Table 5 Comparison of absolute relevance course and relevance rankings for the customised EILD scorecard between the development and validation workshops
Essential | Average relevance score and ranking for essential | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Interviews | Rank | Validation workshop | Rank | |
Organise for resilience | 0.90 | 1 | 0.67 | 2 |
Identify, understand and use current and future risk scenarios | 0.83 | = 2 | 0.96 | 1 |
Strengthen financial capacity for resilience | 0.52 | 6 | 0.42 | = 3 |
Pursue resilient urban development | 0.68 | 4 | 0.42 | = 3 |
Strengthen Institutional Capacity for Resilience | 0.55 | 5 | 0.23 | 8 |
Understand and Strengthen Societal Capacity for Resilience | 0.47 | 9 | * | N.A. |
Increase infrastructure resilience | 0.83 | = 2 | 0.35 | 5 |
Ensure effective disaster response | 0.48 | 8 | 0.29 | 7 |
Expedite recovery and build back better | 0.50 | 7 | 0.30 | 6 |