Abstract
In this note, we consider how the bundle geometry of field space interplays with the covariant phase space methods so as to allow to write results of some generality on the presymplectic structure of invariant gauge theories coupled to matter. We obtain in particular the generic form of Noether charges associated with field-independent and field-dependent gauge parameters, as well as their Poisson bracket. We also provide the general field-dependent gauge transformations of the presymplectic potential and 2-form, which clearly highlights the problem posed by boundaries in generic situations. We then conduct a comparative analysis of two strategies recently considered to evade the boundary problem and associate a modified symplectic structure to a gauge theory over a bounded region: namely the use of edge modes on the one hand, and of variational connections on the other. To do so, we first try to give the clearest geometric account of both, showing in particular that edge modes are a special case of a differential geometric tool of gauge symmetry reduction known as the “dressing field method”. Applications to Yang-Mills theory and General Relativity reproduce or generalise several results of the recent literature.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
G. J. Zuckerman, Action principles and global geometry, Conf. Proc. C 8607214 (1986) 259 [INSPIRE].
C. Crnkovic and E. Witten, Three hundred years of gravitation, Cambridge University Press, Camrbidge U.K. (1987).
C. Crnkovic, Symplectic geometry of the covariant phase space, superstrings and superspace, Class. Quant. Grav. 5 (1988) 1557 [INSPIRE].
F. Gieres, Covariant canonical formulations of classical field theories, arXiv:2109.07330 [INSPIRE].
W. Donnelly and L. Freidel, Local subsystems in gauge theory and gravity, JHEP 09 (2016) 102 [arXiv:1601.04744] [INSPIRE].
H. Gomes and A. Riello, The observer’s ghost: notes on a field space connection, JHEP 05 (2017) 017 [arXiv:1608.08226] [INSPIRE].
H. Gomes and A. Riello, Unified geometric framework for boundary charges and particle dressings, Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 025013 [arXiv:1804.01919] [INSPIRE].
H. Gomes, F. Hopfmüller and A. Riello, A unified geometric framework for boundary charges and dressings: non-Abelian theory and matter, Nucl. Phys. B 941 (2019) 249 [arXiv:1808.02074] [INSPIRE].
H. Gomes and A. Riello, The quasilocal degrees of freedom of Yang-Mills theory, SciPost Phys. 10 (2021) 130 [arXiv:1910.04222] [INSPIRE].
H. Gomes, Gauging the boundary in field-space, Studies History Phil. Sci. B 67 (2019) 89.
H. Gomes, Holism as the empirical significance of symmetries, Eur. J. Phil. Sci. 11 (2021) 87 [arXiv:1910.05330] [INSPIRE].
A. Riello, Soft charges from the geometry of field space, JHEP 05 (2020) 125 [arXiv:1904.07410] [INSPIRE].
A. Riello, Symplectic reduction of Yang-Mills theory with boundaries: from superselection sectors to edge modes, and back, SciPost Phys. 10 (2021) 125 [arXiv:2010.15894] [INSPIRE].
M. Geiller, Edge modes and corner ambiguities in 3d Chern-Simons theory and gravity, Nucl. Phys. B 924 (2017) 312 [arXiv:1703.04748] [INSPIRE].
M. Geiller, Lorentz-diffeomorphism edge modes in 3d gravity, JHEP 02 (2018) 029 [arXiv:1712.05269] [INSPIRE].
A. J. Speranza, Local phase space and edge modes for diffeomorphism-invariant theories, JHEP 02 (2018) 021 [arXiv:1706.05061] [INSPIRE].
M. Geiller and P. Jai-akson, Extended actions, dynamics of edge modes, and entanglement entropy, JHEP 09 (2020) 134 [arXiv:1912.06025] [INSPIRE].
A. Balachandran, L. Chandar and E. Ercolessi, Edge states in gauge theories: Theory, interpretation and predictions, Int. J. Mod. Phys A 10 (1995) 1969.
A. P. Balachandran, L. Chandar and A. Momen, Edge states in gravity and black hole physics, Nucl. Phys. B 461 (1996) 581 [gr-qc/9412019] [INSPIRE].
M. Asorey, A. P. Balachandran and J. M. Pérez-Pardo, Edge states at phase boundaries and their stability, Rev. Math. Phys. 28 (2016) 1650020 .
H. Adami, M. M. Sheikh-Jabbari, V. Taghiloo, H. Yavartanoo and C. Zwikel, Symmetries at null boundaries: two and three dimensional gravity cases, JHEP 10 (2020) 107 [arXiv:2007.12759] [INSPIRE].
A. Seraj, Gravitational breathing memory and dual symmetries, JHEP 05 (2021) 283 [arXiv:2103.12185] [INSPIRE].
L. Freidel, M. Geiller and D. Pranzetti, Edge modes of gravity. Part I. Corner potentials and charges, JHEP 11 (2020) 026 [arXiv:2006.12527] [INSPIRE].
L. Freidel, M. Geiller and D. Pranzetti, Edge modes of gravity. Part II. Corner metric and Lorentz charges, JHEP 11 (2020) 027 [arXiv:2007.03563] [INSPIRE].
L. Freidel, M. Geiller and D. Pranzetti, Edge modes of gravity. Part III. Corner simplicity constraints, JHEP 01 (2021) 100 [arXiv:2007.12635] [INSPIRE].
M. Lavelle and D. McMullan, Constituent quarks from QCD, Phys. Rept. 279 (1997) 1.
E. Bagan, M. Lavelle and D. McMullan, Charges from dressed matter: construction, Ann. Phys. 282 (2000) 471.
E. De Paoli and S. Speziale, A gauge-invariant symplectic potential for tetrad general relativity, JHEP 07 (2018) 040 [arXiv:1804.09685] [INSPIRE].
R. Oliveri and S. Speziale, Boundary effects in general relativity with tetrad variables, Gen. Rel. Grav. 52 (2020) 83 [arXiv:1912.01016] [INSPIRE].
R. Oliveri and S. Speziale, A note on dual gravitational charges, JHEP 12 (2020) 079 [arXiv:2010.01111] [INSPIRE].
S. Murgueitio Ramírez and N. Teh, Abandoning Galileo’s ship: the quest for non-relational empirical significance, British J. Phys. Sci. (2020).
P. Mathieu, L. Murray, A. Schenkel and N. J. Teh, Homological perspective on edge modes in linear Yang-Mills and Chern-Simons theory, Lett. Math. Phys. 110 (2020) 1559.
J. François, Bundle geometry of the connection space, covariant Hamiltonian formalism, the problem of boundaries in gauge theories, and the dressing field method, JHEP 03 (2021) 225 [arXiv:2010.01597] [INSPIRE].
L. F. Abbott and S. Deser, Charge definition in nona-Belian gauge theories, Phys. Lett. B 116 (1982) 259 [INSPIRE].
L. F. Abbott and S. Deser, Stability of gravity with a cosmological constant, Nucl. Phys. B 195 (1982) 76 [INSPIRE].
G. Barnich and F. Brandt, Covariant theory of asymptotic symmetries, conservation laws and central charges, Nucl. Phys. B 633 (2002) 3 [hep-th/0111246] [INSPIRE].
A. Frölicher and A. Kriegl, Linear spaces and differentiation theory, Pure and Applied Mathematics, John Wiley & Sons, U.S.A. (1988).
A. Kriegl and P. P. Michor, The convenient setting of global analysis, Mathematical Surveys and Monographs volume 53, American Mathematical Society, U.S.A. (1997).
I. M. Singer, Some remarks on the Gribov ambiguity, Commun. Math. Phys. 60 (1978) 7 [INSPIRE].
I. M. Singer, The geometry of the orbit space for non-abelian gauge theories, Phys. Scripta 24 (1981) 817.
P. K. Mitter and C. M. Viallet, On the bundle of connections and the gauge orbit manifold in yang-mills theory, Commun. Math. Phys. 79 (1981) 457.
P. Cotta Ramusino and C. Reina, The action of the group of bundle-automorphisms on the space of connections and the geometry of gauge theories, J. Geom. Phys. 1 (1984) 121.
M. Abbati, R. Cirelli, A. Maniá and P. Michor, The Lie group of automorphisms of a principle bundle, J. Geom. Phys. 6 (1989) 215.
J. Fuchs, The singularity structure of the Yang-Mills configuration space, Banach Center Publ. 39 (1997) 287.
V. N. Gribov, Quantization of nonabelian gauge theories, Nucl. Phys. B 139 (1978) 1 [INSPIRE].
B. S. DeWitt, The global approach to quantum field theory, International series of monographs on physics, Oxford University Press, Oxford U.K. (2003).
J. François, Twisted gauge fields, arXiv:1907.08666 [INSPIRE].
R. A. Bertlmann, Anomalies in quantum field theory, International Series of Monographs on Physics volume 91, Oxford University Press, Oxford U.K. (1996).
M. Göckeler and T. Schücker, Differential geometry, gauge theory and gravity, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge U.K. (1987).
J. Mañes, R. Stora and B. Zumino, Algebraic study of chiral anomalies, Commun. Math. Phys. 102 (1985) 157 [INSPIRE].
J. Attard and S. Lazzarini, A note on Weyl invariance in gravity and the Wess–Zumino functional, Nucl. Phys. B 912 (2016) 289 [arXiv:1607.06326] [INSPIRE].
C. Fournel, J. François, S. Lazzarini and T. Masson, Gauge invariant composite fields out of connections, with examples, Int. J. Geom. Meth. Phys. 11 (2014) 1450016.
J. François, Reduction of gauge symmetries: a new geometrical approach, thesis, Aix-Marseille Université, Fracne (2014).
J. Attard, J. François, S. Lazzarini and T. Masson, The dressing field method of gauge symmetry reduction, a review with examples, arXiv:1702.02753 [INSPIRE].
J. François, Artificial versus substantial gauge symmetries: a criterion and an application to the electroweak model, Phil. Sci. 86 (2019) 472.
F. Hélein, Variational problems in differential geometry, London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series volume 394, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge U.K. (2012).
J. Lee and R. Wald, Local symmetries and constraints, J. Math. Phys. 31 (1990) 725.
A. Ashtekar, L. Bombelli and O. Reula, The covariant phase space of asymptotically flat gravitational fields, in Mechanics, analysis and geometry: 200 years after lagrange, M. Francaviglia ed., North-Holland Delta Series, Elsevier, Switzerland (1991).
G. Compère and A. Fiorucci, Advanced lectures on general relativity, arXiv:1801.07064 [INSPIRE].
D. Harlow and J.-Q. Wu, Covariant phase space with boundaries, JHEP 10 (2020) 146 [arXiv:1906.08616] [INSPIRE].
H. Farajollahi and H. Lückock, Dirac observables and the phase space of general relativity, Gen. Rel. Grav. 34 (2002) 1685 [gr-qc/0112051] [INSPIRE].
M. Castrillón López, J. Muñoz Masqué and E. Rosado María, Structure of gauge-invariant Lagrangians, Mediterr. J. Math. 17 (2019) 29.
U. Bruzzo, The global Utiyama theorem in Einstein-Cartan theory, J, Math. Phys. 28 (1987) 2074.
M. Forger and S. Viera Romero, Covariant Poisson brackets in geometric field theory, Commun. math. Phys. 256 (2005) 375.
L. Freidel, R. Oliveri, D. Pranzetti and S. Speziale, Extended corner symmetry, charge bracket and Einstein’s equations, JHEP 09 (2021) 083 [arXiv:2104.12881] [INSPIRE].
G. Barnich, F. Brandt and M. Henneaux, Local BRST cohomology in gauge theories, Phys. Rept. 338 (2000) 439 [hep-th/0002245] [INSPIRE].
R. W. Sharpe, Differential geometry: Cartan’s generalization of Klein’s Erlangen program, Graduate text in Mathematics volume 166, Springer, Germany (1996).
A. Cap and J. Slovak, Parabolic geometries i: background and general theory, Mathematical Surveys and Monographs volume 1, American Mathematical Society, U.S.A. (2009).
S. Carrozza and P. A. Hoehn, Edge modes as reference frames and boundary actions from post-selection, arXiv:2109.06184 [INSPIRE].
P. A. M. Dirac, Gauge-invariant formulation of quantum electrodynamics, Canad. J. Phys. 33 (1955) 650.
P. A. M. Dirac, The principles of quantum mechanics, th edition, Oxford University Press, Oxford, U.K. (1958).
J. B. Pitts, Empirical equivalence, artificial gauge freedom and a generalized Kretschmann objection, arXiv:0911.5400 [INSPIRE].
R. Jackiw and S.-Y. Pi, Fake conformal symmetry in conformal cosmological models, Phys. Rev. D 91 (2015) 067501 [arXiv:1407.8545] [INSPIRE].
P. Berghofer et al., Gauge symmetries, symmetry breaking, and gauge-invariant approaches, arXiv:2110.00616 [INSPIRE].
H. Lyre, Holism and structuralism in U (1) gauge theory, Studies History Phil. Mod. Phys. 35 (2004) 643.
A. Guay, A partial elucidation of the gauge principle, Studies History Phil. Sci. B 39 (2008) 346.
R. Healey, Gauging what’s real: the conceptual foundation of contemporary gauge theories, Oxford University Press, Oxford U.K. (2009).
J. Dougherty, Sameness and separability in gauge theories, Phil. Sci. 84 (2017) 1189.
J. Nguyen, N. J. Teh and L. Wells, Why surplus structure is not superfluous, British J. Phys. Sci. 71 (2020) 665.
A. Riello, Edge modes without edge modes, arXiv:2104.10182 [INSPIRE].
D. Wallace, Deflating the Aharonov-Bohm effect, arXiv:1407.5073 [INSPIRE].
T. Masson and J.-C. Wallet, A remark on the spontaneous symmetry breaking mechanism in the standard model, arXiv:1001.1176 [INSPIRE].
P. W. Higgs, Spontaneous symmetry breakdown without massless bosons, Phys. Rev. 145 (1966) 1156 [INSPIRE].
T. W. B. Kibble, Symmetry breaking in non-Abelian gauge theories, Phys. Rev. 155 (1967) 1554 [INSPIRE].
T. Banks and E. Rabinovici, Finite temperature behavior of the lattice abelian Higgs model, Nucl. Phys. B 160 (1979) 349 [INSPIRE].
J. Fröhlich, G. Morchio and F. Strocchi, Higgs phenomenon without symmetry breaking order parameter, Nucl. Phys. B 190 (1981) 553 [INSPIRE].
W. Buchmüller, Z. Fodor and A. Hebecker, Gauge invariant treatment of the electroweak phase transition, Phys. Lett. B 331 (1994) 131 [hep-ph/9403391] [INSPIRE].
M. Lavelle and D. McMullan, Observables and gauge fixing in spontaneously broken gauge theories, Phys. Lett. B 347 (1995) 89 [hep-th/9412145] [INSPIRE].
L. D. Faddeev, An alternative interpretation of the Weinberg-Salam model, in Progress in High Energy Physics and Nuclear Safety, V. Begun et al. eds., Springer, Germany (2009).
A. Ilderton, M. Lavelle and D. McMullan, Symmetry breaking, conformal geometry and gauge invariance, J. Phys. A 43 (2010) 312002 [arXiv:1002.1170] [INSPIRE].
A. Maas, Brout-Englert-Higgs physics: from foundations to phenomenology, Progr. Part. Nucl. Phys. 106 (2019) 132.
J. Earman, Curie’s principle and spontaneous symmetry breaking, Int. Studies Phil. Sci. 18 (2004) 173.
C. Smeenk, The elusive Higgs mechanism, Phil. Sci. 73 (2006) 487.
H. Lyre, Does the Higgs mechanism exists?, Int. Studies Phil. Sci. 22 (2008) 119.
W. Struyve, Gauge invariant accounts of the higgs mechanism, Studies History Phil. Sci. B 42 (2011) 226.
S. Friederich, Gauge symmetry breaking in gauge theories — In search of clarification, Eur. J. Phil. Sci. 3 (2013) 157.
S. Friederich, A philosophical look at the Higgs mechanism, J. Gen. Philos. Sci 45 (2014) 335.
D. Kastor, Komar integrals in higher (and lower) derivative gravity, Class. Quant. Grav. 25 (2008) 175007 [arXiv:0804.1832] [INSPIRE].
Y. Choquet-Bruhat, General relativity and the Einstein equations, Oxford Mathematical Monographs, Oxford University Press, Oxford U.K. (2009).
J. B. Pitts, The nontriviality of trivial general covariance: How electrons restrict time coordinates, spinors (almost) fit into tensor calculus, and 7/16 of a tetrad is surplus structure, Studies History Phil. Mod. Phys. 43 (2012) 1 [arXiv:1111.4586].
S. N. Curry and A. R. Gover, An introduction to conformal geometry and tractor calculus, with a view to applications in general relativity, in Asymptotic analysis in general relativity, T. Daudé et al. eds., London Mathematical Society, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge U.K. (2018).
G. Barnich and C. Troessaert, BMS charge algebra, JHEP 12 (2011) 105 [arXiv:1106.0213] [INSPIRE].
G. Compère, A. Fiorucci and R. Ruzziconi, The Λ-BMS4 charge algebra, JHEP 10 (2020) 205 [arXiv:2004.10769] [INSPIRE].
L. Freidel, R. Oliveri, D. Pranzetti and S. Speziale, The Weyl BMS group and Einstein’s equations, JHEP 07 (2021) 170 [arXiv:2104.05793] [INSPIRE].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
ArXiv ePrint: 2109.07159
Rights and permissions
Open Access . This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
About this article
Cite this article
François, J., Parrini, N. & Boulanger, N. Note on the bundle geometry of field space, variational connections, the dressing field method, & presymplectic structures of gauge theories over bounded regions. J. High Energ. Phys. 2021, 186 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP12(2021)186
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP12(2021)186