Abstract
Genomic selection (GS) is a marker-assisted selection method, in which high density markers covering the whole genome are used simultaneously for individual genetic evaluation via genomic estimated breeding values (GEBVs). GS can increase the accuracy of selection, shorten the generation interval by selecting individuals at the early stage of life, and accelerate genetic progress. With the availability of high density whole genome SNP (single nucleotide polymorphism) chips for livestock, GS is reshaping the conventional animal breeding systems. In many countries, GS is becoming the major genetic evaluation method for bull selection in dairy cattle and GS may soon completely replace the traditional genetic evaluation system. In recent years, GS has become an important research topic in animal, plant and aquiculture breeding and many exciting results have been reported. In this paper, the methods for obtaining GEBVs, factors affecting the accuracy of GEBVs, and the current status of implementation of GS in livestock are reviewed. Some unresolved issues related to GS in livestock are also discussed.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Goddard M E, Hayes B J. Mapping genes for complex traits in domestic animals and their use in breeding programmes. Nat Rev Genet, 2009, 10: 381–391
Meuwissen T H E, Hayes B J, Goddard M E. Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps. Genetics, 2001, 157: 1819–1829
Heffner E L, Sorrells M E, Jannink J L. Genomic selection for crop improvement. Crop Sci, 2009, 49: 1–12
Sonesson A K, Meuwissen T H. Testing strategies for genomic selection in aquaculture breeding programs. Genet Sel Evol, 2009, 41: 37
Habier D. More than a third of the WCGALP presentations on genomic selection. J Anim Breed Genet, 2010, 127: 336–337
Goddard M E, Hayes B J. Genomic selection. J Anim Breed Genet, 2007, 124: 323–330
Xu S. Estimating polygenic effects using markers of the entire genome. Genetics, 2003, 163: 789–801
Calus M P L. Genomic breeding value prediction: Methods and procedures. Animal, 2010, 4: 157–164
Verbyla K L, Hayes B J, Bowman P J, et al. Accuracy of genomic selection using stochastic search variable selection in Australian Holstein Friesian dairy cattle. Genet Res, 2009, 91: 307–311
Meuwissen T H. Accuracy of breeding values of’ nrelated’ individuals predicted by dense SNP genotyping. Genet Sel Evol, 2009, 41: 35
Meuwissen T H, Solberg T R, Shepherd R, et al. A fast algorithm for BayesB type of prediction of genome-wide estimates of genetic value. Genet Sel Evol, 2009, 41: 2
Long N, Gianola D, Rosa G J, et al. Machine learning classification procedure for selecting SNPs in genomic selection: Application to early mortality in broilers. J Anim Breed Genet, 2007, 124: 377–389
Solberg T R, Sonesson A K, Woolliams J A, et al. Reducing dimensionality for prediction of genome-wide breeding values. Genet Sel Evol, 2009, 41: 29
Gianola D, Fernando R L, Stella A. Genomic-assisted prediction of genetic value with semiparametric procedures. Genetics, 2006, 173: 1761–1776
Bennewitz J, Solberg T, Meuwissen T. Genomic breeding value estimation using nonparametric additive regression models. Genet Sel Evol, 2009, 41: 20
de los Campos G, Naya H, Gianola D, et al. Predicting quantitative traits with regression models for dense molecular markers and pedigree. Genetics, 2009, 182: 375–385
VanRaden P M. Efficient methods to compute genomic predictions. J Dairy Sci, 2008, 91: 4414–4423
Visscher P M, Medland S E, Ferreira M A, et al. Assumption-free estimation of heritability from genome-wide identity-by-descent sharing between full siblings. PLoS Genet, 2006, 2: 316–325
VanRaden P M, Tooker M E. Methods to explain genomic estimates of breeding value. J Dairy Sci, 2007, 90: 374
Habier D, Fernando R L, Dekkers J C M. The impact of genetic relationship information on genome-assisted breeding values. Genetics, 2007, 177: 2389–2397
Strandén I, Garrick D J. Technical note: Derivation of equivalent computing algorithms for genomic predictions and reliabilities of animal merit. J Dairy Sci, 2009, 92: 2971–2975
Goddard M E. Genomic selection: Prediction of accuracy and maximisation of long term response. Genetica, 2009, 136: 245–257
Hayes B J, Visscher P M, Goddard M E. Increased accuracy of artificial selection by using the realized relationship matrix. Genet Res, 2009, 91: 47–60
Daetwyler H D, Villanueva B, Bijma P, et al. Inbreeding in genome-wide selection. J Anim Breed Genet, 2007, 124: 369–376
Muir W M. Comparison of genomic and traditional BLUP-estimated breeding value accuracy and selection response under alternative trait and genomic parameters. J Anim Breed Genet, 2007, 124: 342–355
Calus M P, Meuwissen T H, de Roos A P, et al. Accuracy of genomic selection using different methods to define haplotypes. Genetics, 2008, 178: 553–561
Zhang Z, Ding X D, Liu J F, et al. TA-BLUP: A New Genetic Evaluation Method for Genomic Selectionon. In: 9th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, 2010. Leipzig, Germany. 215
Zhang Z, Liu J F, Ding X D, et al. Best linear unbiased prediction of genomic breeding values using trait-specific marker-derived relationship matrix. PLoS One, 2010, 5: e12648
Solberg T R, Sonesson A K, Woolliams J A, et al. Genomic selection using different marker types and densities. J Anim Sci, 2008, 86: 2447–2454
Calus M P L, Veerkamp R F. Accuracy of breeding values when using and ignoring the polygenic effect in genomic breeding value estimation with a marker density of one SNP per cM. J Anim Breed Genet, 2007, 124: 362–368
Habier D, Fernando R L, Dekkers J C M. Genomic selection using low-density marker panels. Genetics, 2009, 182: 343–353
Legarra A, Aguilar I, Misztal I. A relationship matrix including full pedigree and genomic information. J Dairy Sci, 2009, 92: 4656–4663
Chen C Y, Misztal I, Aguilar I, et al. Genome-wide marker-assisted selection combining all pedigree phenotypic information with genotypic data in one step: An example using broiler chickens. J Anim Sci, 2011, 89: 23–28
Daetwyler H D, Villanueva B, Woolliams J A. Accuracy of predicting the genetic risk of disease using a genome-wide approach. PLoS One, 2008, 3: e3395
Daetwyler H D, Pong-Wong R, Villanueva B, et al. The impact of genetic architecture on genome-wide evaluation methods. Genetics, 2010, 185: 1021–1031
Zhang Z, Ding X D, Liu J F, et al. Accuracy of genomic prediction using low density marker panels. J Dairy Sci, 2011, Doi: 10.3168/ jds.2010-3917
Sved J A. Linkage disequilibrium and homozygosity of chromosome segments in finite populations. Theor Popul Biol, 1971, 2: 125–141
Moser G, Tier B, Crump R E, et al. A comparison of five methods to predict genomic breeding values of dairy bulls from genome-wide SNP markers. Genet Sel Evol, 2009, 41: 56
Schaeffer L R. Strategy for applying genome-wide selection in dairy cattle. J Anim Breed Genet, 2006, 123: 218–223
Hayes B J, Bowman P J, Chamberlain A J, et al. Genomic selection in dairy cattle: Progress and challenges. J Dairy Sci, 2009, 92: 433–443
VanRaden P M, Van Tassell C P, Wiggans G R, et al. Reliability of genomic predictions for North American Holstein bulls. J Dairy Sci, 2009, 92: 16–24
Hayes B, Bowman P, Chamberlain A, et al. Accuracy of genomic breeding values in multi-breed dairy cattle populations. Genet Sel Evol, 2009, 41: 51
Luan T, Woolliams J A, Lien S, et al. The accuracy of genomic selection in Norwegian red cattle assessed by cross-validation. Genetics, 2009, 183: 1119–1126
Harris B L, Montgomerie W A. Current status of the use of genomic information in the national genetic evaluation in New Zealand. In: Proc of the Interbull International Workshop in Genomic Information in Genetic Evaluations, 2009. Interbull: Uppasla, Sweden. 35–38
de Roos A P W, Schrooten C, Mullaart E, et al. Genomic selection at CRV. Interbull Bull, 2009, 39: 47–50
Lund M S, Su G. Genomic selection in the Nordic countries. Interbull bulletin, 2009, 39: 39–42
Habier D, Tetens J, Seefried F R, et al. The impact of genetic relationship information on genomic breeding values in German Holstein cattle. Genet Sel Evol, 2010, 42: 5
Berry D, Kearney F, Harris B. Genomic selection in Ireland. Interbull Bulletin, 2009, 39: 29–34
Loberg A, Dürr J W. Interbull survey on the use of genomic information. Interbull Bull, 2009, 39: 3–14
Tuggle C K, Dekkers J C M. Genotyping: How useful is it for producers? Pig Prog, 2009, 25: 9
Simianer H. The potential of genomic selection to improve litter size in pig breeding programmes. In: European Association for Animal Production 2009 Annual Meetings, 2009. Barcelona, Spain
van der Werf J H J. Potential benefit of genomic selection in sheep. In: The Association for the Advancement of Animal Breeding and Genetics 18th Conference, 2009. Barossa Valley, South Australia. 38–41
McEwan J C. Current and future impact of DNA technologies on the New Zealand sheep industry. In: Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production, 2009. Canterbury, New Zealand. 165–168
Chen C Y, Misztal I, Aguilar I, et al., Genome wide marker assisted selection in chicken: Making the most of all data, pedigree, phenotypic, and genomic in a simple one step procedure. In: 9th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, 2010. Leipzig, Germany
Legarra A, Calenge F, Mariani P, et al. Use of a reduced set of single nucleotide polymorphisms for genetic evaluation of resistance to Salmonella carrier state in laying hens. Poul Sci, 2011, 90: 731–736
Wolc A, Stricker C, Arango J, et al. Breeding value prediction for production traits in layer chickens using pedigree or genomic relationships in a reduced animal model. Genet Sel Evol, 2011, 43: 5
Gonzalez-Recio O, Gianola D, Rosa G J, et al. Genome-assisted prediction of a quantitative trait measured in parents and progeny: Application to food conversion rate in chickens. Genet Sel Evol, 2009, 41: 3
Daetwyler H D, Hickey J M, Henshall J M, et al. Accuracy of estimated genomic breeding values for wool and meat traits in a multi-breed sheep population. Anim Prod Sci, 2010, 50: 1004–1010
Weigel K A, de los Campos G, Vazquez A I, et al. Accuracy of direct genomic values derived from imputed single nucleotide polymorphism genotypes in Jersey cattle. J Dairy Sci, 2010, 93: 5423–5435
Ibánz-Escriche N, Fernando R L, Toosi A, et al. Genomic selection of purebreds for crossbred performance. Genet Sel Evol, 2009, 41: 12
König S, Simianer H, Willam A. Economic evaluation of genomic breeding programs. J Dairy Sci, 2009, 92: 382–391
de Roos A P, Hayes B J, Goddard M E. Reliability of genomic predictions across multiple populations. Genetics, 2009, 183: 1545–1553
Toosi A, Fernando R L, Dekkers J C. Genomic selection in admixed and crossbred populations. J Anim Sci, 2010, 88: 32–46
Kizilkaya K, Fernando R L, Garrick D J. Genomic prediction of simulated multibreed and purebred performance using observed fifty thousand single nucleotide polymorphism genotypes. J Anim Sci, 2010, 88: 544–551
Lund M S, Roos A P W D, Vries A G D, et al. Improving genomic prediction by EuroGenomics collaboration. In: 9th World Conference of Genetics Applied on Livestock Production, 2010. Leipzig, Germany. 880
Harris B L, Johnson D L, Montgomerie W A. National genomic evaluations without genotypes. Interbull Bull, 2009, 40: 189–192
Tian F, Bradbury P J, Brown P J, et al. Genome-wide association study of leaf architecture in the maize nested association mapping population. Nat Genet, 2011, 43: 159–162
Huang X H, Wei X H, Sang T, et al. Genome-wide association studies of 14 agronomic traits in rice landraces. Nat Genet, 2010, 42: 961–967
Weigel K A, de los Campos G, Gonzalez-Recio O, et al. Predictive ability of direct genomic values for lifetime net merit of Holstein sires using selected subsets of single nucleotide polymorphism markers. J Dairy Sci, 2009, 92: 5248–5257
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com
Rights and permissions
This article is published under an open access license. Please check the 'Copyright Information' section either on this page or in the PDF for details of this license and what re-use is permitted. If your intended use exceeds what is permitted by the license or if you are unable to locate the licence and re-use information, please contact the Rights and Permissions team.
About this article
Cite this article
Zhang, Z., Zhang, Q. & Ding, X. Advances in genomic selection in domestic animals. Chin. Sci. Bull. 56, 2655–2663 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-011-4632-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-011-4632-7