Table 2 Results of the ordered logit models: variables associated with the pre-2012, post 2012 and intended uptake of flood warnings (A1-A5), sandbags (B1-B5), flood gates (C1-C5) and insurance (D1-D5), for all communities and for communities with a flood action group
From: The impact of flood action groups on the uptake of flood management measures
All communities | Communities with a flood action group | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Log (odds ratio) | Odds ratio | McKelvey Zavoina R2 | Log (odds ratio) | Odds ratio | McKelvey Zavoina R2 | |||
Flood warnings | ||||||||
A1 | ||||||||
Pre-2012 uptake | ||||||||
Threat appraisal | ||||||||
Coping appraisal | ||||||||
Flood action group variables | ||||||||
Other variables | ||||||||
A2 | A4 | |||||||
Post-2012 uptake | 0.38 | Post-2012 update | 0.32 | |||||
Threat appraisal | ||||||||
Coping appraisal | Self-efficacy | 0.65 (0.13) | 1.9** | Self-efficacy | 0.84 (0.16) | 2.3** | ||
Response cost | −0.35 (0.14) | 0.7* | ||||||
Flood action group variables | ||||||||
Other variables | Neighbours | 0.28 (0.12) | 1.3* | |||||
A3 | A5 | |||||||
Intended uptake | 0.37 | Intended uptake | ||||||
Threat appraisal | Risk | 0.46 (0.15) | 1.6*** | 0.50 | ||||
Coping appraisal | Self-efficacy | 0.79(0.14) | 2.2*** | Self-efficacy | 0.53 (0.19) | 1.7* | ||
Response-efficacy | 0.58 (0.22) | 1.8* | ||||||
Flood action group vaiables | Information on flood warnings | 1.26 (0.54) | 3.5* | |||||
Information on flood risk strategy | 1.16 (0.44) | 3.2* | ||||||
Other variables | ||||||||
Sandbags | ||||||||
B1 | ||||||||
Pre-2012 uptake | ||||||||
Threat appraisal | ||||||||
Coping appraisal | ||||||||
Flood action group vaiables | ||||||||
Other variables | ||||||||
B2 | ||||||||
Post-2012 uptake | ||||||||
Threat appraisal | Risk | 0.62 (0.15) | 1.9*** | Risk | 0.71 (0.18) | 2*** | ||
Coping appraisal | Self-efficacy | 0.62 (0.15) | 1.5*** | Self-efficacy | 0.56 (0.16) | 1.8*** | ||
Flood action grooup variables | ||||||||
Other variables | ||||||||
Flood gates | ||||||||
C1 | ||||||||
Pre-2012 uptake | ||||||||
Threat appraisal | ||||||||
Coping appraisal | ||||||||
Flood action grooup variables | ||||||||
Other variables | ||||||||
C2 | C4 | |||||||
Pre-2012 uptake | 0.13 | Pre-2012 uptake | 0.17 | |||||
Threat appraisal | Risk | 0.4 (0.18) | 1.5* | |||||
Coping appraisal | Self-efficacy | 0.38 (0.13) | 1.5** | |||||
Flood action grooup variables | Information on implement | 1.29 (0.41) | 3.6** | |||||
Other variables | Implementation with neighbours | 0.78 (0.35) | 2.2* | |||||
C3 | C5 | |||||||
Intended uptake | 0.33 | Intended uptake | 0.44 | |||||
Threat appraisal | Risk | 0.64 (0.16) | 1.9*** | Risk | 0.73 (0.20) | 2.1*** | ||
Coping appraisal | Self-efficacy | 0.60 (0.13) | 1.8*** | Self-efficacy | 0.73 (0.17) | 2.1*** | ||
Flood action grooup variables | Neighbours | 0.4 (0.15) | 1.5*** | |||||
Other variables | ||||||||
D1 | ||||||||
Pre-2012 uptake | 0.10 | |||||||
Threat appraisal | ||||||||
Coping appraisal | Self-efficacy | 0.27 (0.12) | 1.31* | |||||
Flood action grooup variables | ||||||||
Other variables | Neighbors | 0.27 (0.12) | 1.31* | |||||
D2 | D4 | |||||||
Post-2012 uptake | 0.12 | Post-2012 uptake | 0.19 | |||||
Threat appraisal | ||||||||
Coping appraisal | ||||||||
Flood action grooup variables | ||||||||
Other variables | Ownership | 2.41 (0.71) | 1.1** | Ownership | 2.29 (0.85) | 9.9** | ||
Overall flood experience | −0.73 (0.35) | 0.48* | ||||||
D3 | D5 | |||||||
Intended uptake | 0.14 | Intended uptake | 0.15 | |||||
Threat appraisal | ||||||||
Coping appraisal | Response efficacy | 0.32 (0.13) | 1.4* | Response efficacy | 0.36 (0.15) | 1.4* | ||
Flood action grooup variables | Information on available measures | 1.16 (0.44) | 3.2* | |||||
Other variables | Ownership | 1.96 (0.64) | 7.1** | |||||