Skip to main content
Account

Table 3 Univariate Cox proportional hazard analysis of survival

From: Appropriateness of the institute certification system for esophageal surgeries by the Japan Esophageal Society: evaluation of survival outcomes using data from the National Database of Hospital-Based Cancer Registries in Japan

Cox analyses

Univariable

Factor

HR

p

95% CI 

Age ≧70 vs. < 70

1.45

< 0.001

1.28

1.64

Male vs. female

1.47

< 0.001

1.22

1.76

T3–4 vs. Tis-2 (n = 2066)a

2.28

< 0.001

2.01

2.57

N1–3 vs. N0 (n = 2076)a

2.09

< 0.001

1.85

2.37

M1 vs. M0 (n = 2077)

2.31

< 0.001

1.92

2.79

Clinical stage (UICC, n = 2069)a

    

 cStage 0

0.34

0.27

0.01

1.95

 cStage I

ref

   

 cStage II

2.28

< 0.001

1.88

2.77

 cStage III

3.72

< 0.001

3.08

4.52

 cStage IV

5.31

< 0.001

4.15

6.78

AIBCES vs. non-AIBCES

0.79

< 0.001

0.70

0.89

Adjuvant therapy (n = 2133)a

    

 No radiation or chemotherapy

ref

   

 +Radiation therapy

5.09

< 0.001

3.56

7.09

 +Chemotherapy

1.34

< 0.001

1.17

1.52

 +Radiation and chemotherapy

2.33

< 0.001

1.95

2.77

  1. AIBCES Authorized Institute for Board Certified Esophageal Surgeon
  2. aIncidence rate ratios are shown due to proportional hazard violation