Abstract
Previous studies indicate that emotion regulation may occur unconsciously, without the cost of cognitive effort, while conscious acceptance may enhance negative experiences despite having potential long-term health benefits. Thus, it is important to overcome this weakness to boost the efficacy of the acceptance strategy in negative emotion regulation. As unconscious regulation occurs with little cost of cognitive resources, the current study hypothesizes that unconscious acceptance regulates the emotional consequence of negative events more effectively than does conscious acceptance. Subjects were randomly assigned to conscious acceptance, unconscious acceptance and no-regulation conditions. A frustrating arithmetic task was used to induce negative emotion. Emotional experiences were assessed on the Positive Affect and Negative Affect Scale while emotion- related physiological activation was assessed by heart-rate reactivity. Results showed that conscious acceptance had a significant negative affective consequence, which was absent during unconscious acceptance. That is, unconscious acceptance was linked with little reduction of positive affect during the experience of frustration, while this reduction was prominent in the control and conscious acceptance groups. Instructed, conscious acceptance resulted in a greater reduction of positive affect than found for the control group. In addition, both conscious and unconscious acceptance strategies significantly decreased emotion-related heart-rate activity (to a similar extent) in comparison with the control condition. Moreover, heart-rate reactivity was positively correlated with negative affect and negatively correlated with positive affect during the frustration phase relative to the baseline phase, in both the control and unconscious acceptance groups. Thus, unconscious acceptance not only reduces emotion-related physiological activity but also better protects mood stability compared with conscious acceptance. This suggests that the clinical practice of acceptance therapy may need to consider using the unconscious priming of an accepting attitude, instead of intentionally instructing people to implement such a strategy, to boost the efficacy of acceptance in emotion regulation.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Davidson K, MacGregor MW, Stuhr J, Dixon K, MacLean D. Constructive anger verbal behavior predicts blood pressure in a population-based sample. Health Psychol, 2000, 19: 55–64
Davidson RJ, Putnam KM, Larson CL. Dysfunction in the neural circuitry of emotion regulation—a possible prelude to violence. Science, 2000, 289: 591–594
Gross JJ. Emotion regulation in adulthood: timing is everything. Curr Dir Psychol Sci, 2001, 10: 214–219
Mayer JD, Salovey P. Emotional intelligence and the construction and regulation of feelings. Appl Prev Psychol, 1995, 4: 197–208
Gross JJ. Antecedent-and response-focused emotion regulation: divergent consequences for experience, expression, and physiology. J Pers Soc Psychol, 1998, 74: 224–237
John OP, Gross JJ. Individual differences in emotion regulation. In: Gross JJ, eds. Handbook of Emotion Regulation. New York: Guilford Press, 2007. 351–372
Moore SA, Zoellner LA, Mollenholt N. Are expressive suppression and cognitive reappraisal associated with stress-related symptoms? Behav Res Ther, 2008, 46: 993–1000
Hayes SC, Luoma JB, Bond FW, Masuda A, Lillis J. Acceptance and commitment therapy: model, processes and outcomes. Behav Res Ther, 2006, 44: 1–25
Hayes SC, Strosahl KD, Wilson KG. Acceptance and Commitment Therapy: an Experiential Approach to Behavior Change. New York: Guilford Press, 1999
Karlin BE, Walser RD, Yesavage J, Zhang A, Trockel M, Taylor CB. Effectiveness of acceptance and commitment therapy for depression: comparison among older and younger veterans. Aging Ment Health, 2013, 17: 555–563
McCracken LM, Sato A, Taylor GJ. A trial of a brief group-based form of acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) for chronic pain in general practice: pilot outcome and process results. J Pain, 2013, 14: 1398–1406
Morgan D. Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for depression: a new approach to preventing relapse. Psychother Res, 2003, 13: 123–125
Day MA, Thorn BE, Ward LC, Rubin N, Hickman SD, Scogin F, Kilgo GR. Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for the treatment of headache pain: a pilot study. Clin J Pain, 2014, 30: 152–161
Orsillo SM, Roemer L, Barlow DH. Integrating acceptance and mindfulness into existing cognitive-behavioral treatment for GAD: a case study. Cogn Behav Pract, 2003, 10: 222–230
Hayes-Skelton SA, Roemer L, Orsillo SM. A randomized clinical trial comparing an acceptance-based behavior therapy to applied relaxation for generalized anxiety disorder. J Consult Clin Psychol, 2013, 81: 761–773
Roemer L, Orsillo SM. An open trial of an acceptance-based behavior therapy for generalized anxiety disorder. Behav Ther, 2007, 38: 72–85
Campbell-Sills L, Barlow DH, Brown TA, Hofmann SG. Acceptability and suppression of negative emotion in anxiety and mood disorders. Emotion, 2006, 6: 587–595
Campbell-Sills L, Barlow DH, Brown TA, Hofmann SG. Effects of suppression and acceptance on emotional responses of individuals with anxiety and mood disorders. Behav Res Ther, 2006, 44: 1251–1263
Kashdan TB, Barrios V, Forsyth JP, Steger MF. Experiential avoidance as a generalized psychological vulnerability: comparisons with coping and emotion regulation strategies. Behav Res Ther, 2006, 44: 1301–1320
Kashdan TB, Morina N, Priebe S. Post-traumatic stress disorder, social anxiety disorder, and depression in survivors of the Kosovo War: experiential avoidance as a contributor to distress and quality of life. J Anxiety Disord, 2009, 23: 185–196
Orcutt HK, Pickett SM, Pope EB. Experiential avoidance and forgiveness as mediators in the relation between traumatic interpersonal events and posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms. J Soc Clin Psychol, 2005, 24: 1003–1029
Plumb JC, Orsillo SM, Luterek JA. A preliminary test of the role of experiential avoidance in post-event functioning. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry, 2004, 35: 245–257
McCracken LM. Learning to live with the pain: acceptance of pain predicts adjustment in persons with chronic pain. Pain, 1998, 74: 21–27
Shallcross AJ, Troy AS, Boland M, Mauss IB. Let it be: accepting negative emotional experiences predicts decreased negative affect and depressive symptoms. Behav Res Ther, 2010, 48: 921–929
Lang PJ, Bradley MM, Cuthbert BN. Motivated attention: affect, activation, and action. In: Lang PJ, Simons RF, Balaban M, eds. Attention and Orienting: Sensory and Motivational Processes. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1997. 97–135
Yuan J, Long Q, Ding N, Lou Y, Liu Y, Yang J. Suppression dampens unpleasant emotion faster than reappraisal: neural dynamics in a Chinese sample. Sci China Life Sci, 2015, 58: 480–491
Dunn BD, Billotti D, Murphy V, Dalgleish T. The consequences of effortful emotion regulation when processing distressing material: a comparison of suppression and acceptance. Behav Res Ther, 2009, 47: 761–773
Hofmann SG, Heering S, Sawyer AT, Asnaani A. How to handle anxiety: the effects of reappraisal, acceptance, and suppression strategies on anxious arousal. Behav Res Ther, 2009, 47: 389–394
Rood L, Roelofs J, Bögels SM, Arntz A. The effects of experimentally induced rumination, positive reappraisal, acceptance, and distancing when thinking about a stressful event on affect states in adolescents. J Abnorm Child Psychol, 2012, 40: 73–84
Mauss IB, Bunge SA, Gross JJ. Automatic emotion regulation. Soc Personal Psychol Compass, 2007, 1: 146–167
Bonanno GA, Papa A, Lalande K, Westphal M, Coifman K. The importance of being flexible the ability to both enhance and suppress emotional expression predicts long-term adjustment. Psychol Sci, 2004, 15: 482–487
Gross JJ, John OP. Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: implications for affect, relationships, and well-being. J Pers Soc Psychol, 2003, 85: 348–362
Polivy J. The effects of behavioral inhibition: integrating internal cues, cognition, behavior, and affect. Psychol Inq, 1998, 9: 181–204
Butler EA, Lee TL, Gross JJ. Emotion regulation and culture: are the social consequences of emotion suppression culture-specific? Emotion, 2007, 7: 30–48
Mauss IB, Cook CL, Gross JJ. Automatic emotion regulation during anger provocation. J Exp Soc Psychol, 2007, 43: 698–711
Carstensen LL, Mikels JA. At the intersection of emotion and cognition aging and the positivity effect. Curr Dir Psychol Sci, 2005, 14: 117–121
Isaacowitz DM, Wadlinger HA, Goren D, Wilson HR. Is there an age-related positivity effect in visual attention? A comparison of two methodologies. Emotion, 2006, 6: 511–516
Bargh JA, Gollwitzer PM, Lee-Chai A, Barndollar K, Trötschel R. The automated will: nonconscious activation and pursuit of behavioral goals. J Pers Soc Psychol, 2001, 81: 1014–1027
Chartrand TL, Jefferis VE. Consequences of automatic goal pursuit and the case of nonconscious mimicry. In: Forgas JP, Williams KD, von Hippel W, eds. Social Judgments: Implicit and Explicit Processes. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2003. 290–305
Fitzsimons GM, Bargh JA. Automatic self-regulation. In: Baumeister R F, Vohs K D, eds. Handbook of Self-regulation: Research, Theory, and Applications. New York: Guilford Publications, 2004. 151–170
Koole SL, Jostmann NB. Getting a grip on your feelings: effects of action orientation and external demands on intuitive affect regulation. J Pers Soc Psychol, 2004, 87: 974–990
Koole SL, Rothermund K. “I feel better but I don’t know why”: the psychology of implicit emotion regulation. Cogn Emot, 2011, 25: 389–399
Gallo IS, Keil A, McCulloch KC, Rockstroh B, Gollwitzer PM. Strategic automation of emotion regulation. J Pers Soc Psychol, 2009, 96: 11–31
Yuan J, Ding N, Liu Y, Yang J. Unconscious emotion regulation: nonconscious reappraisal decreases emotion-related physiological reactivity during frustration. Cogn Emot, 2014, doi: 10.1080/ 02699931.2014.965663
Eder AB. Control of impulsive emotional behaviour through implementation intentions. Cogn Emot, 2011, 25: 478–489
Washington G, Adviser-Jones RP. Understanding the impact of user frustration intensities on task performance using a novel adaptation of the occ theory of emotions. Doctor Dissertation. Washington: The George Washington University, 2011
Williams LE, Bargh JA, Nocera CC, Gray JR. The unconscious regulation of emotion: nonconscious reappraisal goals modulate emotional reactivity. Emotion, 2009, 9: 847–854
Gross JJ, Levenson RW. Hiding feelings: the acute effects of inhibiting negative and positive emotion. J Abnorm Psychol, 1997, 106: 95–103
Jost H. Some physiological changes during frustration. Child Dev, 1941, 12: 9–15
Spielberger CD. STAI manual for the state-trait anxiety inventory. Self-Evaluation Questionnaire. Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists, 1970. 1–24
Beck A, Steer R, Brown G. BDI-II, Beck depression inventory. Manual: Psychological Corp. San Antonio, 1996
Rosenberg M. Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSE). Acceptance and Commitment Therapy. Measures Package. New York: Basic Books, 1979. 61
Hayes SC, Strosahl KD, Wilson KG, Bissett RT, Pistorello J, Toarmino D, Polusny MA, Dykstra TA, Batten SV, Bergan J, Stewart SH, Zvolensky MJ, Eifert GH, Bond FW, Forsyth J P, Karekla M, McCurry SM. Measuring experiential avoidance: a preliminary test of a working model. Psychol Rec, 2004, 54: 553–578
Srull TK, Wyer RS. The role of category accessibility in the interpretation of information about persons: some determinants and implications. J Pers Soc Psychol, 1979, 37: 1660–1672
Bargh JA, Chartrand TL. The mind in the middle: a practical guide to priming and automaticity research. In: Reis HT, Judd CM, eds. Handbook of Research Methods in Social and Personality Psychology. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2000. 253–285
Watson D, Clark LA, Tellegen A. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. J Pers Soc Psychol, 1988, 54: 1063–1070
Grèzes J, Philip L, Chadwick M, Dezecache G, Soussignan R, Conty L. Self-relevance appraisal influences facial reactions to emotional body expressions. PLoS One, 2013, 8: e55885
Phan KL, Taylor SF, Welsh RC, Ho SH, Britton JC, Liberzon I. Neural correlates of individual ratings of emotional salience: a trial-related fMRI study. Neuroimage, 2004, 21: 768–780
Yang J, Yuan J, Li H. Expectation decreases brain susceptibility to fearful stimuli: ERP evidence from a modified emotion evaluation task. Neurosci Lett, 2012, 514: 198–203
Liverant GI, Brown TA, Barlow DH, Roemer L. Emotion regulation in unipolar depression: the effects of acceptance and suppression of subjective emotional experience on the intensity and duration of sadness and negative affect. Behav Res Ther, 2008, 46: 1201–1209
Eifert GH, Heffner M. The effects of acceptance versus control contexts on avoidance of panic-related symptoms. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry, 2003, 34: 293–312
Levitt JT, Brown TA, Orsillo SM, Barlow DH. The effects of acceptance versus suppression of emotion on subjective and psychophysiological response to carbon dioxide challenge in patients with panic disorder. Behav Ther, 2004, 35: 747–766
Kuehner C, Huffziger S, Liebsch K. Rumination, distraction and mindful self-focus: effects on mood, dysfunctional attitudes and cortisol stress response. Psychol Med, 2009, 39: 219–228
Kabat-Zinn J. Mindfulness-based interventions in context: past, present, and future. Clin Psychol: Sci Pract, 2003, 10: 144–156
Segal ZV, Williams JMG, Teasdale JD. Mindfulness-based Cognitive Therapy for Depression. New York: Guilford Press, 2012
Larsen RJ, Ketelaar T. Personality and susceptibility to positive and negative emotional states. J Pers Soc Psychol, 1991, 61: 132–140
Kahneman D, Diener E, Schwarz N. Well-being: Foundations of Hedonic Psychology. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 2003
Dyck MJ, Jolly JB, Kramer T. An evaluation of positive affectivity, negative affectivity, and hyperarousal as markers for assessing between syndrome relationships. Pers Individ Dif, 1994, 17: 637–646
Jolly JB, Dyck MJ, Kramer TA, Wherry JN. Integration of positive and negative affectivity and cognitive content-specificity: improved discrimination of anxious and depressive symptoms. J Abnorm Psychol, 1994, 103: 544–552
Crawford JR, Henry JD. The positive and negative affect schedule (PANAS): construct validity, measurement properties and normative data in a large non-clinical sample. Brit J Clin Psychol, 2004, 43: 245–265
Nummenmaa L, Niemi P. Inducing affective states with successfailure manipulations: a meta-analysis. Emotion, 2004, 4: 207–214
Baars M, Müller MJ, Gallhofer B, Netter P. Depressive and aggressive responses to frustration: development of a questionnaire and its validation in a sample of male alcoholics. Depress Res Treat, 2011, 2011: 352048
Westermann R, Spies K, Stahl G, Hesse FW. Relative effectiveness and validity of mood induction procedures: a meta-analysis. Eur J Soc Psychol, 1996, 26: 557–580
Goodwin AM, Williams JMG. Mood-induction research—its implications for clinical depression. Behav Res Ther, 1982, 20: 373–382
MacLeod AK, Byrne A. Anxiety, depression, and the anticipation of future positive and negative experiences. J Abnorm Psychol, 1996, 105: 286–289
Ebesutani C, Okamura K, Higa-McMillan C, Chorpita BF. A psychometric analysis of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule for Children-Parent Version in a school sample. Psychol Assess, 2011, 23: 406–416
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Contributed equally to this work
This article is published with open access at springerlink.fh-diploma.de
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.
The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.
To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Ding, N., Yang, J., Liu, Y. et al. Paying less but harvesting more: the effect of unconscious acceptance in regulating frustrating emotion. Sci. China Life Sci. 58, 799–809 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11427-015-4875-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11427-015-4875-7