Table 3 Significant results of the mediation analysis for mediation of flood experience variables and flood action group variables through coping and threat appraisal. The figures provided in the table specify the p-values for the equations on top of the columns testing their significance
From: The impact of flood action groups on the uptake of flood management measures
Dataset and variables tested for mediation | Response variable Z | Mediator Y | Explanatory variable X | Z = bX | Z = aY + bX vs. Z = bX | Z = aY + bX vs. Z = aY | Y = bX | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Flood gates | ||||||||
E1 Partial mediation | Flood action group variables | |||||||
Communities with flood action group | Intended uptake | Response efficacy | Usefulness | 0.007 | 0.033 | 0.045 | 0.049 | |
Self-efficacy | Information on available measures | 0.002 | 0.006 | 0.037 | 0.007 | |||
Flood experience variables | ||||||||
Self-efficacy | Post-2012 flood experience | 0.015 | 0.003 | 0.035 | 0.035 | |||
All communities | Intended uptake | Threat | Post-2012 flood experience | 0.015 | 0.038 | 0.035 | 0.000 | |
Threat | Average flood experience | 0.009 | 0.025 | 0.040 | 0.000 | |||
E2 Complete mediation | Flood action group variables | |||||||
Communities with a flood action group | Intended uptake | Self-efficacy | Information on implementation | 0.020 | 0.002 | 0.177 | 0.001 | |
Response efficacy | Information on implementation | 0.020 | 0.036 | 0.090 | 0.000 | |||
Flood experience variables | ||||||||
All communities | Risk | Post-2012 flood experience | 0.015 | 0.002 | 0.143 | 0.000 | ||
Intended uptake | Risk | Average flood experience | 0.009 | 0.001 | 0.171 | 0.000 | ||
Response efficacy | Post-2012 flood experience | 0.022 | 0.002 | 0.376 | 0.000 | |||
Sandbags | ||||||||
F1 Complete mediation | Flood experience variables | |||||||
All Communities | Post-2012 uptake | Risk Risk | Post-2012 flood experience Average flood experience | 0.040 0.022 | 0.002 0.002 | 0.520 0.376 | 0.000 0.00 | |
Flood warnings | ||||||||
G1 Complete mediation | Flood action group variables | |||||||
Post-2012 uptake | Self efficacy | Usefulness | 0.021 | 0.008 | 0.212 | 0.014 | ||
Response efficacy | Usefulness | 0.021 | 0.005 | 0.244 | 0.004 | |||
Intended uptake | Self efficacy | Usefulness | 0.009 | 0.001 | 0.199 | 0.014 | ||
Response efficacy | Usefulness | 0.009 | 0.000 | 0.173 | 0.004 | |||
Communities with a flood action group | Post-2012 uptake | Self efficacy | Information on implementation | 0.046 | 0.000 | 0.641 | 0.005 | |
Intended uptake | Response efficacy | Information on implementation | 0.046 | 0.000 | 0.191 | 0.028 | ||
Self efficacy | Information on available measures | 0.012 | 0.001 | 0.541 | 0.004 | |||
Response efficacy | Information on available measures | 0.012 | 0.000 | 0.117 | 0.031 | |||
Post-2012 uptake | Self efficacy | Information on flood warnings | 0.001 | 0.008 | 0.123 | 0.000 | ||
Intended uptake | Self efficacy | Information on flood warnings | 0.001 | 0.003 | 0.202 | 0.000 | ||
All communities | Post-2012 uptake | Self efficacy | Existing schemes | 0.012 | 0.001 | 0.551 | 0.000 | |
Response efficacy | Existing schemes | 0.012 | 0.001 | 0.228 | 0.000 | |||
Intended uptake | Self efficacy | Existing schemes | 0.022 | 0.000 | 0.325 | 0.000 | ||
Response efficacy | Existing schemes | 0.022 | 0.005 | 0.199 | 0.000 | |||