Abstract
Several manufacturing operations continue to be manual even in today’s highly automated industry because the complexity of such operations makes them heavily reliant on human skills, intellect and experience. This work aims to aid the automation of one such operation, the wheel loading operation on the trim and final moving assembly line in automotive production. It proposes a new method that uses multiple low-cost depth imaging sensors, commonly used in gaming, to acquire and digitise key shopfloor data associated with the operation, such as motion characteristics of the vehicle body on the moving conveyor line and the angular positions of alignment features of the parts to be assembled, in order to inform an intelligent automation solution. Experiments are conducted to test the performance of the proposed method across various assembly conditions, and the results are validated against an industry standard method using laser tracking. Some disadvantages of the method are discussed, and suggestions for improvements are suggested. The proposed method has the potential to be adopted to enable the automation of a wide range of moving assembly operations in multiple sectors of the manufacturing industry.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Michalos G, Makris S, Papakostas N, Mourtzis D, Chryssolouris G (2010) Automotive assembly technologies review: challenges and outlook for a flexible and adaptive approach. CIRP J Manuf Sci Technol 2(2):81–91
Gupta A, Arora S (2009) Industrial automation and robotics. Laxmi Publications, New Delhi
Choi S, Eakins W, Fuhlbrigge T (2010) “Trends and opportunities for robotic automation of trim & final assembly in the automotive industry”, IEEE conference on automation science and engineering (CASE), Toronto, Canada, 21–24 August 2010, pp 124–129
Cho C, Kang S, Kim M, Song J (2005) Macro-micro manipulation with visual tracking and its application to wheel assembly. Int J Control Autom Syst 3(3):461
Chen H, Eakins W, Wang J, Zhang G, Fuhlbrigge T (2009) “Robotic wheel loading process in automotive manufacturing automation”, IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems, (IROS), Taipei, Taiwan, 10–15 October 2009, pp 3814–3819
Reinhart G, Werner J (2007) Flexible automation for the assembly in motion. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 56(1):25–28
Schmitt R, Cai Y (2014) Single camera-based synchronisation within a concept of robotic assembly in motion. Assem Autom 34(2):160–168
Shi J, Menassa R (2010) “Flexible robotic assembly in dynamic environments”, Proceedings of the 10th performance metrics for intelligent systems workshop, ACM, Baltimore, USA, 28–30 September 2010, pp 271–276
Shi J (2008) “Preliminary analysis of conveyor dynamic motion for automation applications”, Proceedings of the 8th workshop on performance metrics for intelligent systems (PerMIS), ACM, Baltimore, USA, 19–21 August 2008, pp 156–161
Lange F, Werner J, Scharrer J, Hirzinger G (2010) “Assembling wheels to continuously conveyed car bodies using a standard industrial robot”, Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on robotics and automation (ICRA), Alaska, USA, 3–7 May 2010, pp 3863–3869
Prabhu VA, Tiwari A, Hutabarat W, Turner C (2014) Monitoring and digitising human-workpiece interactions during a manual manufacturing assembly operation using Kinect™. Key Eng Mater 572:609–612
Such M, Ward C, Hutabarat W, Tiwari A (2014) Intelligent composite layup by the application of low cost tracking and projection technologies. Procedia CIRP 25:122–131
Prabhu VA, Tiwari A, Hutabarat W, Thrower J, Turner C (2014) Dynamic alignment control using depth imagery for automated wheel assembly. Procedia CIRP 25:161–168
Turpen A, Demand for Toyota Vehicles (2012) retrieved on Mar 13, 2015, from http://www.torquenews.com/1080/these-top-3-toyota-models-may-become-hard-get-demand-outstrips-production
Chen H, Wang J, Zhang B, Zhang G, Fuhlbrigge T (2010) “Towards performance analysis of wheel loading process in automotive manufacturing”, IEEE conference on automation science and engineering (CASE), Toronto, Canada, 21–24 August 2010, pp 234–239
Dutta T (2012) Evaluation of the Kinect™ sensor for 3-D kinematic measurement in the workplace. Appl Ergon 43(4):645–649
Khoshelham K, Elberink SO (2012) Accuracy and resolution of kinect depth data for indoor mapping applications. Sensors 12(2):1437–1454
Maimone A, Fuchs H (2012) “Reducing interference between multiple structured light depth sensors using motion”, Proceedings of IEEE virtual reality short papers and posters (VRW), Washington, DC, USA, 4–8 March 2012, pp 51–54
Microsoft Corporation (2014) retrieved on Mar 13, 2015, from http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/kinectforwindows/meetkinect/features.aspx
Cruz L, Lucio D, Velho L (2012) “Kinect and rgbd images: challenges and applications”, Proceedings of the 25th IEEE conference on graphics, patterns and images (SIBGRAPI), Washington, DC, USA, 22–25 August 2012, pp 36–49
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Cite this article
Prabhu, V.A., Song, B., Thrower, J. et al. Digitisation of a moving assembly operation using multiple depth imaging sensors. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 85, 163–184 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-7883-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-7883-7