Abstract
In the context of the AdS/CFT correspondence, it is often convenient to regulate infinite quantities in asymptotically anti-de Sitter spacetimes by introducing a sharp cutoff at some finite, large value of a particular radial coordinate. This procedure is a priori coordinate dependent, and may not be well-motivated in full, covariant general relativity; however, the fact that physically meaningful quantities such as the entanglement entropy can be obtained by such a regulation procedure suggests some underlying covariance. In this paper, we provide a careful treatment of the radial cutoff procedure for computing holographic entanglement entropy in asymptotically anti-de Sitter spacetimes. We prove two results that are frequently assumed in the literature, but that have not been carefully addressed: (i) that the choice of a “globally minimal surface” among several extremal candidates is independent of the choice of regulator, and (ii) that finite CFT quantities such as the mutual information which involve “divergence-cancelling” sums of entanglement entropies are well-defined under the usual prescription for computing covariant holographic entanglement entropy. Our results imply that the “globally minimal surface” prescription for computing the holographic entanglement entropy is well-posed from the perspective of general relativity, and thus support the widely-held belief that this is the correct prescription for identifying the entanglement wedge of a boundary subregion in AdS/CFT. We also comment on the geometric source of state-dependent divergences in the holographic entanglement entropy, and identify precisely the regime of validity of the “vacuum subtraction” protocol for regulating infinite entanglement entropies in arbitrary states by comparing them to the entanglement entropies of identical regions in the vacuum. Our proofs make use of novel techniques for the covariant analysis of extremal surfaces, which are explained in detail and may find use more broadly in the study of holographic entanglement entropy.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
S. Ryu and T. Takayanagi, Aspects of Holographic Entanglement Entropy, JHEP08 (2006) 045 [hep-th/0605073] [INSPIRE].
V.E. Hubeny, M. Rangamani and T. Takayanagi, A covariant holographic entanglement entropy proposal, JHEP07 (2007) 062 [arXiv:0705.0016] [INSPIRE].
A. Lewkowycz and J. Maldacena, Generalized gravitational entropy, JHEP08 (2013) 090 [arXiv:1304.4926] [INSPIRE].
X. Dong, A. Lewkowycz and M. Rangamani, Deriving covariant holographic entanglement, JHEP11 (2016) 028 [arXiv:1607.07506] [INSPIRE].
X. Dong, D. Harlow and A.C. Wall, Reconstruction of Bulk Operators within the Entanglement Wedge in Gauge-Gravity Duality, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 (2016) 021601 [arXiv:1601.05416] [INSPIRE].
J. Cotler, P. Hayden, G. Penington, G. Salton, B. Swingle and M. Walter, Entanglement Wedge Reconstruction via Universal Recovery Channels, Phys. Rev.X 9 (2019) 031011 [arXiv:1704.05839] [INSPIRE].
G.T. Horowitz and R.C. Myers, The AdS/CFT correspondence and a new positive energy conjecture for general relativity, Phys. Rev.D 59 (1998) 026005 [hep-th/9808079] [INSPIRE].
D. Marolf and A.C. Wall, State-Dependent Divergences in the Entanglement Entropy, JHEP10 (2016) 109 [arXiv:1607.01246] [INSPIRE].
R.M. Wald, General Relativity. University of Chicago Press, (1984).
M. Anderson, Complete minimal varieties in hyperbolic space, Invent. Math69 (1982) 477.
M. Anderson, Complete minimal hypersurfaces in hyperbolic n-manifolds, Comment. Math. Helv.58 (1983) 264.
Y. Tonegawa, Existence and regularity of constant mean curvature hypersurfaces in hyperbolic space, Math. Z.221 (1996) 591.
A.C. Wall, Maximin Surfaces and the Strong Subadditivity of the Covariant Holographic Entanglement Entropy, Class. Quant. Grav.31 (2014) 225007 [arXiv:1211.3494] [INSPIRE].
D. Marolf, A.C. Wall and Z. Wang, Restricted Maximin surfaces and HRT in generic black hole spacetimes, JHEP05 (2019) 127 [arXiv:1901.03879] [INSPIRE].
C. Fefferman and C.R. Graham, Conformal invariants, in Élie Cartan et les mathématiques d’aujourd’hui, Lyon, (1984), pp. 95–116.
C.R. Graham and J.M. Lee, Einstein metrics with prescribed conformal infinity on the ball, Adv. Math.87 (1991) 186 [INSPIRE].
C.R. Graham and E. Witten, Conformal anomaly of submanifold observables in AdS/CFT correspondence, Nucl. Phys.B 546 (1999) 52 [hep-th/9901021] [INSPIRE].
C. Fefferman and C.R. Graham, The ambient metric, Ann. Math. Stud.178 (2011) 1 [arXiv:0710.0919] [INSPIRE].
M. Headrick, V.E. Hubeny, A. Lawrence and M. Rangamani, Causality & holographic entanglement entropy, JHEP12 (2014) 162 [arXiv:1408.6300] [INSPIRE].
D.D. Blanco, H. Casini, L.-Y. Hung and R.C. Myers, Relative Entropy and Holography, JHEP08 (2013) 060 [arXiv:1305.3182] [INSPIRE].
J.M. Maldacena, Wilson loops in large N field theories, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80 (1998) 4859 [hep-th/9803002] [INSPIRE].
V. Balasubramanian, B.D. Chowdhury, B. Czech and J. de Boer, Entwinement and the emergence of spacetime, JHEP01 (2015) 048 [arXiv:1406.5859] [INSPIRE].
R. Bousso, Z. Fisher, S. Leichenauer and A.C. Wall, Quantum focusing conjecture, Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 064044 [arXiv:1506.02669] [INSPIRE].
R. Bousso, Z. Fisher, J. Koeller, S. Leichenauer and A.C. Wall, Proof of the Quantum Null Energy Condition, Phys. Rev.D 93 (2016) 024017 [arXiv:1509.02542] [INSPIRE].
J. Koeller and S. Leichenauer, Holographic Proof of the Quantum Null Energy Condition, Phys. Rev.D 94 (2016) 024026 [arXiv:1512.06109] [INSPIRE].
C. Akers, J. Koeller, S. Leichenauer and A. Levine, Geometric Constraints from Subregion Duality Beyond the Classical Regime, arXiv:1610.08968 [INSPIRE].
S. Balakrishnan, T. Faulkner, Z.U. Khandker and H. Wang, A General Proof of the Quantum Null Energy Condition, JHEP09 (2019) 020 [arXiv:1706.09432] [INSPIRE].
C. Akers, V. Chandrasekaran, S. Leichenauer, A. Levine and A. Shahbazi Moghaddam, The Quantum Null Energy Condition, Entanglement Wedge Nesting and Quantum Focusing, arXiv:1706.04183 [INSPIRE].
F. Ceyhan and T. Faulkner, Recovering the QNEC from the ANEC, arXiv:1812.04683 [INSPIRE].
A. Ishibashi and R.M. Wald, Dynamics in nonglobally hyperbolic static space-times. 3. Anti-de Sitter space-time, Class. Quant. Grav.21 (2004) 2981 [hep-th/0402184] [INSPIRE].
A.J. Speranza, Geometrical tools for embedding fields, submanifolds and foliations, arXiv:1904.08012 [INSPIRE].
I. Bakhmatov, N.S. Deger, J. Gutowski, E. Ó Colgáin and H. Yavartanoo, Calibrated Entanglement Entropy, JHEP07 (2017) 117 [arXiv:1705.08319] [INSPIRE].
Open Access
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
ArXiv ePrint: 1908.02297
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.
The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.
To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Sorce, J. Holographic entanglement entropy is cutoff-covariant. J. High Energ. Phys. 2019, 15 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP10(2019)015
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP10(2019)015