Abstract
The central-peripheral population hypothesis (CPH) predicts that peripheral populations have reduced genetic variability. Therefore, it is often assumed that they deserve higher conservation priority over central populations. We examined this hypothesis using computer simulations with the objective of determining the range of species properties (parameters) under which a species is likely to exhibit the CPH pattern. The interaction between migration, genetic drift, and time of population establishment was examined; in particular, various parameters of migration, such as mode of dispersal, migration rate, and maximum migration distance, were investigated. The CPH pattern was observed only within a narrow parameter window of various species properties. Active dispersers with low migration rate and moderate maximum migration distance were more likely to have higher genetic diversity in the central populations than in the peripheral populations. Newly established populations were also more likely to exhibit the CPH pattern. Although migration rate appeared to be the most important determining factor, sensitivity analysis suggested that the interaction between parameters is probably more important than any single parameter. Our findings have important implications for conservation programs.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Mayr E. Animal Species and Evolution. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1963
Lesica P, Allendorf F W. When are peripheral populations valuable for conservation? Conserv Biol, 1995, 9: 753–760
Lesica P, AIlendorf F W. Are small populations of plants worth preserving? Conserv Biol, 1992, 6: 135–139
Shumaker K M, Babbel G R. Patterns of allozyme similarity in ecologically central and marginal populations of Hordeumjubatum in Utah. Evolution, 1980, 34: 110–116
Gapare W J, Aitken S N, Ritland C E. Genetic diversity of core and peripheral Sitka spruce (Picea sitchensis (Bong.) Carr) populations: Implications for conservation of widespread species. Biol Conserv, 2005, 123: 113–123
Crozier R H. Genetic diversity and the agony of choice. Biol Conserv, 1992, 61: 11–15
Levin D A. Local speciation in plants: The rule not the exception. Syst Bot, 1993, 18: 197–208
Durka W. Genetic diversity in peripheral and subcentral populations of Corrigiola litoralis L. (Illecebraceae). Heredity, 1999, 83: 476–484
Shea K L, Furnier G R. Genetic variation and population structure in central and isolated populations of balsam fir, Abies balsamea (Pinaceae). Am J Bot, 2002, 89: 783–791
Cassel A, Tammaru T. Allozyme variability in central, peripheral and isolated populations of the scarce heath (Coenonympha hero: Lepidoptera, Nymphalidae): Implications for conservation. Conserv Genet, 2003, 4: 83–93
Lönn M, Prentice H C. Gene diversity and demographic turnover in central and peripheral populations of the perennial herb Gypsophila fastigiata. Oikos, 2002, 99: 489–498
Zhan A, Li C, Fu J. Big mountains but small barriers: Population genetic structure of the Chinese wood frog (Rana chensinensis) in the Tsinling and Daba Mountain region of northern China. BMC Genetics, 2009, 10: 17
Guries R P, Ledig F T. Genetic diversity and population structure in pitch pine (Pinus rigida Mill). Evolution, 1982, 36: 387–402
Betancourt J L, Schuster W S, Mitton J B, et al. Fossil and genetic history of a pinyon pine (Pings edults) isolate. Ecology, 1991, 72: 1685–1697
Garner T W J, Pearman P B, Angelone S. Genetic diversity across a vertebrate species’ range: A test of the central-peripheral hypothesis. Mol Ecol, 2004, 13: 1047–1053
Garcia-Ramos G, Kirkpatrick M. Genetic models of adaptation and gene flow in peripheral populations. Evolution, 1997, 51: 21–28
Griffin S R, Barrett S C H. Post-glacial history of Trillium grandiflorum (Melanthiaceae) in Eastern North America: Inferences from phylogeography. Am J Bot, 2004, 91: 465–473
Amato M, Brooks R J, Fu J. A phylogeographic analysis of populations of the wood turtle (Glyptemys insculpta) throughout its range. Mol Ecol, 2008, 17: 570–581
Lammi A, Siikamäki P, Mustajärvi K. Genetic diversity, population size, and fitness in central and peripheral populations of a rare plant Lychnis viscaria. Conserv Biol, 1999, 13: 1069–1078
Miller S D, MacInnes H E, Fewster R M. Detecting invisible migrants: An application of genetic methods to estimate migration rates. In: Thomson D L, Cooch E G, Conroy M J, eds. Modeling Demographic Processes in Marked Populations, Volume 3. New York: Springer, 2009. 417–437
Saltelli A, Chan K, Scott E M. Sensitivity Analysis. New York: Wiley, 2000
Dancik G M, Jones D E, Dorman K S. Parameter estimation and sensitivity analysis in an agent-based model of Leishmania major infection. J Theor Biol, 2010, 262: 398–412
Monod H, Naud C, Makowski D. Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis for crop models. In: Wallach D, Makowski D, Jones J W, eds. Working with Dynamic Crop Models: Evaluation, Analysis, Parameterization and Applications. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2006. 55–100
Lamboni M, Makowski D, Monod H. Multivariate global sensitivity analysis for dynamic crop models. Field Crop Res, 2009, 113: 312–320
Lamboni M, Makowski D, Monod H. Multisensi: Multivariate Sensitivity Analysis. R package version 1.0–3. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=multisensi, 2010.
R Development Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2011
Lande R, Barrowclough G F. Effective population size, genetic variation, and their use in population management. In: Soulé M E, ed. Viable Populations for Conservation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987. 87–123
Theodorou K, Couvet D. Genetic load in subdivided populations: Interactions between the migration rate, the size and the number of subpopulations. Heredity, 2006, 96: 69–78
Webb T, Bartlein P J. Global changes during the last 3 million years: Climatic controls and biotic responses. Ann Rev Ecol Syst, 1992, 23: 141–173
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
This article is published under an open access license. Please check the 'Copyright Information' section either on this page or in the PDF for details of this license and what re-use is permitted. If your intended use exceeds what is permitted by the license or if you are unable to locate the licence and re-use information, please contact the Rights and Permissions team.
About this article
Cite this article
Dai, Q., Fu, J. When central populations exhibit more genetic diversity than peripheral populations: A simulation study. Chin. Sci. Bull. 56, 2531–2540 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-011-4605-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-011-4605-x