Table 2 Radom intercept logistic regression, odds ratios and 95%-confidence intervals [CI] to receive home care and random intercept ordinary least square regression and 95%-CI of the difference in mean number of home care hours for the Swedish population aged 65 + in 2016
From: Determinants of home care utilization among the Swedish old: nationwide register-based study
Variables | Logit home care | OLS home care hours |
|---|---|---|
OR (95%-CI) | Beta (95%-CI) | |
Age-group | ||
65–69 | 1 | 0 |
70–74 | 1.70 (1.60–1.80) | − 0.38 (− 2.02–1.26) |
75–79 | 4.00 (3.78–4.23) | − 1.29 (− 2.73–0.15) |
80–84 | 11.04 (10.4–11.66) | − 1.49 (− 3.01–0.03) |
85–89 | 29.51 (27.91–31.20) | − 1.32 (− 3.18–0.54) |
90 + | 72.81 (68.27–77.67) | 4.55 (2.39–6.71) |
Charlson index | ||
Healthy | 1 | 0 |
Mild | 3.23 (3.07–3.40) | 4.59 (3.98–5.20) |
Moderate | 6.91 (6.50–7.34) | 8.48 (7.64–9.32) |
Severe | 15.01 (14.02 16.08) | 13.34 (12.03 14.64) |
Sex | ||
Man | 1 | 0 |
Women | 1.42 (1.39–1.45) | 2.40 (1.83–2.97) |
Household type | ||
Cohabitating | 1 | 0 |
Living alone | 5.72 (5.47–5.99) | 2.98 (1.85–4.10) |
Family availability | ||
No living children | 1 | 0 |
Child not in same municipality | 0.80 (0.78–0.81) | − 2.83 (− 3.67 to 1.98) |
Child in same municipality | 0.73 (0.72–0.74) | − 1.69 (− 2.48 -0.89) |
Level of education | ||
Primary | 1 | 0 |
Secondary | 0.92 (0.91–0.93) | − 0.68 (− 1.29 to 0.07) |
Under-graduate | 0.89 (0.87–0.91) | − 1.18 (− 2.19 to 0.17) |
Graduate level | 0.92 (0.90–0.94) | 0.04 (− 0.92–1.01) |
Income quartile | ||
-25% | 1 | 0 |
26–50% | 0.97 (0.93–1.02) | − 0.50 (− 1.24 to 0.23) |
51–75% | 0.45 (0.42–0.48) | 0.10 (− 0.82 to 1.02) |
76%- | 0.28 (0.26–0.30) | 2.41 (0.67–4.14) |
Household type * Age-group | ||
Living alone * 70–74 | 0.85 (0.81–0.90) | |
Living alone * 75–79 | 0.69 (0.66–0.73) | |
Living alone * 80–84 | 0.55 (0.52–0.58) | |
Living alone * 85–89 | 0.47 (0.45–0.49) | |
Living alone * 90 + | 0.45 (0.42–0.47) | |
Household type * Sex | ||
Living alone * Women | 0.76 (0.74–0.78) | |
Age-group * Income quartile | ||
70–74 * 26–50% | 1.01 (0.95–1.08) | |
70–74 * 51–75% | 1.29 (1.20–1.39) | |
70–74 * 76%- | 1.57 (1.43–1.71) | |
75–79 * 26–50% | 0.96 (0.90–1.02) | |
75–79 * 51–75% | 1.44 (1.35–1.55) | |
75–79 * 76%- | 2.10 (1.93–2.29) | |
80–84 * 26–50% | 0.95 (0.89–1.00) | |
80–84 * 51–75% | 1.69 (1.58–1.80) | |
80–84 * 76%- | 2.53 (2.32–2.75) | |
85–89 * 26–50% | 0.94 (0.89–1.00) | |
85–89 * 51–75% | 1.79 (1.67–1.92) | |
85–89 * 76%- | 2.91 (2.67–3.17) | |
90 + * 26–50% | 0.99 (0.93–1.05) | |
90 + * 51–75% | 1.91 (1.77–2.06) | |
90 + * 76%- | 2.99 (2.71–3.30) | |
Charlson index * Age-group | ||
Mild * 70–74 | 0.83 (0.78–0.88) | |
Mild * 75–79 | 0.73 (0.69–0.77) | |
Mild * 80–84 | 0.60 (0.57–0.63) | |
Mild * 85–89 | 0.54 (0.51–0.57) | |
Mild * 90 + | 0.50 (0.47–0.53) | |
Moderate * 70–74 | 0.80 (0.74–0.86) | |
Moderate * 75–79 | 0.60 (0.56–0.65) | |
Moderate * 80–84 | 0.44 (0.41–0.47) | |
Moderate * 85–89 | 0.37 (0.35–0.40) | |
Moderate * 90 + | 0.31 (0.29–0.34) | |
Severe * 70–74 | 0.85 (0.78–0.92) | |
Severe * 75–79 | 0.59 (0.54–0.63) | |
Severe * 80–84 | 0.38 (0.36–0.41) | |
Severe * 85–89 | 0.27 (0.25–0.29) | |
Severe * 90 + | 0.22 (0.20–0.24) | |
Charlson index * Sex | ||
Mild * Women | 1.12 (1.09–1.15) | |
Moderate * Women | 1.18 (1.14–1.22) | |
Severe * Women | 1.14 (1.10–1.19) | |
cons | .008 (.007–.009) | 23.38 (22.99 25.77) |
Intra class correlation | 0.02 | 0.07 |
SD (_cons) | 1.32 | 13.34 |
N | 1 840 107 | 132 442 |