Abstract
We present a study on the effect of instruction on collaboration in a collaborative discovery learning environment. The instruction we used, called RIDE, is built upon four principles identified in the literature on collaborative processes: Respect, Intelligent collaboration, Deciding together, and Encouraging. In an experimental study, a group of learners (ages 15–17) receiving this instruction was compared to a control group. The learners worked in dyads on separate computers in a shared discovery learning environment in the physics domain of collisions, communicating through a chat channel. Qualitative and quantitative analyses of the logged actions in the learning environment and the chat protocols showed that the RIDE instruction can lead to more constructive communication, and improved discovery learning activities, as expected, although no direct effect on discovery learning results was found. This study shows the benefits of providing instruction on effective communication and the learning process in a collaborative discovery learning situation.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Baker M.J., Hansen T., Joiner T., Traum D. (1999). The role of grounding in collaborative learning tasks. In: Dillenbourg P., (eds) Collaborative Learning: Cognitive and Computational Approaches. Amsterdam, Pergamon/Elsevier Science, pp. 31–63
Baker M.J., Lund K.(1997). Promoting reflective interactions in a CSCL environment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 13:175–193
Blatchford P., Kutnick P., Baines E., Galton M. (2003). Toward a social pedagogy of classroom group work. International Journal of Educational Research 39:153–172
Boxtel, C. van (2000). Collaborative concept learning. Collaborative learning tasks, student interaction, and the learning of physics concepts. Doctoral dissertation, University Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
Boxtel C. van, Linden J. van der, Kanselaar G. (2000). Deep processing in a collaborative learning environment. In: Cowie H., van der Aalsvoort G.M., (eds) Social Interaction in Learning and Instruction. Amsterdam, Pergamon Press; Elsevier Science, pp. 161–178
Chan C.K.K. (2001). Peer collaboration and discourse patterns in learning from incompatible information. Instructional Science 29:443–479
Chan C., Burtis J., Bereiter C. (1997). Knowledge-building as a mediator of conflict in conceptual change. Cognition and Instruction 15:1–40
Chi M.T.H., Bassok M., Lewis M.W., Reiman P., Glaser R. (1989). Selfexplanations: How students study and use examples in learning to solve problems. Cognitive Science 13:145–182
Dekker R., Elshout-Mohr M. (1998). A process model for interaction and mathematical level raising. Educational Studies in Mathematics 36:303–314
Ebbens S., Ettekoven S., Rooijen J. van (1997). Samenwerkend leren. PraktUkboek (Collaborative learning. Practical book). Groningen, Wolters-Noordhoff
Ettekoven S. (1997). Samenwerkend leren in de praktijk. Valkuilen of uitdagingen? (Collaborative learning in practice. Pitfalls or challenges?). In: Leenheer P., Simons P.R.J., Zuylen J., (eds) Didactische verkenningen van het studiehuis (Didactic explorations of the studiehuis). Tilburg, MesoConsult B.V., pp. 89–97
Fleiss J.L. (1981). Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions. New York, John Wiley & Sons
Hendricks C.C. (2001). Teaching causal reasoning through cognitive apprenticeship: What are results from situated learning? The Journal of Educational Research 94(5):302–311
Hoek D.J. (1998). Social and cognitive strategies in cooperative groups: Effects of strategy instruction in secondary mathematics. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Howe C., Tolmie A. (1998). Computer support for learning in collaborative contexts: Prompted hypothesis testing in physics. Computers & Education 3–4:223–235
Jager B. de, Reezigt G.J., Creemers B.P.M. (2002). The effects of teacher training on new instructional behaviour in reading comprehension. Teaching and Teacher Education 18:831–842
Joolingen W.R. van (1999). Cognitive tools for discovery learning. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Education10:385–397
Joolingen W.R. van, Jong T. de (2003). SimQuest, authoring educational simulations. In: Murray T., Blessing S., Ainsworth S., (eds) Authoring Tools for Advanced Technology Learning Environments: Toward cost-effective adaptive, interactive, and intelligent educational software. Dordrecht, Kluwer, pp. 1–31
King A. (1997). ASK to THINK-TEL WHY\(\circledR \copyright\) : A model of transactive peer tutoring for scaffolding higher level complex learning. Educational Psychologist 32(4):221–235
Kozma R.B. (1991). The impact of computer-based tools and embedded prompts in writing. Cognition & Instruction 8(1):1–27
Lajoie S.P. (1993). Cognitive tools for enhancing learning. In: Lajoie S.P., Derry S.J., (eds) Computers as cognitive tools. Hillsdale, NJ, Erlbaum, pp. 261–289
Lazonder A.W., Wilhelm P., Ootes S.A.W. (2003). Using sentence openers to foster student interaction in computer-mediated learning environments. Computers & Education 41(3):291–308
Lebie L., Rhoades J.A., McGrath J.E. (1996). Interaction process in computer mediated and face-to-face groups. Computer Supported Cooperative Work 4(2–3):127–152
Linden J. van der, Erkens G., Schmidt H., Renshaw P. (2000). Collaborative learning. In: Simons P.R.J., van der Linden J., Duffy T., (eds) New Learning. Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 37–55
Marshall S.P. (1995). Schemas in Problem Solving. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
Masterman L., Sharples M. (2002). A theory-informed framework for designing software to support reasoning about causation in history. Computers & Education 38:165–185
Mercer N. (1996). The quality of talk in children’s collaborative activity in the classroom. Learning and Instruction 6(4):359–377
Njoo M.K.H., Jong T. de (1993). Exploratory learning with a computer simulation for control theory: Learning processes and instructional support. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 30(8):821–844
Okada T, Simon H.A. (1997). Collaborative discovery in a scientific domain. Cognitive Science 21(2):109–146
Pijls M., Dekker R., Hout-Wolters van B.H.A.M. (2003). Mathematical level raising through collaborative investigations with the computer. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning 8:191–213
Ploetzner R., Dillenbourg P., Preier, Traum D. (1999). Learning by explaining to oneself and to others. In: Dillenbourg P., (eds) Collaborative Learning. Cognitive and Computational Approaches. Oxford, Elsevier Science Ltd., pp. 103–121
Roelofs E., Linden J. van der, Erkens G. (1999). Leren in dialoog. Een discussie over samenwerkend leren in onderwijs en opleiding (Dialogic learning. A discussion about collaborative learning in education and training). Pedagogische Studiën 76(6):7–34
Ross J.A. Cousins J.B. (1995). Impact of explanation seeking on student achievement and attitudes. Journal of Educational Research 89(2):109–117
Rojas-Drummond S., Mercer N. (2003). Scaffolding the development of effective collaboration and learning. International Journal of Educational Research 39:99–111
Saab N., Joolingen van W.R., Hout-Wolters van B.H.A.M. (2005). Communication in collaborative discovery learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology 75(4):603–621
Salomon G., Globerson T. (1989). When teams do not function the way they ought to. International Journal of Educational Research 13:89–98
She H.C. (1999). Student’s knowledge construction in small groups in the seventh grade biology laboratory: Verbal communication and physical engagement. International Journal of Science Education 21(10):1051–1066
Springer L., Stanne M.E., Donovan S.S. (1999). Effects of small-group learning on undergraduates in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology. A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research 69:21–51
Swaak J. (1998). What-if discovery simulations and assessment of intuitive knowledge. Doctoral dissertation, University Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
Swing S.R., Peterson P.L. (1982). The relationship of student ability and smallgroup interaction to student achievement. American Educational Research Journal 19(2):259
Veerman A.L., Andriessen J.E.B., Kanselaar G. (2000). Learning through synchronous electronic discussion. Computers & Education 34:269–290
Veermans K.H., Jong T., Joolingen W.R. van (2000). Promoting self directed learning in simulation based discovery learning environments through intelligent support. Interactive Learning Environments 8:229–255
Wasson B. (1998). Identifying coordination agents for collaborative telelearning. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 9:275–299
Webb N.M., Farivar S. (1994). Promoting helping behavior in cooperative small groups in middle school mathematics. American Educational Research Journal 31(2):369–395
Wegerif R. (1996). Using computers to help coach exploratory talk across the curriculum. Computers and Education 26(1–3):51–60
Wegerif R., Mercer N. (1997). Computers and reasoning through talk in the classroom. Language and Education 11(4):271–286
Wegerif R., Mercer N., Dawes L. (1999). From social interaction to individual reasoning: an empirical investigation of a possible socio-cultural model of cognitive development. Learning and Instruction 9:493–516
Weiss G., Dillenbourg P. (1999). What is ‘Multi’ in Multi-agent learning?. In: Dillenbourg P., (eds) Collaborative Learning. Cognitive and Computational Approaches. Oxford, Elsevier Science Ltd., pp. 1–20
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0 ), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
About this article
Cite this article
Saab, N., van Joolingen, W.R. & van Hout-Wolters, .H.A.M. Supporting Communication in a Collaborative Discovery Learning Environment: the Effect of Instruction. Instr Sci 35, 73–98 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-006-9003-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-006-9003-4