Skip to main content
Account

Table 6 Unstandardized estimates and bias-corrected confidence intervals of indirect path coefficients of the moderated mediation model (study 4)

From: The Long Reach of Unemployment: Sensitizing or Inoculating Employee Reactions to Job Insecurity?

  

Indirect effect

Variables

Estimate

95% CI [LL;UL]

Job insecurity →frustration → perceived demands-abilities fit

Indirect effect

 − .05

[− .07, − .02]

Moderator prior unemployment: conditional indirect effects

Prior unemployment (PU)

 − .09

[− .13, − .05]

No prior unemployment (NPU)

 − .05

[− .07, − .02]

Difference between PU and NPU conditions

 − .04

[− .08, − .01]

Job insecurity → frustration → perceived needs-supplies fit

Indirect effect

 − .09

[− .14, − .05]

Moderator prior unemployment: conditional indirect effects

Prior unemployment (PU)

 − .18

[− .25, − .11]

No prior unemployment (NPU)

 − .09

[− .14, − .05]

Difference between PU and NPU conditions

 − .08

[− .16, − .02]

Job insecurity → frustration → intentions to remain

Indirect effect

 − .09

[− .14, − .04]

Moderator prior unemployment: conditional indirect effects

Prior unemployment (PU)

 − .17

[− .25, − .11]

No prior unemployment (NPU)

 − .09

[− .15, − .05]

Difference between PU and NPU conditions

 − .08

[− .16, − .01]

Job insecurity → frustration → job satisfaction

Indirect effect

 − .13

[− .20, − .07]

Moderator prior unemployment: conditional indirect effects

Prior unemployment (PU)

 − .25

[− .34, − .17]

No prior unemployment (NPU)

 − .13

[− .20, − .07]

Difference between PU and NPU conditions

 − .12

[− .22, − .02]

Job insecurity → frustration → task performance

Indirect effect

 − .03

[− .06, − .01]

Moderator prior unemployment: conditional indirect effects

Prior unemployment (PU)

 − .07

[− .10, − .03]

No prior unemployment (NPU)

 − .03

[− .06, − .01]

Difference between PU and NPU conditions

 − .03

[− .06, − .01]

Job insecurity → frustration→ incivility towards coworkers

Indirect effect

.04

[.02, .07]

Moderator prior unemployment: conditional indirect effects

Prior unemployment (PU)

.07

[.04, .12]

No prior unemployment (NPU)

.04

[.02, .07]

Difference between PU and NPU conditions

.04

[.01, .07]

Job insecurity → relative deprivation → perceived demands-abilities fit

Indirect effect

-.08

[-.12, -.05]

Moderator prior unemployment: conditional indirect effects

Prior unemployment (PU)

-.05

[-.08, -.02]

No prior unemployment (NPU)

-.08

[-.12, -.05]

Difference between PU and NPU conditions

.03

[.003, .07]

Job insecurity → relative deprivation → perceived needs-supplies fit

Indirect effect

-.11

[-.15, -.07]

Moderator prior unemployment: conditional indirect effects

Prior unemployment (PU)

-.06

[-.11, -.03]

No prior unemployment (NPU)

-.11

[-.16, -.06]

Difference between PU and NPU conditions

.05

[.005, .09]

Job insecurity →relative deprivation→ intentions to remain

Indirect effect

-.11

[-.16, -.07]

Moderator prior unemployment: conditional indirect effects

Prior unemployment (PU)

-.07

[-.11, -.03]

No prior unemployment (NPU)

-.11

[-.17, -.06]

Difference between PU and NPU conditions

.05

[.005, .10]

Job insecurity → relative deprivation → job satisfaction

Indirect effect

-.11

[-.15, -.07]

Moderator prior unemployment: conditional indirect effects

Prior unemployment (PU)

-.06

[-.10, -.03]

No prior unemployment (NPU)

-.11

[-.16, -.06]

Difference between PU and NPU conditions

.04

[.005, .09]

Job insecurity → relative deprivation → task performance

Indirect effect

-.03

[-.06, .002]

Moderator Prior unemployment: Conditional indirect effects

Prior unemployment (PU)

-.02

[-.04, .0005]

No prior unemployment (NPU)

-.03

[-.06, .0005]

Difference between PU and NPU conditions

.01

[-.001, .03]

Job insecurity → relative deprivation → incivility towards coworkers

Indirect effect

.03

[-.004, .06]

Moderator prior unemployment: conditional indirect effects

Prior unemployment (PU)

.02

[-.003, .04]

No prior unemployment (NPU)

.03

[-.007, .06]

Difference between PU and NPU conditions

-.01

[-.03, .003]

  1. N = 453. Parameter estimates are unstandardized. 95% CI refers to the Monte Carlo 95% confidence interval with 20,000 draws (Selig & Preacher, 2008)
  2. LL lower limit, UL upper limit
  3. Bolded estimates represent significant effects