Abstract
We propose a methodology for local gravity field modelling from gravity data using spherical radial basis functions. The methodology comprises two steps: in step 1, gravity data (gravity anomalies and/or gravity disturbances) are used to estimate the disturbing potential using least-squares techniques. The latter is represented as a linear combination of spherical radial basis functions (SRBFs). A data-adaptive strategy is used to select the optimal number, location, and depths of the SRBFs using generalized cross validation. Variance component estimation is used to determine the optimal regularization parameter and to properly weight the different data sets. In the second step, the gravimetric height anomalies are combined with observed differences between global positioning system (GPS) ellipsoidal heights and normal heights. The data combination is written as the solution of a Cauchy boundary-value problem for the Laplace equation. This allows removal of the non-uniqueness of the problem of local gravity field modelling from terrestrial gravity data. At the same time, existing systematic distortions in the gravimetric and geometric height anomalies are also absorbed into the combination. The approach is used to compute a height reference surface for the Netherlands. The solution is compared with NLGEO2004, the official Dutch height reference surface, which has been computed using the same data but a Stokes-based approach with kernel modification and a geometric six-parameter “corrector surface” to fit the gravimetric solution to the GPS-levelling points. A direct comparison of both height reference surfaces shows an RMS difference of 0.6 cm; the maximum difference is 2.1 cm. A test at independent GPS-levelling control points, confirms that our solution is in no way inferior to NLGEO2004.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Barthelmes F (1986) Untersuchungen zur Approximation des äusseren Gravitationsfeldes der Erde durch Punktmassen mit optimierten Positionen. Veröffentlichungen des Zentralinstituts für Physik der Erde, Nr. 92, Potsdam
Barthelmes F (1988) Local gravity field approximation by point masses with optimized positions. In: Proc. 6th international symposium “Geodesy and Physics of the Earth”, Potsdam
Bjerhammar A (1976) A Dirac approach to physical geodesy. Zeitschrift für Vermessungswesen (ZfV) 101: 41–44
Blackman RB, Tukey JW (1958) The measurement of power spectra from the point of view of communication engineering—part II. Bell Syst Tech J485–569
Blaha G, Blessette RP, Hadgigeorge G (1986) Global point-mass adjustment of the oceanic geoid based on satellite altimetry. Mar Geodesy 10: 97–129
Bottoni GP, Barzaghi R (1993) Fast collocation. Bulletin Géodésique 67: 119–126
Chambodut A, Panet I, Mandea M, Diament M, Holschneider M, Jamet O (2005) Wavelet frames: an alternative to spherical harmonic representation of potential fields. Geophys J Int 163: 875–899
Crombaghs M, de Bruijne A (2004) NLGEO2004 - een nieuw geoïdemodel voor Nederland. Adviesdienst Geo-informatie en ICT, Report AGI-GAP-2004-25, Delft, 41 p
Eicker A, Mayer-Gürr T, Ilk KH (2004) Global gravity field solutions from GRACE SST data and regional refinements by GOCE SGG observations. In: Proceedings IAG international symposium gravity, geoid and space missions (GGSM2004), Porto, Portugal
Förste C, Flechtner F, Schmidt R, Meyer U, Stubenvoll R, Barthelmes F, König R, Neumayer KH, Rothacher M, Reigber Ch, Biancale R, Bruinsma S, Lemoine JM, Raimondo JC, (2005) A new high resolution global gravity field model derived from combination of GRACE and CHAMP mission and altimetry/gravimetry surface gravity data. Poster presented at EGU General Assembly 2005, Vienna
Förstner W (1979) Ein Verfahren zur Schätzung von Varianz- und Kovarianzkomponenten. Allgemeine Vermessungsnachrichten 86: 446–453
Fotopoulos G, Kotsakis C, Sideris MG (2003) How accurately can we determine orthometric height differences from GPS and geoid data. J Surv Eng 1: 1–10
Freeden W, Reuter R (1983) Spherical harmonic splines: theoretical and computational aspects. Meth u Verf d Math Phys 27: 79–103
Freeden W, Schreiner M, Franke R (1997) A Survey on spherical spline approximation. Surv Math Ind 7: 29–85
Freeden W, Gervens T, Schreiner M (1998) Constructive approximation on the sphere (with applications to geomathematics). Oxford Science Publication, Oxford University Press, New York
Golub GH, Heath M, Wahba G (1979) Generalized cross-validation as a method for choosing a good ridge parameter. Technometrics 21: 215–223
Hardy RL, Göpfert WM (1975) Least squares prediction of gravity anomalies, geoidal undulations, and deflections of the vertical with multiquadric harmonic functions. Geophys Res Lett 2: 423–426
Heck B, Grüninger W (1988) Modification of Stokes’ integral formula by combining two classical approaches. In: Proceedings IAG symposia, XIX IUGG general assembly, Vancouver/Canada, 10–22 August 1987, Paris 1988, Tome II, pp 319–337
Heck B, Seitz K (1993) Effects on non-linearity in the geodetic boundary value problem. Deutsche Geodätische Kommission, Reihe A, Heft Nr. 109, München
Heck B, Seitz K (2003) Solutions of the linearized geodetic boundary value problem for an ellipsoidal boundary to order e 3. J Geod 77: 182–192
Heikkinen M (1981) Solving the shape of the Earth by using digital density models. Finnish Geodetic Institute, Report 81:2, Helsinki
Holschneider M, Iglewska-Nowak I (2007) Poisson wavelets on the sphere. J Fourier Anal Appl 13: 405–419
Holschneider M, Chambodut A, Mandea M (2003) From global to regional analysis of the magnetic field on the sphere using wavelet frames. Phys Earth Planet Inter 135: 107–124
Klees R, Marchenko NK, Alberts B, Wittwer T (2005) Comparison of various methods for the inversion of airborne gravity data. In: Proceedings dynamic planet 2005, Cairns, Australia (CD-ROM)
Klees R, Wittwer T (2007a) A data-adaptive design of a spherical basis function network for gravity field modelling. In: Tregoning P, Rizos C(eds) Dynamic planet—monitoring and understanding a dynamic planet with geodetic and oceanographic tools, international association of geodesy symposia, vol 130. Springer, Berlin, pp 323–328
Klees R, Wittwer T (2007b) Local gravity field modelling with multipole wavelets. In: Tregoning P, Rizos C(eds) Dynamic planet—monitoring and understanding a dynamic planet with geodetic and oceanographic tools. In: International association of geodesy symposia, vol 130. Springer, Berlin, pp 303–308
Koch KR, Kusche J (2002) Regularization of geopotential determination from satellite data by variance components. J Geod 76: 259–268
Kotsakis C, Sideris MG (1999) On the adjustment of combined GPS-levelling/geoid networks. J Geod 73: 412–421
Krarup T (1969) A contribution to the mathematical foundation of physical geodesy. Report 44, Danish Geodetic Institute, Copenhagen
Kusche J (2003) A Monte-Carlo technique for weight estimation in satellite geodesy. J Geod 76: 641–652
Kusche J, Ilk KH, Rudolph S, Thalhammer M et al (1998) Application of spherical wavelets for regional gravity field recovery—a comparative study. In: Forsberg R(eds) Geodesy on the Move, IAG symposia, vol 119. Springer, Berlin, pp 213–218
Lelgemann D (1981) On numerical properties of interpolation with harmonic kernel functions. Manuscr Geod 6: 157–191
Lelgemann D, Marchenko AN (2001) On concepts for modelling the Earth’s gravity field. Deutsche Geodätische Kommission, Reihe A, Heft Nr. 117, München
Marchenko AN (1998) Parametrization of the Earth’s gravity field: point and line singularities. Lviv Astronomical and Geodetical Society, Lviv
Marchenko AN (2003) Regional gravity field model from satellite altimetry, gravimetry and GPS-levelling data in the Black Sea area. Bollettino Di Geodesia E Scienze Affini 1XII: 245–259
Marchenko AN, Barthelmes F, Meyer U, Schwintzer P (2001) Regional geoid determination: an application to airborne gravity data in the Skagerrak. Scientific Technical Report no. 01/07, GeoForschungsZentrum Potsdam, 50 pp
de Min E (1996) The geoïde voor Nederland. Nederlands Commissie voor Geodesie, Delft, 224 p
Panet I, Chambodut A, Diament M, Holschneider M, Jamet O (2006) New insights on intraplate volcanism in French Polynesia from wavelet analysis of GRACE, CHAMP, and sea surface data. J Geophys Res 111: B09403. doi:10.1029/2005JB004141
Prutkin I, Klees R (2007) The non-uniqueness of local quasi-geoids computed from terrestrial gravity anomalies. J Geod. doi:10.1007/s00190-007-0161-1
Reilly JP, Herbrechtsmeier EH (1978) A systematic approach to modelling the geopotential with point mass anomalies. J Geophys Res 83: 841–844
Sanso F, Tscherning CC (2003) Fast spherical collocation: theory and examples. J Geod 77: 101–112
Schmidt M, Fabert O, Shum CK, Han SC (2004) Gravity field determination using multiresolution techniques. Proceedings 2nd international GOCE User workshop, ESA-ESRIN, Frascati
Schmidt M, Kusche J, van Loon J, Shum CK, Han SC, Fabert O (2005) Multi-resolution representation of regional gravity data. In: Jekeli C, Bastos L, Fernandes J(eds) Gravity, geoid and space missions. Springer, Berlin, pp 167–172
Schmidt M, Fengler M, Mayer-Gürr T, Eicker A, Kusche J, Sanchez L, Han SC (2007) Regional gravity modelling in terms of spherical base functions. J Geod 81: 17–38
Sünkel H (1981) Point mass models and the anomalous gravitational field. Report 328, Department of Geodetic Sciences, Ohio State University, Columbus
Tenzer R, Klees R (2007) The choice of the spherical radial basis functions in local gravity field modelling. Studia Geophys Geod (in review)
Tscherning CC (1986) Functional methods for gravity field approximation. In: Sünkel H(eds) Mathematical and numerical techniques in physical geodesy, Lecture Notes in earth sciences, vol 7. Springer, Berlin, pp 3–47
Vermeer M (1982) The use of mass point models for describing the Finnish gravity field. Proc. 9th meeting of the Nordic Geodetic Commission, Gävle, Sweden
Vermeer M (1983) A new SEASAT altimetric geoid for the Baltic. Finnish Geodetic Institute, Report 83: 4, Helsinki
Vermeer M (1984) Geoid studies on Finland and the Baltic. Finnish Geodetic Institute, Report 84: 3, Helsinki
Vermeer M (1995) Mass point geopotential modelling using fast spectral techniques; historical overview, toolbox description, numerical experiment. Manuscr Geod 20: 362–378
Open Access
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution,and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
About this article
Cite this article
Klees, R., Tenzer, R., Prutkin, I. et al. A data-driven approach to local gravity field modelling using spherical radial basis functions. J Geod 82, 457–471 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-007-0196-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-007-0196-3