Abstract
The first objective of this paper is to show that some basic concepts used in global navigation satellite systems (GNSS) are similar to those introduced in Fourier synthesis for handling some phase calibration problems. In experimental astronomy, the latter are at the heart of what is called ‘phase closure imaging.’ In both cases, the analysis of the related structures appeals to the algebraic graph theory and the algebraic number theory. For example, the estimable functions of carrier-phase ambiguities, which were introduced in GNSS to correct some rank defects of the undifferenced equations, prove to be ‘closure-phase ambiguities:’ the so-called ‘closure-delay’ (CD) ambiguities. The notion of closure delay thus generalizes that of double difference (DD). The other estimable functional variables involved in the phase and code undifferenced equations are the receiver and satellite pseudo-clock biases. A related application, which corresponds to the second objective of this paper, concerns the definition of the clock information to be broadcasted to the network users for their precise point positioning (PPP). It is shown that this positioning can be achieved by simply having access to the satellite pseudo-clock biases. For simplicity, the study is restricted to relatively small networks. Concerning the phase for example, these biases then include five components: a frequency-dependent satellite-clock error, a tropospheric satellite delay, an ionospheric satellite delay, an initial satellite phase, and an integer satellite ambiguity. The form of the PPP equations to be solved by the network user is then similar to that of the traditional PPP equations. As soon as the CD ambiguities are fixed and validated, an operation which can be performed in real time via appropriate decorrelation techniques, estimates of these float biases can be immediately obtained. No other ambiguity is to be fixed. The satellite pseudo-clock biases can thus be obtained in real time. This is not the case for the satellite-clock biases. The third objective of this paper is to make the link between the CD approach and the GNSS methods based on the notion of double difference. In particular, it is shown that the information provided by a maximum set of independent DDs may not reach that of a complete set of CDs. The corresponding defect is analyzed. One of the main results of the corresponding analysis concerns the DD–CD relationship. In particular, it is shown that the DD ambiguities, once they have been fixed and validated, can be used as input data in the ‘undifferenced CD equations.’ The corresponding algebraic operations are described. The satellite pseudo-clock biases can therefore be also obtained via particular methods in which the notion of double differencing is involved.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Baarda HA (1973) S-transformations and criterion matrices. Publications in Geodesy 1. Netherlands Geodetic Commission, Delft. 5
Bertiger W, Desai SD, Haines B, Harvey N, Moore AW, Owen S, Weiss JP (2010) Single receiver phase ambiguity resolution with GPS data. J Geod 84: 327–337
Biggs N (1996) Algebraic graph theory, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Björck A (1996) Numerical methods for least-squares problems. SIAM
de Jonge PJ (1998) A processing strategy for the application of the GPS in networks. PhD dissertation 46. Netherlands Geodetic Commission, Delft
Dow JM, Neilan RE, Rizos C (2009) The International GNSS Service in a changing landscape of global navigation satellite systems. J Geod 83: 191–198
Ge M, Gendt G, Dick G, Zhang FP (2005) Improving carrier-phase ambiguity resolution in global GPS networks solutions. J Geod 79: 103–110
Ge M, Gendt G, Dick G, Zhang FP, Rothacher M (2006) A new data processing strategy for huge GNSS global networks. J Geod 80: 199–203
Ge M, Gendt G, Rothacher M, Shi C, Lui J (2008) Resolution of GPS carrier-phase ambiguities in precise point positioning (PPP) with daily observations. J Geod 82: 389–399
Lannes A (2005) A global analysis of the phase calibration operation. J Opt Soc Am A 22: 697–707
Lannes A, Gratton S (2008) QR implementation of GNSS centralized approaches. J GPS 7: 133–147
Lannes A, Gratton S (2009) GNSS networks in algebraic graph theory. J GPS 8: 53–75
Saalfeld A (1999) Generating basis sets of double differences. J Geod 73: 291–297
Teunissen PJG (1984) Generalized inverses, adjustment, the datum problem and S-transformations. In: Grafarend E, Sanso F (eds) Optimization of geodetic networks. Springer, Berlin, pp 11–55
Teunissen PJG (1995) The least-squares ambiguity decorrelation adjustment: a method for fast GPS integer ambiguity estimation. J Geod 70: 65–82
Teunissen PJG, Kleusberg A (1998) GPS for geodesy, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin
Verhagen S, Teunissen PJG (2006) New global satellite system ambiguity resolution methods compared to existing approaches. J Guid Control Dyn 29: 891–991
Zumberge JF, Heflin MB, Jefferson DC, Watkins MM, Webb FH (1997) Precise point positioning for the efficient and robust analysis of GPS data from large networks. J Geophys Res 102: 5005–5017
Acknowledgments
The second author is the recipient of an Australian Research Council Federation Fellowship (project number FF0883188). This support is gratefully acknowledged.
Open Access
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
About this article
Cite this article
Lannes, A., Teunissen, P.J.G. GNSS algebraic structures. J Geod 85, 273–290 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-010-0435-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-010-0435-x