRE].

  74. I. Caprini, Higher-order perturbative coefficients in QCD from series acceleration by conformal mappings, Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 056019 [arXiv:1908.06632] [INSPIRE].

  75. I. Caprini, Conformal mapping of the Borel plane: going beyond perturbative QCD, Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020) 054017 [arXiv:2006.16605] [INSPIRE].

  76. A.H. Hoang and C. Regner, Borel representation of τ hadronic spectral function moments in contour-improved perturbation theory, Phys. Rev. D 105 (2022) 096023 [arXiv:2008.00578] [INSPIRE].

  77. A.H. Hoang and C. Regner, On the difference between FOPT and CIPT for hadronic τ decays, Eur. Phys. J. ST 230 (2021) 2625 [arXiv:2105.11222] [INSPIRE].

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. C. Ayala, G. Cvetič and D. Teca, Determination of perturbative QCD coupling from ALEPH τ decay data using pinched Borel-Laplace and finite energy sum rules, Eur. Phys. J. C 81 (2021) 930 [arXiv:2105.00356] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  79. C. Ayala, G. Cvetič and D. Teca, Using improved operator product expansion in Borel-Laplace sum rules with ALEPH τ decay data, and determination of pQCD coupling, Eur. Phys. J. C 82 (2022) 362 [arXiv:2112.01992] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  80. I.O. Goriachuk, A.L. Kataev and V.S. Molokoedov, The \( \overline{\mathrm{MS}} \)-scheme \( {\alpha}_s^5 \) QCD contributions to the Adler function and Bjorken polarized sum rule in the Crewther-type two-fold β-expanded representation, JHEP 05 (2022) 028 [arXiv:2111.12060] [INSPIRE].

  81. M.A. Benitez-Rathgeb, D. Boito, A.H. Hoang and M. Jamin, Reconciling the contour-improved and fixed-order approaches for τ hadronic spectral moments I: renormalon-free gluon condensate scheme, arXiv:2202.10957 [INSPIRE].

  82. C. Ayala, G. Cvetič and D. Teca, Borel-Laplace sum rules with ALEPH τ decay data, using OPE with improved anomalous dimensions, arXiv:2206.05631 [INSPIRE].

  83. A. Pich and J. Prades, Strange quark mass determination from Cabibbo suppressed τ decays, JHEP 10 (1999) 004 [hep-ph/9909244] [INSPIRE].

  84. M. González-Alonso, A. Pich and A. Rodríguez-Sánchez, Updated determination of chiral couplings and vacuum condensates from hadronic τ decay data, Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016) 014017 [arXiv:1602.06112] [INSPIRE].

  85. C.A. Dominguez and K. Schilcher, Chiral sum rules and duality in QCD, Phys. Lett. B 448 (1999) 93 [hep-ph/9811261] [INSPIRE].

  86. K. Maltman, Constraints on hadronic spectral functions from continuous families of finite energy sum rules, Phys. Lett. B 440 (1998) 367 [hep-ph/9901239] [INSPIRE].

  87. A. Pich and A. Rodríguez-Sánchez, SU(3) analysis of four-quark operators: K → ππ and vacuum matrix elements, JHEP 06 (2021) 005 [arXiv:2102.09308] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  88. V. Cirigliano, D. Díaz-Calderón, A. Falkowski, M. González-Alonso and A. Rodríguez-Sánchez, Semileptonic τ decays beyond the Standard Model, JHEP 04 (2022) 152 [arXiv:2112.02087] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Departament de Física Teòrica, IFIC, Universitat de València — CSIC, Parque Científico, Catedrático José Beltrán 2, E-46980, Paterna, Spain

    Antonio Pich

  2. Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS/IN2P3, IJCLab, 91405, Orsay, France

    Antonio Rodríguez-Sánchez

Authors
  1. Antonio Pich
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Antonio Rodríguez-Sánchez
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Antonio Pich.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

ArXiv ePrint: 2205.07587

Rights and permissions

Open Access . This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pich, A., Rodríguez-Sánchez, A. Violations of quark-hadron duality in low-energy determinations of αs. J. High Energ. Phys. 2022, 145 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP07(2022)145

Download citation

  • Received: 17 May 2022

  • Accepted: 22 June 2022

  • Published: 26 July 2022

  • Version of record: 26 July 2022

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP07(2022)145

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • The Strong Coupling
  • Semi-Leptonic Decays
  • Specific QCD Phenomenology
  • Chiral Lagrangian

Associated Content

Part of a collection:

JHEP Anniversary Special Issue

Advertisement

Search

Navigation

  • Find a journal
  • Publish with us
  • Track your research

Footer Navigation

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Books A-Z
  • Subjects A-Z

Publish with us

  • Journal finder
  • Publish your research
  • Language editing
  • Open access publishing

Products and services

  • Our products
  • Librarians
  • Societies
  • Partners and advertisers

Our brands

  • Springer
  • Nature Portfolio
  • BMC
  • Palgrave Macmillan
  • Apress
  • Discover

Corporate Navigation

  • Your US state privacy rights
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms and conditions
  • Privacy policy
  • Help and support
  • Legal notice
  • Cancel contracts here

Not affiliated

Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature