Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Account
Menu
Find a journal Publish with us Track your research
Search
Saved research
Cart
  1. Home
  2. Journal of High Energy Physics
  3. Article

Constraining new physics with SModelS version 2

  • Regular Article - Theoretical Physics
  • Open access
  • Published: 04 August 2022
  • Volume 2022, article number 68 (2022)
  • Cite this article

You have full access to this open access article

Download PDF
View saved research
Journal of High Energy Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript
Constraining new physics with SModelS version 2
Download PDF
  • Gaël Alguero1,2,
  • Jan Heisig3,4,
  • Charanjit K. Khosa5,6,7,
  • Sabine Kraml  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-2613-70001,
  • Suchita Kulkarni8,
  • Andre Lessa9,
  • Humberto Reyes-González5,6,
  • Wolfgang Waltenberger10,11 &
  • …
  • Alicia Wongel12 

  • 704 Accesses

  • 61 Citations

  • 1 Altmetric

  • Explore all metrics

A preprint version of the article is available at arXiv.

Abstract

We present version 2 of SModelS, a program package for the fast reinterpretation of LHC searches for new physics on the basis of simplified model results. The major novelty of the SModelS v2 series is an extended topology description with a flexible number of particle attributes, such as spin, charge, decay width, etc. This enables, in particular, the treatment of a wide range of signatures with long-lived particles. Moreover, constraints from prompt and long-lived searches can be evaluated simultaneously in the same run. The current database includes results from searches for heavy stable charged particles, disappearing tracks, displaced jets and displaced leptons, in addition to a large number of prompt searches. The capabilities of the program are demonstrated by two physics applications: constraints on long-lived charged scalars in the scotogenic model, and constraints on the electroweak-ino sector in the Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model.

Article PDF

Download to read the full article text

Similar content being viewed by others

Constraining electroweak and strongly charged long-lived particles with CheckMATE

Article Open access 03 November 2021

Probing new physics with charge asymmetries in 2 same-sign leptons plus jets final states at the LHC

Article Open access 25 January 2024

SModelS v3: going beyond \( \mathcal{Z} \)2 topologies

Article Open access 12 November 2024

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, books and news in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.
  • Accelerator Physics
  • Experimental Particle Physics
  • Particle Physics
  • Theoretical Particle Physics
  • Quantum Electrodynamics, Relativistic and Many-body Calculations
  • Open Source

References

  1. S. Kraml et al., Searches for New Physics: Les Houches Recommendations for the Presentation of LHC Results, Eur. Phys. J. C 72 (2012) 1976 [arXiv:1203.2489] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. LHC Reinterpretation Forum collaboration, Reinterpretation of LHC Results for New Physics: Status and Recommendations after Run 2, SciPost Phys. 9 (2020) 022 [arXiv:2003.07868] [INSPIRE].

  3. K. Cranmer et al., Publishing statistical models: Getting the most out of particle physics experiments, SciPost Phys. 12 (2022) 037 [arXiv:2109.04981] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. S. Kraml et al., SModelS: a tool for interpreting simplified-model results from the LHC and its application to supersymmetry, Eur. Phys. J. C 74 (2014) 2868 [arXiv:1312.4175] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. F. Ambrogi et al., SModelS v1.1 user manual: Improving simplified model constraints with efficiency maps, Comput. Phys. Commun. 227 (2018) 72 [arXiv:1701.06586] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. J. Dutta, S. Kraml, A. Lessa and W. Waltenberger, SModelS extension with the CMS supersymmetry search results from Run 2, LHEP 1 (2018) 5 [arXiv:1803.02204] [INSPIRE].

    Google Scholar 

  7. F. Ambrogi et al., SModelS v1.2: long-lived particles, combination of signal regions, and other novelties, Comput. Phys. Commun. 251 (2020) 106848 [arXiv:1811.10624] [INSPIRE].

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. C. K. Khosa, S. Kraml, A. Lessa, P. Neuhuber and W. Waltenberger, SModelS Database Update v1.2.3, LHEP 2020 (2020) 158 [arXiv:2005.00555] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. G. Alguero, S. Kraml and W. Waltenberger, A SModelS interface for pyhf likelihoods, Comput. Phys. Commun. 264 (2021) 107909 [arXiv:2009.01809] [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. G. Alguero et al., New developments in SModelS, PoS TOOLS2020 (2021) 022 [arXiv:2012.08192] [INSPIRE].

  11. W. Waltenberger, A. Lessa and S. Kraml, Artificial Proto-Modelling: Building Precursors of a Next Standard Model from Simplified Model Results, JHEP 03 (2021) 207 [arXiv:2012.12246] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. L. Edelhäuser, J. Heisig, M. Krämer, L. Oymanns and J. Sonneveld, Constraining supersymmetry at the LHC with simplified models for squark production, JHEP 12 (2014) 022 [arXiv:1410.0965] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. L. Edelhäuser, M. Krämer and J. Sonneveld, Simplified models for same-spin new physics scenarios, JHEP 04 (2015) 146 [arXiv:1501.03942] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. S. Kraml, U. Laa, L. Panizzi and H. Prager, Scalar versus fermionic top partner interpretations of \( t\overline{t}+{E}_T^{\mathrm{miss}} \) searches at the LHC, JHEP 11 (2016) 107 [arXiv:1607.02050] [INSPIRE].

  15. E. Ma, Verifiable radiative seesaw mechanism of neutrino mass and dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 73 (2006) 077301 [hep-ph/0601225] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. J. Kubo, E. Ma and D. Suematsu, Cold Dark Matter, Radiative Neutrino Mass, μ → eγ, and Neutrinoless Double Beta Decay, Phys. Lett. B 642 (2006) 18 [hep-ph/0604114] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. H. E. Haber, Introductory low-energy supersymmetry, in Theoretical Advanced Study Institute (TASI 92): From Black Holes and Strings to Particles, (1993), pp. 589–686 [hep-ph/9306207] [INSPIRE].

  18. H. Baer et al., Low-energy supersymmetry phenomenology, hep-ph/9503479 [INSPIRE].

  19. M. Drees and S. P. Martin, Implications of SUSY model building, in Electroweak symmetry breaking and new physics at the TeV scale, T.L. Barklow, S. Dawson, H.E. Haber and J.L. Siegrist, eds., pp. 146–215 (1995), DOI [hep-ph/9504324] [INSPIRE].

  20. H. P. Nilles, Phenomenological aspects of supersymmetry, in Workshop on Gauge Theories, Applied Supersymmetry, and Quantum Gravity, (1995), pp. 81–105 [hep-ph/9511313] [INSPIRE].

  21. G. Bélanger, F. Boudjema, A. Pukhov and A. Semenov, MicrOMEGAs_3: A program for calculating dark matter observables, Comput. Phys. Commun. 185 (2014) 960 [arXiv:1305.0237] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. G. Bélanger, F. Boudjema, A. Goudelis, A. Pukhov and B. Zaldivar, MicrOMEGAs5.0 : Freeze-in, Comput. Phys. Commun. 231 (2018) 173 [arXiv:1801.03509] [INSPIRE].

  23. D. Barducci et al., Collider limits on new physics within MicrOMEGAs_4.3, Comput. Phys. Commun. 222 (2018) 327 [arXiv:1606.03834] [INSPIRE].

  24. Gaël Alguero et al., SModelS version 2, https://smodels.github.io/.

  25. C. Degrande, C. Duhr, B. Fuks, D. Grellscheid, O. Mattelaer and T. Reiter, UFO - The Universal FeynRules Output, Comput. Phys. Commun. 183 (2012) 1201 [arXiv:1108.2040] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. J. Alwall, M. Herquet, F. Maltoni, O. Mattelaer and T. Stelzer, MadGraph 5: Going Beyond, JHEP 06 (2011) 128 [arXiv:1106.0522] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. J. Alwall et al., The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations, JHEP 07 (2014) 079 [arXiv:1405.0301] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. ATLAS collaboration, Search for heavy charged long-lived particles in the ATLAS detector in 36.1 fb−1 of proton-proton collision data at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV, Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) 092007 [arXiv:1902.01636] [INSPIRE].

  29. ATLAS collaboration, Search for long-lived charginos based on a disappearing-track signature in pp collisions at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector, JHEP 06 (2018) 022 [arXiv:1712.02118] [INSPIRE].

  30. CMS collaboration, Search for disappearing tracks in proton-proton collisions at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV, Phys. Lett. B 806 (2020) 135502 [arXiv:2004.05153] [INSPIRE].

  31. A. Belyaev, S. Prestel, F. Rojas-Abbate and J. Zurita, Probing dark matter with disappearing tracks at the LHC, Phys. Rev. D 103 (2021) 095006 [arXiv:2008.08581] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  32. A. Belyaev, S. Prestel, F. Rojas-Abbate and J. Zurita, Probing Dark Matter with Disappearing Tracks at the LHC (Zenodo dataset), (2020) [DOI].

  33. ATLAS collaboration, Search for long-lived, massive particles in events with displaced vertices and missing transverse momentum in \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV pp collisions with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) 052012 [arXiv:1710.04901] [INSPIRE].

  34. CMS collaboration, Search for long-lived particles using nonprompt jets and missing transverse momentum with proton-proton collisions at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV, Phys. Lett. B 797 (2019) 134876 [arXiv:1906.06441] [INSPIRE].

  35. ATLAS collaboration, Search for Displaced Leptons in \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV pp Collisions with the ATLAS Detector, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127 (2021) 051802 [arXiv:2011.07812] [INSPIRE].

  36. ATLAS collaboration, Search for squarks and gluinos in final states with one isolated lepton, jets, and missing transverse momentum at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 with the ATLAS detector, Eur. Phys. J. C 81 (2021) 600 [Erratum ibid. 81 (2021) 956] [arXiv:2101.01629] [INSPIRE].

  37. ATLAS collaboration, Search for squarks and gluinos in final states with jets and missing transverse momentum using 139 fb−1 of \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV pp collision data with the ATLAS detector, JHEP 02 (2021) 143 [arXiv:2010.14293] [INSPIRE].

  38. ATLAS collaboration, Search for a scalar partner of the top quark in the all-hadronic \( t\overline{t} \) plus missing transverse momentum final state at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector, Eur. Phys. J. C 80 (2020) 737 [arXiv:2004.14060] [INSPIRE].

  39. ATLAS collaboration, Search for direct production of electroweakinos in final states with missing transverse momentum and a Higgs boson decaying into photons in pp collisions at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector, JHEP 10 (2020) 005 [arXiv:2004.10894] [INSPIRE].

  40. ATLAS collaboration, Search for chargino-neutralino production using recursive jigsaw reconstruction in final states with two or three charged leptons in proton-proton collisions at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 092012 [arXiv:1806.02293] [INSPIRE].

  41. ATLAS collaboration, Search for chargino-neutralino production with mass splittings near the electroweak scale in three-lepton final states in \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV pp collisions with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 072001 [arXiv:1912.08479] [INSPIRE].

  42. CMS collaboration, Search for supersymmetry in events with soft leptons, low jet multiplicity, and missing transverse energy in proton-proton collisions at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 8 TeV, Phys. Lett. B 759 (2016) 9 [arXiv:1512.08002] [INSPIRE].

  43. Planck collaboration, Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters, Astron. Astrophys. 641 (2020) A6 [Erratum ibid. 652 (2021) C4] [arXiv:1807.06209] [INSPIRE].

  44. L. Lopez Honorez, E. Nezri, J. F. Oliver and M. H. G. Tytgat, The Inert Doublet Model: An Archetype for Dark Matter, JCAP 02 (2007) 028 [hep-ph/0612275] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  45. A. Goudelis, B. Herrmann and O. Stål, Dark matter in the Inert Doublet Model after the discovery of a Higgs-like boson at the LHC, JHEP 09 (2013) 106 [arXiv:1303.3010] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  46. B. Eiteneuer, A. Goudelis and J. Heisig, The inert doublet model in the light of Fermi-LAT gamma-ray data: a global fit analysis, Eur. Phys. J. C 77 (2017) 624 [arXiv:1705.01458] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  47. J. Heisig, S. Kraml and A. Lessa, Constraining new physics with searches for long-lived particles: Implementation into SModelS, Phys. Lett. B 788 (2019) 87 [arXiv:1808.05229] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  48. M. Klasen, C. E. Yaguna, J. D. Ruiz-Alvarez, D. Restrepo and O. Zapata, Scalar dark matter and fermion coannihilations in the radiative seesaw model, JCAP 04 (2013) 044 [arXiv:1302.5298] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  49. I. M. Ávila, G. Cottin and M. A. Díaz, Revisiting the scotogenic model with scalar dark matter, J. Phys. G 49 (2022) 065001 [arXiv:2108.05103] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  50. D. Borah and A. Gupta, New viable region of an inert Higgs doublet dark matter model with scotogenic extension, Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) 115012 [arXiv:1706.05034] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  51. M. Baak et al., Updated Status of the Global Electroweak Fit and Constraints on New Physics, Eur. Phys. J. C 72 (2012) 2003 [arXiv:1107.0975] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  52. Particle Data Group collaboration, Review of Particle Physics, PTEP 2020 (2020) 083C01 [INSPIRE].

  53. C. H. Chen, M. Drees and J. F. Gunion, Searching for invisible and almost invisible particles at e+ e− colliders, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76 (1996) 2002 [hep-ph/9512230] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  54. C. H. Chen, M. Drees and J. F. Gunion, A Nonstandard string/SUSY scenario and its phenomenological implications, Phys. Rev. D 55 (1997) 330 [Erratum ibid. 60 (1999) 039901] [hep-ph/9607421] [INSPIRE].

  55. A. Belyaev, G. Cacciapaglia, I. P. Ivanov, F. Rojas-Abatte and M. Thomas, Anatomy of the Inert Two Higgs Doublet Model in the light of the LHC and non-LHC Dark Matter Searches, Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) 035011 [arXiv:1612.00511] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  56. G. Bélanger, A. Mjallal and A. Pukhov, Two dark matter candidates: The case of inert doublet and singlet scalars, Phys. Rev. D 105 (2022) 035018 [arXiv:2108.08061] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  57. CMS collaboration, Search for heavy stable charged particles with 12.9 f b−1 of 2016 data, CMS-PAS-EXO-16-036, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland (2016).

  58. CMS collaboration, Searches for Long-Lived Charged Particles in pp Collisions at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 7 and 8 TeV, JHEP 07 (2013) 122 [arXiv:1305.0491] [INSPIRE].

  59. CMS collaboration, Constraints on the pMSSM, AMSB model and on other models from the search for long-lived charged particles in proton-proton collisions at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 8 TeV, Eur. Phys. J. C 75 (2015) 325 [arXiv:1502.02522] [INSPIRE].

  60. J. McDonald, Thermally generated gauge singlet scalars as selfinteracting dark matter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88 (2002) 091304 [hep-ph/0106249] [INSPIRE].

  61. T. Asaka, K. Ishiwata and T. Moroi, Right-handed sneutrino as cold dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 73 (2006) 051301 [hep-ph/0512118] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  62. L. J. Hall, K. Jedamzik, J. March-Russell and S. M. West, Freeze-In Production of FIMP Dark Matter, JHEP 03 (2010) 080 [arXiv:0911.1120] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  63. E. Molinaro, C. E. Yaguna and O. Zapata, FIMP realization of the scotogenic model, JCAP 07 (2014) 015 [arXiv:1405.1259] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  64. A. G. Hessler, A. Ibarra, E. Molinaro and S. Vogl, Probing the scotogenic FIMP at the LHC, JHEP 01 (2017) 100 [arXiv:1611.09540] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  65. N. Palanque-Delabrouille et al., Hints, neutrino bounds and WDM constraints from SDSS DR14 Lyman-α and Planck full-survey data, JCAP 04 (2020) 038 [arXiv:1911.09073] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  66. Q. Decant, J. Heisig, D. C. Hooper and L. Lopez-Honorez, Lyman-α constraints on freeze-in and superWIMPs, JCAP 03 (2022) 041 [arXiv:2111.09321] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  67. A. Garzilli, A. Magalich, O. Ruchayskiy and A. Boyarsky, How to constrain warm dark matter with the Lyman-α forest, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 502 (2021) 2356 [arXiv:1912.09397] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  68. B. C. Allanach, SOFTSUSY: a program for calculating supersymmetric spectra, Comput. Phys. Commun. 143 (2002) 305 [hep-ph/0104145] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  69. B. C. Allanach and T. Cridge, The Calculation of Sparticle and Higgs Decays in the Minimal and Next-to-Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Models: SOFTSUSY4.0, Comput. Phys. Commun. 220 (2017) 417 [arXiv:1703.09717] [INSPIRE].

  70. M. D. Goodsell, S. Kraml, H. Reyes-González and S. L. Williamson, Constraining Electroweakinos in the Minimal Dirac Gaugino Model, SciPost Phys. 9 (2020) 047 [arXiv:2007.08498] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  71. T. Sjöstrand, S. Mrenna and P. Z. Skands, A Brief Introduction to PYTHIA 8.1, Comput. Phys. Commun. 178 (2008) 852 [arXiv:0710.3820] [INSPIRE].

  72. T. Sjöstrand et al., An introduction to PYTHIA 8.2, Comput. Phys. Commun. 191 (2015) 159 [arXiv:1410.3012] [INSPIRE].

  73. W. Beenakker, R. Hopker and M. Spira, PROSPINO: A Program for the production of supersymmetric particles in next-to-leading order QCD, hep-ph/9611232 [INSPIRE].

  74. CMS collaboration, Combined search for electroweak production of charginos and neutralinos in proton-proton collisions at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV, JHEP 03 (2018) 160 [arXiv:1801.03957] [INSPIRE].

  75. ATLAS collaboration, Search for electroweak production of charginos and sleptons decaying into final states with two leptons and missing transverse momentum in \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV pp collisions using the ATLAS detector, Eur. Phys. J. C 80 (2020) 123 [arXiv:1908.08215] [INSPIRE].

  76. ATLAS collaboration, Search for direct production of electroweakinos in final states with one lepton, missing transverse momentum and a Higgs boson decaying into two b-jets in pp collisions at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector, Eur. Phys. J. C 80 (2020) 691 [arXiv:1909.09226] [INSPIRE].

  77. XENON collaboration, Dark Matter Search Results from a One Ton-Year Exposure of XENON1T, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 (2018) 111302 [arXiv:1805.12562] [INSPIRE].

  78. ATLAS collaboration, Search for bottom squark pair production in proton-proton collisions at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector, Eur. Phys. J. C 76 (2016) 547 [arXiv:1606.08772] [INSPIRE].

  79. ATLAS collaboration, Search for top squarks in final states with one isolated lepton, jets, and missing transverse momentum in \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV pp collisions with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016) 052009 [arXiv:1606.03903] [INSPIRE].

  80. ATLAS collaboration, Search for squarks and gluinos in final states with jets and missing transverse momentum at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector, Eur. Phys. J. C 76 (2016) 392 [arXiv:1605.03814] [INSPIRE].

  81. ATLAS collaboration, Search for supersymmetry at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV in final states with jets and two same-sign leptons or three leptons with the ATLAS detector, Eur. Phys. J. C 76 (2016) 259 [arXiv:1602.09058] [INSPIRE].

  82. ATLAS collaboration, Search for squarks and gluinos in final states with jets and missing transverse momentum using 36 fb−1 of \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV pp collision data with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) 112001 [arXiv:1712.02332] [INSPIRE].

  83. ATLAS collaboration, Search for supersymmetry in final states with two same-sign or three leptons and jets using 36 fb−1 of \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV pp collision data with the ATLAS detector, JHEP 09 (2017) 084 [Erratum ibid. 08 (2019) 121] [arXiv:1706.03731] [INSPIRE].

  84. ATLAS collaboration, Search for a scalar partner of the top quark in the jets plus missing transverse momentum final state at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector, JHEP 12 (2017) 085 [arXiv:1709.04183] [INSPIRE].

  85. ATLAS collaboration, Search for top-squark pair production in final states with one lepton, jets, and missing transverse momentum using 36 fb−1 of \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV pp collision data with the ATLAS detector, JHEP 06 (2018) 108 [arXiv:1711.11520] [INSPIRE].

  86. ATLAS collaboration, Search for direct top squark pair production in final states with two leptons in \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV pp collisions with the ATLAS detector, Eur. Phys. J. C 77 (2017) 898 [arXiv:1708.03247] [INSPIRE].

  87. ATLAS collaboration, Search for top squarks decaying to tau sleptons in pp collisions at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 032008 [arXiv:1803.10178] [INSPIRE].

  88. ATLAS collaboration, Search for electroweak production of supersymmetric particles in final states with two or three leptons at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector, Eur. Phys. J. C 78 (2018) 995 [arXiv:1803.02762] [INSPIRE].

  89. ATLAS collaboration, Search for supersymmetry in final states with charm jets and missing transverse momentum in 13 TeV pp collisions with the ATLAS detector, JHEP 09 (2018) 050 [arXiv:1805.01649] [INSPIRE].

  90. ATLAS collaboration, Search for photonic signatures of gauge-mediated supersymmetry in 13 TeV pp collisions with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) 092006 [arXiv:1802.03158] [INSPIRE].

  91. ATLAS collaboration, Search for supersymmetry in events with b-tagged jets and missing transverse momentum in pp collisions at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector, JHEP 11 (2017) 195 [arXiv:1708.09266] [INSPIRE].

  92. ATLAS collaboration, Search for new phenomena using the invariant mass distribution of same-flavour opposite-sign dilepton pairs in events with missing transverse momentum in \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV pp collisions with the ATLAS detector, Eur. Phys. J. C 78 (2018) 625 [arXiv:1805.11381] [INSPIRE].

  93. ATLAS collaboration, Search for chargino and neutralino production in final states with a Higgs boson and missing transverse momentum at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 012006 [arXiv:1812.09432] [INSPIRE].

  94. ATLAS collaboration, Search for pair production of higgsinos in final states with at least three b-tagged jets in \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV pp collisions using the ATLAS detector, Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 092002 [arXiv:1806.04030] [INSPIRE].

  95. ATLAS collaboration, Search for direct stau production in events with two hadronic τ-leptons in \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV pp collisions with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 032009 [arXiv:1911.06660] [INSPIRE].

  96. ATLAS collaboration, Search for bottom-squark pair production with the ATLAS detector in final states containing Higgs bosons, b-jets and missing transverse momentum, JHEP 12 (2019) 060 [arXiv:1908.03122] [INSPIRE].

  97. CMS collaboration, Search for supersymmetry in events with at least one soft lepton, low jet multiplicity, and missing transverse momentum in proton-proton collisions at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV, Tech. Rep. , CERN, Geneva (2017).

  98. CMS collaboration, Search for supersymmetry in the all-hadronic final state using top quark tagging in pp collisions at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV, Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) 012004 [arXiv:1701.01954] [INSPIRE].

  99. CMS collaboration, Search for the pair production of third-generation squarks with two-body decays to a bottom or charm quark and a neutralino in proton-proton collisions at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV, Phys. Lett. B 778 (2018) 263 [arXiv:1707.07274] [INSPIRE].

  100. CMS collaboration, Search for supersymmetry in multijet events with missing transverse momentum in proton-proton collisions at 13 TeV, Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) 032003 [arXiv:1704.07781] [INSPIRE].

  101. CMS collaboration, Search for new phenomena in final states with two opposite-charge, same-flavor leptons, jets, and missing transverse momentum in pp collisions at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV, JHEP 03 (2018) 076 [arXiv:1709.08908] [INSPIRE].

  102. CMS collaboration, Search for physics beyond the standard model in events with two leptons of same sign, missing transverse momentum, and jets in proton-proton collisions at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV, Eur. Phys. J. C 77 (2017) 578 [arXiv:1704.07323] [INSPIRE].

  103. CMS collaboration, Search for new phenomena with the MT2 variable in the all-hadronic final state produced in proton-proton collisions at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV, Eur. Phys. J. C 77 (2017) 710 [arXiv:1705.04650] [INSPIRE].

  104. CMS collaboration, Search for Supersymmetry in pp Collisions at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV in the Single-Lepton Final State Using the Sum of Masses of Large-Radius Jets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 (2017) 151802 [arXiv:1705.04673] [INSPIRE].

  105. CMS collaboration, Search for electroweak production of charginos and neutralinos in multilepton final states in proton-proton collisions at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV, JHEP 03 (2018) 166 [arXiv:1709.05406] [INSPIRE].

  106. CMS collaboration, Search for supersymmetry in events with at least three electrons or muons, jets, and missing transverse momentum in proton-proton collisions at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV, JHEP 02 (2018) 067 [arXiv:1710.09154] [INSPIRE].

  107. CMS collaboration, Search for supersymmetry in events with one lepton and multiple jets exploiting the angular correlation between the lepton and the missing transverse momentum in proton-proton collisions at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV, Phys. Lett. B 780 (2018) 384 [arXiv:1709.09814] [INSPIRE].

  108. CMS collaboration, Search for electroweak production of charginos and neutralinos in WH events in proton-proton collisions at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV, JHEP 11 (2017) 029 [arXiv:1706.09933] [INSPIRE].

  109. CMS collaboration, Search for supersymmetry with Higgs boson to diphoton decays using the razor variables at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV, Phys. Lett. B 779 (2018) 166 [arXiv:1709.00384] [INSPIRE].

  110. CMS collaboration, Search for gauge-mediated supersymmetry in events with at least one photon and missing transverse momentum in pp collisions at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV, Phys. Lett. B 780 (2018) 118 [arXiv:1711.08008] [INSPIRE].

  111. CMS collaboration, Search for supersymmetry in events with at least one photon, missing transverse momentum, and large transverse event activity in proton-proton collisions at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV, JHEP 12 (2017) 142 [arXiv:1707.06193] [INSPIRE].

  112. CMS collaboration, Search for direct production of supersymmetric partners of the top quark in the all-jets final state in proton-proton collisions at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV, JHEP 10 (2017) 005 [arXiv:1707.03316] [INSPIRE].

  113. CMS collaboration, Search for supersymmetry in proton-proton collisions at 13 TeV using identified top quarks, Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) 012007 [arXiv:1710.11188] [INSPIRE].

  114. CMS collaboration, Search for top squark pair production in pp collisions at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV using single lepton events, JHEP 10 (2017) 019 [arXiv:1706.04402] [INSPIRE].

  115. CMS collaboration, Search for top squarks and dark matter particles in opposite-charge dilepton final states at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV, Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) 032009 [arXiv:1711.00752] [INSPIRE].

  116. CMS collaboration, Search for supersymmetry in events with a τ lepton pair and missing transverse momentum in proton-proton collisions at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV, JHEP 11 (2018) 151 [arXiv:1807.02048] [INSPIRE].

  117. CMS collaboration, Search for top squarks decaying via four-body or chargino-mediated modes in single-lepton final states in proton-proton collisions at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV, JHEP 09 (2018) 065 [arXiv:1805.05784] [INSPIRE].

  118. CMS collaboration, Search for Physics Beyond the Standard Model in Events with High-Momentum Higgs Bosons and Missing Transverse Momentum in Proton-Proton Collisions at 13 TeV, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 (2018) 241801 [arXiv:1712.08501] [INSPIRE].

  119. CMS collaboration, Search for supersymmetric partners of electrons and muons in proton-proton collisions at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV, Phys. Lett. B 790 (2019) 140 [arXiv:1806.05264] [INSPIRE].

  120. CMS collaboration, Searches for pair production of charginos and top squarks in final states with two oppositely charged leptons in proton-proton collisions at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV, JHEP 11 (2018) 079 [arXiv:1807.07799] [INSPIRE].

  121. CMS collaboration, Search for supersymmetry in events with a photon, jets, b -jets, and missing transverse momentum in proton-proton collisions at 13 TeV, Eur. Phys. J. C 79 (2019) 444 [arXiv:1901.06726] [INSPIRE].

  122. CMS collaboration, Search for supersymmetry in proton-proton collisions at 13 TeV in final states with jets and missing transverse momentum, JHEP 10 (2019) 244 [arXiv:1908.04722] [INSPIRE].

  123. CMS collaboration, Search for direct top squark pair production in events with one lepton, jets, and missing transverse momentum at 13 TeV with the CMS experiment, JHEP 05 (2020) 032 [arXiv:1912.08887] [INSPIRE].

  124. S. Kraml et al., Micromegas interface and IDM implementation used in “Constraining new physics with SModelS version 2” (arXiv:2112.00769), Zenodo (2021) [DOI].

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Laboratoire de Physique Subatomique et de Cosmologie (LPSC), Université Grenoble-Alpes, CNRS/IN2P3, 53 Avenue des Martyrs, F-38026, Grenoble, France

    Gaël Alguero & Sabine Kraml

  2. LAPTh, CNRS, USMB, 9 Chemin de Bellevue, 74940, Annecy, France

    Gaël Alguero

  3. Institute for Theoretical Particle Physics and Cosmology, RWTH Aachen University, Sommerfeldstr. 16, D-52056, Aachen, Germany

    Jan Heisig

  4. Centre for Cosmology, Particle Physics and Phenomenology (CP3), Université catholique de Louvain, 2 Chemin du Cyclotron, B-1348, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium

    Jan Heisig

  5. Department of Physics, University of Genova, Via Dodecaneso 33, 16146, Genova, Italy

    Charanjit K. Khosa & Humberto Reyes-González

  6. INFN, Sezione di Genova, Via Dodenasco 33, I-16146, Genova, Italy

    Charanjit K. Khosa & Humberto Reyes-González

  7. H.H. Wills Physics Laboratory, University of Bristol, Tyndall Avenue, Bristol, BS8 1TL, U.K.

    Charanjit K. Khosa

  8. Institute of Physics, NAWI Graz, University of Graz, Universitätsplatz 5, A-8010, Graz, Austria

    Suchita Kulkarni

  9. Centro de Ciências Naturais e Humanas, Universidade Federal do ABC, Santo André, SP, 09210-580, Brazil

    Andre Lessa

  10. Institut für Hochenergiephysik, Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften, Nikolsdorfer Gasse 18, A-1050, Wien, Austria

    Wolfgang Waltenberger

  11. University of Vienna, Faculty of Physics, Boltzmanngasse 5, A-1090, Wien, Austria

    Wolfgang Waltenberger

  12. Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron, DESY, Notkestraße 85, 22607, Hamburg, Germany

    Alicia Wongel

Authors
  1. Gaël Alguero
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jan Heisig
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Charanjit K. Khosa
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Sabine Kraml
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Suchita Kulkarni
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Andre Lessa
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Humberto Reyes-González
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Wolfgang Waltenberger
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Alicia Wongel
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andre Lessa.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

ArXiv ePrint: 2112.00769

Rights and permissions

Open Access . This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Alguero, G., Heisig, J., Khosa, C.K. et al. Constraining new physics with SModelS version 2. J. High Energ. Phys. 2022, 68 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP08(2022)068

Download citation

  • Received: 09 December 2021

  • Accepted: 23 June 2022

  • Published: 04 August 2022

  • Version of record: 04 August 2022

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP08(2022)068

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Beyond Standard Model
  • Supersymmetric Standard Model

Advertisement

Search

Navigation

  • Find a journal
  • Publish with us
  • Track your research

Footer Navigation

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Books A-Z
  • Subjects A-Z

Publish with us

  • Journal finder
  • Publish your research
  • Language editing
  • Open access publishing

Products and services

  • Our products
  • Librarians
  • Societies
  • Partners and advertisers

Our brands

  • Springer
  • Nature Portfolio
  • BMC
  • Palgrave Macmillan
  • Apress
  • Discover

Corporate Navigation

  • Your US state privacy rights
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms and conditions
  • Privacy policy
  • Help and support
  • Legal notice
  • Cancel contracts here

Not affiliated

Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature