Abstract
Exposure to cigarette smoke (CS) is a known risk factor in the pathogenesis of smoking-caused diseases, such as chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases (COPD) and lung cancer. To assess the effects of CS on the function and phenotype of airway epithelial cells, we developed a novel repeated treatment protocol and comprehensively evaluated the progression of key molecular, functional, and structural abnormalities induced by CS in a human in vitro air–liquid-interface (ALI) airway tissue model. Cultures were exposed to CS (diluted with 0.5 L/min, 1.0 L/min, and 4.0 L/min clean air) generated from smoking five 3R4F University of Kentucky reference cigarettes under the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) machine smoking regimen, every other day for 4 weeks (3 days per week, 40 min/day). By integrating the transcriptomics-based approach with the in vitro pathophysiological measurements, we demonstrated CS-mediated effects on oxidative stress, pro-inflammatory cytokines and matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), ciliary function, expression and secretion of mucins, and squamous cell differentiation that are highly consistent with abnormalities observed in airways of smokers. Enrichment analysis on the transcriptomic profiles of the ALI cultures revealed key molecular pathways, such as xenobiotic metabolism, oxidative stress, and inflammatory responses that were perturbed in response to CS exposure. These responses, in turn, may trigger aberrant tissue remodeling, eventually leading to the onset of respiratory diseases. Furthermore, changes of a panel of genes known to be disturbed in smokers with COPD were successfully reproduced in the ALI cultures exposed to CS. In summary, findings from this study suggest that such an integrative approach may be a useful tool for identifying genes and adverse cellular events caused by inhaled toxicants, like CS.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Cigarette smoke (CS) is a complex mixture of over 7000 chemicals (USDHHS 2014). Of these chemicals, 93 have been established by FDA as Harmful or Potentially Harmful Constituents (HPHCs) in tobacco products and tobacco smoke, being identified as carcinogens, respiratory toxicants, cardiovascular toxicants, reproductive or developmental toxicants, and addictive agents (FDA 2012). Cigarette smoking adversely affects nearly every tissue in the body, particularly the respiratory system, contributing to the initiation and progression of both malignant and nonmalignant lung diseases, such as lung cancer, asthma, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (USDHHS 2014). Smoking is considered one of the most common preventable causes of morbidity and mortality in the United States (CDC 2008).
Long-term CS exposure is the primary risk factor for developing the chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). It accounts for 85–90% of the incidence and approximately 80% of COPD-related death (Pauwels et al. 2001; USDHHS 2010; USDHHS 2014). The underlying pathogenesis of COPD is multifaceted. In general, it is characterized by irreversible obstruction of airflow associated with persistent airway inflammation, tissue destruction, and disturbance of mucin homeostasis (Laniado-Laborin 2009). The increased oxidant burden from CS induces oxidative stress, which, in turn, initiates inflammatory responses (Brody and Spira 2006). Reactive oxygen/nitrogen species released by the epithelial and immune cells result in further oxidative damage, leading to perpetual oxidative stress and chronic inflammatory reactions in the lung. These molecular initiating events eventually cause the modification of tissue structure and function that are characteristic of COPD (Kirkham and Barnes 2013).
Although extensive knowledge about CS health effects has been gained from decades of tobacco research, toxicity evaluation of CS remains challenging due to the complexity of tobacco products, variations in smoking behavior, and lack of testing standards (Brownawell 2007; St. Hilaire 2007). Given the limitations of animal models, there is a degree of uncertainty in using animal data for evaluating and predicting human responses (Bracken 2009). New alternative methods (NAMs), therefore, have been devised to address key challenges and facilitate evaluating the hazard posed by CS in humans. NAMs have proven invaluable in prioritizing further research and generating mechanistic insight to inform adverse outcome pathway analysis (Clippinger et al. 2018).
The epithelial lining of the airways interacts directly with inhaled substances. The airway lining functions as the first line of defense against inhaled toxicants and pathogens, not only by providing a physical barrier but also through mucociliary clearance mechanisms and immunological defense functions (Tam et al. 2011). Considering its critical role in responses to toxicant exposures, elucidating the cellular and tissue changes in airway epithelium could provide useful information on the toxicity and disease outcomes of inhaled toxicants.
Primary human bronchial epithelial cells can be differentiated into organotypic pseudo-stratified epithelium at the air–liquid interface (ALI). ALI airway models have a complex tissue structure that retains many of the cell types and tissue architecture found in airway epithelium in vivo. These unique properties, along with their ability to remain functional for months, provide a means for generating data in vitro using extended CS treatment regimens. Our laboratory has tested a variety of CS solutions and constituents to evaluate the suitability of human airway ALI models for toxicity assessments and, as a result of these studies, developed a panel of respiratory disease-relevant toxicity endpoints (Cao et al. 2017, 2018; Xiong et al. 2018, 2019). In these studies, we observed a general concordance of abnormalities induced by CS constituents and fractions, such as impaired cilia activity, dysfunction in mucin secretion, and aberrant tissue remodeling (e.g., squamous differentiation) between in vitro and in vivo responses.
In this study, we evaluated the pathophysiological responses, such as cilia beating, mucin homeostasis, epithelial integrity, and tissue morphology, modulated by CS in human airway ALI cultures. A novel repeated treatment regimen (40 min per day, 3 times per week, for a total of 4 weeks, illustrated in Fig. 1a) was employed to establish the association of subacute responses with the key events depicted in the proposed mode of action (MOA) of CS as well as to distinguish acute stress responses from adaptive/modified responses (Fig. 1b). Transcriptome analysis was integrated with the pathophysiological evaluations at several key timepoints to elucidate the molecular basis of the functional and structural changes induced by CS. Furthermore, the reversibility of the molecular and tissue responses was assessed to understand the persistence of the toxic responses.
Materials and methods
Human air–liquid-interface airway tissue models
Human ALI airway tissue models were established as described previously (Xiong et al. 2018). Normal human bronchial epithelial (NHBE) cells (MatTek, Ashland, MA) were expanded in PneumaCult™-Ex Medium (STEMCELL Technologies, Vancouver, Canada). Cells were seeded at a density of 4.0 × 104 cells onto 24-well Transwell® culture inserts and grown in the Expansion Medium until they reached 100% confluence. Medium from the apical side was then removed and cultures were fed from the basolateral side with PneumaCult™-ALI Maintenance Medium (STEMCELL Technologies) for 4 weeks.
Cigarette smoke generation
3R4F reference cigarettes (University of Kentucky, KY) were conditioned in an environmental chamber (Caron, Marietta, OH) for a minimum of 48 h according to ISO 3402:1999 (22 ± 1 ℃, relative humidity of 60 ± 2%). Whole CS was freshly generated using a Vitrocell® VC10 S-Type (VC10-S) Rotary Smoking Robot equipped with a 10-port smoke head and 2 independent syringe pumps (Waldkirch, Germany). Performance of the smoking robot was assessed by verifying the air velocity (200 ± 30 mm/s), system leakage, and puff volume (35.0 ± 0.3 mL) according to ISO 3308:2012 before each exposure. Whole CS was generated by smoking 5 3R4F reference cigarettes according to ISO 4387:2000 (35 mL per puff over 2 s every 60 s, to a defined number of 8 puffs per cigarette).
Whole smoke exposure
Whole CS was diluted to three concentrations by introducing dilution air (ultra-zero synthetic air, 85% nitrogen and 15% oxygen, nexAir, Memphis, TN) at 4.0, 1.0, and 0.5 L/min (hereafter referred to as the low, mid, and high CS concentration) using a Vitrocell® Dilution System. Diluted smoke then was drawn into a Vitrocell® 12/12 Exposure System by vacuum at a flow rate of 2.0 mL/min. Two Exposure Systems were connected linearly to increase the number of replicate cultures exposed to each concentration. A Quartz Crystal Microbalance (QCM) was connected at the end of each dilution line to record CS particle deposition every 2 s throughout the smoke exposure. ALI airway cultures were gently washed twice with DPBS before being placed into positions in the exposure modules that contained sufficient Maintenance Medium. The cultures were then exposed to diluted CS at the ALI for 40 min (5 cigarettes per exposure, 8 min per cigarette), 3 exposures every week on Monday, Wednesday, and Friday, for 4 consecutive weeks. After each exposure, ALI cultures were washed with DPBS from the basolateral side only and maintained in a new 24-well plate containing fresh Maintenance Medium (400 µL per well) until the next exposure. During the recovery phase, ALI cultures were washed from both the apical and basolateral sides every other day and maintained in Maintenance Medium (500 µL per well) for 20 days (Fig. 1a). Clean air-exposed cultures were included as concurrent vehicle controls.
Mass spectrometry analysis of nicotine concentration in the exposure medium
Nicotine quantification was adapted from a method described previously (Haswell et al. 2017) with modifications on sample preparation procedures. The medium collected at the end of each exposure was mixed with acetonitrile containing 50 ng/mL of the internal nicotine-d4 standard at a ratio of 1:4 (v/v), vortexed, and centrifuged at 22,000 × g for 5 min. Supernatant (2 µL) was injected onto a Waters ACQUITY UPLC System coupled with a Waters ACQUITY QDa Mass Detector (Milford, MA). Nicotine and nicotine-d4 were eluted on an ACQUITY UPLC HSS T3 column (2.1 mm × 50 mm, 1.8 μm) at 40˚C with mobile phases consisting of 10 mM ammonium acetate (A) and acetonitrile (B), both containing 0.1% formic acid, at a flow rate of 0.5 mL/min. Elution started with 7% Solvent B for 0.1 min, followed by a linear gradient of 7–40% Solvent B over 0.9 min, returning to 7% Solvent B in 0.2 min, and maintained at 7% Solvent B for 0.8 min to re-equilibrate the column. The eluate was analyzed using mass spectrometry with an electrospray ion source operating in the positive ion mode (ESI +) using single ion recording (SIR). The monitored (M + H)+ ions were m/z 163.05 for nicotine and m/z 167.10 for nicotine-d4. Nicotine was quantified using a calibration curve ranging from 0.78 to 1000 ng nicotine/mL with Waters Empower 3 software. Concentrations of nicotine were expressed as ng nicotine/mL exposure medium.
Lactate dehydrogenase activity assay
The cytotoxicity of CS was monitored 24 h after 1 (T1) and 12 intermittent exposures (T12), as well as after a 20-day recovery period (PT20) using a Lactate Dehydrogenase (LDH) Activity Assay kit (Roche, Indianapolis, IN). Basolateral media was collected at T1, T12, and PT20 and assayed for LDH release. Equal volumes of the basolateral medium and freshly prepared Reaction Mixture were mixed and allowed to react for 15 min at room temperature in the dark. Reactions were terminated by the Stop Solution. Absorbance at 490 nm was measured using a Synergy H4 microplate reader (BioTek, Winooski, VT).
Protein carbonyl ELISA
The intracellular level of protein carbonyls was measured immediately after CS exposure (acute) and at T1, T12, as well as PT20. Protein carbonyls were quantified using a Protein Carbonyl ELISA kit and by following the manufacturer’s instructions (CellBio Labs, San Diego, CA) as described previously (Xiong et al. 2018). Briefly, ELISA plates were coated with 100 µL standards or 1 µg cell lysate diluted in 100 µL Dulbecco’s phosphate-buffered saline (DPBS) at 4 ℃ overnight. Carbonyl groups were derivatized with an equal volume of 0.04 mg/mL 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine (DNPH) for 45 min at room temperature. Derivatized proteins were detected using an anti-DNP antibody and a HRP-conjugated secondary antibody, followed by color development using the kit-provided 3,3′,5,5′-Tetramethylbenzidine (TMB) substrate. The absorbance was measured at 450 nm using a BioTek Synergy H4 microplate reader. Reduced bovine serum albumin (BSA) standard was used as the background control.
Intracellular GSH and GSSG levels
Modulation of GSH homeostasis in pulmonary tissues is associated with the development and progression of inflammatory lung diseases, including COPD (Rahman and MacNee 1999). As an additional endpoint assessing CS-induced oxidative stress, the intracellular levels of GSH and GSSG were quantified at the same time points as those for protein carbonyl quantification (i.e., acute, T1, T12, and PT20) using a modified liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC–MS) method (Xiong et al. 2018).
Immunoblotting
Expression of key protein markers was measured at T1, T12, and PT20 using immunoblotting as described previously (Xiong et al. 2018). Briefly, proteins were denatured in a loading buffer containing 50 mM dithiothreitol (DTT), separated on a NuPage® Novex® 4–12% Bis–Tris gradient gel (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA), and transferred onto a nitrocellulose membrane (LI-COR, Lincoln, NE). Proteins were detected by incubating first with primary antibodies (rabbit anti-HMOX-1 antibody, Cell Signaling, Danvers, MA; mouse anti-acetylated α-tubulin, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO; mouse anti-CK6, Santa Cruz, Dallas, TX; or mouse anti-involucrin, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) and then IRDye-conjugated secondary antibodies (LI-COR). Images were taken using the LI-COR Odyssey® CLx Imaging System and densitometry performed using the LI-COR Image Studio software.
Bio-plex human cytokine and matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) assays
The proinflammatory properties of CS contribute to the initiation and progression of inflammatory respiratory diseases, including asthma and COPD (Strzelak et al. 2018). The inflammatory response triggered by CS has been correlated with MMP-mediated extracellular matrix remodeling in the lungs of smokers (Perlstein and Lee 2006). To assess these inflammatory responses to subacute exposures to CS, we quantified the secretion of select cytokines, chemokines, and MMPs into the basolateral medium at T12 and PT20. The Bio-plex Pro Human Cytokine 27-plex assay kit and a Human MMP 9-plex assay kit (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA) were used for quantifying the secretion of select cytokines and MMPs into the basolateral medium. Briefly, basolateral media were incubated first with fluorescent magnetic beads by shaking vigorously at 850 ± 50 rpm for 1 h at room temperature, followed by incubation with the Detection Antibodies. The protein-antibody conjugates were visualized with streptavidin-PE. Fluorescence of the beads was measured and quantified using a MAGPIX system (Luminex, Austin, TX).
Mucin ELISA
Maintaining mucin homeostasis is vital for respiratory health (Ridley and Thornton 2018). The effects of CS on the intracellular expression and secretion of 3 airway mucin proteins, i.e., MUC5AC, MUC5B, and club cell secretory protein (CCSP) were examined at T12 and PT20 using an ELISA method. Apical washes were collected into 200 µL DPBS. The disulfide bonds in the mucins were disrupted by adding DTT to a final concentration of 0.025 mM. Cell debris was removed by centrifugation at 600 × g for 10 min at 4 °C. Mucin samples (50 µL apical washes for mucin secretion analysis and 3 µg whole cell lysates for mucin expression analysis) were loaded onto a NUNC-Immuno® MaxiSorp™ ELISA plate (Thermo Fisher Scientific); the plate was dried in a 37 °C incubator overnight. Detection of the mucin proteins was conducted as described previously (Xiong et al. 2018).
Cilia beating frequency
Cilia beating frequency (CBF) in response to subacute CS exposure was measured at T12 and PT20. Cultures were equilibrated to 30 °C on a heated stage before measuring CBF. The beating of ciliated cells was captured using a high-speed camera (Ammons Engineering, Mount Morris, MI) affixed to a Leica DMI4000B microscope (Buffalo Grove, IL). Four fields devoid of mucus clumps were randomly selected and videotaped for each culture. CBF was analyzed using Sisson-Ammons Video Analysis (SAVA) software (Ammons Engineering).
Histology and immunohistochemistry
Morphological changes caused by subacute exposure to CS were assessed at T12 and PT20. Culture inserts were washed with DPBS and fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin for 48 h at 4 °C. The insert membranes then were excised from the plastic support, routinely processed, embedded in paraffin, sectioned to approx. 4–5-µm thickness, mounted on positively charged glass slides, deparaffinized with xylene, and rehydrated with ethanol solutions of decreasing concentrations. One set of the tissue sections was stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) using a Leica Autostainer (Buffalo Grove, IL), dehydrated in ethanol, cleared with xylene, and finally mounted with Permount™ Mounting Medium (Fisher Scientific, Pittsburg, PA).
Goblet cells were detected by staining a separate set of tissue sections for mucopolysaccharides with periodic acid-Schiff (PAS). Briefly, the slides were deparaffinized with xylene, rehydrated in ethanol solutions of decreasing concentration to distilled water, placed in 0.5% periodic acid for 5 min, rinsed in distilled water, stained with Schiff’s reagent for 30 min, and rinsed in running tap water for 10 min. The slides next were counterstained with Gill’s Hematoxylin III for 15 s, rinsed in 3 changes of distilled water, placed in Scott’s Bluing Reagent for 1 min, dipped 3 times in distilled water, dehydrated in ethanol, cleared with xylene, and mounted with Permount™ Mounting Medium. Goblet cell density was calculated by counting the PAS-positive cells over a 5-mm length in the center of the tissue section and expressed as PAS-positive cells per mm.
The effect of CS on cell turnover was evaluated on tissue sections immunohistochemically stained with anti-cleaved caspase-3, anti-p63, and anti-Ki-67 antibodies for identifying apoptotic bodies, basal cells, and proliferating cells, respectively, at T12 and PT20. Squamous differentiation was assessed using anti-involucrin antibody. Expression of involucrin is up-regulated in human airway epithelium that has undergone squamous differentiation, a common pathological lesion observed in habitual smokers (Rigden et al. 2016). The tissue sections mounted on slides were placed in an antigen retrieval solution (0.01 M citrate buffer, pH 6.0) for 15 min in a microwave oven set at 110 °C and 800 W. For detection of involucrin, the antigen was retrieved in 1 mg/mL trypsin for 5 min at 37 °C. Tissue sections then were incubated in 3% hydrogen peroxide for 10 min to inactivate the endogenous peroxidases. Nonspecific staining was blocked in 0.5% casein (for Ki67 and cleaved caspase-3 staining) or 10% rat serum (for p63 and involucrin staining) for 20 min. The primary antibodies (diluted 1:100 in DPBS) were applied to the sections and incubated in a moisturized chamber for 1 h at room temperature. Following a 5-min wash in DPBS, biotinylated goat anti-rabbit or rat anti-mouse secondary antibodies (diluted 1:200 in DPBS, Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, West Grove, PA) were applied to the tissue sections and incubated for 30 min at room temperature. The slides then were washed and the sections incubated in ExtrAvidin peroxidase (Sigma-Aldrich). Positively stained cells were visualized in 3′-diaminobenzidine (Sigma-Aldrich) for 5 min at room temperature. Sections were counter-stained with hematoxylin, dehydrated, cleared in xylene, and mounted with Permount™ Mounting Medium. The number of Ki67- or p63-positive nuclei as well as cleaved caspase-3-positive apoptotic bodies were counted over a 5-mm length in the center of the tissue section and expressed as Ki67-, p63-, or cleaved caspase 3-positive cells per mm. All counts were done under the light microscope (BX40, Olympus, Japan).
Trans-epithelial electrical resistance
Tissue permeability was assessed at T12 and PT20 by measuring changes in trans-epithelial electrical resistance (TEER) using an EVOM2 epithelial volt-ohmmeter and a chopstick electrode (World Precision Instruments, Sarasota, FL). Prior to the TEER measurement, ALI cultures were briefly washed twice with DPBS from the apical side to remove the excess mucus. Cultures were then equilibrated to room temperature in fresh Maintenance Medium (400 µL per well). DPBS (200 µL) was added to the apical chamber of the culture inserts. Measurements on each culture were made at 3 positions that were 120° apart and the average was used for data analysis.
RNA-Seq analysis
Aberrant tissue remodeling caused by CS exposure, such as squamous differentiation and metaplasia, is resulted from a multi-step process initiated by a cascade of molecular events, including responses to oxidative stress, induction of proinflammatory mediators as well as abnormal cell differentiation (Jetten 1989). Herein, a high-throughput RNA-Seq was used to analyze changes in the transcriptome profiles induced by CS at multiple time points. As changes in gene expression occur earlier than those in protein expression, samples were also collected 4 h after 1 (T1-4h) and 3 (T3-4h) exposures as well as 24 h after 3 exposures (T3), in addition to the T1, T12, and PT20 time points. Total RNA (1 μg), extracted using a RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen, Gaithersburg, MD), was sent to Novogene (Sacramento, CA) for RNA-Seq library preparation and sequencing. Reads in FASTQ files were first aligned to the human genome using the STAR aligner (v2.5). HTSeq (v0.6.1) was used to count the read numbers mapped for each gene. Differential expression analysis between the treatment and control groups (three biological replicates per group) was performed using the DESeq2 R package (2_1.6.3). The resulting p-values were adjusted using Benjamini–Hochberg approach for controlling False Discovery Rate (FDR). Genes with an adjusted p-value (padj) of less than 0.05 were considered differentially expressed. The cluster Profiler R package was then used to test the enrichment of differentially expressed genes into different pathways as defined by Gene Ontology (GO, www.geneontology.org), KEGG (http://www.kegg.jp/), and Human Disease Ontology (DO, http://www.disease-ontology.org). GO, KEGG, and DO terms with padj < 0.05 were considered significantly enriched by differentially expressed genes.
Statistical analysis
All experiments were conducted at least three times and the data (except the dosimetry data in Fig. 2) are presented as means ± standard error of the mean (SEM). Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism (La Jolla, CA). Unless otherwise indicated, p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant compared to the respective clean air-exposed control by one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s multiple comparison test.
Results
Smoke dosimetry assessment
To ensure the repeatability of CS generation, two methods were used concurrently with cell culture exposures to evaluate smoke dosimetry. First, particle deposition was recorded for each CS dilution using in-line QCMs (Fig. 2a). A linear increase in the deposition of smoke particles was observed. Deposited particle mass on the QCMs for the low, mid, and high CS concentrations were recorded as 0.681 ± 29.37% relative standard deviation (RSD), 3.478 ± 19.24%RSD, and 10.54 ± 8.11%RSD µg/cm2 for each 40-min exposure, which is equivalent to a particle mass of 0.14–2.11 µg/cm2 per 3R4F cigarette (particle mass/cigarette = average of QCM/5 cigarettes). Quantification of nicotine concentrations in the exposure medium was conducted for each CS dilution as an additional method to assess the repeatability of CS delivery (Fig. 2b). The nicotine concentration in the exposure medium collected from the low CS concentration group was below the detection limit of the analytical method. A proportional increase in nicotine concentration was observed at the mid and high CS concentrations. The nicotine concentrations (ng/mL) in the mid and high concentration groups are 65.8 ± 18.4%RSD and 210.1 ± 17.2%RSD, respectively. As can be inferred from the standard deviations of these measurements, both CS dosimetry evaluation conducted in parallel with cell exposures demonstrated consistent and repeatable generation and delivery of smoke aerosols throughout the study.
Cytotoxicity of CS
Minimal cytotoxicity was observed at all CS concentrations throughout the exposure and recovery phases (Fig. 3a). The percentage of apoptotic bodies (ABs) was less than 15% in all groups at both time points (Fig. 3b, T12 and PT20). Examination of the tissue sections, however, indicated that exposure to the high concentration of CS caused heterogeneous structural changes to the tissue sections (see below). In areas of the epithelium where cilia and goblet cells were absent or where squamous differentiation was present, ABs were also absent (Fig. 3b, T12). A 20-day recovery period partially restored the structure of the damaged tissues (Fig. 3b, PT20). Quantitative analysis of the immunohistochemically-stained sections revealed a consistent decrease in ABs in cultures exposed to the high concentration of CS (Fig. 3c, T12). After a 20-day recovery period, inhibition of AB formation in these cultures persisted, although to a lesser extent and the decrease was not statistically significant (Fig. 3c, PT20).
Induction of oxidative stress by CS
Induction of oxidative stress by CS exposure was assessed using three methods that probe different mechanisms, including protein oxidation (Dalle-Donne et al. 2003), GSH/GSSG redox balance (Jones 2002), and induction of heme oxygenase-1, HMOX-1 (Choi and Alam 1996). Formation of protein carbonyls was induced immediately following the first exposure (Fig. 4a, acute). Their levels returned to the baseline at T1 and T12 and throughout the recovery phase (Fig. 4a, T1, T12, and PT20). Given the temporary nature of protein oxidation induction, the formation of protein carbonyls was independent of the number of exposures.
Significant concentration-dependent decreases in the intracellular levels of GSH and GSSG were observed immediately following the first CS exposure (Fig. 4b, top and middle panels, acute). As the CS-mediated depletion of GSH occurred to a greater extent than the formation of GSSG, the ratio of GSH/GSSG also was decreased (Fig. 4b, bottom panel, acute). Both GSH and GSSG levels were markedly increased in a concentration-dependent manner 24 h after the first exposure (Fig. 4b, top and middle panels, T1). Furthermore, the level of GSSG in the high CS concentration group was significantly greater than that of GSH, resulting in a decrease in the GSH/GSSG ratio (Fig. 4b, bottom panel, T1). Following 12 CS exposures, the intracellular levels of GSH and GSSG remained elevated but were at comparable levels (Fig. 4b, top and middle panels, T12). The GSH/GSSG ratio, therefore, appeared not to be affected by CS exposure at this time point (Fig. 4b, bottom panel, T12). The levels of GSH and GSSG as well as the GSH/GSSG ratio returned to the baseline after a 20-day recovery (Fig. 4b, PT20).
Expression of HMOX-1 was increased in a concentration-dependent manner, with the high concentration of CS causing more than 16-fold increase in its expression (Fig. 4c, d, T1). Its levels remained elevated after 12 CS exposures (Fig. 4c, d, T12), but returned to baseline levels after a 20-day recovery (Fig. 4c, d, PT20).
Modulation of cytokine and MMP secretions by CS
Release of IL-1β, IL-1RA (interleukin-1 receptor antagonist), IL-6, IL-8, G-CSF, and RANTES (i.e., CCL5) was significantly increased 24 h after 12 exposures (Fig. 5a, T12). Among the cytokines stimulated by CS exposure, the secretion of IL-1β was increased approx. 6.5 folds at the high CS concentration and in a concentration-dependent manner. Secretion of IL-1RA, IL-8, and G-CSF also increased in a concentration-dependent manner, although to a lesser extent. Release of both IL-6 and RANTES was increased to approx. 1.6-fold in the high CS concentration group. On the contrary, secretion of two proinflammatory cytokines, IL-7 and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) were concentration-dependently inhibited by CS exposure, with MCP-1 being inhibited by as much as 90%. After a 20-day recovery, the secretion of all cytokines, except IL-6, returned to levels comparable to that of the clean air-exposed vehicle control (Fig. 5a, PT20). Unlike the stimulative effect on IL-6 secretion observed during the treatment phase, secretion of IL-6 was decreased at the end of the recovery by as much as 60%. Secretion of IL-7 remained decreased in the treated groups at PT20, although the inhibition was lessened.
In the current study, the release of 8 MMPs into the basolateral medium was evaluated at the T12 and PT20 sampling times. Secretion of all MMPs, except MMP-9 and -12, were inhibited after 12 intermittent exposures (Fig. 5b, T12). Among these MMPs, the release of MMP-10 and -13 was significantly inhibited by approximately 60% and 90%, respectively, in the high CS concentration group. Decreases in the secretions of other MMPs, including MMP-1, -2, -3, and -7, were less, with the extent of inhibition ranging from 30 to 50%. Secretion of MMP-9, on the other hand, was increased approx. 1.6-fold by the mid CS concentration. At the end of the recovery phase, secretion of MMP-1, -3, -7, and -13, returned to levels comparable to the clean air-exposed controls (Fig. 5b, PT20). The effects of CS on the release of MMP-10 (inhibitory) and MMP-12 (stimulatory) persisted after a 20-day recovery (Fig. 5b). In contrast to the inhibitory effect on MMP-2 release observed at T12, CS exposure increased MMP-2 secretion by approx. 1.3-fold, which persisted through the 20-day recovery. The release of MMP-12 was increased by approx. 1.7-fold by the mid CS concentration after a 20-day recovery, despite that no change was observed at the T12 sampling time.
Disturbance of mucin homeostasis by CS
Expression of mucin proteins, including MUC5AC, MUC5B, and CCSP, was down-regulated in a concentration-dependent manner after 12 exposures (Fig. 6a, T12) and returned to baseline levels at the PT20 sampling time (Fig. 6a, PT20). Secretion of mucins, on the other hand, was suppressed by CS exposures at both sampling times (Fig. 6b, T12 versus PT20).
In addition to its effects on mucins, loss of ciliated cells and goblet cells was observed in cultures exposed to the high concentration of CS (Fig. 6c, T12). The density of goblet cells was decreased by approx. 50% at the T12 sampling time (Fig. 6d, T12). Although goblet cell density in the CS-exposed cultures returned to a level comparable to that of the clean air-exposed control following a 20-day recovery (Fig. 6d, PT20), the structure of goblet cells was only partially restored. Histological examination indicated that goblet cells in the treated cultures appeared smaller compared to those in the clean air-exposed controls (Fig. 6c, PT20).
Impaired ciliary structures and functions by CS
Repeated exposure to the mid and high concentrations of CS resulted in a number of ciliary abnormalities at the T12 sampling time (Fig. 7a, T12). Cilia abnormalities consisted of decreased number of cilia, cilia of reduced length and/or absence of cilia in low cuboidal apical epithelial cells compared to the ciliated columnar epithelial cells of the vehicle controls. Areas with ciliary abnormalities coincided with areas that had cystic degeneration (one or more round to oval intraepithelial cystic spaces within the cultured bronchial epithelium that often compress adjacent epithelial cells), epithelial hyperplasia, epithelial atrophy, and/or squamous differentiation. The ciliary abnormalities caused by the mid concentration of CS were completely resolved after a 20-day recovery period. However, ciliary abnormalities persisted throughout the 20-day recovery in the high CS concentration group (Fig. 7b).
Consistent with the structural changes, CS inhibited CBF in a concentration-dependent manner after 12 repeated exposures. Cilia beating was abolished at T12, but was completely reversed after a 20-day recovery in the high CS concentration group (Fig. 7c, T12 and PT20). Examination of the expression of a ciliary structural protein, acetylated α-tubulin, revealed a similar pattern, with its expression being down-regulated after 12 repeated exposures (T12) and partially restored, but still significantly reduced relative to the clean air-exposed control, at PT20 (Fig. 7d, e).
Induction of squamous differentiation and related changes produced by CS
Repeated exposures to CS significantly increased the staining intensity for involucrin, particularly in cells with squamoid appearance (Fig. 8a, T12). Areas with squamous differentiation consisted of aggregates of polygonal- or squamous-shaped cells. A 20-day recovery partially reversed the squamous differentiation that was observed in the medium CS concentration group at the T12 sampling time (Fig. 8a, PT20). Involucrin-positive cells were still evident in cultures exposed to the high concentration of CS at the end of the recovery, suggesting that the morphological changes in this group were only partially reversed.
Consistent with the histopathological observations on squamous differentiation, the expression of both involucrin and CK6 was upregulated in a concentration-dependent manner by CS exposures (Fig. 8b, c, T12). Their expression remained elevated after a 20-day recovery, although to a lesser extent, compared to the levels measured at T12 (Fig. 8b, c, PT20), indicating partial recovery from induction of squamous differentiation after a 20-day recovery period.
A positive correlation between the extent of squamous differentiation and epithelial barrier integrity was suggested by concentration-dependent increases in TEER values following CS exposure (Fig. 8d, T12 and PT20). In addition, a reversible decrease in the number of p63-positive basal cells was observed in CS-exposed cultures (Figure S1A, T12 and PT20). The number of Ki67-positive cells, however, remained unchanged at the T12 and PT20 sampling times (Figure S1B, T12 and PT20).
Key molecular abnormalities induced by CS
To correlate the CS-modulated biochemical and phenotypic changes to relevant molecular pathways, we performed high-throughput RNA-Seq to analyze changes in the transcriptome profiles in response to CS exposure of the ALI airway models and identified key genes involved in the proposed MOA for CS toxicity (Fig. 1b).
Significant numbers of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified after 12 repeated exposures, with more genes being up-regulated than down-regulated by CS (Table 1, T12). Although the expression of most DEGs identified in the low and mid CS concentration groups returned to the baseline after a 20-day recovery, 434 genes remained differentially expressed in the high concentration group after a 20-day recovery (Table 1, PT20). Temporal transcriptome profiling revealed a total of 10,198 DEGs in the high concentration group 4 h after the first exposure (T1-4h) (Tables S1 and S2). As the number of treatments increased, the number of DEGs was found to decrease. The expression of most of the DEGs identified during the period of CS exposure (up to T12) returned to levels that were similar to the clean air control following the recovery at PT20.
The top 20 molecular pathways (padj < 0.05) upregulated by CS exposure were identified by KEGG enrichment analysis (Figure S2). Genes involved in metabolic pathways were profoundly perturbed by both the acute and repeated CS exposures. Consistent with this observation, the expression of key transcriptional regulators of xenobiotic enzymes, such as peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors PPARα (PPARA/NR1C1) and aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR), was increased as a result of the first 3 exposures (Fig. 9a, T1-4h–T3). Upregulation of PPARβ/δ (PPARD/NR1C2) and PPARγ (PPARG/NR1C3) expression, however, required a greater number of exposures and was observed only at T12 (Fig. 9a, T12). CS transiently inhibited the expression of pregnane X receptor (NR1/2) 4 h after 1 or 3 exposures (Fig. 9a, T1-4h and T3-4h). Expression of these transcriptional regulators returned to the baseline level at the end of the 20-day recovery (Fig. 9a, PT20).
Differential expression of key genes involved in the proinflammatory and MMP pathways also were identified by RNA-Seq analysis. Consistent with the effects of CS on cytokine and MMP secretion (Fig. 5), the expression of IL1RN was upregulated by CS throughout the treatment and recovery phases (Fig. 9b). Furthermore, CS induced the expression of IL-1β and IL-8, while inhibited the expression of VEGFA, IL-6, IL-7, IL-12A, and RANTES (i.e., CCL5) after 12 repeated exposures (Fig. 9b, T12). The expression of these genes returned to the levels comparable to that of the control cultures following the recovery (Fig. 9b, PT20). The effects of CS on most MMP genes, however, persisted through the 20-day recovery period. In particular, the expression of MMP-9 and -13 was gradually modulated with an increasing number of CS exposures and culminated after 12 exposures (Fig. 9b). CS persistently upregulated the expression of MMP-1 and MMP-9 and downregulated the expression of MMP-10 and -13 throughout the treatment phase. Expression of all MMPs, except MMP-3 and -10, remained significantly elevated at the end of the recovery (Fig. 9b, PT20).
A list of airway epithelial cell markers was identified from the literature (Choksi et al. 2014; Montoro et al. 2018; Plasschaert et al. 2018; Rock et al. 2010). Repeated CS exposure induced significant changes in the gene expression of markers for 3 major epithelial cell types, including secretory and goblet cells, ciliated cells, and basal cells. The expression of secretory and goblet cell markers, including SCGB1A1, MUC5AC, and MUC5B, was downregulated, while the expression of squamous cell markers, such as KRT6A, KRT13, and IVL, remained increased after 12 repeated CS exposures (Fig. 9c, T12). KRT5 and KRT14 expression was also induced at T12 (Fig. 9c, T12), indicating that a subset of the basal cells may have differentiated into squamous cells as previously reported (Montoro et al. 2018). Ciliated cell markers, including FoxJ1, TUBA1A, DNAI1, and CETN2, were all differentially expressed throughout the treatment and recovery phases (Fig. 9c), correlating well with the effects of CS on ciliary structure and function (Fig. 7). Consistently, downregulation of cilia biogenesis pathways was identified by GO enrichment analysis (Figure S3). Transient modulation was observed for the expression of ionocyte and pulmonary neuroendocrine cell (PNEC) markers, such as ASCL3, ASCL1, ASCL2, and HGA. Expression of these genes was affected only by the acute, but not the repeated CS exposures (Fig. 9c). Furthermore, the expression of CFTR was found to be persistently downregulated at both the T12 and PT20 sampling times, indicating the possible irreversible effects of CS on the functions of ion channels.
Modulation of COPD-associated genes by CS
The molecular and structural abnormalities induced by CS in ALI airway cultures, including oxidative stress, altered secretion of cytokines and MMPs, and squamous differentiation, exhibit striking similarities to the key events involved in the pathogenesis of COPD (Agustí and Hogg 2019; Kirkham and Barnes 2013; Puchelle et al. 2006). We, therefore, compiled a comprehensive list of 146 genes associated with COPD from the literature (Agustí et al. 2019; Demeo et al. 2006; Ezzie et al. 2012; Gohy et al. 2015; Ning et al. 2004; Smolonska et al. 2009; Llinas et al. 2011; Morrow et al. 2019; Pierrou et al. 2007; Wadhwa et al. 2019; Steiling et al. 2009; Siafakas and Tzortzaki 2002; Sidhaye et al. 2019; Silverman 2006) and examined the pattern of their expression in response to CS exposure in the ALI cultures (Table S3).
A total of 82 COPD-associated genes were differentially expressed in CS-exposed cultures after 12 exposures; expression of 15 genes remained differentially expressed at the end of the recovery (Fig. 10a). Clustering analysis identified clusters for a total of 116 COPD-associated genes at all time points assessed in this study (Fig. 10b, for details see Table S3). Genes involved in oxidative stress (n = 25), i.e., AHRR, APOD, ALDH1A3, AKR1C1, AKR1C2, AKR1C3, AKR1B1, AKR1B10, CYP1A1, CYP1B1, CYP4F3, DUOX2, GPX2, GPX3, G6PD, GCLC, GCLM, GSTM3, HMOX1, MGST1, NQO1, PRDX1, TALDO1, TXN, and TXNRD1, were significantly upregulated throughout the treatment phase (highlighted in red in Fig. 10b). Persistent downregulation of the growth factor/receptor genes, i.e., RARB, CTGF, EGR1, and VIM, and upregulation of inflammatory genes, i.e., IL1B, IL1RN, IL-8, and CX3CL1, was observed after 12 repeated exposures (highlighted in blue and red, respectively, in Fig. 10b).
CS-induced changes also included the upregulation of MMP genes (i.e., MMP1 and MMP14) as well as genes involved in airway remodeling (i.e., KRT4, CLDN10, FN1, TJP1, TGFB1, and TGFB2). It is noteworthy that the expression of SERPINA1, the deficiency and mutation of which is highly associated with the development of COPD (Brode et al. 2012; Silverman 2006; Wadhwa et al. 2019), was persistently downregulated by CS throughout the treatment and recovery phases.
Discussion
It is anticipated that modern toxicological assessments will benefit from the development of MOA-based in vitro alternatives for safety assessment (Clippinger et al. 2018). In this study, we integrated transcriptome analysis with pathophysiological measurements and conducted a comprehensive evaluation of the toxicity responses produced by whole CS in an in vitro human ALI airway tissue model. A repeated exposure regimen was employed to examine subacute responses to CS exposure. Our findings demonstrate that CS induces a series of structural, functional, and molecular alterations in these cultures, including oxidative stress, release of proinflammatory cytokines and MMPs, impaired ciliary functionality, dysregulated expression and secretion of mucins, and squamous differentiation, that are highly consistent with the abnormalities observed in airways of smokers (Bernard et al. 1992; Herfs et al. 2012; Kirkham and Barnes 2013; Leopold et al. 2009). RNA-seq analysis further revealed a panel of DEGs that are associated with the key events in the MOA of CS toxicity. In particular, repeated CS exposures profoundly modulated the expression of genes involved in the pathogenesis of COPD, suggesting their potential as biomarkers of harm for monitoring the adverse health effects caused by CS.
Smokers are exposed to high concentrations of free radicals, reactive oxidants, and heavy metals (e.g., cadmium is known to induce oxidative stress via replacing redox-active metals, such as Fe, or inactivating antioxidant enzymes by binding to cysteine residues) (Counts et al. 2005; FDA 2012; Pappas et al. 2014; Eiserich et al. 2005; Morrow et al. 1995; Reznick et al. 1992; Nagai et al. 2006; Barreiro et al. 2013), resulting in direct or indirect oxidation of biomolecules and disturbance of the redox balance in the airways, blood, and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid. CS-mediated oxidative stress is believed to be the key molecular initiating event underlying the pathogenesis of smoking-associated respiratory diseases, such as COPD and lung cancer (Boukhenouna et al. 2018; Gould et al. 2011). Our data demonstrated an immediate, but transient, induction of protein carbonyl formation in the ALI cultures following the first exposure. The lack of accumulation of protein carbonyls after repeated CS exposures indicates either efficient degradation by proteasomes or decomposition via retro-Michael addition of oxidized proteins (Davies 2001; Dalle-Donne et al. 2017). Disruption of glutathione homeostasis, on the other hand, exhibited temporal responses. A rapid depletion of GSH, which resulted in a concurrent decrease in GSSG formation, was observed immediately after the first exposure to CS. Following a 24-h recovery, GSH adaptive responses, such as upregulation of the rate-limiting enzymes involved in de novo GSH synthesis, may have been initiated, resulting in significant increases in both GSH and GSSG levels (Cantin 2010). By the end of the twelfth exposure, the GSH redox balance appeared to reach a new steady state, as the GSH/GSSG ratio was no longer unaffected by CS. However, the expression of HMOX-1 remained elevated at this timepoint, indicating that oxidative stress persisted throughout the CS treatment phase.
It has been reported that disruption of the redox balance by CS leads to the production of proinflammatory cytokines, i.e., IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, and TNFα in smokers, regulation of which is closely associated with the progression of respiratory diseases, such as COPD (Zuo et al. 2014; Strzelak et al. 2018). Increased secretion of these cytokines is associated with tracheobronchial squamous metaplasia in smokers (Barnes 2004). Consistent with observations reported in smokers, the gene expression and secretion of proinflammatory cytokines (e.g., IL-1β, IL-6, and IL-8) as well as squamous differentiation were both induced in CS-exposed ALI cultures after 12 repeated exposures. Repeated CS exposure also resulted in the release of elevated amounts of G-CSF and RANTES, both of which are implicated in neutrophilic inflammatory responses and the exacerbation of neutrophilic asthma (Kim et al. 2019; Pan et al. 2000). Although higher levels of MCP-1 are reported in the bronchiolar epithelium of subjects with COPD (de Boer et al. 2000), we observed a decrease in MCP-1 secretion. Such a departure from the in vivo findings suggest limitations of this in vitro model that may be due to either the lack of other cell types, such as fibroblasts and immune cells, or an insufficient treatment duration for the cultures to acquire the full-spectrum of the phenotypes characteristic of COPD. Although airway ALI model co-cultures containing fibroblasts and immune cells are available, the addition of other cell types, such as macrophages, may introduce more variations, their suitability for toxicity testing, therefore, remains to be evaluated.
In addition to cytokines, MMPs also are involved in the recruitment of immune cells and in airway remodeling in smokers with COPD (Puchelle et al. 2006; Bergeron et al. 2009). Secretion of all the MMPs examined in this study, except MMP-9 and MMP-12, was downregulated at the end of the subacute exposure. Their secretion either returned to the baseline levels (i.e., MMP-1, -3, -7, and -13) or rather increased at the end of the recovery phase (i.e., MMP-2, -9, and -12). Compared to its effects on cytokine and chemokine secretion, CS persistently modulates MMP secretion, suggesting their longer-term, direct involvement in airway remodeling of the ALI cultures. Indeed, CS-induced increases in several MMPs, predominantly MMP-1, -2, -9 and -12, have been associated with the development and exacerbation of COPD (Barnes 2004; Churg et al. 2012).
Ciliated cells are an integral component of the mucociliary clearance apparatus that facilitates the effective removal of the endogenous mucus as well as inhaled substances (Tilley et al. 2015). Several lung diseases, including COPD and lung cancer, are characterized by abnormalities in mucociliary clearance associated with disruption of ciliary structure and function (Yaghi et al. 2012; Yaghi and Dolovich 2016). Shorter or missing cilia, compound cilia, or reduced beating frequencies are observed in smokers and likely contribute to the pathogenesis of smoking-associated lung diseases (Leopold et al. 2009; Tilley et al. 2015). Herein, we demonstrated reversible decreases in CBF by repeated CS exposure of ALI cultures. We observed not only reductions in the number and length of cilia in CS-exposed cultures but also the loss of ciliated cells in areas of the cultures undergoing epithelial remodeling. These observations were consistent with the downregulation of acetylated α-tubulin protein expression. Transcriptome profiling provided evidence for the inhibition of additional ciliary proteins by as little as one CS exposure, suggesting the potential use of these early markers for predicting ciliary damage caused by inhaled substances. In particular, the decrease in the expression of FoxJ1, which has been shown to play a key role in the differentiation of ciliated cells in a mouse ALI airway model (You et al. 2004), suggests possible impairment of ciliogenesis by CS exposures. The severity of ciliary damage (e.g., reduction in ciliary beating and shortened cilia) was positively correlated with CS concentration, with abnormalities elicited by the high concentration being only partially reversed by a 20-day recovery.
Cigarette smoking often results in exposure to high levels of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), a major risk factor for the development of lung cancer (DeMarini 2004; IARC 2004). PAHs, such as benzo[a]pyrene, are bio-activated by phase I drug metabolism enzymes, i.e., CYP1A1/2 and CYP1B1, leading to the formation of radical cations, diol-epoxides, and ortho-quinones. These reactive metabolites can react with DNA and trigger tumorigenesis (Moorthy et al. 2015). PAHs are also capable of inducing CYP1A1/2 and CYP1B1 via aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR)-dependent pathway that, in turn, can exacerbate the toxicity and carcinogenicity of PAHs (Omiecinski et al. 2011). In this study, we observed that CS exposure resulted in a transient induction of AHR (Fig. 9a, T1 and T3), accompanied by persistent upregulation of CYP1A1 and CYP1B1. These findings are consistent with those reported in the airways of COPD patients and highlight the potential role of CYP1A and CYP1B family enzymes in CS-induced toxicity and carcinogenicity (Pierrou et al. 2007). In contrast to the transient upregulation of AHR, the expression of two isoforms of the metabolic regulator PPAR, i.e., PPARβ/δ (PPARD/NR1C2) and PPARΥ (PPARG/NR1C3), was induced after 12 repeated CS exposures. Recent studies in animals have uncovered a novel function for PPARs in inhibiting proinflammatory signaling pathways via the inflammatory transcription factors, such as NF-κB (Liu et al. 2017; Solleti et al. 2015). Thus, the downregulation of NF-κB-dependent genes, including VEGFA, IL6, IL7, IL12A, and CCL5 (Fig. 9b, T12), that was observed in CS-exposed cultures may have resulted from the activation of PPARs.
Upregulation of genes in the aldo–keto reductase family, in particular AKR1B1 and AKR1B10, may reflect a cellular defense mechanism against CS toxicity. Both AKR1B1 and AKR1B10 are capable of metabolizing toxic carbonyls, such as formaldehyde and acrolein, to less toxic metabolites, and, therefore, attenuate the electrophilic injury from CS (Barski et al. 2008). Moreover, AKR1B10 has been considered a potential biomarker of CS-associated lung cancer (Wang et al. 2010). Our data demonstrate a persistent and irreversible effect of CS on both the gene and protein expression of AKR1B10 (Fig. 10b and Figure S4), suggesting AKR1B10 may be a useful biomarker for CS exposure. It is uncertain whether or not significant changes in the expression of Phase II genes (e.g., AKRs, ALDHs, HMOX-1, and NQO1) are induced via Nrf2 pathway, which is usually activated by nucleus translocation but not necessarily by increased expression induced by the electrophiles and oxidants in CS (Müller and Hengstermann 2012).
Understanding the cellular phenotypes that are affected by CS help to identify the molecular targets responsible for the lung diseases associated with smoking (Crystal et al. 2008). Repeated exposure to CS elicited cumulative effects on the expression of a panel of genes, with their expression being most significantly altered after 12 exposures (Table S3). DO enrichment analysis of the transcriptome profiles for CS-exposed ALI cultures indicated that an increased number of lung disease-associated pathways was found after the recovery phase (Table S4, n = 7 at T12 vs. n = 12 at PT20). The predicted lung diseases include lung carcinoma, non-small cell lung carcinoma, COPD, lung adenocarcinoma, small cell lung carcinoma, pulmonary emphysema, interstitial lung disease, lung squamous cell carcinoma, and pulmonary fibrosis. These profiles reflected alteration in the expression of genes involved in extracellular matrix remodeling (i.e., MMP1, MMP2, MMP7, MMP9, MMP13, and MMP14), mucin-producing mechanisms (i.e. SCGB1A1), xenobiotic metabolism (i.e., AKR1B10, CYP1B1, DUOX2, IDO1, PTGS1, and PTGS2), and inflammation (i.e., ICAM1 and IL1RN). Consistent with previous findings, the DO enrichment analysis conducted in this study identified the common molecular pathways underlying the pathogenesis of both COPD and lung cancer (Young and Hopkins 2011). For instance, the squamous differentiation observed in CS-exposed ALI cultures is found in the airways of smokers with COPD and squamous cell carcinoma (Bozinovski et al. 2015; Greenberg et al. 2002; Rigden et al. 2016).
CS-induced phenotypic changes, such as damage to ciliated cells and goblet cells and squamous differentiation, could be reversed to a great extent by a 20-day recovery, suggesting that airway epithelial cells have strong capacities for self-renewal and transdifferentiation. The gene expression of markers for different cell types revealed a negative correlation between the expression of squamous cell markers (i.e., KRT6A, KRT13 and IVL) and ciliated (i.e., FOXJ1, TUBA1A, DNAI and CETN2)/basal cell markers (i.e., NGFR). Squamous cells observed in the CS-exposed cultures may be derived from ciliated cells or a subset of basal cells as previously reported in the bronchiolar epithelium of a transgenic mouse model (Park et al. 2006). Expression of the secretory cell markers, MUC5AC, MUC5B, and SCGB1A1, exhibited differential responses, with MUC5B and SCGB1A1 being persistently downregulated and MUC5AC being fully restored at the end of the recovery period. These observations demonstrate the dynamic and differential responses of subsets of secretory cells to CS exposure. It is also possible that cell transdifferentiation may have been triggered as a rapid repair mechanism to preserve the integrity of airway epithelium (Crystal 2014; Jetten 1989; Randell 2006).
There are several limitations of our study including limited analysis of chemicals in mainstream CS. In this study, we employed QCM to quantitate the particle phase and nicotine measurement in the exposure medium as indirect indicators of smoke dosimetry. Our data on these two measurements demonstrated the linearity, even distribution, and reproducibility of CS generation throughout the exposure phase and were correlated with CS-induced functional and morphological changes observed in ALI cultures. Quantification of key CS constituents may provide more robust dosimetric parameters that are useful for correlating the in vitro and in vivo exposure doses. For instance, dilution of CS may cause the migration of semi-volatile chemical species in the particle phase to the gas phase (Alderman and Ingebrethsen 2011 and Ingbrethesen et al. 2012), resulting in higher levels of certain gas phase constituents in diluted CS. Therefore, the effects of semi-volatile CS constituents may be different between the low and high concentration groups. Recently, studies have demonstrated heterogeneous deposition of particles within the Vitrocell® exposure system (Oldham et al. 2020a,b). Therefore, caution needs to be exercised when interpreting the extent of CS-induced alterations in the ALI cultures, as the biological effects are correlated with not only the concentration but also the deposition of CS aerosols (particles as well as gas phases) across the ALI cultures. A thorough investigation of the homogeneity of CS aerosol deposition within the exposure module is warranted.
It is also worth mentioning that mucus clumps were removed from the ALI cultures by a brief washing with DPBS before each CS exposure. While this may not be comparable to mucociliary clearance that occurs in vivo, our preliminary studies indicate that accumulation of mucus clumps on the apical surface of ALI cultures could significantly affect chemical uptake and absorption (data not shown). Thus, as a routine practice in our laboratory to improve the reproducibility of the assays, ALI cultures were washed with DPBS prior to the exposures.
Finally, the relevance of the in vitro CS exposure regimen employed in this study to the CS exposure experienced by habitual smokers is not assessed. It is important to note that reliable translation of the in vitro exposure scenario to the human exposure condition(s) requires extensive in-vitro to in-vivo extrapolation, which relies on thorough chemical analysis of a greater spectra of CS constituents, computational fluid dynamic-based aerosol dosimetry assessment, and physiologically-based pharmacokinetic modeling.
In summary, we have developed a repeated treatment protocol to evaluate the subacute responses to whole CS exposure in a human airway tissue model. Using an integrative approach consisting of transcriptomic analysis and pathophysiological assessments, the MOA for CS toxicity in vivo was largely replicated in this in vitro model. This study represents one of the first comprehensive analyses of the temporal progression of the key molecular and structural abnormalities induced by CS in differentiated airway ALI cultures. Furthermore, the transcriptomic analysis conducted in parallel with the assessment of physiological responses revealed key molecular targets that potentially could serve as biomarkers of harm for CS exposure.
References
Agustí A, Hogg JC (2019) Update on the pathogenesis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. N Engl J Med 381(13):1248–1256
Alderman SL, Ingebrethsen BJ (2011) Characterization of mainstream cigarette smoke particle size distributions from commercial cigarettes using a DMS500 fast particulate spectrometer and smoking cycle simulator. Aerosol Sci Tech 44:1409–1421
Backinger CL, Meissner HI, Ashley DL (2016) The FDA deeming rule and tobacco regulatory research. Tob Regul Sci 2(3):290–293
Barnes PJ (2004) Mediators of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Pharmacol Rev 56(4):515–548
Barreiro E, Fermoselle C, Mateu-Jimenez M, Sanchez-Font A, Pijuan L, Gea J, Curull V (2013) Oxidative stress and inflammation in the normal airways and blood of patients with lung cancer and COPD. Free Radic Biol Med 65:859–871
Barski OA, Tipparaju SM, Bhatnagar A (2008) The aldo-keto reductase superfamily and its role in drug metabolism and detoxification. Drug Metab Rev 40(4):553–624
Bergeron C, Al-Ramli W, Hamid Q (2009) Remodeling in asthma. Proc Am Thorac Soc 6(3):301–305
Bernard A, Marchandise FX, Depelchin S, Lauwerys R, Sibille Y (1992) Clara cell protein in serum and bronchoalveolar lavage. Eur Respir J 5(10):1231–1238
Boukhenouna S, Wilson MA, Bahmed K, Kosmider B (2018) Reactive oxygen species in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Oxid Med Cell Longev 28:5730395
Bozinovski S, Vlahos R, Anthony D, McQualter J, Anderson G, Irving L, Steinfort D (2015) COPD and squamous cell lung cancer: aberrant inflammation and immunity is the common link. Br J Pharmacol 173(4):635–648
Bracken MB (2009) Why animal studies are often poor predictors of human reactions to exposure. J R Soc Med 102(3):120–122
Brode SK, Ling SC, Chapman KR (2012) Alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency: a commonly overlooked cause of lung disease. CMAJ 184(12):1365–1371
Brody JS, Spira A (2006) Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Inflammation, and Lung Cancer. Proc Am Thorac Soc 3(6):535–537
Brownawell AB (ed) (2007) Biological effects assessment in theevaluation of potential reduced-risk tobacco products. Life Sciences Research Oranization, Bethesda
Cantin AM (2010) Cellular response to cigarette smoke and oxidants: adapting to survive. Proc Am Thorac Soc 7(6):368–375
Cao X, Muskhelishvili L, Latendresse J, Richter P, Heflich RH (2017) Evaluating the toxicity of cigarette whole smoke solutions in an air-liquid-Interface human in vitro airway tissue model. Toxicol Sci 156(1):14–24
Cao X, Wang Y, Xiong R, Muskhelishvili L, Davis K, Richter PA, Heflich RH (2018) Cigarette whole smoke solutions disturb mucin homeostasis in a human in vitro airway tissue model. Toxicology 409:119–128
Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) (2008) Smoking-attributable mortality, years of potential life lost, and productivity losses—United States, 2000–2004. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 57(45):1226–1228
Choi AM, Alam J (1996) Heme oxygenase-1: function, regulation, and implication of a novel stress-inducible protein in oxidant-induced lung injury. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 15(1):9–19
Choksi SP, Lauter G, Swoboda P, Roy S (2014) Switching on cilia: transcriptional networks regulating ciliogenesis. Development 141(7):1427–1441
Churg A, Zhou S, Wright JL (2012) Series “matrix metalloproteinases in lung health and disease”: matrix metalloproteinases in COPD. Eur Respir J 39(1):197–209
Clippinger AJ, Allen D, Behrsing H, BéruBé KA, Bolger MB, Casey W et al (2018) Pathway-based predictive approaches for non-animal assessment of acute inhalation toxicity. Toxicol In Vitro 52:131–145
Counts ME, Morton MJ, Laffoon SW, Cox RH, Lipowicz PJ (2005) Smoke composition and predicting relationships for international commercial cigarettes smoked with three machine-smoking conditions. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 41:185–227
Crystal RG (2014) Airway basal cells. The “smoking gun” of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 190(12):1355–1362
Crystal RG, Randell SH, Engelhardt JF, Voynow J, Sunday ME (2008) Airway epithelial cells current concepts and challenges. Proc Am Thorac Soc 5(7):772–777
Dalle-Donne I, Colombo G, Gornati R, Garavaglia ML, Portinaro N, Giustarini D, Bernardini G, Rossi R, Milzani A (2017) Protein carbonylation in human smokers and mammalian models of exposure to cigarette smoke: focus on redox proteomic studies. Antioxid Redox Signal 26(8):406–426
Davies KJ (2010) Degradation of oxidized proteins by the 20S proteasome. Biochimie 83(3–4):301–310
de Boer WI, Sont JK, van Schadewijk A, Stolk J, van Krieken JH et al (2000) Monocyte chemoattractant protein 1, interleukin 8, and chronic airways inflammation in COPD. J Pathol 190(5):619–626
DeMarini DM (2004) Genotoxicity of tobacco smoke and tobacco smoke condensate: a review. Mutat Res 567:447–474
Demeo DL, Mariani TJ, Lange C, Srisuma S, Litonjua AA et al (2006) The SERPINE2 gene is associated with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Hum Genet 78:253–264
Ding YS, Richter P, Hearn B, Zhang L, Bravo R, Yan X et al (2017) Chemical characterization of mainstream smoke from SPECTRUM variable nicotine research cigarettes. Tob Regul Sci 3(1):81–94
Eiserich JP, van der Vliet A, Handelman GJ, Halliwell B, cross, C. E. (2005) Dietary antioxidants and cigarette smoke-induced biomolecular damage a complex interaction. Am J Clin Nutr 62(6 Suppl):1490S-1500S
Ezzie ME, Crawford M, Cho JH, Orellana R, Zhang S, Gelinas R, Batte K, Yu L, Nuovo G, Galas D et al (2012) Gene expression networks in COPD: microRNA and mRNA regulation. Thorax 67:122–131
FDA (2012). “Harmful and potentially harmful constituents in tobacco products and tobacco smoke: Established List.” From http://www.fda.gov/TobaccoProducts/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/ucm297786.htm.
Gohy ST, Hupin C, Fregimilicka C, Detry BR, Bouzin C, Chevronay HG, Lecocq M, Weynand B, Ladjemi MZ, Pierreux CE, Birembaut P, Polette M, Pilette C (2015) Imprinting of the COPD airway epithelium for dedifferentiation and mesenchymal transition. Eur Respir J 45:1258–1272
Gould NS, Min E, Gauthier S, Martin RJ, Day BJ (2011) Lung glutathione adaptive responses to cigarette smoke exposure. Respir Res 12:133
Greenberg AK, Yee H, Rom WN (2002) Preneoplastic lesions of the lung. Respir Res 3(1):20
Haswell LE, Baxter A, Banerjee A, Verrastro I, Mushonganono J, Adamson J et al (2017) Reduced biological effect of e-cigarette aerosol compared to cigarette smoke evaluated in vitro using normalized nicotine dose and RNA-seq–based toxicogenomics. Sci Rep 7:888
Herfs M, Hubert P, Poirrier A-L, Vandevenne P, Renoux V, Habraken Y et al (2012) Proinflammatory cytokines induce bronchial hyperplasia and squamous metaplasia in smokers. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 47(1):67–79
Hilaire CL (2007) Scientific methods to evaluate potential reduced-risk tobacco products. Life Sciences Research Organization, Bethesda
Ingebrethsen BJ, Cole SK, Alderman SL (2012) Electronic cigarette aerosol particle size distribution measurements. Inhalation Toxicol 1:976–984
International Agency for Research on Cancer (2004) Tobacco smoking and tobacco smoke, IARC monographs on the evaluation of the carcinogenic risks of chemicals to humans, vol 83. International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon
International Organization for Standardisation (1991) Cigarettes - determination of total and nicotine-free dry particulate matter using a routine analytical smoking machine. ISO International Standards Organisation, Geneva
International Organization for Standardisation (1991) Tobacco and tobacco products - Atmosphere for conditioning and testing. ISO 3402. International Standards Organisation, Geneva
Jetten AM (1989) Multistep process of squamous differentiation in tracheobronchial epithelial cells in vitro: analogy with epidermal differentiation. Environ Health Perspect 80:149–160
Kim YM, Kim H, Lee S, Kim S, Lee JU et al (2019) Airway G-CSF identifies neutrophilic inflammation and contributes to asthma progression. Eur Respir J 2:1900827
Kirkham PA, Barnes PJ (2013) Oxidative Stress in COPD. Chest 144(1):266–273
Laniado-Laborin R (2009) Smoking and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Parallel epidemics of the 21st century. Int J Environ Res Public Health 6(1):209–224
Leopold PL, O’Mahony MJ, Lian XJ, Tilley AE, Harvey BG, Crystal RG (2009) Smoking is associated with shortened airway cilia. PLoS ONE 4(12):e8157
Liu T, Zhang L, Joo D, Sun S-C (2017) NF-κB signaling in inflammation. Signal Transduct Target Ther 2:17023
Llinas L, Peinado VI, Ramon Goni J, Rabinovich R, Pizarro S, Rodriguez-Roisin R, Barbera JA, Bastos R (2011) Similar gene expression profiles in smokers and patients with moderate COPD. Pulm Pharmacol Ther 24:32–41
Montoro DT, Haber AL, Biton M, Vinarsky V, Lin B, Birket SE et al (2018) A revised airway epithelial hierarchy includes CFTR-expressing ionocytes. Nature 560(7718):319–324
Moorthy B, Chu C, Carlin DJ (2015) Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons: from metabolism to lung cancer. Toxicol Sci 145:5–15
Morrow JD, Frei B, Longmire AW, Gaziano JM, Lynch SM, Shyr Y, Strauss WE, Oates JA, Roberts LJ (1995) Increase in circulating products of lipid peroxidation (F2-isoprostanes) in smokers: smoking as a cause of oxidative damage. N Engl J Med 332(18):1198–1203
Morrow JD, Chase RP, Parker MM, Glass K, Seo M, Divo M et al (2019) RNA-sequencing across three matched tissues reveals shared and tissue-specific gene expression and pathway signatures of COPD. Respir Res 20:65
Müller T, Hengstermann A (2012) Nrf2: friend and foe in preventing cigarette smoking-dependent lung disease. Chem Res Toxicol 25(9):1805–1824
Nagai K, Betsuyaku T, Kondo T, Nasuhara Y, Nishimura M (2006) Long term smoking with age builds up excessive oxidative stress in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid. Thorax 61(6):496–502
Ning W, Li CJ, Kaminski N, Feghali-Bostwick CA, Alber SM, Di YP, Otterbein SL, Song R, Hayashi S, Zhou Z, Pinsky DJ, Watkins SC, Pilewski JM, Sciurba FC, Peters DG, Hogg JC, Choi AM (2004) Comprehensive gene expression profiles reveal pathways related to the pathogenesis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:14895–14900
Oldham MJ, Castro N, Zhang J, Rostami AA, Lucci F, Pithawalla Y, Kuczaj A, Gilman IG, Kosachevsky P, Hoeng J, Lee KM (2020a) Deposition efficiency and uniformity of monodisperse solid particle deposition in the Vitrocell® 24/48 air-liquid-interface in-vitro exposure system, Aerosol Sci. Tech 54:52–65
Oldham MJ, Castro N, Zhang J, Lucci F, Kosachevsky P, Rostami AA, Gilman IG, Pithawalla YB, Kuczaj AK, Hoeng J, Lee KM (2020b) Comparison of experimentally measured and computational fluid dynamic predicted deposition and deposition uniformity of monodisperse solid particles in the Vitrocell® AMES 48 air-liquid-interface in-vitro exposure system. Toxicol In Vitro 67:104870
Omiecinski CJ, Vanden Heuvel JP, Perdew GH, Peters JM (2011) Xenobiotic metabolism, disposition, and regulation by receptors: from biochemical phenomenon to predictors of major toxicities. Toxicol Sci 120(Suppl 1):S49-75
Pan ZZ, Parkyn L, Ray A, Ray P (2000) Inducible lung-specific expression of RANTES: preferential recruitment of neutrophils. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 279(4):L658–L666
Pappas RS, Fresquez MR, Martone N, Watson CH (2014) Toxic metal concentrations in mainstream smoke from cigarettes available in the USA. J Anal Toxicol 38(4):204–211
Park K-S, Wells JM, Zorn AM, Wert SE, Laubach VE, Fernandez LG, Whitsett JA (2006) Transdifferentiation of ciliated cells during repair of the respiratory epithelium. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 34(2):151–157
Pauwels RA, Buist AS, Calverley PR, Jenkins CR, Hurd SS, Scientific Committee GOLD (2001) Global strategy for the diagnosis, management, and prevention of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. NHLBI/WHO Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) Workshop summary. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 163(5):1256–1276
Perlstein TS, Lee RT (2006) Smoking, metalloproteinases, and vascular disease. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 26(2):250–256
Pierrou S, Broberg P, O’Donnell RA, Pawłowski K, Virtala R, Lindqvist E et al (2007) Expression of genes involved in oxidative stress responses in airway epithelial cells of smokers with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 175(6):577–586
Plasschaert LW, Žilionis R, Choo-Wing R, Savova V, Knehr J, Roma G et al (2018) A single-cell atlas of the airway epithelium reveals the CFTR-rich pulmonary ionocyte. Nature 560(7718):377–381
Puchelle E, Zahm J-M, Tournier J-M, Coraux C (2006) Airway epithelial repair, regeneration, and remodeling after injury in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Proc Am Thorac Soc 3(8):726–733
Rahman I, MacNee W (1999) Lung glutathione and oxidative stress: implications in cigarette smoke-induced airway disease. Am J Physiol 277(6):L1067–L1088
Randell SH (2006) Airway epithelial stem cells and the pathophysiology of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Proc Am Thorac Soc 3(8):718–725
Reznick AZ, Cross CE, Hu ML, Suzuki YJ, Khwaja S, Safadi A, Motchnik PA, Packer L, Halliwell B (1992) Modification of plasma proteins by cigarette smoke as measured by protein carbonyl formation. Biochem J 286(2):607–611
Ridley C, Thornton DJ (2018) Mucins: the frontline defence of the lung. Biochem Soc Trans 46(5):1099–1106
Rigden HM, Alias A, Havelock T, O’Donnell R, Djukanovic R, Davies DE, Wilson SJ (2016) Squamous metaplasia is increased in the bronchial epithelium of smokers with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. PLoS ONE 11(5):e0156009
Rock JR, Randell SH, Hogan BLM (2010) Airway basal stem cells: a perspective on their roles in epithelial homeostasis and remodeling. Dis Model Mech 3(9–10):545–556
Rodgman A, Perfetti TA (2013) The chemical components of tobacco and tobacco smoke, 2nd edn. CRC Press Taylor Francis Group, Florida
Siafakas NM, Tzortzaki EG (2002) Few smokers develop COPD. Why? Respir Med 96:615–624
Sidhaye VK, Holbrook JT, Burke A et al (2019) Compartmentalization of anti-oxidant and anti-inflammatory gene expression in current and former smokers with COPD. Respir Res 20(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12931-019-1164-1
Silverman EK (2006) Progress in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease genetics. Proc Am Thorac Soc 3(5):405–408
Smolonska J, Wijmenga C, Postma DS, Boezen HM (2009) Meta-analyses on suspected chronic obstructive pulmonary disease genes: a summary of 20 years’ research. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 180:618–631
Solleti SK, Simon DM, Srisuma S, Arikan MC, Bhattacharya S, Rangasamy T et al (2015) Airway epithelial cell PPARγ modulates cigarette smoke-induced chemokine expression and emphysema susceptibility in mice. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 309(3):L293–L304
Steiling K, Lenburg ME, Spira A (2009) Airway gene expression in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Proc Am Thorac Soc 8:697–700
Strzelak A, Ratajczak A, Adamiec A, Feleszko W (2018) Tobacco smoke induces and alters immune responses in the lung triggering inflammation, allergy, asthma and other lung diseases: a mechanistic review. Int J Environ Res Public Health 15(5):E1033
Tam A, Wadsworth S, Dorscheid D, Paul Man SF, Sin DD (2011) The airway epithelium: more than just a structural barrier. Ther Adv Respir Dis 5(4):255–273
Tilley AE, Walters MS, Shaykhiev R, Crystal RG (2015) Cilia dysfunction in lung disease. Annu Rev Physiol 77:379–406
US Department of Health and Human Services (2010) How tobacco smoke causes disease the biology and behavioral basis for smoking-attributable disease: a report of the surgeon general. Office on Smoking and Health, Atlanta
US Department of Health and Human Services (2014) The health consequences of smoking—50 years of progress : A report of the Surgeon General Atlanta. Office on Smoking and Health, Atlanta
Wadhwa R, Aggarwal T, Malyla V, Kumar N, Gupta G, Chellappan DK et al (2019) Identification of biomarkers and genetic approaches toward chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. J Cell Physiol 234(10):16703–16723
Wang R, Wang G, Ricard MJ, Ferris B, Strulovici-Barel Y, Salit J et al (2010) Smoking-induced upregulation of akr1b10 expression in the airway epithelium of healthy individuals. Chest 138(6):1402–1410
Xiong R, Wu Q, Muskhelishvili L, Davis K, Shemansky JM, Bryant M, Rosenfeldt H, Healy SM, Cao X (2018) Evaluating mode of action of acrolein toxicity in an in vitro human airway tissue model. Toxicol Sci 166(2):451–464
Xiong R, Wu Q, Trbojevich R et al (2019) Disease-related responses induced by cadmium in an in vitro human airway tissue model. Toxicol Lett 303:16–27
Yaghi A, Dolovich MB (2016) Airway epithelial cell cilia and obstructive lung disease. Cells 5(4):40
Yaghi A, Zaman A, Cox G, Dolovich MB (2012) Ciliary beating is depressed in nasal cilia from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease subjects. Respir Med 106(8):1139–1147
You Y, Huang T, Richer EJ, Schmidt JE, Zabner J et al (2004) Role of f-box factor foxj1 in differentiation of ciliated airway epithelial cells. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 286(4):L650–L657
Young RP, Hopkins RJ (2011) How the genetics of lung cancer may overlap with COPD. Respirology 16(7):1047–1055
Zuo L, He F, Sergakis GG, Koozehchian MS, Stimpfl JN, Rong Y, Diaz PT, Best TM (2014) Interrelated role of cigarette smoking, oxidative stress, and immune response in COPD and corresponding treatments. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 307(3):L205–L218
Funding
This work is supported by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Center for Tobacco Products.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Xiong, R., Wu, Y., Wu, Q. et al. Integration of transcriptome analysis with pathophysiological endpoints to evaluate cigarette smoke toxicity in an in vitro human airway tissue model. Arch Toxicol 95, 1739–1761 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-021-03008-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-021-03008-0