Abstract
Saunders has recently claimed that “identical quantum particles” with an anti-symmetric state (fermions) are weakly discernible objects, just like irreflexively related ordinary objects in situations with perfect symmetry (Black’s spheres, for example). Weakly discernible objects have all their qualitative properties in common but nevertheless differ from each other by virtue of (a generalized version of) Leibniz’s principle, since they stand in relations an entity cannot have to itself. This notion of weak discernibility has been criticized as question begging, but we defend and accept it for classical cases likes Black’s spheres. We argue, however, that the quantum mechanical case is different. Here the application of the notion of weak discernibility indeed is question begging and in conflict with standard interpretational ideas. We conclude that the introduction of the conceptual resource of weak discernibility does not change the interpretational status quo in quantum mechanics.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Adams, R.M.: Primitive thisness and primitive identity. J. Philos. 76, 5–26 (1979)
Black, M.: The identity of indiscernibles. Mind 61, 153–164 (1952)
Esfeld, M., Lam, V.: Moderate structural realism about space-time. Synthese 160, 27–46 (2008)
French, S., Krause, D.: Identity in Physics: A Historical, Philosophical, and Formal Analysis. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2006)
Hawley, K.: Weak discernibility. Analysis 66, 300–303 (2006)
Hawley, K.: Identity, indiscernibility and number. Unpublished manuscript (2007)
Keränen, J.: The identity problem for realist structuralism. Philos. Math. 9, 308–330 (2001)
Quine, W.V.: Grades of discriminability. J. Philos. 73, 113–116 (1976). Reprinted in Quine, Theories and Things. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1981)
Saunders, S.: Physics and Leibniz’s principles. In: Brading, K., Castellani, E. (eds.) Symmetries in Physics: Philosophical Reflections. Cambridge University Press (2003)
Saunders, S.: Are quantum particles objects? Analysis 66, 52–63 (2006)
Schrödinger, E.: Science and Humanism. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1952). Partly reprinted as: What is an elementary particle? In: Castellani, E. (ed.) Interpreting Bodies: Classical and Quantum Objects in Modern Physics, pp. 197–210. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1998)
Teller, P.: Quantum mechanics and haecceities. In: Castellani, E. (ed.) Interpreting Bodies: Classical and Quantum Objects in Modern Physics, pp. 114–141. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1998)
Van Fraassen, B.C.: Quantum Mechanics—An Empiricist View. Clarendon Press, Oxford (1991)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
About this article
Cite this article
Dieks, D., Versteegh, M.A.M. Identical Quantum Particles and Weak Discernibility. Found Phys 38, 923–934 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-008-9243-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-008-9243-z