Abstract
Dyes are among the main environmental pollutants, due to the high amount of discharge of wastewater, lost in the dyeing process, without any further treatment. Anthraquinone dyes are stable and resistant in the aquatic system. Among the methods that have been applied to remove these dyes from wastewaters, adsorption on activated carbon has been reported as a very effective technique, and its modification with oxides and hydroxides of metals have been used to increase its surface area. In the present study, the production of activated carbon was originated by coconut shells, and a mixture of metals and metalloids, such as magnesium, silicate, lanthanum, and aluminum (AC-Mg-Si-La-Al), was used for its subsequent modification and applied to Remazol Brilliant Blue R (RBBR) removal. AC-Mg-Si-La-Al surface morphology was studied by BET, FTIR, and SEM methods. For the evaluation of AC-Mg-Si-La-Al, several parameters, such as dosage, pH, contact time, and initial RBBR concentration were studied. According to the results, in pH 5.0 ± 0.1, the dye percentage rate reached 100% by applying 0.5 g/L. Therefore, the optimal dose of 0.4 g/L and pH 5.0 ± 0.1 are selected, which leads to 99% removal of RBBR. The experimental data found to better fit to Freundlich isotherm (R2 = 0.9189) and pseudo-second-order kinetic (R2 = 0.9291) models and 4 h were the sufficient time for adsorption. According to thermodynamics, a positive value of ∆H0 (19.661 kJ/mol) suggests the endothermic nature of the process. The AC-Mg-Si-La-Al adsorbent was able to regenerate after 5 cycles of use, showing only a 17% decrease in its efficiency. Because of its effectiveness in full RBBR removal, AC-Mg-Si-La-Al could be further examined for the removal of several other dyes, even anionic or cationic.
Graphical Abstract
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Environmental concerns related to wastewater effluents have become controversial among researchers worldwide and have forced scientists to look for simple, more economical, and immediate solutions for their treatment (Pal et al. 2022). Dyes are among the environmental pollutants due to their large amount deposited in wastewater (Farhan Hanafi and Sapawe 2020) and can be characterized as high-strength industrial wastewaters (Tolkou and Zouboulis 2020). Various types of dyes, used in industries (Yaseen and Scholz 2019), such as leather, food, cosmetic, paper, textile, and printing, are transferred to the effluents discharged from these industries (Arya et al. 2020a) without any further treatment, thus causing wide environmental pollution. Τhere are three categories of dyes used, such as non-ionic, cationic, and anionic, which are water-soluble and can be toxic even at low concentrations (Rahdar et al. 2021). As for instance, sugarcane bagasse pulp was recently used for the successful treatment of textile wastewater effluents including methylene blue dye (cationic) (Elshabrawy et al. 2023). Moreover, colorants are classified into natural and into the more commonly used synthetic dyes produced in various colors (Khehra et al. 2006). Synthetic dyes according to their chemical structure and different groups can be divided to azo, anthraquinone, sulfur, phthalocyanine, and triarylmethane and as per their applications can be described as reactive, direct, disperse, basic, and vat (Yeow et al. 2021). Most of these dyes are decomposed and provide high toxicity, carcinogenicity, and mutagenic products in water (Brüschweiler and Merlot 2017; Lellis et al. 2019).
Anthraquinone dyes have a serious impact on the environment as due to their complex structure is difficult to be naturally degraded (Routoula and Patwardhan 2020; Samchetshabam et al. 2017). The biggest environmental concern of the presence of dyes in water is related to the absorption and reflection of sunlight by them. Hence, light enters the water with the consequent reduction of the photosynthetic activity of the algae, which thus affects the food chain. A serious problem is also the fact that these dyes can remain in the environment for a long time, due to their high thermal stability (Samchetshabam et al. 2017).
RBBR is a widely used anthraquinone dye (C22H16N2Na2O11S3; molecular weight: 626.54 g/mol) (Ahmad et al. 2020) (Fig. 1). It is soluble in water, making it a common contaminant found in industrial wastewaters, which is often used as a source substantial for the creation of polymeric colorants (Hadibarata and Kristanti 2012) and belongs to non-biodegradable, recalcitrant, and toxic organic pollutants (Silva et al. 2016).
Several methods, physical, biological, chemical and a combination of these methods, have been used for the elimination of dyes in wastewater (Al-Tohamy et al. 2022). However, studies found that some physical and chemical treatments do not completely inactivate dyes, which may cause secondary pollution when discharged into the environment. On the other hand, biological treatment is cost-effective, produces less sludge compared to physical and chemical treatments, but is less efficient for decolorization, depending on the microorganism used in treatment (Al-Tohamy et al. 2022; Piaskowski et al. 2018). The applied treatment includes precipitation (Faisal et al. 2022; Han et al. 2022; Li et al. 2022), oxidation (Peramune et al. 2022), coagulation (Ihaddaden et al. 2022; Mcyotto et al. 2021), adsorption (Al-Tohamy et al. 2022; Alhogbi et al. 2021; Farhan Hanafi and Sapawe 2020; Yaseen and Scholz 2019), and membrane separation (Raval et al. 2022; Zhao et al. 2023). Nevertheless, adsorption is a low-cost, simple, and a common method for the removal of organic dyes from wastewater (Gupta and Suhas 2009; Jia et al. 2017; Kandisa and Saibaba 2016; Kyzas et al. 2018; Ramakrishna and Viraraghavan 1997).
Several adsorbents, including zeolites (Senguttuvan et al. 2022; Zhang et al. 2022), alumina (Al-Salihi et al. 2022; Folawewo and Bala 2022), silica gel (Volikov et al. 2016), chitosan (Kyzas et al. 2014, 2013), magnetic nanocomposites (Rahdar et al. 2021), graphene oxide (Saroyan et al. 2019a, b; Travlou et al. 2013), and activated carbon (Azam et al. 2022; Gul et al. 2022; H. S. Saroyan et al. 2019a, b), have been widely used for dye removal from wastewater.
Activated carbon (AC), a porous carbonaceous substance, is one of the most effective and widely used adsorbents, which has been applied to wastewater treatment because of its operation, simplicity, and reusability (Vijayaraghavan et al. 2009). However, regardless of its wide application in wastewater treatment, certain commercial activated carbon remains an unprofitable material (Nizam et al. 2021). Consequently, researchers’ interest in lower-cost sources of activated carbon which maintain the advantages of a safe, effective, and economical dye removal method from wastewater has increased (Ramakrishna and Viraraghavan 1997). Therefore, activated carbons from different low-cost origin materials, such as agriculture waste and by-products (e.g., coconut shell and husks, bamboo, sugarcane, coffee waste, fruit peels, bagasse), have been produced in several studies (Devi et al. 2012; Gupta and Suhas 2009; Kyzas et al. 2022; Sarker et al. 2017; Tolkou et al. 2023, 2022). Therefore, there is need for the design and development of advanced and composite activated carbon materials that have high dye removal performance and efficiency.
Recently, many researchers have studied the modification of activated carbons with several additives, to increase its surface area, for their application in dye removal. Therefore, focusing on the additives used in this study, AC has been modified recently with aluminum (Al) (Kazeem et al. 2018) for cationic dye removal, but the dosage used was very high (5–10 g/L) and with lanthanum(III) (Goscianska et al. 2014) for the removal of methyl orange dye. Dye removal was also studied using modified silicate minerals (Selim et al. 2014) for methyl violet dye and polyvinyl pyrrolidone–modified magnesium oxide (Khan et al. 2022) for methyl orange and Congo red adsorption. In addition, recently, the authors of this study modified AC with a combination of magnesium, lanthanum, and silica for the efficient removal of fluoride anions from water (Tolkou et al. 2023).
The present study describes the application of activated carbon, produced from coconut shells, impregnated with a mixture of metals and metalloids, such as magnesium, silicate, lanthanum, and aluminum (AC-Mg-Si-La-Al), as an adsorbent to remove reactive anthraquinone dye RBBR. The aim of this research was the production of an adsorbent material, which would take advantage of the properties of each additional additive, but at the same time a low dose of it would be applied for the effective and complete removal of dye. To the best of our knowledge, to date, there is no study that has examined the use of such a modified material, i.e., the use of activated carbon derived from coconut shells modified with magnesium, silicate, lanthanum, and aluminum for dye removal. The effects of each additive present, the initial pH value, adsorbent’s dose, initial RBBR concentration, and contact time, were investigated. The structure and the morphology of the modified activated carbons were analyzed by BET, FTIR, and SEM/EDS. In addition, kinetic and isotherm models were used to interpret the adsorption process, and thermodynamics and regeneration studies were applied.
Materials and methods
Materials
Chemicals
RBBR dye used as an adsorbate and supplied by Sigma-Aldrich. A 1000-mg/L stock solution of RBBR dye (1.0 g diluted in 1000 mL deionized water) was produced and used for the preparation of required concentrations. MgO (PMS2 pure magnesia), SiO2 (Merck), LaCl3·7H2O 98% (Merck), and AlCl3·6H2O (Merck) were used for activated carbon’s modification. For pH adjustment, 0.01–0.1 M of HCl 37% (Panreac) or NaOH ACS reagent, ≥ 97.0%, and pellets (Sigma-Aldrich) were used. Moreover, 1.0 M NaOH was used for the regeneration study and NaCl (Sigma-Aldrich) solutions (0.1–1.0 M) for testing the effect of ionic strength on dye removal.
Synthesis of modified activated carbon
Activated carbon used in this research, as adsorbent, was produced initially by using coconut shells as origin material according to a previous study (Tolkou et al. 2023, 2022). MgO (0.8 g), SiO2 (0.6 g), LaCl3 (1.8 g), or AlCl3 (0.8 g) were separately added to 5.0 g of activated carbon samples in 25 mL, aiming at its modification. Each content was mixed for 1 h at 298 K and sonicated for 2 h. After being filtered and washed with distilled water, they were dried over night at 333 K. These formed materials are further named as AC-Mg, AC-Si, AC-La, and AC-Al, respectively. Then, shares of these dried samples were mixed and calcined at 773 K for 5 h to obtain the AC-Mg-Si-La-Al (magnesium/silicate/lanthanum/aluminum) composite modified activated carbon and then cooled down at room temperature in order to be used in the experiments that follow.
Analytical determinations
An ultraviolet–visible (UV–Vis) spectrophotometer (WTW Spectroflex 6100, Weilheim, Germany) was used for the determination of the residual concentration of RBBR at 593 nm (λmax) (Arya et al. 2020a), by corresponding the absorbance to the standard curve of RBBR.
Characterization techniques
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (Jeol JSM-6390 LV, Japan scanning electron microscope)/EDS, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR, Perkin Elmer, New York, NY, USA), and Brunauer, Emmett, and Teller (BET) analysis software, were used for the characterization of the surface of AC-Mg-Si-La-Al activated carbon.
Adsorption experiments
For adsorption experiments, a specific amount of adsorbent has been introduced into Falcon tubes (15 mL) filled with appropriate concentrations of RBBR solution at constant temperature. Then, a Trayster overhead shaker and Loopster rotator were used for the agitation of the mixture at a specific agitation speed (80 rpm). pH value (3–9) of the solution, RBBR initial concentration (5–250 mg/L), dosage (0.1–0.5 g/L), and contact time (5–240 min) are some of the factors examined in the following experiments, as derived from preliminary experiments (results not shown in this study). A 0.45-μm pore size nylon filter was used for the filtration of the collected water samples for further analysis. Results show the average of three experiments performed. The percentage removal (% R) of RBBR was determined from Eq. 1:
where C0 = initial RBBR concentration (mg/L) and Cf = final RBBR concentration (mg/L).
The adsorption capacity of adsorbent (Qe) (mg/g) was calculated from Eq. 2:
where Ce = RBBR concentration (mg/L) at equilibrium, V = volume of solution (L), and m = mass of the adsorbent used (g).
Isotherm models
A fixed amount of AC-Mg-Si-La-Al (g) was mixed with 10 mL of RBBR solution (5–250 mg/L). Even though there are many isotherm models (i.e., Dubinin-Radushkevich, Khan, Langmuir–Freundlich), in order to quantitatively evaluate the adsorption results, the most widely used models (Kalam et al. 2021), Langmuir (Eq. 3) and Freundlich (Eq. 4), were selected for fitting the equilibrium data.
where Qm = theoretical monolayer/maximum adsorption capacity (mg/g), KL = energy of RBBR adsorption (L/mg), KF = constant related to adsorption capacity, 1/n = constant related to the intensity of adsorption or surface heterogeneity, and Ce = RBBR concentration (mg/L) at equilibrium.
The Langmuir model assumes monolayer coverage and characterizes chemisorption at specified adsorption sites, without interactions among adsorbed molecules. Conversely, Freundlich isotherm model assumes multilayer coverage as it is indicated for surface heterogeneity, indicating physisorption at the surface.
In this study, non-linear isotherm models were used, as it has been reported in the literature that non-linear modeling better represents the experimental results compared to linear ones (El-Khaiary and Malash 2011; Subramanyam and Das 2014).
Kinetics experiments
Pseudo-first-order (PFO) and pseudo-second-order (PSO) kinetic models of RBBR adsorption were chosen to fit the kinetic data of the experiments. The physical significance of this equation is their suitability for either long (PFO) (Eq. 5) or short (PSO) (Eq. 6) times of adsorption (Kyzas et al. 2012).
where Qt = RBBR adsorbed (mg/g) at time t (min) and Qe = RBBR adsorbed (mg/g) at equilibrium. k1 = pseudo-first-order rate constant (L/min), k2 = pseudo-second-order rate constant adsorption (g/mg min), and t = contact time (min).
Thermodynamics
In this study, three significant thermodynamic parameters, the change of Gibbs free energy (∆G0, kJ/mol), enthalpy (∆H0, kJ/mol), and entropy (∆S0, kJ/mol·K), are considered to estimate the adsorption procedure thermodynamically and determine the potential spontaneous nature. Therefore, to calculate the thermodynamic parameters, four different temperatures (298, 308, 318, and 338 K) were conducted and the following equations (Smith et al. 2018):
ΔG0 was given from Eq. (8), and the values of ΔH0 and ΔS0 were calculated from the slope and intercept of the plot of ln(Kc) versus 1/T (Eq. (10)).
Results and discussion
Characterizations
Physical properties
According to N2 adsorption–desorption isotherms of AC-Mg-Si-La-Al adsorbent versus relative pressure (P/Po) shown in Fig. 2, AC-Mg-Si-La-Al displays type IV isotherms with hysteresis loops (Sotomayor et al. 2018), confirming the mesoporous structure of this adsorbent. The values of BET specific surface area, median Barrett-Joyner-Halenda (BJH) pore size and pore volume for AC-Mg-Si-La-Al are presented in Table 1. The co-presence of Mg, Si, La, and Al on AC tolerates simpler and quicker physisorption of N2; therefore, the curves overlap to the critical region. BET is then calculated by the desorption curve. The results showed that the AC-Mg-Si-La-Al displays a surface area of 289 m2/g, which is slightly lower than the corresponding values of other magnesium- and silica-modified activated carbons found in the literature (Mohamed et al. 2022).
SEM/EDS
The SEM images of AC-Mg-Si-La-Al before and after RBBR adsorption are shown in Fig. 3. As illustrated in Fig. 3a, the surface of AC-Mg-Si-La-Al shows a rough texture spread over the surface. After RBBR adsorption (Fig. 3b), the surface of the adsorbent was converted to be more compact and smoother due to the filling of RBBR molecules on the AC-Mg-Si-La-Al surface. These results obtained from the SEM analysis identified that the morphology of AC-Mg-Si-La-Al is appropriate for RBBR dye adsorption.
The SEM–EDS analysis of AC-Mg-Si-La-Al before and after RBBR adsorption is shown in Fig. 4, and the relative percentages of the elements found on the surface are presented in Table 2. As shown, Mg, Si, La, and Al were noticed on the surface of activated carbon, verifying carbon modification with a homogeneous distribution of these elements on the surface. Furthermore, after the adsorption of RBBR (Fig. 4b) is observed a greater percentage of carbon and sulfur in the surface of AC-Mg-Si-La-Al, which is possibly due to the additional carbon and sulfur that resulted from the structure of the adsorbed dye. In addition, after adsorption, a decrease in the percentage of silicon and aluminum is observed, possibly related to the binding of the dye as the presence of silicon was found to increase the surface affinity of the activated carbon with the dye (Mohamed et al. 2022).
FTIR
The FTIR of AC-Mg-Si-La-Al-modified activated carbon before and after adsorption of RBBR is shown in Fig. 5. Observing the spectrum after adsorption, a broad peak at 3408 cm−1 (Fig. 4a) is shown which is limited in intensity to the spectrum of activated carbon before adsorption and is due to the water molecules (H2O) (symmetric and asymmetric O–H stretching vibration) that may have entered from the solvent (Arya et al. 2020a). Furthermore, the most characteristic peaks and variations are seen on a closer scale in Fig. 5. Thus, the bands at around 1545–1407 cm−1 do not protrude before adsorption but become apparent after adsorption and could attributed to the C = C stretching vibration in the aromatic rings which are for the anthraquinone dye RBBR (Arya et al. 2020a), confirming the adsorption of dye on the surface of AC-Mg-Si-La-Al. Moreover, the absorption band at 1547 cm−1 is attributed to the C = C stretching or amide-II (protein N–H bend, or C–N stretch) (Ozturk and Silah 2020) and at 1037 cm−1 is attributed to the S = O stretching vibration from sulfonic (–SO3−) groups (Sangar et al. 2019) that both exist at RBBR structure and is not appeared before adsorption. The intense broad peak seen at 110 cm−1, in the wide region 1000–1200 cm−1, both presented before and after the adsorption, corresponding to the Si − O − Si bond (Choong et al. 2020) and to the infrared vibration of C-O (Kazeem et al. 2018). Additionally, observing both spectra, a sharp peek at 1487 and 674 cm−1 can be assigned to MgO stretching vibrations (Selvam et al. 2011), while at 801–804 cm–1 is a suggestive peak for the stretching vibration of La = O groups (Aghazadeh et al. 2011).
Batch adsorption experiments
Effect of adsorbents modification on dye adsorption
In batch experiments, the effect of modification type of AC was examined to determine the efficiency of the adsorbents in RBBR removal. To test the effectiveness, an indicative dose of all applied adsorbents (0.5 g/L) was used at different pH values, to cover the acidic, neutral, and basic conditions, using 100 mg/L initial dye concentration at room temperature, and the results are shown in Fig. 6. As depicted, the effectiveness of AC in the adsorption of RBBR in some cases increases with its modification, and in some others a significant degradation is observed. In particular, the modification only with magnesium (AC-Mg), lanthanum (AC-La), and especially when modifying it with silicon (AC-Si) exhibits very low removal rates in all examined pH values. On the other hand, when aluminum participates in the modification of activated carbon (AC-Al, AC-Mg–Al and AC-Mg-Si-La-Al), its effectiveness increases relative to unmodified carbon. According to literature (Kazeem et al. 2018) the deposit of Al on the surface of AC enriches the pore structure for improved adsorption. Moreover, when all the additional components participate in the modification (AC-Mg-Si-La-Al), the effectiveness of the activated carbon increases impressively at all pH values, reaching the complete removal of RBBR dye (100%) at pH 5.0 ± 0.1. In addition, observing the removal rates of AC-Mg–Al material, at this pH value (95%), the combination of aluminum and magnesium is the one that contributes to this increase in efficiency, as magnesium may ionize the surface of AC to produce cationic and anionic molecules (Mg2+−OH−) that can enhance the adsorption of dyes (Ghalehkhondabi et al. 2021; Kittappa et al. 2020). According to recent literature, the composite with aluminum/magnesium showed preferential adsorption of anionic dyes (Grover et al. 2022).
In conclusion, this composite adsorbent material AC-Mg-Si-La-Al is chosen to be further studied in terms of its effectiveness and the possible mechanism that takes place for this complete dye removal.
Effect of adsorbent dose and initial pH on dye adsorption
The effect of the initial pH of the solution is an important factor that can affect the performance of adsorbents in water and wastewater treatment. Hence, the pH range 3.0 to 9.0 ± 0.1 at an initial dye concentration of 100 mg/L was studied and the relative results are shown in Fig. 7. In the same time, the effect of adsorbent’s dosage was studied, in order to define the optimum combination of dosage and pH for adsorption procedure. As depicted in Fig. 7, with increasing the dosage of AC-Mg-Si-La-Al, the removal efficiency of RBBR dye increases, as expected, at all considered pH values. Moreover, complete removal for RBBR dye (100%) was achieved by adding 0.5 g/L of adsorbent at acidic pH values. It is worth noting that at pH 5.0 ± 0.1, with the addition of just 0.2 g/L, 70% of the dye was removed and with 0.3 g/L the removal rate reached 95%.
In aquatic solutions, RBBR dye’s behavior is as follows (Mate and Mishra 2020):
The pHpzc (point of zero charge) of AC-Mg-Si-La-Al adsorbent was measured in the range of 2–10 ± 0.1. pHpzc, which is the point at which the material’s surface charge becomes neutral, calculated by the relative curve plotted against ΔpH vs pHinitial using pH drift method. As shown in Fig. 8, the relative pHpzc value was 7.22. For pH > 7.22, mainly negatively charged surface of AC-Mg-Si-La-Al is occurred (Kyzas et al. 2013). At pH < 7.22, the surface charge may get mostly positively charged. This meant that the positive surface charge of AC-Mg-Si-La-Al would be electrostatically attracted to the RBBR when pH is below 7.22. Therefore, at pH 5.0 ± 0.1, there is a full dye removal (100%), as at acidic pH, the dye molecule behaves as a cation due to protonation of the NH2 group (NH3+) (Arya et al. 2020a) and enhances its adsorption on the cation exchange sites. On the other hand, the negative surface charge would facilitate the interaction between adsorbent molecules and RBBR molecules (negatively charged form due to SO3− groups) via electrostatic repulsion at pH higher than 7.22, due to competition between excess hydroxyl ions and negatively charged dye ions for adsorption binding sites (Parimelazhagan et al. 2022).
In basic conditions, carboxylate group present in the modified AC is converted into a carboxylate as follows (Mate and Mishra 2020):
These negatively charged carboxyl ions repelled the anionic dye resulting in a reduction in adsorption efficiency. Moreover, according to the literature (Ada et al. 2009; Aracagök, 2022; Arya et al. 2020b, 2020a; Kyzas et al. 2012; Ozturk and Silah 2020; Parimelazhagan et al. 2022), low pH value is usually ideal for the removal of RBBR dye, which is in agreement with the present study.
Finally, all adsorption studies that follow in this study performed at optimum pH 5.0 ± 0.1 and at a constant dosage of 0.4 g/L (97% removal).
Effect of contact time
In Fig. 9 is shown the effect of contact time on adsorption. Five to 1440 (24 h) min was the examined contact time range and was found that after 4 h (240 min) of reaction, additional increase in dye removal was insignificant, and thus, 4 h of reaction was chosen for further batch experiments. In particular, up to 80 min, there is an instantaneous dye adsorption (reaching 60% removal), indicating rapid external distribution and surface adsorption. Between 80 and 240 min, there is a slow equilibrium increasing removal rate to 80%, and after 300 min (5 h) up to 1440 min (24 h), an equilibrium state is achieved (Kyzas et al. 2012; Wang and Wang 2008). As it appears, the adsorption of RBBR is fast at the early stage of the contact time, where several sites on the surface are available for adsorption, but progressively is delayed until it reaches equilibrium, where the rest of the surface sites are harder to occupy, because of the existing repulsion among the solute molecules of the solid and the bulk phase.
Adsorption isotherms
Two different isotherm models (Freundlich and Langmuir) were used for the evaluation of the equilibrium data of adsorption. Figure 10 presents the adsorption isotherms of RBBR dye on AC-Mg-Si-La-Al, and Table 3 displays the several isotherm parameters. Based on the correlation coefficient (R2), the adsorption of RBBR dye is better described by the Freundlich isotherm model (R2 = 0.9189 for Freundlich and 0.8735 for Langmuir, respectively). Moreover, according to the Freundlich isotherm model, the meaning of the n value is when n < 1 the adsorption is a chemical procedure, n = 1 the adsorption is linear, and when n > 1 the adsorption is physical (Ozturk and Silah 2020). The relative n value of this study is 4.8939 and since 1/n is less than one (calculated as 0.2043), the adsorption of RBBR dye onto AC-Mg-Si-La-Al is favorable, confirming also that is a physical process (Rashid et al. 2018). As Freundlich adsorption isotherm model is valid for heterogeneous surfaces, this high n value shows a strong interface between adsorbent surface and RBBR based on the strong affinity of cationic exchange sites (Ozturk and Silah 2020) of AC-Mg-Si-La-Al with dye. This agrees with the conclusion obtained from Fig. 6 that the combination of aluminum and magnesium is the one that contributes to this increase in efficiency. Moreover, the higher the value of KF, the more effective the adsorption performance is.
On the other hand, the Langmuir isotherm model was used to estimate the maximum adsorption capacity (Qmax) (Ozturk and Silah 2020) that describes the total capacity of the AC-Mg-Si-La-Al for the RBBR as 465 mg/g. In addition, the Langmuir constant (KL) indicates the extent of interaction between adsorbate and the surface but the small value 0.697 L/mg indicates a weak interaction (Tolkou et al. 2023).
Table 4 compares the synthesized adsorbent material of this study (AC-Mg-Si-La-Al) with some revealing materials published in the recent literature, comparing various parameters. As it can be shown, acidic conditions are confirmed to be optimal for RBBR dye removal, with pH values ranging 2.0–6.0. The relative results, presented in Table 4, showed that in most of the adsorption studies a higher adsorbent dose was used, leading to higher adsorption capacities, but none of the specific materials being compared achieves 100% of dye removal.
The novelty of this material (AC-Mg-Si-La-Al) examined in the present study is that an activated carbon, produced by coconut shells and further modified by using magnesium, silicate, lanthanum, and aluminum and applied to the removal of RBBR, is first mentioned in literature. Moreover, it is worth noting that the dose of AC-Mg-Si-La-Al used is very low compared to literature, as shown in Table 4, i.e., only 0.5 g/L to reach complete removal. Moreover, according to Fig. 7, by adding even 0.3 g/L, the percentage removal is still very high (95%). Relative removal rates found in the literature range between 76 and 95% using however higher doses. In addition, AC-Mg-Si-La-Al showed a relatively high adsorption capacity (465 mg/g) compared to other materials, suggesting that it is a potential and effective adsorbent material for dye removal.
Adsorption kinetics
The adsorption of RBBR on AC-Mg-Si-La-Al was fitted to pseudo-first-order (PFO) and pseudo-second-order (PSO) models. These models and their non-linear forms are reported in Fig. 11 and Table 5. According to the results obtained, PSO model has the highest R2 value, thus 0.9291 in comparison with the relative low value of PFO (0.8695), indicating that that PSO model fits better to AC-Si-Mg-La-Al. In addition, the kinetic parameters showed that Qe,cal (221 mg/g) calculated from Eq. (6) of pseudo-second-order model was similar to the experimental value (243 mg/g). Hence, adsorption kinetics study exhibited that the adsorption was closer to chemisorption instead of mass transfer which was about the exchange or sharing of electrons between dye and adsorbent (Arya et al. 2020a), and that was the determining step in the adsorption of RBBR.
Effect of ionic strength
The effect of ionic strength on the adsorption of RBBR by adding a fixed amount of AC-Mg-Si-La-Al (0.4 g) was conducted by adding different concentrations of NaCl (0.1, 0.3, 0.5, and 1.0 M) during the adsorption experiment, following the same previous experimental procedure. According to the results shown in Fig. 12, a slight increase in the removal (%) of RBBR was observed, but with increasing NaCl concentration, a decrease in dye removal was seen. At 0.5 M ionic strength, the percentage of dye removed was 99.3% while at higher salt concentration (1.0 M), the relative percentage it only reached 98.7%, possibly because of the surface was less available to the dye removal at a greater salt presence (Khalaf et al. 2021). Therefore, sorption of RBBR became lower.
Thermodynamics
The values of ΔH0 and ΔS0 were determined from the slop and intercept of the plot between ln(Kc) versus 1/T (R2 = 0.971, data is not displayed). The relative thermodynamic parameters, at all temperatures, are given in Table 6. As it results from the parameters, there is a positive value of ∆H0 (19.661 kJ/mol) that suggests the endothermic nature of the process (Kyzas et al. 2012). In addition, according to bibliography (Lima et al. 2019), the values of ∆G0 cannot be positive, as if the process of adsorption occurs, the corresponding values should be negative. That is because the negative values of ∆G0 recommend that the process of the anthraquinone acid dye adsorption is spontaneous (Kyzas et al. 2012; Liu 2009). Thus, adsorption is endothermic and the quantity of adsorbed molecules increases with increasing temperature. According to the positive value of ∆S0 (0.0737 kJ/mol∙K), there is an increase in random interaction between solid/liquid interfaces, which is because the water molecules, which are displaced by the dye molecules, gain more entropy than is lost.
Regeneration study
Regeneration experiments were applied to study the reusability of AC-Mg-Si-La-Al for the removal of RBBR dye (C0 100 mg/L, pH 5.0 ± 0.1, dose 0.5 g/L) for five cycles. After the first cycle, the solids of AC-Mg-Si-La-Al were treated with 0.01 M NaOH and agitated for 3 h as the indicative repetitive time and then rinsed with distilled water for base removal. According to Fig. 13, at first cycle the removal (%) of RBBR dye was around 95% and after the fifth cycle it was reduced to 78%. Consequently, this work showed a reuse of AC-Mg-Si-La-Al adsorbent for five cycles of regeneration, showing only a 17% reduction in its efficiency, making it an effective and reusable material for many cycles.
Conclusions
Activated carbon from coconut shells was used after modification with a mixture of metals and metalloids, such as magnesium, silicate, lanthanum, and aluminum (AC-Mg-Si-La-Al), for the removal of reactive anthraquinone dye RBBR. SEM, FTIR, and BET techniques were used for the characterization of the produced adsorbent. According to the results, the adsorbent has a surface area of 289 m2/g, has a rough texture spread over the surface, and has a homogeneous distribution of all elements on the surface confirming carbon impregnation, while FTIR results, before and after adsorption, confirmed the adsorption of RBBR on AC-Mg-Si-La, as specified by the peaks at 1547 cm−1 and 1037 cm−1 which are attributed to the amide-II (protein N–H bend, or C–N stretch) and to the S = O stretching vibration from sulfonic (–SO3−) groups, respectively.
Regarding the performance of the AC-Mg-Si-La-Al adsorbent, it was found that at pH 5.0 ± 0.1, with the addition of 0.3 g/L, the removal rate reached 95%, while a complete removal is achieved by adding 0.5 g/L. Moreover, at pH 5.0 ± 0.1, which is less than pHpzc (7.22) of the adsorbent used, the positive surface charge of AC-Mg-Si-La-Al would be electrostatically attracted to the RBBR while at acidic pH, the dye molecule behaves as a cation due to protonation of the NH2 group and enhances its adsorption on the cation exchange sites.
The Freundlich isotherm model was found to better fit the adsorption (R2 = 0.92), than the application of Langmuir. Maximum Langmuir adsorption capacity was found to be 465 mg/g and 4 h (240 min) was selected as optimum time for the experiment. In addition, the results fitted better to the pseudo-second-order kinetic model, concluding that the adsorption of RBBR on AC-Mg-Si-La-Al was closer to chemisorption.
According to thermodynamics, there is a positive value of ∆H0 (19.661 kJ/mol) that suggests the endothermic nature of the process. Finally, a reuse of AC-Mg-Si-La-Al adsorbent for five cycles after successfully regenerated, showed only a 17% reduction in its efficiency, making it an effective and reusable material for many cycles.
The use of activated carbon derived from coconut shells co-modified with magnesium, silicate, lanthanum and aluminum was reported for the first time in this study for the removal of RBBR dye. Due to its efficiency in complete removal of RBBR, AC-Mg-Si-La-Al could be further used to remove many other dyes, even anionic or cationic ones.
Data availability
The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Ada K, Ergene A, Tan S, Yalçin E (2009) Adsorption of Remazol Brilliant Blue R using ZnO fine powder: Equilibrium, kinetic and thermodynamic modeling studies. J Hazard Mater 165:637–644. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.10.036
Aghazadeh M, Golikand AN, Ghaemi M, Yousefi T (2011) A novel lanthanum hydroxide nanostructure prepared by cathodic electrodeposition. Mater Lett 65:1466–1468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2011.02.039
Ahmad MA, Ahmad N, Bello OS (2015) Adsorption kinetic studies for the removal of synthetic dye using durian seed activated carbon. J Dispers Sci Technol 36:670–684. https://doi.org/10.1080/01932691.2014.913983
Ahmad MA, Eusoff MA, Oladoye PO, Adegoke KA, Bello OS (2020) Statistical optimization of Remazol Brilliant Blue R dye adsorption onto activated carbon prepared from pomegranate fruit peel. Chem Data Collect 28:100426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cdc.2020.100426
Al-Salihi S, Jasim AM, Fidalgo MM, Xing Y (2022) Removal of Congo red dyes from aqueous solutions by porous γ-alumina nanoshells. Chemosphere 286:131769. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.131769
Al-Tohamy R, Ali SS, Li F, Okasha KM, Mahmoud YAG, Elsamahy T, Jiao H, Fu Y, Sun J (2022) A critical review on the treatment of dye-containing wastewater: ecotoxicological and health concerns of textile dyes and possible remediation approaches for environmental safety. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 231:113160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2021.113160
Alhogbi BG, Altayeb S, Bahaidarah EA, Zawrah MF (2021) Removal of anionic and cationic dyes from wastewater using activated carbon from palm tree fiber waste. Processes 9:1–21. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9030416
Aracagök YD (2022) Biosorption of Remazol Brilliant Blue R dye onto chemically modified and unmodified Yarrowia lipolytica biomass. Arch Microbiol 204:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00203-021-02743-3
Arya MC, Bafila PS, Mishra D, Negi K, Kumar R, Bughani A (2020a) Adsorptive removal of Remazol Brilliant Blue R dye from its aqueous solution by activated charcoal of Thuja orientalis leaves: an eco-friendly approach. SN Appl Sci 2. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-020-2063-2
Arya MC, Bafila PS, Mishra D, Negi K, Kumar R, Bughani A (2020b) Adsorptive removal of Remazol Brilliant Blue R dye from its aqueous solution by activated charcoal of Thuja orientalis leaves: an eco-friendly approach. SN Appl Sci 2. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-020-2063-2
Azam K, Shezad N, Shafiq I, Akhter P, Akhtar F, Jamil F, Shafique S, Park YK, Hussain M (2022) A review on activated carbon modifications for the treatment of wastewater containing anionic dyes. Chemosphere 306:135566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.135566
Brüschweiler BJ, Merlot C (2017) Azo dyes in clothing textiles can be cleaved into a series of mutagenic aromatic amines which are not regulated yet. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 88:214–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2017.06.012
Choong CE, Wong KT, Jang SB, Nah IW, Choi J, Ibrahim S, Yoon Y, Jang M (2020) Fluoride removal by palm shell waste based powdered activated carbon vs. functionalized carbon with magnesium silicate: implications for their application in water treatment. Chemosphere 239:124765. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.124765
Devi B, Jahagirdar A, Ahmed M (2012) Adsorption of chromium on activated carbon prepared from coconut shell. Adsorption 2:364–370
El-Khaiary MI, Malash GF (2011) Common data analysis errors in batch adsorption studies. Hydrometallurgy 105:314–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2010.11.005
Elshabrawy SO, Elhussieny A, Taha MM, Pal K, Fahim IS (2023) Wastewater treatment via sugarcane bagasse pulp. Int J Environ Sci Technol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-023-04831-x
Faisal AAH, Ramadhan ZK, Al-Ansari N, Sharma G, Naushad M, Bathula C (2022) Precipitation of (Mg/Fe-CTAB) - Layered double hydroxide nanoparticles onto sewage sludge for producing novel sorbent to remove Congo red and methylene blue dyes from aqueous environment. Chemosphere 291:132693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.132693
Farhan Hanafi M, Sapawe N (2020) A review on the water problem associate with organic pollutants derived from phenol, methyl orange, and remazol brilliant blue dyes. Mater Today Proc 31:A141–A150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.01.258
Folawewo AD, Bala MD (2022) Carbon-covered alumina-supported ZnO nanocatalysts with enhanced visible light photocatalytic performance for the removal of dyes. Environ Technol Innov 28:102866. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2022.102866
Ghalehkhondabi V, Fazlali A, Ketabi K (2021) Synthesis and characterization of modified activated carbon (MgO/AC) for methylene blue adsorption: optimization, equilibrium isotherm and kinetic studies. Water Sci Technol 83:1548–1565. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2021.016
Goscianska J, Marciniak M, Pietrzak R (2014) Mesoporous carbons modified with lanthanum(III) chloride for methyl orange adsorption. Chem Eng J 247:258–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2014.03.012
Grover A, Mohiuddin I, Malik AK, Aulakh JS, Vikrant K, Kim KH, Brown RJC (2022) Magnesium/aluminum layered double hydroxides intercalated with starch for effective adsorptive removal of anionic dyes. J Hazard Mater 424:127454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.127454
Gul A, Ma’amor A, Khaligh NG, Muhd Julkapli N (2022) Recent advancements in the applications of activated carbon for the heavy metals and dyes removal. Chem Eng Res Des. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2022.07.051
Gupta VK, Suhas (2009) Application of low-cost adsorbents for dye removal - a review. J Environ Manage 90:2313–2342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.11.017
Hadibarata T, Kristanti RA (2012) Effect of environmental factors in the decolorization of Remazol Brilliant Blue R. J Chil Chem Soc 2:1095–1098
Han G, Du Y, Huang Y, Wang W, Su S, Liu B (2022) Study on the removal of hazardous Congo red from aqueous solutions by chelation flocculation and precipitation flotation process. Chemosphere 289:133109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.133109
Ihaddaden S, Aberkane D, Boukerroui A, Robert D (2022) Removal of methylene blue (basic dye) by coagulation-flocculation with biomaterials (bentonite and Opuntia ficus indica). J. Water Process Eng. 49:102952. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2022.102952
Jia Z, Li Z, Ni T, Li S (2017) Adsorption of low-cost absorption materials based on biomass (Cortaderia selloana flower spikes) for dye removal: Kinetics, isotherms and thermodynamic studies. J Mol Liq 229:285–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2016.12.059
Kalam S, Abu-Khamsin SA, Kamal MS, Patil S (2021) Surfactant adsorption isotherms: a review. ACS Omega 6:32342–32348. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.1c04661
Kandisa RV, Saibaba KVN (2016) Dye removal by adsorption: a review. J Bioremediation Biodegrad 07. https://doi.org/10.4172/2155-6199.1000371
Kazeem TS, Lateef SA, Ganiyu SA, Qamaruddin M, Tanimu A, Sulaiman KO, Sajid Jillani SM, Alhooshani K (2018) Aluminium-modified activated carbon as efficient adsorbent for cleaning of cationic dye in wastewater. J Clean Prod 205:303–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.09.114
Khalaf IH, Al-Sudani FT, AbdulRazak AA, Aldahri T, Rohani S (2021) Optimization of Congo red dye adsorption from wastewater by a modified commercial zeolite catalyst using response surface modeling approach. Water Sci Technol 83:1369–1383. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2021.078
Khan A, Naeem A, Mahmood T, Ahmad B, Ahmad Z, Farooq M, Saeed T (2022) Mechanistic study on methyl orange and Congo red adsorption onto polyvinyl pyrrolidone modified magnesium oxide. Int J Environ Sci Technol 19:2515–2528. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-021-03308-z
Khehra MS, Saini HS, Sharma DK, Chadha BS, Chimni SS (2006) Biodegradation of azo dye C.I. Acid Red 88 by an anoxic - Aerobic sequential bioreactor. Dye Pigment 70:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dyepig.2004.12.021
Kittappa S, Jais FM, Ramalingam M, Ibrahim S (2020) Functionalized magnetic mesoporous palm shell activated carbon for enhanced removal of azo dyes. J Environ Chem Eng 8:104081. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2020.104081
Kyzas G, Tolkou AK, Al Musawi TJ, Mengelizadeh N, Mohebi S, Balarak D (2022) Fluoride removal from water by using magnetic activated carbon derived from canola stalks. SSRN Electron J 1–17. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4035553
Kyzas GZ, Christodoulou E, Bikiaris DN (2018) Basic dye removal with sorption onto low-cost natural textile fibers. Processes 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr6090166
Kyzas GZ, Lazaridis NK, Kostoglou M (2014) Adsorption/desorption of a dye by a chitosan derivative: experiments and phenomenological modeling. Chem Eng J 248:327–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2014.03.063
Kyzas GZ, Lazaridis NK, Kostoglou M (2013) On the simultaneous adsorption of a reactive dye and hexavalent chromium from aqueous solutions onto grafted chitosan. J Colloid Interface Sci 407:432–441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2013.05.052
Kyzas GZ, Lazaridis NK, Mitropoulos AC (2012) Removal of dyes from aqueous solutions with untreated coffee residues as potential low-cost adsorbents: equilibrium, reuse and thermodynamic approach. Chem Eng J 189–190:148–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2012.02.045
Lellis B, Fávaro-Polonio CZ, Pamphile JA, Polonio JC (2019) Effects of textile dyes on health and the environment and bioremediation potential of living organisms. Biotechnol Res Innov 3:275–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biori.2019.09.001
Li Y, An Y, Zhao R, Zhong Y, Long S, Yang J, Li J, Zheng H (2022) Synergetic removal of oppositely charged dyes by co-precipitation and amphoteric self-floating capturer: mechanism investigation by molecular simulation. Chemosphere 296:134033. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.134033
Lima EC, Hosseini-Bandegharaei A, Moreno-Piraján JC, Anastopoulos I (2019) A critical review of the estimation of the thermodynamic parameters on adsorption equilibria. Wrong use of equilibrium constant in the Van’t Hoof equation for calculation of thermodynamic parameters of adsorption. J Mol Liq 273:425–434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2018.10.048
Liu Y (2009) Is the free energy change of adsorption correctly calculated? J Chem Eng Data 54:1981–1985. https://doi.org/10.1021/je800661q
Mate CJ, Mishra S (2020) Synthesis of borax cross-linked Jhingan gum hydrogel for remediation of Remazol Brilliant Blue R (RBBR) dye from water: adsorption isotherm, kinetic, thermodynamic and biodegradation studies. Int J Biol Macromol 151:677–690. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.02.192
Mcyotto F, Wei Q, Macharia DK, Huang M, Shen C, Chow CWK (2021) Effect of dye structure on color removal efficiency by coagulation. Chem Eng J 405:126674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2020.126674
Mohamed F, Shaban M, Zaki SK, Abd-Elsamie MS, Sayed R, Zayed M, Khalid N, Saad S, Omar S, Ahmed AM, Gerges A, El-Mageed HRA, Soliman NK (2022) Activated carbon derived from sugarcane and modified with natural zeolite for efficient adsorption of methylene blue dye: experimentally and theoretically approaches. Sci Rep 12:1–18. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-22421-8
Nandanwar PM, Saravanan D, Jugade RM (2022) Materials advances chitosan Entrapped microporous activated carbon composite as a supersorbent for remazol brilliant 5488–5496. https://doi.org/10.1039/d2ma00508e
Nizam NUM, Hanafiah MM, Mahmoudi E, Halim AA, Mohammad AW (2021) The removal of anionic and cationic dyes from an aqueous solution using biomass-based activated carbon. Sci Rep 11:1–17. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-88084-z
Ozturk G, Silah H (2020) Adsorptive Removal of Remazol Brilliant Blue R from water by using a macroporous polystyrene resin: isotherm and kinetic studies. Environ Process 7:479–492. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40710-020-00429-4
Pal K, Chakroborty S, Panda P, Nath N, Soren S (2022) Environmental assessment of wastewater management via hybrid nanocomposite matrix implications—an organized review. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29:76626–76643. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-23122-5
Parimelazhagan V, Yashwath P, Arukkani Pushparajan D, Carpenter J (2022) Rapid Removal of Toxic Remazol Brilliant Blue-R Dye from Aqueous Solutions Using Juglans nigra Shell Biomass Activated Carbon as Potential Adsorbent: optimization, isotherm, kinetic, and thermodynamic investigation. Int J Mol Sci 23:1–33. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms232012484
Peramune D, Manatunga DC, Dassanayake RS, Premalal V, Liyanage RN, Gunathilake C, Abidi N (2022) Recent advances in biopolymer-based advanced oxidation processes for dye removal applications: a review. Environ. Res. 215:114242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2022.114242
Piaskowski K, Świderska-Dąbrowska R, Zarzycki PK (2018) Dye removal from water and wastewater using various physical, chemical, and biological processes. J AOAC Int 101:1371–1384. https://doi.org/10.5740/jaoacint.18-0051
Rahdar S, Rahdar A, Sattari M, Hafshejani LD, Tolkou AK, Kyzas GZ (2021) Barium/cobalt@polyethylene glycol nanocomposites for dye removal from aqueous solutions. Polymers (Basel) 13. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13071161
Ramakrishna KR, Viraraghavan T (1997) Dye removal using low cost adsorbents. Water Sci Technol 36:189–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0273-1223(97)00387-9
Rashid RA, Mohd MA, Hello KM (2018) Adsorptive removal of methylene blue by commercial coconut shell activated carbon. Sci Lett 12:301–316
Raval AR, Kohli HP, Mahadwad OK (2022) Application of emulsion liquid membrane for removal of malachite green dye from aqueous solution: Extraction and stability studies. Chem Eng J Adv 12:100398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceja.2022.100398
Routoula E, Patwardhan SV (2020) Degradation of anthraquinone dyes from effluents: a review focusing on enzymatic dye degradation with industrial potential. Environ Sci Technol 54:647–664. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b03737
Samchetshabam G, Hussan A, Choudhury TG, Gita S (2017) Impact of textile dyes waste on aquatic environments and its treatment wastewater management view project tribal sub plan view project. Environ Ecol 35:2349–2353
Sangar SK, Lan CS, Razali SM, Farabi MSA, Taufiq-Yap YH (2019) Methyl ester production from palm fatty acid distillate (PFAD) using sulfonated cow dung-derived carbon-based solid acid catalyst. Energy Convers Manag 196:1306–1315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2019.06.073
Sarker TC, Azam SMGG, El-Gawad AMA, Gaglione SA, Bonanomi G (2017) Sugarcane bagasse: a potential low-cost biosorbent for the removal of hazardous materials. Clean Technol Environ Policy 19:2343–2362. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-017-1429-7
Saroyan H, Kyzas GZ, Deliyanni EA (2019a) Effective dye degradation by graphene oxide supported manganese oxide. Processes 7. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr7010040
Saroyan HS, Arampatzidou A, Voutsa D, Lazaridis NK, Deliyanni EA (2019b) Activated carbon supported MnO 2 for catalytic degradation of reactive black 5. Colloids Surfaces A Physicochem Eng Asp 566:166–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2019.01.025
Selim KA, Youssef MA, Abd El-Rahiem FH, Hassan MS (2014) Dye removal using some surface modified silicate minerals. Int J Min Sci Technol 24:183–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmst.2014.01.007
Selvam NCS, Kumar RT, Kennedy LJ, Vijaya JJ (2011) Comparative study of microwave and conventional methods for the preparation and optical properties of novel MgO-micro and nano-structures. J Alloys Compd 509:9809–9815. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2011.08.032
Senguttuvan S, Janaki V, Senthilkumar P, Kamala-Kannan S (2022) Polypyrrole/zeolite composite – a nanoadsorbent for reactive dyes removal from synthetic solution. Chemosphere 287:132164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.132164
Silva TL, Ronix A, Pezoti O, Souza LS, Leandro PKT, Bedin KC, Beltrame KK, Cazetta AL, Almeida VC (2016) Mesoporous activated carbon from industrial laundry sewage sludge: adsorption studies of reactive dye Remazol Brilliant Blue R. Chem Eng J 303:467–476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2016.06.009
Smith JM, Van NHC, Abbott MM, Swihart MT (2018) Introduction to chemical engineering thermodynamics. Print
Sotomayor F, Quantatec AP, Sotomayor FJ, Cychosz KA, Thommes M (2018) Characterization of micro/mesoporous materials by physisorption: concepts and case studies. Acc Mater Surf Res 3:34–50
Subramanyam B, Das A (2014) Linearised and non-linearised isotherm models optimization analysis by error functions and statistical means. J Environ Heal Sci Eng 12:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1186/2052-336X-12-92
Tolkou AK, Trikalioti S, Makrogianni O, Katsoyiannis IA, Kyzas GZ (2023) Magnesium modified activated carbons derived from coconut shells for the removal of fluoride from water. Sustain Chem Pharm 31:100898. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scp.2022.100898
Tolkou AK, Trikalioti S, Makrogianni O, Xanthopoulou M, Deliyanni EA, Kyzas GZ, Katsoyiannis IA (2022) Lanthanum modified activated carbon from coconut shells for chromium ( VI ) removal from water. Nanomaterials 12:1–18
Tolkou AK, Zouboulis AI (2020) Application of composite pre-polymerized coagulants for the treatment of high-strength industrial wastewaters. Water (Switzerland) 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/W12051258
Travlou NA, Kyzas GZ, Lazaridis NK, Deliyanni EA (2013) Graphite oxide/chitosan composite for reactive dye removal. Chem Eng J 217:256–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2012.12.008
Vijayaraghavan K, Won SW, Yun YS (2009) Treatment of complex Remazol dye effluent using sawdust- and coal-based activated carbons. J Hazard Mater 167:790–796. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.01.055
Volikov AB, Ponomarenko SA, Konstantinov AI, Hatfield K, Perminova IV (2016) Nature-like solution for removal of direct brown 1 azo dye from aqueous phase using humics-modified silica gel. Chemosphere 145:83–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.11.070
Wang L, Wang A (2008) Adsorption properties of congo red from aqueous solution onto N O-carboxymethyl-chitosan. Bioresour Technol 99:1403–1408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2007.01.063
Xu H, Boeuf G, Jia Z, Zhu K, Nikravech M, Kanaev A, Azouani R, Traore M, Elm’selmi A (2021) Solvent-free synthesized monolithic ultraporous aluminas for highly efficient removal of remazol brilliant blue R: equilibrium, kinetic, and thermodynamic studies. Materials (Basel). 14:1–19. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14113054
Yaseen DA, Scholz M (2019) Textile dye wastewater characteristics and constituents of synthetic effluents: a critical review, International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-018-2130-z
Yeow PK, Wong SW, Hadibarata T (2021) Removal of azo and anthraquinone dye by plant biomass as adsorbent – a review. Biointerface Res Appl Chem 11:8218–8232. https://doi.org/10.33263/BRIAC111.82188232
Zhang Y, Zhang Z, Han H, Zhang M, Wang H, Song H, Chen Y (2022) Effective removal of organic dyes using the ultrasonic-assisted hydrothermal synthesis of NaP zeolite doping Cu or Fe in Fenton-like oxidation systems. Sep Purif Technol 299:121767. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2022.121767
Zhao J, Liu H, Xue P, Tian S, Lv Z, Wang R, Lv X, Sun S (2023) High-performance PVDF water treatment membrane based on IL-Na+MMT for simultaneous removal of dyes and oil-water emulsions. J Environ Chem Eng 11:109093. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2022.109093
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Mr. Dimitrios G. Trikkaliotis for taking some characterization measurements.
Funding
Open access funding provided by HEAL-Link Greece. This research was funded by the Greek Ministry of Development and Investments (General Secretariat for Research and Technology) through the research project “Research-Create-Innovate,” with the topic “Development of an integration methodology for the treatment of micropollutants in wastewaters and leachates coupling adsorption, advanced oxidation processes and membrane technology” (Grant no: T2EDK-04066).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Athanasia K. Tolkou: investigation, methodology, writing (original draft), formal analysis, supervision. Athanasios C. Mitropoulos: Conceptualization, validation, supervision. George Z. Kyzas: Resources, formal analysis, visualization, supervision.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical approval
Not applicable.
Consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent to publish
We undertake and agree that the manuscript submitted to your journal has not been published elsewhere and has not been simultaneously submitted to other journals.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Philippe Garrigues
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Tolkou, A.K., Mitropoulos, A.C. & Kyzas, G.Z. Removal of anthraquinone dye from wastewaters by hybrid modified activated carbons. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30, 73688–73701 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-27550-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-27550-9