Abstract
As a model independent approach to search for the signals of new physics (NP) beyond the Standard Model (SM), the SM effective field theory (SMEFT) draws a lot of attention recently. The energy scale of a process is an important parameter in the study of an EFT such as the SMEFT. However, for the processes at a hadron collider with neutrinos in the final states, the energy scales are difficult to reconstruct. In this paper, we study the energy scale of anomalous γγ → W+W− scattering in the vector boson scattering (VBS) process pp → jjℓ+ℓ−ν\( \overline{\nu} \) at the large hadron collider (LHC) using artificial neural networks (ANNs). We find that the ANN is a powerful tool to reconstruct the energy scale of γγ → W+W− scattering. The factors affecting the effects of ANNs are also studied. In addition, we make an attempt to interpret the ANN and arrive at an approximate formula which has only five fitting parameters and works much better than the approximation derived from kinematic analysis. With the help of ANN approach, the unitarity bound is applied as a cut on the energy scale of γγ → W+W− scattering, which is found to has a significant suppressive effect on signal events. The sensitivity of the process pp → jjℓ+ℓ−ν\( \overline{\nu} \) to anomalous γγWW couplings and the expected constraints on the coefficients at current and possible future LHC are also studied.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
S. Weinberg, Baryon and Lepton Nonconserving Processes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 43 (1979) 1566 [INSPIRE].
B. Grzadkowski, M. Iskrzynski, M. Misiak and J. Rosiek, Dimension-Six Terms in the Standard Model Lagrangian, JHEP 10 (2010) 085 [arXiv:1008.4884] [INSPIRE].
S. Willenbrock and C. Zhang, Effective Field Theory Beyond the Standard Model, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 64 (2014) 83 [arXiv:1401.0470] [INSPIRE].
E. Masso, An Effective Guide to Beyond the Standard Model Physics, JHEP 10 (2014) 128 [arXiv:1406.6376] [INSPIRE].
R. Contino, A. Falkowski, F. Goertz, C. Grojean and F. Riva, On the Validity of the Effective Field Theory Approach to SM Precision Tests, JHEP 07 (2016) 144 [arXiv:1604.06444] [INSPIRE].
T.D. Lee and C.-N. Yang, Theoretical discussions on possible high-energy neutrino experiments, Phys. Rev. Lett. 4 (1960) 307 [INSPIRE].
M. Froissart, Asymptotic behavior and subtractions in the Mandelstam representation, Phys. Rev. 123 (1961) 1053 [INSPIRE].
G. Passarino, WW scattering and perturbative unitarity, Nucl. Phys. B 343 (1990) 31 [INSPIRE].
T. Corbett, O.J.P. Éboli and M.C. Gonzalez-Garcia, Unitarity Constraints on Dimension-Six Operators, Phys. Rev. D 91 (2015) 035014 [arXiv:1411.5026] [INSPIRE].
A. Alboteanu, W. Kilian and J. Reuter, Resonances and Unitarity in Weak Boson Scattering at the LHC, JHEP 11 (2008) 010 [arXiv:0806.4145] [INSPIRE].
Y.-C. Guo, Y.-Y. Wang, J.-C. Yang and C.-X. Yue, Constraints on anomalous quartic gauge couplings via Wγjj production at the LHC, Chin. Phys. C 44 (2020) 123105 [arXiv:2002.03326] [INSPIRE].
A. Falkowski, M. Gonzalez-Alonso, A. Greljo, D. Marzocca and M. Son, Anomalous Triple Gauge Couplings in the Effective Field Theory Approach at the LHC, JHEP 02 (2017) 115 [arXiv:1609.06312] [INSPIRE].
G. Chaudhary et al., EFT triangles in the same-sign WW scattering process at the HL-LHC and HE-LHC, Eur. Phys. J. C 80 (2020) 181 [arXiv:1906.10769] [INSPIRE].
A. Ballestrero, E. Maina and G. Pelliccioli, W boson polarization in vector boson scattering at the LHC, JHEP 03 (2018) 170 [arXiv:1710.09339] [INSPIRE].
CMS collaboration, Measurement of the Polarization of W Bosons with Large Transverse Momenta in W+Jets Events at the LHC, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 (2011) 021802 [arXiv:1104.3829] [INSPIRE].
ATLAS collaboration, Measurement of the polarisation of W bosons produced with large transverse momentum in pp collisions at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 7 TeV with the ATLAS experiment, Eur. Phys. J. C 72 (2012) 2001 [arXiv:1203.2165] [INSPIRE].
K. Doroba et al., The WLWL Scattering at the LHC: Improving the Selection Criteria, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 036011 [arXiv:1201.2768] [INSPIRE].
ATLAS collaboration, Measurement of the W boson polarisation in t\( \overline{t} \) events from pp collisions at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 8 TeV in the lepton + jets channel with ATLAS, Eur. Phys. J. C 77 (2017) 264 [Erratum ibid. 79 (2019) 19] [arXiv:1612.02577] [INSPIRE].
CMS collaboration, Measurement of the W boson helicity fractions in the decays of top quark pairs to lepton + jets final states produced in pp collisions at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 8TeV, Phys. Lett. B 762 (2016) 512 [arXiv:1605.09047] [INSPIRE].
M. Peruzzi, First measurement of vector boson polarization at LHC, Ph.D. thesis, Zurich, ETH (2011) CERN-THESIS-2011-088; CMS-TS-2011-039.
J. Searcy, L. Huang, M.-A. Pleier and J. Zhu, Determination of the WW polarization fractions in pp → W±W±jj using a deep machine learning technique, Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 094033 [arXiv:1510.01691] [INSPIRE].
J. Lee et al., Polarization fraction measurement in same-sign WW scattering using deep learning, Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) 033004 [arXiv:1812.07591] [INSPIRE].
J. Lee et al., Polarization fraction measurement in ZZ scattering using deep learning, Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 116010 [arXiv:1908.05196] [INSPIRE].
K. Lasocha, E. Richter-Was, D. Tracz, Z. Was and P. Winkowska, Machine learning classification: Case of Higgs boson CP state in H → ττ decay at the LHC, Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 113001 [arXiv:1812.08140] [INSPIRE].
L. Lönnblad, C. Peterson and T. Rognvaldsson, Using neural networks to identify jets, Nucl. Phys. B 349 (1991) 675 [INSPIRE].
V. Innocente, Y.F. Wang and Z.P. Zhang, Identification of tau decays using a neural network, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 323 (1992) 647 [INSPIRE].
B. Holdom and Q.-S. Yan, Searches for the t′ of a fourth family, Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 114031 [arXiv:1101.3844] [INSPIRE].
A. Radovic et al., Machine learning at the energy and intensity frontiers of particle physics, Nature 560 (2018) 41 [INSPIRE].
P. Baldi, P. Sadowski and D. Whiteson, Searching for Exotic Particles in High-Energy Physics with Deep Learning, Nature Commun. 5 (2014) 4308 [arXiv:1402.4735] [INSPIRE].
J. Ren, L. Wu, J.M. Yang and J. Zhao, Exploring supersymmetry with machine learning, Nucl. Phys. B 943 (2019) 114613 [arXiv:1708.06615] [INSPIRE].
M. Abdughani, J. Ren, L. Wu and J.M. Yang, Probing stop pair production at the LHC with graph neural networks, JHEP 08 (2019) 055 [arXiv:1807.09088] [INSPIRE].
R. Iten, T. Metger, H. Wilming, L. del Rio and R. Renner, Discovering physical concepts with neural networks, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124 (2020) 010508.
J. Ren, L. Wu and J.M. Yang, Unveiling CP property of top-Higgs coupling with graph neural networks at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B 802 (2020) 135198 [arXiv:1901.05627] [INSPIRE].
Y.-C. Guo, L. Jiang and J.-C. Yang, Detecting anomalous quartic gauge couplings using the isolation forest machine learning algorithm, Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021) 035021 [arXiv:2103.03151v2] [INSPIRE].
O.J.P. Eboli, M.C. Gonzalez-Garcia and J.K. Mizukoshi, pp → jje±μ±νν and jje±μ±νν at \( \mathcal{O} \)(\( {\alpha}_{\mathrm{em}}^6 \)) and \( \mathcal{O} \)(\( {\alpha}_{\mathrm{em}}^4{\alpha}_s^2 \)) for the study of the quartic electroweak gauge boson vertex at CERN LHC, Phys. Rev. D 74 (2006) 073005 [hep-ph/0606118] [INSPIRE].
O.J.P. Éboli and M.C. Gonzalez-Garcia, Classifying the bosonic quartic couplings, Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 093013 [arXiv:1604.03555] [INSPIRE].
M. Born and L. Infeld, Foundations of the new field theory, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A 144 (1934) 425.
J. Ellis and S.-F. Ge, Constraining Gluonic Quartic Gauge Coupling Operators with gg → γγ, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 (2018) 041801 [arXiv:1802.02416] [INSPIRE].
D. Espriu and F. Mescia, Unitarity and causality constraints in composite Higgs models, Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) 015035 [arXiv:1403.7386] [INSPIRE].
R.L. Delgado, A. Dobado, M.J. Herrero and J.J. Sanz-Cillero, One-loop γγ → \( {W}_L^{+} \) \( {W}_L^{-} \) and γγ → ZL ZL from the Electroweak Chiral Lagrangian with a light Higgs-like scalar, JHEP 07 (2014) 149 [arXiv:1404.2866] [INSPIRE].
S. Fichet and G. von Gersdorff, Anomalous gauge couplings from composite Higgs and warped extra dimensions, JHEP 03 (2014) 102 [arXiv:1311.6815] [INSPIRE].
T.D. Lee, A Theory of Spontaneous T Violation, Phys. Rev. D 8 (1973) 1226 [INSPIRE].
J.-C. Yang and M.-Z. Yang, Effect of the Charged Higgs Bosons in the Radiative Leptonic Decays of B− and D− Mesons, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 31 (2016) 1650012 [arXiv:1508.00314] [INSPIRE].
X.-G. He, G.C. Joshi, H. Lew and R.R. Volkas, Simplest Z-prime model, Phys. Rev. D 44 (1991) 2118 [INSPIRE].
J.-X. Hou and C.-X. Yue, The signatures of the new particles h2 and Zμτ at e-p colliders in the \( \mathrm{U}{(1)}_{L_{\mu }-{L}_{\tau }} \) model, Eur. Phys. J. C 79 (2019) 983 [arXiv:1905.00627] [INSPIRE].
K. Mimasu and V. Sanz, ALPs at Colliders, JHEP 06 (2015) 173 [arXiv:1409.4792] [INSPIRE].
C.-X. Yue, M.-Z. Liu and Y.-C. Guo, Searching for axionlike particles at future ep colliders, Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 015020 [arXiv:1904.10657] [INSPIRE].
C. Zhang and S.-Y. Zhou, Positivity bounds on vector boson scattering at the LHC, Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 095003 [arXiv:1808.00010] [INSPIRE].
Q. Bi, C. Zhang and S.-Y. Zhou, Positivity constraints on aQGC: carving out the physical parameter space, JHEP 06 (2019) 137 [arXiv:1902.08977] [INSPIRE].
C.F. Anders et al., Vector boson scattering: Recent experimental and theory developments, Rev. Phys. 3 (2018) 44 [arXiv:1801.04203] [INSPIRE].
J.-C. Yang, Y.-C. Guo, C.-X. Yue and Q. Fu, Constraints on anomalous quartic gauge couplings via Zγjj production at the LHC, Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021) 035015 [arXiv:2107.01123] [INSPIRE].
Y.-C. Guo, Y.-Y. Wang and J.-C. Yang, Constraints on anomalous quartic gauge couplings by γγ → W+W− scattering, Nucl. Phys. B 961 (2020) 115222 [arXiv:1912.10686] [INSPIRE].
S. Tizchang and S.M. Etesami, Pinning down the gauge boson couplings in WWγ production using forward proton tagging, JHEP 07 (2020) 191 [arXiv:2004.12203] [INSPIRE].
C. Zhang and S.-Y. Zhou, Convex Geometry Perspective on the (Standard Model) Effective Field Theory Space, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 (2020) 201601 [arXiv:2005.03047] [INSPIRE].
C. Degrande, A basis of dimension-eight operators for anomalous neutral triple gauge boson interactions, JHEP 02 (2014) 101 [arXiv:1308.6323] [INSPIRE].
J. Ellis, S.-F. Ge, H.-J. He and R.-Q. Xiao, Probing the scale of new physics in the ZZγ coupling at e+e− colliders, Chin. Phys. C 44 (2020) 063106 [arXiv:1902.06631] [INSPIRE].
J. Ellis, H.-J. He and R.-Q. Xiao, Probing new physics in dimension-8 neutral gauge couplings at e+e− colliders, Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 64 (2021) 221062 [arXiv:2008.04298] [INSPIRE].
A. Senol et al., Probing the Effects of Dimension-eight Operators Describing Anomalous Neutral Triple Gauge Boson Interactions at FCC-hh, Nucl. Phys. B 935 (2018) 365 [arXiv:1805.03475] [INSPIRE].
Q. Fu, J.-C. Yang, C.-X. Yue and Y.-C. Guo, The study of unitarity bounds on the neutral triple gauge couplings in the process e+e− → ℓ+ℓ−γ, arXiv:2102.03623 [INSPIRE].
G. Perez, M. Sekulla and D. Zeppenfeld, Anomalous quartic gauge couplings and unitarization for the vector boson scattering process pp → W+W+jjX → ℓ+νℓℓ+νℓjjX, Eur. Phys. J. C 78 (2018) 759 [arXiv:1807.02707] [INSPIRE].
C. Arzt, M.B. Einhorn and J. Wudka, Patterns of deviation from the standard model, Nucl. Phys. B 433 (1995) 41 [hep-ph/9405214] [INSPIRE].
B. Henning, X. Lu, T. Melia and H. Murayama, 2, 84, 30, 993, 560, 15456, 11962, 261485, . . .: Higher dimension operators in the SM EFT, JHEP 08 (2017) 016 [Erratum ibid. 09 (2019) 019] [arXiv:1512.03433] [INSPIRE].
D.R. Green, P. Meade and M.-A. Pleier, Multiboson interactions at the LHC, Rev. Mod. Phys. 89 (2017) 035008 [arXiv:1610.07572] [INSPIRE].
ATLAS collaboration, Evidence for Electroweak Production of W±W±jj in pp Collisions at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 8 TeV with the ATLAS Detector, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113 (2014) 141803 [arXiv:1405.6241] [INSPIRE].
ATLAS collaboration, Studies of Zγ production in association with a high-mass dijet system in pp collisions at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 8 TeV with the ATLAS detector, JHEP 07 (2017) 107 [arXiv:1705.01966] [INSPIRE].
CMS collaboration, Measurement of the cross section for electroweak production of Zγ in association with two jets and constraints on anomalous quartic gauge couplings in proton-proton collisions at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 8 TeV, Phys. Lett. B 770 (2017) 380 [arXiv:1702.03025] [INSPIRE].
CMS collaboration, Measurement of the cross section for electroweak production of a Z boson, a photon and two jets in proton-proton collisions at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV and constraints on anomalous quartic couplings, JHEP 06 (2020) 076 [arXiv:2002.09902] [INSPIRE].
CMS collaboration, Measurement of electroweak-induced production of Wγ with two jets in pp collisions at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 8 TeV and constraints on anomalous quartic gauge couplings, JHEP 06 (2017) 106 [arXiv:1612.09256] [INSPIRE].
CMS collaboration, Measurement of vector boson scattering and constraints on anomalous quartic couplings from events with four leptons and two jets in proton-proton collisions at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV, Phys. Lett. B 774 (2017) 682 [arXiv:1708.02812] [INSPIRE].
CMS collaboration, Measurement of differential cross sections for Z boson pair production in association with jets at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 8 and 13 TeV, Phys. Lett. B 789 (2019) 19 [arXiv:1806.11073] [INSPIRE].
ATLAS collaboration, Observation of electroweak W±Z boson pair production in association with two jets in pp collisions at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Lett. B 793 (2019) 469 [arXiv:1812.09740] [INSPIRE].
CMS collaboration, Measurement of electroweak WZ boson production and search for new physics in WZ + two jets events in pp collisions at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13TeV, Phys. Lett. B 795 (2019) 281 [arXiv:1901.04060] [INSPIRE].
CMS collaboration, Observation of electroweak production of same-sign W boson pairs in the two jet and two same-sign lepton final state in proton-proton collisions at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 (2018) 081801 [arXiv:1709.05822] [INSPIRE].
CMS collaboration, Search for anomalous electroweak production of vector boson pairs in association with two jets in proton-proton collisions at 13 TeV, Phys. Lett. B 798 (2019) 134985 [arXiv:1905.07445] [INSPIRE].
CMS collaboration, Observation of electroweak production of Wγ with two jets in proton-proton collisions at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV, Phys. Lett. B 811 (2020) 135988 [arXiv:2008.10521] [INSPIRE].
CMS collaboration, Measurements of production cross sections of WZ and same-sign WW boson pairs in association with two jets in proton-proton collisions at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV, Phys. Lett. B 809 (2020) 135710 [arXiv:2005.01173] [INSPIRE].
CMS collaboration, Evidence for electroweak production of four charged leptons and two jets in proton-proton collisions at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV, Phys. Lett. B 812 (2021) 135992 [arXiv:2008.07013] [INSPIRE].
CMS collaboration, Measurement of the electroweak production of Zγ and two jets in proton-proton collisions at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV and constraints on anomalous quartic gauge couplings, arXiv:2106.11082 [INSPIRE].
CMS collaboration, Evidence for exclusive γγ → W+W− production and constraints on anomalous quartic gauge couplings in pp collisions at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 7 and 8 TeV, JHEP 08 (2016) 119 [arXiv:1604.04464] [INSPIRE].
M. Rauch, Vector-Boson Fusion and Vector-Boson Scattering, arXiv:1610.08420 [INSPIRE].
J. Alwall et al., The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations, JHEP 07 (2014) 079 [arXiv:1405.0301] [INSPIRE].
N.D. Christensen and C. Duhr, FeynRules — Feynman rules made easy, Comput. Phys. Commun. 180 (2009) 1614 [arXiv:0806.4194] [INSPIRE].
T. Sjöstrand et al., An introduction to PYTHIA 8.2, Comput. Phys. Commun. 191 (2015) 159 [arXiv:1410.3012] [INSPIRE].
NNPDF collaboration, Parton distributions with QED corrections, Nucl. Phys. B 877 (2013) 290 [arXiv:1308.0598] [INSPIRE].
DELPHES 3 collaboration, DELPHES 3, A modular framework for fast simulation of a generic collider experiment, JHEP 02 (2014) 057 [arXiv:1307.6346] [INSPIRE].
Y. LeCun, Y. Bengio and G. Hinton, Deep learning, Nature 521 (2015) 436.
K. He, X. Zhang, S. Ren and J. Sun, Delving Deep into Rectifiers: Surpassing Human-Level Performance on ImageNet Classification, arXiv:1502.01852 [INSPIRE].
M. Abadi et al., TensorFlow: Large-Scale Machine Learning on Heterogeneous Distributed Systems, arXiv:1603.04467 [INSPIRE].
CMS collaboration, Measurement of the t\( \overline{t} \) production cross section using events with one lepton and at least one jet in pp collisions at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV, JHEP 09 (2017) 051 [arXiv:1701.06228] [INSPIRE].
ATLAS collaboration, ATLAS b-jet identification performance and efficiency measurement with t\( \overline{t} \) events in pp collisions at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV, Eur. Phys. J. C 79 (2019) 970 [arXiv:1907.05120] [INSPIRE].
J. Kalinowski, P. Kozów, S. Pokorski, J. Rosiek, M. Szleper and S. Tkaczyk, Same-sign WW scattering at the LHC: can we discover BSM effects before discovering new states?, Eur. Phys. J. C 78 (2018) 403 [arXiv:1802.02366] [INSPIRE].
W. Kilian, T. Ohl, J. Reuter and M. Sekulla, High-Energy Vector Boson Scattering after the Higgs Discovery, Phys. Rev. D 91 (2015) 096007 [arXiv:1408.6207] [INSPIRE].
R.L. Delgado, A. Dobado, M. Espada, F.J. Llanes-Estrada and I.L. Merino, Collider production of electroweak resonances from γγ states, JHEP 11 (2018) 010 [arXiv:1710.07548] [INSPIRE].
R.L. Delgado, A. Dobado and F.J. Llanes-Estrada, Coupling WW, ZZ unitarized amplitudes to γγ in the TeV region, Eur. Phys. J. C 77 (2017) 205 [arXiv:1609.06206] [INSPIRE].
C. Garcia-Garcia, M. Herrero and R.A. Morales, Unitarization effects in EFT predictions of WZ scattering at the LHC, Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 096003 [arXiv:1907.06668] [INSPIRE].
M. Jacob and G.C. Wick, On the General Theory of Collisions for Particles with Spin, Annals Phys. 7 (1959) 404 [INSPIRE].
J. Layssac, F.M. Renard and G.J. Gounaris, Unitarity constraints for transverse gauge bosons at LEP and supercolliders, Phys. Lett. B 332 (1994) 146 [hep-ph/9311370] [INSPIRE].
T. Corbett, O.J.P. Éboli and M.C. Gonzalez-Garcia, Unitarity Constraints on Dimension-six Operators II: Including Fermionic Operators, Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) 035006 [arXiv:1705.09294] [INSPIRE].
R. Gomez-Ambrosio, Vector Boson Scattering Studies in CMS: The pp → ZZjj Channel, Acta Phys. Polon. Supp. 11 (2018) 239 [arXiv:1807.09634] [INSPIRE].
E.d.S. Almeida, O.J.P. Éboli and M.C. Gonzalez-Garcia, Unitarity constraints on anomalous quartic couplings, Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 113003 [arXiv:2004.05174] [INSPIRE].
W. Kilian, S. Sun, Q.-S. Yan, X. Zhao and Z. Zhao, Multi-Higgs boson production and unitarity in vector-boson fusion at future hadron colliders, Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 076012 [arXiv:1808.05534] [INSPIRE].
W. Kilian, S. Sun, Q.-S. Yan, X. Zhao and Z. Zhao, Highly Boosted Higgs Bosons and Unitarity in Vector-Boson Fusion at Future Hadron Colliders, JHEP 05 (2021) 198 [arXiv:2101.12537] [INSPIRE].
D. Barducci et al., Interpreting top-quark LHC measurements in the standard-model effective field theory, arXiv:1802.07237 [INSPIRE].
D. Racco, A. Wulzer and F. Zwirner, Robust collider limits on heavy-mediator Dark Matter, JHEP 05 (2015) 009 [arXiv:1502.04701] [INSPIRE].
M. Szleper et al., EFT validity issues in Vector Boson Scattering processes, PoS LHCP2020 (2021) 023 [INSPIRE].
ATLAS collaboration, Search for high-mass dilepton resonances using 139 fb−1 of pp collision data collected at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Lett. B 796 (2019) 68 [arXiv:1903.06248] [INSPIRE].
D. Liu, C. Sun and J. Gao, Constraints on neutrino non-standard interactions from LHC data with large missing transverse momentum, JHEP 02 (2021) 033 [arXiv:2009.06668] [INSPIRE].
ATLAS and CMS collaborations, Electroweak measurements at High-Luminosity LHC, PoS LHCP2019 (2019) 242 [INSPIRE].
P. Kozów, L. Merlo, S. Pokorski and M. Szleper, Same-sign WW Scattering in the HEFT: Discoverability vs. EFT Validity, JHEP 07 (2019) 021 [arXiv:1905.03354] [INSPIRE].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
ArXiv ePrint: 2107.13624
Rights and permissions
Open Access . This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
About this article
Cite this article
Yang, JC., Chen, JH. & Guo, YC. Extract the energy scale of anomalous γγ → W+W− scattering in the vector boson scattering process using artificial neural networks. J. High Energ. Phys. 2021, 85 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP09(2021)085
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP09(2021)085