Skip to main content
Account

Table 1 Characteristics of the included studies

From: What is the Accuracy of Nuclear Imaging in the Assessment of Periprosthetic Knee Infection? A Meta-analysis

Study

Year

Design*

Number of patients

Patients demographics (male/female)

Age (range)

Age (mean)

Number of prostheses

Reference standard

Number of hip prostheses (total/infected)

Rand & Brown [38]

1990

Retrospective

38

16/22

26–86

65.0

38 knee

M, H, IOF

38/18

Palestro et al.[34]

1991

Retrospective

28

7/21

23–85

65.0

32 knee

M, IOF, CFU

32/9

Ooi et al. [28]

1993

NR

19

11/8

25–84

NR

6 knee

M, H, IOF, CFU

6/3

Nijhof et al. [27]

1997

NR

226

108/118

5–90

54.0

87 hip, 17 knee

M, IOF, CFU

17/3

Scher et al. [41]

2000

NR

143

NR

26–87

61.0

91 hip, 40 knee

M, H, IOF

40/14

van Acker et al. [50]

2001

Prospective

21

8/13

33–78

66.0

22 knee

M, CFU

22/6

Joseph et al. [16]

2001

Retrospective

58

18/40

27–82

60.0

36 hip, 22 knee

M, H, IOF

22/6

Larikka et al. [20]

2001

Prospective

28

4/24

47–82

75.0

30 knee

M, IOF

30/8

Zhuang et al. [56]

2001

NR

62

NR

27–81

NR

38 hip, 36 knee

M, IOF, A, CFU

36/11

Ivancevic et al. [14]

2002

Retrospective

30

13/17

30–85

Median 62.0

21 hip, 6 knee

M, H

6/2

El Espera et al.[7]

2004

NR

60

NR

NR

NR

45 hip, 28 knee

M, IOF, A

28/7

Love et al. [21]

2004

NR

59

22/37

35–89

NR

40 hip, 19 knee

M, H, IOF

19/11

Pelosi et al. [37]

2004

Retrospective

78

36/42

30–87

70.0

47 hip, 40 knee

M, IOF, CFU

40/25

von Rothenburg et al. [52]

2004

Retrospective

38

9/29

45–81

71.0

26 hip, 12 knee

M, IOF, A, L

12/4

Iyengar & Vinjamuri [15]

2005

Retrospective

38

18/20

54–89

NR

17 hip, 13 knee, 8 other

M, IOF, A, I, CFU

13/2

Stumpe et al. [44]

2006

Prospective

28

13/15

50–86

67.0/59.0

28 knee

M, CFU

28/3

Rubello et al. [40]

2008

Prospective

78

27/51

49–81

5.0

78 knee

M, CFU

78/41

Mayer-Wagner et al. [23]

2010

NR

32

13/19

45–90

NR

30 hip, 44 knee

M

16/7

Fuster et al. [9]

2011

Prospective

40

14/26

NR

66.0

21 hip, 16 knee, 3 shoulder

M, IOF, CFU

16/6

Jung et al. [17]

2012

Prospective

11

2/9

NR

72.0

11 knee

M, H, IOF, CFU

11/5

Basu et al. [2]

2014

Prospective

87

35/52

32–83

57.0

134 hip, 87 knee

M, H, IOF

87/19

Kim et al. [18]

2014

Retrospective

164

53/111

17–82

65.0

71 hip, 93 knee

M, H, IOF, CFU, A

93/63

Granados et al. [12]

2015

Prospective

120

50/70

NR

71.0

63 hip, 57 knee

M, CFU

57/8

  1. *Explicit notation in study; M = microbiology; H = histology; IOF = intraoperative findings; A = aspiration; L = laboratory (erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C-reactive protein); I = imaging; CFU = clinical followup at least 6 months; NR = not recorded.