Abstract
Dian Basin in Yunnan province is an important center for both early agricultural production and centralized state formation. Settled agricultural villages are present in the province since at least the third millennium BC, and by the first millennium BC, the Dian Culture, a highly specialized bronze polity, flourished in the Dian Basin and surrounding area, until it was conquered by the Han in 109 BC. The increased deployment of flotation at recent archaeological excavations in Yunnan allowed the reconstruction of agricultural practices from the Neolithic to the early Bronze Age, documented at Baiyangcun, Haimenkou, and Xueshan among others. However, archaeobotanical evidence relating to the pivotal period right before and after the Han conquest have so far been lacking, with only limited written records about agricultural production in the Shiji by Sima Qian. Here we present for the first time direct archaeobotanical evidence relating to this transitional period as revealed by rich Han period deposits found during the 2016 excavation of Hebosuo, the largest Dian settlement investigated in Yunnan so far, dated by direct AMS on charred cereal grains and artefactual evidence as spanning from between 850 BC–220 AD. Following the Han conquest, the main components of the agricultural system did not undergo radical changes, but the weedy flora indicates a heavier reliance of wet-land rice systems, evidencing a higher level of water management or even irrigation practices, and the consequent intensification of the agricultural production. These findings on shifting agricultural regimes in Yunnan also contribute to current debates about the interplay between intensification, food risk, and ecology in times of political instability.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
The study of archaeobotanical remains from imperial frontiers is critical to understanding how premodern empires managed agricultural intensification under varying socio-environmental conditions as well as the impacts of empire building associated with those endeavors (Marston 2015, Rosenzweig and Marston 2018, Hastorf 2017, Morrison 2018). During the last two centuries BC, the Han state in China undertook a series of imperial campaigns that extended its territorial reach across parts of Eurasia and Southeast Asia, leading to a continental empire comparable in size to Rome at its apex. While the footprint of Han expansionism has been documented by recent excavations of farming colonies and irrigation systems along the proto-Silk roads in northwest China, the significance of the southern frontier — a region characterized by rugged terrain and pronounced monsoonal variability — to Han economic history remains poorly understood despite historiographic accounts of large-scale agrarian projects. Located in Southwest China, the Dian Kingdom arose during the later 1st millennium BC and was on the periphery of the region from which the Han Dynasty emerged. The Dian are historically significant for being among the earliest complex polities in Southwest China, competing with the early Chinese Empire before being conquered by the Han in 109 BC (Zhang 1997; Allard 1998; Qian 1956). After this, Dian dominions were reorganized into 24 counties that together constituted the Yizhou prefecture, a newly established political unit that was placed under the administration of a centrally appointed governor (Ban 2005; Li and Chen 2021). In addition to establishing political control, the Han also implemented a massive migration of people from the central plains to the Dian Basin (Lin 2005). The end of the first millennium BC was thus a pivotal time in Yunnan for cultural and social change. Most scholars have either approached the development of sociopolitical hierarchies through the study of bronze production, especially as evidenced in élite burials (Dewall 1967; Lee 1996; Tawara kanji 2001; Rode 2004; Chiou-Peng 2004; Yao 2005) or questions regarding the local impact of Han imperialism and migration-driven population growth from a funerary perspective (i.e., Yang 2011; Chiang 2012; Wu 2018; Yao 2016). In recent years, less mundane aspects of Dian society have also started to gain more research attention, including the investigation of the food production system through the systematic collection and analysis of environmental remains, including flotation for the retrieval of ancient plant remains (Yao et al. 2015; Yang et al. 2021; Dal Martello et al. 2021). However, little direct evidence for discussing the history of agricultural production is available for the Bronze Age to the Han imperial period, or the transition between the fall of the Dian and the establishment of the Han rule over Central Yunnan.
In this study, we draw on archaeobotanical evidence from directly dated assemblages obtained through flotation during the 2016 excavation of the site of Hebosuo, a key settlement associated with the Dian and representing occupations before and after Han conquest. Hebosuo is one of the few early, large-scale settlement sites dating to the first millennium BC that have been systematically investigated so far in the Dian Basin and surrounding areas, Central Yunnan. By documenting food production at an important southern frontier with well-dated archaeobotanical deposits from Hebosuo (YPICRA in prep), we address how agricultural intensification was pursued, that is, either through the adaptation or change to local Bronze Age crop regime, and whether new systems of land use were involved. Our findings provide a reconstruction of the historical ecology of an imperial frontier, showing how the tracing of continuities and changes in cereal cultivation and field management strategies, especially in relation to irrigation practices, may enrich comparative discussions of anthropogenic impacts of empire building. These findings on shifting agricultural regimes in Yunnan also contribute to current debates about the interplay between intensification, food risk, and ecology in times of political instability.
The site of Hebosuo
Environment, excavation history, and chronology of Hebosuo
Hebosuo is located nearby the Shangsuan town in the Jinning district on the eastern bank of Lake Dian, about 60 km from Kunming (102.244212 E; 24.25246 N; Figs. 1 and 2), and only 1 km south from Shizhaishan cemetery, the earliest discovered site belonging to the Dian Culture, or Dian Kingdom, formerly known as Shizhaishan Culture (Wang 1980; Jiang 1998). It is the largest of a group of 16 sites known as the “Hebosuo cluster,” dated to the first millennium BC, which were identified over the course of two joint Sino-American archaeological surveys led by the Yunnan Provincial Institute of Cultural Relics and Archaeology (henceforth YPICRA) in association with the Department of Anthropology University of Toronto in 2008 and 2012. On these occasions, the eastern, southern, and western banks of the lake were surveyed (YPICRA 2012; YPICRA et al. 2014) with the goal of investigating the settlement patterns of Dian sites, and Hebosuo was identified as one of the core settlements of the Dian (Yao et al. 2015), which continued to be occupied after the Han arrival in 109 BC.
Lake Dian is the largest water reservoir of Yunnan province. It has an area of over 330m2 and a total length, north to south, of 40 km. The Dian Basin has elevations ranging between 1885 and 1900 m above sea level and is characterized by a subtropical monsoonal climate, presenting general mild, warm, and humid conditions. The favorable weather makes Kunming known as the city of the eternal spring, and the Dian Basin presents no harsh cold winter or hot summers. Average annual temperature is attested between 14.7 and 15.4℃, with sunlight hours total to 2302–2345 per year. Average annual precipitation is attested on 900 mm. These environmental conditions and relatively flat terrain are extremely favorable to agricultural production, allowing up to four cropping per year with irrigation; today cultivated crops include rice, wheat, rapeseed, and broad bean (Kunming Jinning District Local Chronicles Comittee 2003). The Dian Basin in central Yunnan is considered among the most important centers for agricultural production in the province since prehistoric times and paleo-environmental reconstruction established that current weather conditions stabilized in the region at the beginning of the 1st millennium BC (Xiao et al. 2020; Dearing et al. 2008; Shen et al. 2005; Dykoski et al. 2005; Hillman et al. 2019).
Following the 2008 and 2012 surveys, the YPICRA and the Department of Anthropology of the University of Chicago led the first excavation season of Hebosuo in 2014. The principal aim of the excavation campaign was to establish a precise chronology for the site through direct radiocarbon dating (YPICRA et al. 2019; Yao et al. 2020). In 2016, a second excavation campaign was undertaken with the aim of defining precise cultural phases and especially targeting post-Dian period cultural development at the site.
Both excavation campaigns focused on the southeast area of the site, the 2016 trench was located about 200 m south from the 2014 trench (Fig. 2). The 2016 excavation area comprised of two 10 × 10 m trenches. A total of 19 cultural layers were individuated during excavation, reaching a depth of about 5 m (Fig. 3). Only two features were revealed during the 2016 campaign, H1 and H2, representing two ash pits; in addition to those pits, 5 scattered postholes were also individuated, possibly indicating an architectural feature. Both pits and postholes were located underneath the 11th stratigraphic layer. Additionally, further rubbish pits were individuated at the end of the excavation on the western wall profile of the trench; these were not identified in the course of the excavation due to the due to the high groundwater levels (Fig. 3). While the 2014 excavation revealed mostly Dian period deposits, and a continuous occupation from c. 1200 BC to c. 500 BC, corresponding to the late Bronze Age period pre-Dian to the Dian period in Yunnan (YPICRA 2019); the 2016 excavation revealed rich late Dian and Han period deposits and related material culture, c. 800 BC–220 AD.
On the basis of stratigraphic sequence and artefactual evidence (Fig. 4) as well as direct radiocarbon dating on charred cereal grains (Table 1 and Fig. 5), the following chronology was established for the 2016 Hebosuo excavation:
-
layers 1 to 6: Ming-Qing Dynasties (1368–1911 AD)
-
layers 7 to 16: Han Dynasty (202 BC–220 AD)
-
Layers 17 to 19: Dian Kingdom (Dian or Shizhaishan Culture) (800–109 BC)
Layers 17 to 19 contained numerous Dian culture artefacts and were largely consistent in time with layers 3–6 yielding Dian cultural deposits revealed in the 2014 excavations to the northwest (Table 1) (Yao et al. 2020). These temporal correspondences indicate contemporaneous occupations in both areas of Hebosuo during the Bronze Age. The precise phases between layers 16 and 1 of the 2016 excavation were strongly based on the relationship between the stratigraphic sequence and artefactual evidence. This includes the large quantity of Han artefacts recovered between layers 16 and 7, such as corded decorated tiles, gaigongmao, a typical Han style chariot implement, coins bearing wuzhu, which were produced from 118 BC, under Emperor Wudi, and in use until the end of the Eastern Han Dynasty (220 AD). From layer 6 onward, instead, numerous typical Ming and Qing Dynasty styles tiles have been recovered, as well as a copper coin bearing Honghua Tongbao (corresponding to 1679-1681 AD) recovered in layer 5, thus indicating that layers 6 to 1 were occupied in more recent times, during the Ming and Qing Dynasties.
Previous archaeobotanical work at Hebosuo: pre-Dian and early Dian agriculture
Hebosuo is a shell-midden site, its location close to the Dian Lake indicates that in the past the lake fluctuating water levels might have affected the deposition and preservation of the plant remains. Flotation analyses at Hebosuo were first undertaken during the 2014 excavation season of Hebosuo, which focused on the occupation of the site between c. 1200 BC and c. 500 BC. The archaeobotanical analyses revealed a rich assemblage showing an agricultural system based on the mixed cultivation of dryland (wheat and millets) and wetland crops (rice), as well as contributions from soybean; large quantities of Chenopodium and few Prunus type fruits possibly collected locally (Yang et al. 2021). Cereals crops constitute the main component of the 2014 archaeobotanical assemblage of Hebosuo, and among the cereals, wheat is prevalent, followed equally by rice and millets (Yang et al. 2021).
Material and methods
A total of 57 archaeobotanical samples were collected for flotation during the 2016 excavation of Hebosuo. The majority of the archaeobotanical samples came from stratigraphic cultural layers; the strata were distinguished by differentiating colors and soil inclusions. Samples for flotation were taken from securely identified layers, as well as from the two rubbish pits. The samples analyzed covered a stratigraphic sequence from layer 19 to layer 7, corresponding to the late Dian and Han Dynasty periods. One sample was also collected from the upper layers 6–1 representing Ming-Qing Dynasty periods deposits; since this sample was sterile and these later time periods were not the main focus of the campaign, no further samples associated with these strata were collected. The total volume of soil floated was 599 L, and each sample had an average bulk soil volume of 10.5 l. Four additional samples (T1⑬:1HP, T1⑭:1HP, T1⑭:2HP, T1⑯:1HP) were taken where large quantities of botanical remains became visible with the naked eye during excavation; these samples were not floated since they consisted of only large botanical remains and have been reported separately below (Tables 2, 3, 4, and 5, see also Supplementary Material Table S1). The samples were processed at the site through manual bucket flotation, the float was collected using a 0.18-mm mesh size sieve, and the organic material was poured onto cotton bag and let to dry naturally in the shade. All samples were sorted with a Leica M125c low-power binocular microscope at magnification up to × 100, and the sorting was undertaken by WY at Joint International Research Laboratory for Environmental and Social Archaeology, Shandong University, as part of her doctorate research. Macro-botanical remains were extracted, counted, and identified following the Flora of China (eFloras 2008) nomenclature. Photos of the remains were taken with the Zeiss Stemi 200C camera and processed (including measurements of the main crop species) with ProgRes Capture Pro V2.8 software.
Results
General features of the assemblage and key economic taxa
The archaeobotanical samples from Hebosuo presented a very rich assemblage comprising of both charred and, in minor quantity, waterlogged remains, including mostly wood fragments, and seeds and peach pits (see Tables 2, 3, and 4). A total of 67,977 individual charred remains and 598 waterlogged remains from 34 families and 60 species were recovered from the 56 floated archaeobotanical samples (Tables 3 and 4). This includes whole seeds, seeds fragments, rice spikelet bases, and wheat rachises, as well fruit stone and tuber fragments. Unidentified and unidentifiable categories include those remains that could not be identified, or had no characterizing feature that allowed identification (Supplementary Material S1). From the four handpicked samples, a total of 303 individual plant remains were recovered (Table 5). These have not been included in the quantitative analyses below, but are presented in supplementary material Table S1; a summary is also provided in Tables 2 and 5 below.
The samples from the 2016 excavation season of Hebosuo had a high density of charcoal fragments; for the ≥ 1 mm fraction, charcoal content per each sample averaged 6.4 g/L, with the highest recorded density of 36.6 g/L of floated soil (from sample t1 h1-1). A higher presence of charcoal fragments correlated with a higher presence of ancient charred plant remains. The average density of charred seeds per floated soil liter was 130.7 for Han period samples and 33.3 for Dian period samples (Table 2). Waterlogged remains showed a lower density per liter of floated soil (Table 2). There is a strict correlation between the quantity of charcoal and charred seed present in each sample; the higher the quantity of charcoal fragments found corresponds to a higher number of charred seeds found. This indicates that the majority of the seeds became incorporated in the archaeobotanical assemblage following the burning of domestic waste, such as left-over food after cooking or the disposal of crop processing waste products. Waterlogged remains, instead, are mostly represented by peach pits; this might indicate that the fruits were consumed in a different way than other retrieved food remains, and became incorporated into the archaeobotanical assemblage through post-depositional underground water movements. Ancient hydrological variation studies in the area attest to several events of water table levels rise across the millennia (Yan et al. 2020), and this could explain the presence of both charred and waterlogged remains at the site, given the location of Hebosuo near to the lake.
Ancient plant remains were divided in the following categories: cereal crops, cultivated legumes, other possible economic species, fruits nuts and tubers, and weedy taxa. Cereals and weedy taxa remains show the highest ubiquity across both periods of occupation, as well as the highest absolute counts, after Chenopodium seeds (see below, Figs. 6 and 7). Pulses, fruits, and other possible economic species are present in lower quantities among the charred remains; however, they represent the majority of the waterlogged material, indicating they still had an important role in in the overall economy of the site (Figs. 6 and 7 and Tables 2 and 3).
Cereal crops
Three species of cereals were found in the 2016 Hebosuo samples, and these include in order of importance free-threshing wheat (Triticum aestivum), rice (Oryza sativa), and foxtail millet (Setaria italica). Both grains, whole and fragmented, as well as rice spikelet bases and wheat rachises (Tables 3 and 4; supplementary material Table S1; Fig. 9). Some of the cereal remains were too fragmented and badly preserved to allow for precise identification, and these have been grouped into the Cerealia category. For the quantitative analyses below, only grains were counted, excluding Cerealia, rachises, and rice spikelet bases. Additionally, grain fragments were equaled to approximate whole grain counts, for rice fragments bigger than half grains, these were counted as 1; for fragments smaller than half grains, these were counted as 3 fragments = 1 grain. In Tables 3 and 4, numbers are estimated of whole grains equivalent.
Rice — Oryza sativa
Rice remains recovered from the 2016 Hebosuo samples included whole grains, both mature and immature, fragments of grains, and spikelet bases. The rice fragments were further categorized by size, those fragments that were bigger than half grain were counted as 1 grain, fragments smaller than half grain were instead approximated to whole grain count estimates, with 3 fragments counting as 1 grain. In total, 65080 rice remains where retrieved, including 126 grains and 64954 spikelet bases; all of the spikelet bases were of the domesticated type. Chronologically, rice remains increase both in ubiquity, from 81.8 to 88.9% from the Dian to the Han period, and in frequency with rice remains representing 88.4% of the total recovered archaeobotanical remains in the Dian samples and increasing to 94.9% in the Han samples (Figs. 6 and 7). Rice grains appeared generally well preserved by charring; each grain showed a crescent-shaped embryo on the side, with clear longitudinal ridges along the grain. Especially the longitudinal ridges are clearly visible even in fragments of rice grains, and this allows for their inclusion in the rice category. Those grains which were shrunken, with no clear longitudinal ridges along the grain, presenting a concave embryo have been categorized as immature grains through the comparison of ancient and modern immature rice grains.
Twenty-five whole, well-preserved mature grains were selected for measurements (Fig. 8; Supplementary Material S2), average length was 4.52 mm with a standard deviation of 0.6 mm, average width was 2.40 mm with a standard deviation of 0.4 mm, and average thickness was 1.93 mm with a standard deviation of 0.3 mm. L:W ratio was on average 1.9 (Fig. 8). According to previous morphometric research on rice grains, those grains having a L:W > 2.2 belong to the so-called indica type (Harvey and Fuller 2005; Castillo et al. 2016) and grains with a L:W < 2 belong to the japonica type. Most of the measured rice grains from the 2016 Hebosuo samples showed a L:W < 2; only 5 of the measured grains had a L:W > 2.2, and 3 belonged to the middle range 2–2.2; this indicated that rice from Hebosuo can be identified as Oryza sativa subsp. japonica. This is in line with previous rice remains found from earlier sites in Yunnan, such as Baiyangcun (Dal Martello et al. 2018), Haimenkou (Xue et al. 2022), and Xueshan (Wang et al. 2019).
Free-threshing wheat — Triticum aestivum
Wheat remains include whole grains (n = 150) and rachis fragments. These were found in samples dating to the both the Dian and the Han periods, showing an increased ubiquity from Dian to Han from 54.5 to 66.7%; however, this corresponds to a slight decrease of overall frequency (Fig. 7). In general, these seeds had no visible husk, the embryo was sunken, and the ventral furrow was clearly visible; the back of seed showed the typical rounded lower hump. Additionally, a few grains were significantly smaller, stunted, with a shrunken embryo and overall shrunken surface of the grain. These were identified as immature grains. Due to highly pronounced morphological differences between some of the wheat grains, these were further categories in the following sub-types:
-
type I: larger size grains with an elongated shape, a total of 35 grains belonged to this type;
-
type II: highly compact grains with an overall rounder profile; smaller in overall size than type I; a total of 115 grains belonged to this type.
Both types were recovered from both time periods. Thirty-nine well-preserved and whole, mature grains where selected for measuring, and morphometric measurements further supported the division of wheat grains in the two subtypes: 15 type I grains were measured and their average L:W ratio was 1.63; 24 type II highly compact wheat grains showed instead a much smaller average L:W ratio of 1.25 (see supplementary material table S2). Overall, type II grains were on average 3.38-mm long and 2.7-mm wide (see Fig. 9). Due to the lower quantity of wheat grains retrieved from the Dian samples, only 5 grains belonging to this time period could be measured.
Foxtail millet — Setaria italica
Foxtail millet was not present in large quantities among the samples analyzed. A total of 19 grains were recovered from 9 samples, representing the 15.8% of the samples analyzed. Chronologically, millet remains show a decrease trend in both ubiquity and frequency, from 18.2 to 15.6% in ubiquity, and c. 0.2% to slightly less than 0.02% in frequency from the Dian to the Han period (Figs. 6 and 7). Morphologically, millet grains are round or slightly oval in shape, the embryo has a clear reversed U-shaped depressed area, and the embryo is as big or longer than half of the total length of the grain. Eight well-preserved mature millet grains were selected for measuring and averaged 1.17 mm in length, 1.05 mm in thickness, and 0.83 mm in thickness (Supplementary Material S2); this is comparable to other domesticated foxtail millet remains from earlier archaeological sites in Yunnan, such as at Baiyangcun (Dal Martello et al. 2018) and Haimenkou (Xue et al. 2022). There was no clear size difference between grains recovered from period one to period two of occupation. A few immature grains were also recovered from period 1, and these measured significantly smaller than mature grains; immature grains were on average 0.96-mm long, 0.83-mm wide, and 0.67-mm thick (Supplementary Material S2).
Cultivated legumes
Soybean and adzuki bean
A few grains of soybean (Glycine max) and adzuki bean (Vigna cf angularis) were recovered from samples belonging to the Han period. Three complete soybean grains were recovered from 2 samples and 2 grains of adzuki beans from 1 sample. The soybean presented an overall round-oval shape with an oval hilum on one side; the thin seed coat was still visible on small sections of the grains (Fig. 10). The thickness of the seed coat in soybean is usually taken as a diagnostic trait when distinguishing wild vs. domesticated specimens (e.g., Murphy et al. 2019). One grain was well preserved enough to be measured, and it was 3.56-mm long, 2.35-mm wide, and 1.93-mm thick. The size of this grain is comparable to modern domesticated soybean.
Adzuki beans had a round shape, slightly flat on both sides, showing a long hilum placed on one side. The seed coat of the recovered adzuki bean was smooth and thin. One grain was measured and it was 3.62-mm long, 2.54-mm wide, and 2.37-mm thick. Adzuki beans are not native to China; current evidence indicates this species might have been domesticated in Japan or Korean and brought to mainland China via early connections and exchange via sea possibly at the end of the first millennium BC (e.g., Chen et al. 2019; Lee 2013).
Possible cultivated species
Buckwheat — Fagopyrum esculentum
Three grains of buckwheat were recovered from two samples, 1 grain from sample T1⑰a-1 from period 1 and 2 from sample T1⑬-5 from period 2. All three grains were charred, they present a triangular shape with pronounced longitudinal ridges on each side, and embryo is located in the center of the grain (Fig. 10). The examination of the grain in cross-section revealed slightly curving at the edges. Each grain still presented the coat. One grain could be measured and it was 2.72 mm in length, 1.74 mm in width, and 1.65 mm in thickness. The buckwheat from Hebosuo is comparatively smaller than known modern cultivated buckwheat, but its size is comparable to other known archaeological buckwheat seeds, ranging between 2.21 and 3.99 mm in length and 2.43–3.28 mm in width (Yang et al. 2021).
Chenopodium
Abundant quantities of Chenopodium grains were found in the samples analyzed: a total of 472 Chenopodium album and 2439 Chenopodium ficifolium grains. These were found in 38 samples, corresponding 66.7% ubiquity. Both species present very similar seeds, differentiating by seed coat patterns; C. ficifolium shows hexagonal depressions on the seed coat and a small size, averaging in diameter less than 1.00 mm; C. album seeds have obtuse rim margins, shallower seed coat patterns, and larger seeds, usually with a diameter of 1.2–1.5 mm. Both species have black colored seeds. Additionally, both species are edible, including both the grains and the leaves as greens (e.g., Fogg 1983; Tanaka and Nakao 1976). Although uncharred modern Chenopodium grains show a similarly colored seed coat, however, charred grains have a much more brittle seed coat layer, which is easily broken when examining the seeds under microscope. Modern seed coat is tough and not easily broken with simple pressure by the tweezers, and although charred seeds have a similar seed coat colors to modern seeds, their difference in seed coat elasticity makes them easily distinguishable. Chenopodium seeds decrease from the first to the second period of occupation from 7.5 to 4.1% of the total recovered archaeobotanical remains.
Fruits, nuts, and tubers
Fruit remains retrieved from the 2016 Hebosuo samples include charred grape seeds (Vitis vinifera), hawthorn (Crataegus cuneata), Indian strawberry seeds (Duchesnea indica), and a few fragments of unidentified fruits and/or nut species, and tubers (Tables 3 and 4; Supplementary Material S1; Fig. 11). Although fruits are present in very low quantities among the charred remains; waterlogged material from the sites is mostly comprised of fruit remains. These include seeds of bottle gourds (Lagenaria sp.), several Prunus remains, including stones of peach (Prunus persica), possible cherry (Prunus cerasus), Japanese plum (Prunus salicina), and indeterminate Prunus stones, as well as Rubus seeds (Table 4; Supplementary Material S1). Among the handpicked samples, noteworthy is the find of possible hog plum remains (Choerospondias axillaris; Table 5).
Fruit remains account for c. 0.2% of the total recovered archaeobotanical remains, of which 0.19% are Rosaceae type fruits. Although present in both periods of occupation, fruit remains increased considerably in diversity and quantity of remains recovered in the second period of occupation. For example, with the exception of cherry, all other Prunus and Rosaceae fruits were found in the Han period samples (Tables 3 and 4). Among these, peach stones are the most abundant; due to their large size, these peach pits were mostly collected by hand during excavation from layers 13 to 16. A total of 279 among complete stones and fragments were recovered. Intact stones were measured and are about 1.8–2.2 cm in length and 1.34–1.62 cm in width (See supplementary Material S2 for a complete list of peach stone measurements). Additionally, 186 stones have drill marks at one end, on the surface show concave gaps, and the kernels in the seeds are absent. The extraction of the kernel could be related to detoxification processes to make the pit edible (Hosoya et al 2010).
Three fragments of tuber were found; these are larger in size than cereal grains and have a typical tuber internal structure. All of the tuber fragments were found in samples belonging to the second phase of occupation, but were retrieved only in 5.8% of the samples analyzed.
Some additional unidentified fruit stones were also recovered, but they lacked distinguishable characteristics that could identify them to species. These were found in 10.5% of the samples analyzed.
Bottle gourd — Lagenaria sp.
A total of 81 bottle gourd (Lagenaria sp.) seeds have been recovered from the 2016 Hebosuo samples. All of these were preserved by waterlogging, their appeared creamy yellow in color and presented a narrow and oblong shape, with a wider bottom end, truncated margins, and a protrusion on each side. The top end has a triangular tip, with two longitudinal edges on each side. The hilum is located on the narrow cusp end (Fig. 11). Due to the large dimension of these seeds, the majority of these were collected by hand during the excavation, since they were clearly visible with the naked eye. A small number of them were also recovered through flotation.
Other possible economic species
Sichuan pepper — Zanthoxylum bungeanum
A total of 10 seeds of Zanthoxylum bungeanum were found in the 2016 Hebosuo samples (three from the Dian samples and four from the Han samples), all of which were preserved by charring. These are of oval shape and slightly flattened at one side, and the surface shows a protruding dotted pattern (Fig. 11). We chose 4 well preserved and complete seeds to measure, and they measured on average 3.3 mm in length and 2.7 mm in width.
Weedy taxa
A total of 607 seeds of wild weedy taxa have been recovered from the 2016 Hebosuo samples, accounting for 0.89% of the total recovered archaeobotanical remains (Fig. 7). Seeds of field weeds belong overall to 35 different species, which were categorized in dryland, wetland, and wasteland weeds, with the addition of a few indeterminate weeds which could only be identified to family level. This division was made consulting local floras to establish each species growing ecology (eFloras 2008).
Dryland weeds include species associated with dryland cultivation, often found infesting fields of wheat and millet. These include Polygonum lapathifolium, Digitaria sp., Kochia scopara, Setaria viridis, Xanthium strumarium, and Stellaria media. Seeds of dryland weeds decrease in both diversity and abundance from the first to the second period of occupation (Fig. 7).
Wetland weeds comprise those species typically growing in irrigated or more heavily watered agricultural fields, such as paddy rice fields. Wetland weedy taxa recovered from the 2016 Hebosuo samples include Scirpus triqueter, Schoenoplectus juncoides, Eleocharis sp., Potamogeton sp., and Bulbostylis sp. Wetland weed seeds show a significant increase in presence and variety of taxa from the first to the second period of occupation of Hebosuo.
So-called wasteland weeds are those species associated with disturbed landscapes, growing by hillsides or on abandoned pastoral fields. This includes, for example, Atriplex patens, Potentilla biforcuta, Oxalis corniculate, Verbena officinalis, and Sambucus javanica. These show an increase in ubiquity through time; however, the overall quantities of wasteland weed type seeds decrease from the Dian to the Han period.
Arboreal species
Remains of the arboreal species of Pinus (pine cone fragments) and Celtis (hackberry, two seeds) were also found in the samples analyzed. These were preserved by waterlogging.
Discussion
Staple crop composition as evidenced from the archaeobotanical assemblage
The archaeobotanical assemblage retrieved from the 2016 excavation at Hebosuo shows that people inhabiting the site during the mid-first millennium BC practiced a mixed economy based on the cultivation of both dryland and wetland cereal crops, legumes, possibly buckwheat, and Chenopodium, and the collection of several local wild fruits, in continuity with earlier reported results from the 2014 archaeobotanical assemblage from the site. Rice was the primary wetland crop, supplemented by wheat and millet, although millet has been retrieved in much lower quantities in comparison to wheat and might have been a secondary crop. The high quantity of rice spikelet bases recovered indicates that rice was grown locally, and the analysis of the associated weedy flora, abundant in wetland species such as Schoenoplectus juncoide, Scirpus triqueter, and Potamogeton L., suggests that rice was most likely grown in the lowlands, possibly through some sort of water management, and dryland crops were instead grown in the nearby hills.
The high quantity of Chenopodium grains retrieved at Hebosuo might indicate that it might have been actively exploited and utilized as food or fodder resource by people living at Hebosuo. Chenopodium grains are often reported from early archaeological sites that have undergone flotation analysis, especially from Southwestern China. High quantities of this species have been reported from Yingpanshan (c. 3300–2600 BC, Zhao and Chen 2011) and Guiyuanqiao (c. 3100–1000 BC, SPICRA 2015), in Sichuan, and at the site of Haimenkou (1600–400 BC, Xue et al. 2022) and Guangfentou (c. 800–400 BC, Li and Liu 2016) in Yunnan. At these sites, Chenopodium grains were found in high quantities, sometimes representing more than half of the total recovered archaeobotanical remains. At other sites in Yunnan, such as Xueshan, Dayingzhuang, and from the 2014 Hebosuo samples, Chenopodium grains are also reported, albeit in much lower quantities (Wang et al. 2019; Dal Martello et al. 2021; Yang et al. 2021). The widespread report of high numbers of archaeobotanical Chenopodium grains from early sites in Southwestern China might indicate that the species was exploited by humans and had some role in the overall production system of the early southwestern China economy. Stems from Chenopodium plants have also been known to be used as fire started after appropriate drying. However, how this species was used is difficult to ascertain and future research should address this issue.
Seeds of Sichuan pepper are another common find at sites in Southwest China that have undergone flotation. Today, Sichuan pepper has many uses, it is an important spice in Chinese cuisine, it can be used as anti-septic medicine, for producing beverages, and the woody part of the plant can be used for manufacturing purposes. Sichuan pepper is considered to originate in Sichuan, a neighboring province to Yunnan. In China, the use of Zanthoxylum can be traced back to at least the fourth millennium BC, with the earliest reported finds of Zanthoxylum seeds from Xiahe, in Shanxi province (c. 3900–3600 BC, Liu et al. 2013). With the increased deployment of flotation in archaeological excavations in the past years, finds of this species have been increasingly reported, with finds from Erlitou (CASS 2014); the ancient city of Zhuguo (Ma et al. 2019); and from several ancient cemeteries including at the Shang Dynasty Gushi cemetery in Henan (Ding 1991), Yachang cemetery at Yinxu (Yang 2012), Chu cemetery in Baoshan, Jingmen, Hubei (BTJRA 1988), Han Dynasty Luopowan cemetery in Guixian county in Guangxi (Cultural Relics Task Force of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region 1982), and at the Han Dynasty Mawangdui tomb in Changsha (HAI and CASIB 1978). Many early sites in Yunnan have also reported finds of this species, including Shilinggang (Li et al. 2016), Dayingzhuang (Dal Martello et al.2021), Yubeidi (Yang et al. 2020), and Xueshan (Wang et al. 2019). This shows that Zanthoxylum was possibly being exploited during the first millennium BC in Yunnan, especially in the Nujiang, Jinsha, and Dian basins, but the domestication trajectory of this species is still not well understood.
An important find at Hebosuo is the numerous Lagenaria seeds. This is a gourd genus native to East Asia, with archaeobotanical finds reported since prehistoric times. In China, bottle gourd remains have been reported from the sites of Peiligang, Hemudu, and Tianluoshan, dating to about 8000–7000 years ago. This indicates that this species could have been domesticated in the lower Yangzi Basin; however, a possible center in Japan has also been indicated as a possibility (Fuller et al. 2010), while a separate American domestication has also been demonstrated (Kistler et al. 2014). In the Americas, ancient gourd finds date to at least 10,000 years ago, and their domestication is usually measured through the progressive thinning of the gourd skin. The fact that gourds remains found at these Neolithic sites presented a morphology closely resembling that of modern day, domesticated gourd, seem to imply that selection pressure was already applied prior to the Holocene (Fuller et al. 2010). Gourds can be used in a variety of ways, many species are edible, and given their thick and sturdy skins, many are used as container once emptied and dried. Gourds depictions have been found in Neolithic pottery remains from China, including the famous Yangshao gourd-shaped bottle (Wang 2014). Additionally, gourds have a highly symbolic meaning in traditional Chinese culture; their shape is thought to resemble female genitalia and therefore bottle gourd is used as fertility (Liu 1996a). In antiquity, gourds were used as offering in Shinto rituals, symbolizing immortality (Liu 1996b). In Yunnan, bronze bottle gourds used as musical instruments, known as sheng pipe, and other miniature figurines of bottle gourds have been found in Dian graves at the cemetery sites of Shizhaishan, Lijiashan, and others (YPM 1959; YPM 1975). This indicates the ritual use of the cucurbit beyond its edible function and its importance in Dian music and ritual dances. There exist two types of gourd sheng pipe: the straight or the curved pipe; each is played in a different way and represents two different musical instruments (Ge 1987). The modern shape of the bottle gourd might have been selected by the specific needs to achieve for this musical pipe.
That fruits remains from Hebosuo are mostly preserved by waterlogging, in contrast to charred cereals and other economic species, might indicate that fruit remains were not discarded into the fire, but possibly eaten while wandering through the site and their waste discarded spontaneously. Prunus and more broadly fruit belonging to the Rosaceae family have been sporadically reported from other early sites in Yunnan, including at Haimenkou (Xue et al. 2022) and Baiyangcun (Dal Martello et al. 2018). However, at all previous sites, fruit remains are present in very low quantities (Dal Martello 2022). The large quantity of especially peach stones from Han period Hebosuo reported here might indicate a more intensive exploitation of this species starting at the end of the first millennium BC with the arrival of the Han to the province who brought with them a higher cultural and subsistence value for these fruits. According to present evidence, the oldest archaeological peach stones have been reported from Kuahuqiao, in the middle and lower Yangzi river basin, dating to at least 7500 year ago (Zheng et al 2014); and peach remains are widely reported from archaeological sites in China by 4000 year ago (Fuller and Stevens 2019) and in India by 3700 years ago (Fuller and Madella 2001). The oldest written reference to peach is found in Shang Dynasty oracle bones inscriptions (Yu 1996); further references are found in the Shi Jing, or Book of Songs, the Huainanzi, and other early texts dating to the late second millennium BC onward (Jiang 1998). During the Han Dynasty, peach symbolized immortality and possessed the power of warding off ghosts and evil spirits. Peach stones are a common funerary find in Han period graves including at Pujiang in Zhaohua, Sichuan, in Echeng, Hubei, as well as Guishan in Tongshan in Jiangsu, and at Shuihudi in Hubei (Chen 1994). Clay figurines depicting peach tree branches have also been found at the Han Dynasty Mawangdui tomb in Changsha (HPM and HPICRA 2004). However, in the Yunnan-Guizhou Plateau, few peach remains have previously been found. Previous reports include at the Neolithic site of Duliao (c. 4000 BC; Zheng et al. 2014) in Guizhou and at Baiyangcun (c. 2600–1800 BC; YPM 1981) and Haimenkou (c. 1600–400 BC; Xue et al. 2022) in Yunnan. However, only a few stones and stone remains have been reported from these sites, and the peach finds from Hebosuo are the largest archaeobotanical assemblage retrieved from the province so far. The metrics taken on the stones support their identification as cultivated or actively exploited variety, and the holes drilled at the end of the stones could indicate the removal of the kernels for detoxification purposes, but it could also indicate that this fruit had also a decorating or ritual use in addition to its edible use.
Finally, the finds of arboreal species such as Pinus and Celtis indicate not only that these types of trees were possibly presented in the immediate vicinity of the village, but could also indicate that people living at Hebosuo used their wood as fuel or for manufacturing purposes.
Continuity and intensification of cereal crop production during the Han
The agricultural system as attested by the retrieved archaeobotanical remains from the 2016 excavation of Hebosuo does not show substantial changes from the Dian to the Han period. Drawing on a historical ecology perspective, we show how imperial rulers incorporated a pre-existing Bronze Age multi-crop base of wet and dry (wheat-millet-rice) cereals that is well-adapted to the monsoonal conditions of the Dian basin. However, even though the same rotation of crops from the Bronze Age was maintained throughout the two periods, our analysis of weed assemblages indicates Han officials attempted to intensify agricultural production by shifting to an irrigated land use system, which appears to dovetail with paleoenvironmental proxies for the Dian basin. However, according to the Shiji records, the Han conquer of the Dian implied at least some level of political stability given that the former Dian King retained command of the lands (Watson 1961). Dian agriculture, as attested by archaeobotanical studies undertaken both at Hebosuo and other sites, such as Dayingzhuang and Xueshan, shows that the main crops at the basis of the Dian productive economy were wheat, rice, and millet, supplemented by the production of legumes such as soybean, possibly buckwheat and with the contribution of wild resources such as local fruits. As seen above, archaeobotanical remains from the 2016 Han samples show a continuity in composition and importance of plant species with both the late Dian period from the 2016 excavation, as well as the early Dian period reported from the 2014 excavation (Yang et al. 2021). This continuity may derive in part from the local soil and environmental conditions and/or constraints, given the peculiar vertical zonation of Yunnan, and this kind of mixed, dryland, and wetland regime represents the best choice for a rich agricultural production that takes advantage of water-rich lowlands and nearby highlands. The plains provide sufficient water resources for the cultivation of paddy rice, while the nearby hills provide a suitable environment for the cultivation of wheat and millets. This type of mixed cereal cultivation was introduced to the Dian area from at least the end of the second millennium BC (Yang et al. 2021). An additional reason for this continuation might be the effort made by the Han ruling class to integrate and find local solutions to maintain their political rule in new territories. By avoiding disrupting the local, pre-existing cultivation system, the new ruling class may have tried to prevent upheavals. Finally, the possibility of having an abundant food supply was also the driver for the Han migration into the fertile Dian Basin. Archaeological material culture retrieved from post-Dian sites also shows that although the Han Dynasty conquered the Dian in 109 BC, Dian local customs and lifeways continued for a period of time (Chiang 2012) until the first century AD coinciding with the abandonment of elite cemetery grounds.
Although there is not much change in overall composition of the agricultural assemblage from the Dian to Han periods, there is clear evidence indicating intensification of the cereal production in the Han period. Cereal crops increase in numbers during the Han (from 90 to 92.5% of the total recovered archaeobotanical remains), as well as in density (from 29.8 to 124.3 grains/L). This suggests an expansion and intensification of cereal cultivation that is possibly connected with migration-driven population growth. This is further supported by textual evidence found in the Hou Han Shu (Western Han Dynasty, Wang Mang period, AD 19), which records more 2000 hectares of new lands being cleared for cultivation during the protectorate of Wen Qi. The clearance of new land for agriculture is also attested by the increase in density of charcoal fragments from 2.7 to 7.2 g/L retrieved in the archaeological strata of the site and its surrounding. A recent study of lake sediments from the Dian Lake has detected an increased charcoal signature at the end of the first millennium BC (Xiao et al. 2020). The authors of the study have suggested this might represent an increased fire use, possibly linked to imperial land management policies.
Changes in relative proportion of cereal crops are also present from the Dian to the Han; although the ubiquity of rice and wheat both increase in the Han, the total numbers of remains show an increase of rice, in contrast with a marked decrease in wheat remains (Figs. 6 and 7). This might reflect a dislike of wheat by the Han migrant population, as attested by a slow uptake of wheat cultivation in the Central Plains until the end of the Han Dynasty (Boivin et al. 2012; Deng et al. 2020). Millet also shows a decrease in both ubiquity and frequency over time, in line with a declining trend that has been attested in other sites in Central Yunnan following the introduction of wheat in the mid-second millennium BC (Dal Martello 2022; Yang et al. 2021).
In addition to changes in cereal production, further changes can be detected in the increase in numbers and variety of fruit taxa in the Han period in comparison to the previous Dian period. Fruit taxa are present in very low quantities from sites in the Dian Basin preceding the occupation of Hebosuo, including Xueshan, Dayingzhuang, and Guangfentou (Dal Martello 2022; Wang et al. 2019; Dal Martello et al. 2021; Li and Liu 2016). This increase might indicate a preference to fruit by the Han population and possibly the beginning of fruit tree management practices, especially of peach trees. In the Lingnan area, homeland of the Nanyue Kingdom, there are recorded similar records of increase exploitation of Cucurbitaceae and Rosaceae fruits (Chen 2015).
The question of irrigation and possible anthropogenic impact
The analysis of the weedy taxa composition from archaeobotanical samples also substantiates a shift in land use practices that is connected with wet rice cultivation introduced under the Han. Seeds of field weeds get incorporated into the archaeobotanical assemblage through the harvesting and crop processing activities carried out on site, as well as through food preparation. The presence of such weeds can thus help clarify the environment in which the crops they are associated with in the archaeobotanical assemblage were grown. Chronologically, dryland field weeds are more prevalent in the first phase of occupation of the site, while in the second phase, dryland weeds not only decrease and wetland weeds increase, but the overall variety of weed taxa also increases. This is usually linked with the clearance of new lands, but the particular increase in wetland weeds might mean a more intensive water management/irrigation practices were taking place, and/or the development of new agricultural production practices especially linked with new tools. Scholars believe that iron tools were employed in Yunnan since at least the Western Han period (202 BC–6 AD) with the production of pure iron tools and a marked increase in the number of agricultural tools recovered by the Eastern Han period (9–220 AD; see Lin 1963; Li and Zhou 2014). Such tools also impacted the precise plant harvesting practices, making it possible to harvest the whole plant from the roots. This practice would bring a higher number of weeds into the site, compared to harvesting the plant at the panicle, a method practiced with the claw sickle and attested during the Dian period. Previous archaeobotanical work at Dayingzhuang showed that earlier rice cultivation in Yunnan was mostly based on seasonal rain and alluvial activities from the nearby rivers (Dal Martello et al. 2021; Yang et al. 2021). However, from the Han period onward, rice cultivation may have shifted to a more intentional water management system, possibly with the wide-scale adoption of irrigation. The intensification of rice production, especially through paddy construction, terracing, and irrigation, can have a lasting impact on local vegetation and soil conditions. Analysis of palynological samples of lake sediment cores from the Dian Lake shows a notable increase in Poaceae pollen and charcoal density beginning in the first century AD (Xiao et al. 2020). The anthropogenic impact of a wet rice regime is also associated with an increase in soil erosion (e.g., uptick in magnetic susceptibility values) and the deposition of a red clay layer in lake sediments in both the northern and southern end of the lake (Hillman et al. 2019). These proxies suggest a more intensive land-use practice which corroborate temporally with the introduction of a more intensive cultivation regime documented in Han sources.
According to the Houhan Shu, Han officials described the Dian Basin as a vast agricultural land with abundant water resources, one that was well-suited for paddy rice cultivation. Historical accounts describe irrigation practices in the Dian Basin from at least the first century AD. The new prefecture established by the Han Emperor Wu in 109 BC, named the Yizhou Prefecture and largely consisting in the former Dian territory in Yunnan province, is described as having a large lake, identified with the modern-day Lake Dian, which was surrounded by salt wells, ponds, and vast agricultural fields. During the period of Wang Mang’s rebellion in AD 19, the central government appointed Wen Qi as the prefect of Yizhou, and he built the Bei pond in the Dian Lake area, to irrigate and develop agriculture (Fang and Li 1965). Intensive rice cultivation in paddy fields is much more labor intensive than growing wheat and millet. However, it also has the advantage of a much higher yield, which in turn can help prevent famine and related crisis. Han historical documents record that famines were a frequent occurrence in Yizhou Prefecture at the end of the first millennium BC. The most serious famine was recorded during the reign of Emperor Ling of the eastern Han Dynasty, during which time Jing Yi was the prefect of Yizhou. This crisis may have been amplified by population growth that was fueled by migration from the north. Short fall and rising demand drove up the price of rice until Jing Yi assumed office and stabilized the price of rice to previous levels (Chang 1985).
The construction of the Bei pond by Wei Qi is also attested by large clay models depicting paddy fields recovered from Han period tombs in the Dian Basin (Xiao 1994). These not only show paddy fields, but also details such as irrigation channels connecting them, the division and layout of the fields, the use of fish as nitrogen nutrient fixer, and the rearing of ducks, turtles, and fish on rice paddies (see Fig. 12). The frequency of iron farming tools in Han tombs also suggests that labor saving tools made for more effective and efficient tilling of clay soils. Similar clay models have also been recovered from the Erhai region, west from Dali, at the Dazhantun cemetery (Dali Zhou Wenwu Guanlisuo 1988; Zhang 1992) indicating that paddy rice cultivation of similar type than the one attested in the Dian basin was also present in Northwest Yunnan at about the same period. All of these visual and material sources illustrate an investment in a wide suite of technologies and infrastructures critical to supporting this farming system. These adoptions eventually transformed the local constitution of soils, water, and microbiota, changes which the paleoenvironment data do help confirm.
Conclusion
Archaeobotanical analyses from the 2016 excavation season of Hebosuo provide the first direct evidence of agricultural production during the transitional period between the Dian and the arrival of the Han in the Dian Basin, in Central Yunnan. Although the same staple crops (rice and wheat) continued to be cultivated during this transition period, the weed assemblage shows that new agricultural regimes associated with wet or irrigated systems were being introduced. These practices may be tied to both migration and population pressures and attested state efforts to intensify agricultural production in the region. Other important economic species include soybean and adzuki bean. Chenopodium was retrieved in high quantities and this might indicate it was actively exploited; finally, Sichuan pepper grains were also retrieved. However, the early exploitation and domestication trajectory of these species are not well understood and future studies should address this issue. At present, archaeobotanical evidence indicates cultivation of similar staple crops with the arrival of the Han; some intensification of the agricultural production can be attested, especially in regard to the irrigation of rice, and diversification of local wild taxa, which corroborate with the increase in charcoal volume and grass pollen, as well as soil erosion rates, detected in lake sediments by previous studies (Hillman et al. 2019; Xiao et al. 2020). Future targeted excavation of post-Dian sites in central Yunnan will also help clarify the degree of intensification of the productive economy that is presently attested at Hebosuo.
Data availability
All data generated and analyzed during this study are included in this published article (and its supplementary information files).
Code availability
Not applicable.
References
Allard F (1998) Stirrings at the periphery: history, archaeology, and the study of Dian. Int J Hist Archaeol 2(4):321–341
Ban G (1999) Han Shu. Zhonghua Shuju Press, Beijing, p 1218
Boivin N, Fuller DQ, Crowther A (2012) Old World globalization and the Columbian exchange: comparison and contrast. World Archaeol 44(3):452–469
Bronk Ramsey C (2009) Bayesian analysis of radiocarbon dates. Radiocarbon 51(1):337–360
BTJRA, Baoshan Team of Jingsha railway archaeology, Hubei Province (1988) Jingmenshi Baoshan Chumu fajue jianbao [Preliminary report on the excavation of Chu tombs in Baoshan, Jingmen city] (in Chinese). Wenwu 5:1–14
CASS, IA, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, Institute of Archaeology (2014) Zhiwu ziyuan de huoqu yu liyong [Acquisition and utilization of plant resources] (in Chinese). in Erlitou (1999–2006). Cultural Relics Press, Beijing, pp 1295–1313
Castillo CC, Tanaka K, Sato YI et al (2016) Archaeogenetic study of prehistoric rice remains from Thailand and India: evidence of early japonica in South and Southeast Asia. Archaeol Anthropol Sci 8:523–543. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12520-015-0236-5
Chang Q (1985) Huayangguo zhi. Beijing, Zhonghua shuju
Chen Y (2015) Nanyueguo gongshu yizhi chutu de Nanyuewang Gongyuan dongzhiwu yicun [Plant and animal remains from the Imperial Palace Garden of the Nanyue Kingdom]. In Nanyue Wanggong Bowuguan (eds) Xihan nanyueguo shi yanjiu lunji 1 [Essays on the history of Nanyue during the Western Han Dynasty vol. 1]. Yilin Publishing House, Nanjing, pp 97–104
Chen D, Luo W, Bai Y (2019) The social interaction between China and Japanese archipelago during Western Han Dynasty: comparative study of bronze mirrors from Linzi and Yayoi sites. Archaeol Anthropol Sci 11:3449–3457. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12520-018-0763-y
Chen WH (1994) Zhongguo nongye kaogu tulu [Atlas of agricultural archaeology of China] (in Chinese). Jiangxi Sci Technol Press Pp:99–101
Chiang, Po-yi (2012) Transformation of the Shizhaishan Cultural Complex under the Influence of the Han Empire. In Sichuan University National Museum (ed). Southern Ethnology and Archaeology. Chengdu, Sichuan University Press, Chengdu, pp 173–192
Chiou-Peng T-H (2004) Horsemen in the Dian culture of Yunnan. In Gender and Chinese archaeology. Linduff KM and Y Sun (eds) Pp:289–313. AltaMira Press, Walnut Creek, CA
D’Alpoim Guedes J, J Wan (2015) Sichuan Shifangshi Guiyuanqiao yizhi fuxuan jieguo yu fenxi [Flotation results and analysis from Yingpanshan site, Shifang, Sichuan]. Sichuan Wenwu 5:81–87+94
Dal Martello R (2022) The origins of multi-cropping agriculture in Southwestern China: archaeobotanical insights from third to first millennium B.C. Yunnan. Asian Archaeol https://doi.org/10.1007/s41826-022-00052-2
Dal Martello R, Min R, Stevens C, Higham C, Higham T, Qin L, Fuller DQ (2018) Early agriculture at the crossroads of China and Southeast Asia: archaeobotanical evidence and radiocarbon dates from Baiyangcun, Yunnan. J Archaeol Sci Rep 20:711–721
Dal Martello R, Li XR, Fuller DQ (2021) Two-season agriculture and irrigated rice during the Dian: radiocarbon dates and archaeobotanical remains from Dayingzhuang, Yunnan. South China Archaeol Anthropol Sci 13:62
Dali Zhou Wenwu Guanlisuo (1988) Yunnan Dali Dazhantun erhao Hanmu [Han Tomb n.2 at Dazhantun, Dali, Yunnan]. Kaogu 5:449–456
DCRAI, Dali Cultural Relics Administration Institute (1988) Yunnan Dali Dazhantun 2 hao Hanmu [Preliminary report on excavation of Han tomb No. 2 in Dazhantun, Dali Yunnan]. Kaogu 5(449):456
Dearing JA, Jones RT, Shen J, Yang XD, Boyle JF, Foster GC, Crook DS, Elvin MJ (2008) Using multiple archives to understand past and present climate–human–environment interactions: the lake Erhai catchment, Yunnan Province. China J Paleolimnol 40(1):3–31
Deng ZH, Fuller DQ, Chu XL, Cao YP, Jiang YC, Wang LZ, Lu HH (2020) Assessing the occurrence and status of wheat in late Neolithic central China: the importance of direct AMS radiocarbon dates from Xiazhai. Veg Hist Archaeobotany 29(1):61–73
Ding YX (1991) Henan Gushi Shangdaimu nei faxian huajiao [Sichuan pepper was found in a Shang Dynasty tomb in Gushi, Henan Province] (in Chinese). Nongye Kaogu 1:309
Dykoski CA, Edwards RL, Cheng H, Yuan DX, Cai YJ, Zhang ML, Lin YS, Qing JM, An ZS, Revenaugh J (2005) A high-resolution, absolute-dated Holocene and deglacial Asian monsoon record from Dongge cave. China Earth Planet Sci Lett 233(1–2):71–86
eFloras (2008) Published on the internet. http://www.efloras.org. Accessed 22 February 2008*' Missouri Botanical Garden, St. Louis, MO & Harvard University Herbaria, Cambridge
Erickson DL, Smith BD, Clarke AC, Sandweiss DH, Tuross N (2005) An Asian origin for a 10,000-year-old domesticated plant in the Americas. Proceed Nat Acad Sci United Am 102(51):18315–18320
Fang Y compiled (Song Dynasty), Li X annotated (Tang Dynasty) (1965) Houhanshu. Bejing, Zhonghua shuju Press
Fogg WH (1983) Swidden cultivation of foxtail millet by Taiwan aborigines: a cultural analogue of the domestication of Setaria italica in China. Orig Chin Civiliz, 95–115
Fuller DQ, Madella M (2001) Issues in HaraPpan archaeobotany: retrospect and prospect. In: Settar S, Korisettar R (eds) Indian archaeology in retrospect Volume II Protohistory 317–390. Indian Council of Historical Research Manohar Publishers and Distributors, New Delhi
Fuller DQ, Hosoya LA, Zheng YF, Qin L (2010) A contribution to the prehistory of domesticated bottle gourds in Asia: rind measurements from Jomon Japan and Neolithic Zhejiang. Chian Econ Bot 64(3):260–265
Fuller DQ, Stevens CJ (2019) Between domestication and civilization: the role of agriculture and arboriculture in the emergence of the first urban societies. Veg Hist Archaeobot. 28(3):263–282. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00334-019-00727-4
Cultural Relics Task Force of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region (1982) Guangxi Guixian Luobowan 2hao Hanmu [Preliminary report on the excavation of No. 2 Han tomb in Luobo Bay, Guixian County, Guangxi]. Kaogu 4:355–364+453-454
Ge JF (1987) Yunnan chutu tong hulusheng tantao [Discussion on the unearthed bronze Hulusheng in Yunnan] (in Chinese). Kaogu 9:821–825
HAI and CASIB- Hunan Agricultural Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences Institute of Botany (1978) Changsha Mawangdui yihao Hanmu chutu Dongzhiwu biaoben de yanjiu [Analysis of the plant and animal remains from the Mawangdui Han Tomb n. 1 in Changsha]. Cultural Relics Press, Beijing
Harvey E, Fuller DQ (2005) Investigating crop processing using phytolith analysis: The example of rice and millets. J Archaeol Sci 32:739–752
Hastorf CA (2017) The social archaeology of food: thinking about eating from prehistory to the present. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Hillman AL, Abbott MB, Finkenbinder MS, Yu JQ (2017) An 8,600 year lacustrine record of summer monsoon variability from Yunnan, China. Quaternary Sci Rev 174:120–132
Hillman AL, Yao A, Abbott MB, Bain DJ (2019) Two millennia of anthropogenic landscape modification and nutrient loading at Dian Lake, Yunnan Province. Chin Holocene 29(3):505–517
Hosoya LA, Wollstonecroft M, Fuller D, Qin L (2010) Experimentalpilot study of peach/apricot kernel detoxification: for reconstruc-tion of Chinese early rice farmers broad spectrum subsistencestrategy. In: NEOMAP Project, Research Institute for Humanityand Nature (ed) The studies of landscape history on East Asian inland seas, vol 1. Research Institute for Humanity and Nature, Kyoto, pp 69–76
HPM and HPICRA, Hunan Provincial Museum and Hunan Provincial Institute of Cultural Relics and Archaeology (2004) Changsha Mawangdui 2&3 hao Hanmu tianye kaogu fajue baogao [Field archaeological excavation report of Han tombs no.2 and No.3 in Mawangdui, Changsha]. Cultural relics Press
Jiang ZL (1998) Zhailun Shizhaishan Culture [Discuss Shizhaishan Culture again] (in Chinese). Wenwu 6:31–41
Jin HT (2013) Yunnan Jianchuan Haimenkou yizhi tanhua zhiwu yicun zonghe fenxi [Comprehensive analysis of carbonized plant remains in Haimenkou site, Jianchuan, Yunnan]. Unpubished PhD Dissertation. Peking University, Beijng
Kistler L, Montenegro A, Smith BD, Gifford JA, Green RE, Newsom LA, Shapiro B (2014) Transoceanic drift and the domestication of African bottle gourds in the Americas. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111(8):2937–41. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1318678111
Kunming Jinning District Local Chronicles Comittee (ed) (2003) Jinning county annals. Yunnan People Press, Kunming, pp 76–102
Lee YK (1996) Material representations of status in the Dian culture. Bull Indo-Pacific Prehist Assoc 15(1):216–225
Lee G-A (2013) Archaeological perspectives on the origins of azuki (Vigna angularis). Holocene 23(3):453–459
Li DH, Chen LY (2021) Cong Dianguo sanyin kan xihan shiqi de xinan bianjiang zhili [Discuss the governance of southwest frontier of China in western Han Dynasty from the three seals of Dian State]. Chin Borderland Hist Geogr Stud 3:14–23+213
Li XR, Liu X (2016) Yunnan Jiangchuan Guangfentou yizhi zhiwu yicun fuxuan jieguo ji fenxi [Flotation results and analysis of plant remains from Guangzhaotou site, Jiangchuan, Yunnan] (in Chinese). Nongye Kaogu 3:20–27
Li YF, Zhou L (2014) Research on ironware unearthed from the Yunnan-Guizhou Plateau in the Warring States Period and Qin and Han Dynasties. Jianghan Archeol 6:69–83
Li HM, Zuo XX, Kang LH, Ren LL, Liu FW, Liu HG, Zhang NM, Min R, Liu X, Dong GH (2016) Prehistoric agriculture development in the Yunnan-Guizhou Plateau, Southwest China: archaeobotanical evidence. Sci China Earth Sci 59:1562–1573. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-016-5292-x
Lin S (1963) Talking about the date of Yunnan’s beginning of manufacture of ironware. Archaeol 4:201–203
Lin CM (2005) Hanzu yimin yu Yunnan tongyi [Han immigrants and the unification of Yunnan] (in Chinese). J Yunnan Minzu Univ 3:106–113
Liu H, Hu SM, Zhang PC, Yang QH, Jiang HE, Wang WL, Wang CS (2013) Shanxi liangchu Yangshao shiqi yizhi fuxuan jieguo fenxi jiqi bijiao [Analysis and comparison of flotation results of two Yangshao period sites in Shaanxi] (in Chinese). Kaogu Yu Wenwu 4:106–112
Liu XX (1996a) Zuling chongbai, muti chongbai yu hulu [Ancestor worship, maternal worship and gourd] (in Chinese). in Gourd and Symbol -- Proceedings of the International Symposium on Chinese Folk Culture. Commercial Press, Shanghai, pp 268–279
Liu YH (1996b) Lun Zhonghua Hulu Wenhua [Discussion on Chinese gourd culture] (in Chinese). in Gourd and Symbol -- Proceedings of the International Symposium on Chinese Folk Culture. Commercial Press, Shanghai, pp 65–85
Ma FQ, Chen XX, Lu GQ Wang Q (2019) Shandong Zoucheng Zhuguo gucheng yizhi 2015 nian fajue chutu zhiwu dayicun fenxi—jianyi gudai chengshi guanli shijiao zhong de ren yu zhiwu [Plant Macroremains Excavated from the Ancient Capital City Site of the Zhu Kingdom in Zoucheng, Shandong Province in 2015]. Humans and Plants in the Perspective of Ancient Urban Management] (in Chinese). Dongnan Wenhua 3:57–69+127-128
Marston JM (2015) Modeling resilience and sustainability in ancient agricultural systems. J Ethnobiol 35:585–605
Morrison KD (2018) Empires as ecosystem engineers: toward a nonbinary political ecology. J Anthropol Archaeol 52:196–203
Murphy C, Fuller DQ, Stevens C, Gregory T, Parracho Silva F, Dal Martello R, Song J, Bodey AJ, Rau C (2019) Looking beyond the surface: use of high-resolution X-ray computed tomography on archaeobotanical remains. Interdisciplin Archaeol 10(1):7–18
Qian S (1959) Shiji [Memories of an historian] (in Chinese). Zhonghua Shuju Press, Beijing
Rode P (2004) Textile production and female studies in bronze age Yunnan. In: Linduff KM, Sun Y (eds) Gender and Chinese Archaeology. AltaMira Press, Walnut Creek, pp 315–338
Rosenzweig MS, Marston JM (2018) Archaeologies of empire and environment. J Anthropol Archaeol 52:87–102
Shen J, Yang LY, Yang XD, Matsumoto R, Tong GB, Zhu YX, Zhang ZK, Wang SM (2005) Lake sediment records on climate change and human activities since the Holocene in Erhai catchment, Yunnan Province, China. Sci Chin Ser : Earth Sci 48(3):353–363
Tanaka T, Nakao S (1976) Encyclopedia of edible plants. Keigaku Publishing, Tokyo
Tawara kanji (2001) Dianwang de quanli yu xipu—Shizhaishan wenhua zangzhi de kaogufenxi (Zhaiyao) [The political power and pedigree of Dian kings ── archaeological analysis of the burial system of Shizhaishan culture]. in Tonggu he qingtongwenhua yanjiu [Bronze Drum and bronze Culture research(Abstract)] 171–174. Guizhou People’s Press, Guiyang
von Dewall M (1967) The Tien culture of South-west China. Antiquity 41(161):8–21
Wang Q, Jiang ZL, Yang W, Chen XX (2019) Yunnan Chengjiang Xueshan yizhi zhiwu yicun fuxuan jieguo ji fenxi [Flotation results and analysis of plant remains from Xueshan site, Chengjiang, Yunnan] (in Chinese). Zhongguo Nongshi 2:3–11
Wang NS (1980) Shilun Shizhaishan wenhua [Preliminary discussion on Shizhaishan culture], in Zhongguo Kaoguxuehui diyici nianhui lunwenji 1979 [Proceedings of the first Annual conference of Chinese Archaeology in 1979]. Cultural Relics Press, Beijing, pp 278–293
Wang W (2014) Zhongguo kaoguxue da cidian [Dictionary of Chinese archaeology] (in Chinese). Lexicographical Press, Shanghai
Watson B (1961) Records of the grand historian of China: translations from the Shih chi of Ssu-ma Ch’ien, vol 2. Columbia University Press, New York
Wu XP (2018) Lianghan shiqi Yungui diqu Hanwenhua de kaoguxue tansuo [Archaeological exploration of Han culture in Yunnan-Guizhou area during the Han Dynasty] (in Chinese). Zhejiang University Press, Zhengzhou
Xiao MH (1994) Pichi suitian moxing yu donghan shiqi Yunnan de nongye [The Pichi Paddy Field models and the agriculture of Yunnan during the Eastern Han Dynasty]. Nongye Kaogu 1:97–102
Xiao XJ, Yao A, Hillman AL, Shen J, Haberle S (2020) Vegetation, climate and human impact since 20 ka in Central Yunnan Province based on high-resolution pollen and charcoal records from Dianchi, southwestern China. Quatern Sci Rev 236:106297
Xue YN, Dal Martello R, Qin L, Stevens CJ, Min R, Fuller DQ (2022) Post-Neolithic broadening of agriculture in Yunnan, China :archaeobotanical evidence from Haimenkou. Archaeol Res Asia 30:100364
Yan FN, Yan D, Wunnemann B, Jiang Z et al (2020) Hydrological variations of a lake-catchment and human interaction during the last 6 ka in Yunnan. China J Hydrol 587:124932
Yang JF (2012) Yinxu Yachangmu suizang huajiao zangsu qianyi [Preliminary discussion on the Burial custom of Sichuan pepper in Ya-chang tomb of Yinxu] (in Chinese). Nongye Kaogu 4:8–12
Yang W, Jiang ZL, Chen XX (2020) Yunnan Dongchuan Yubeidi yizhi (2013 niandu) zhiwu yicun fuxuan jieguo ji chubu fenxi [Plant remains from the Yubeidi site in Dongchuan County, Yunnan Province, China] (in Chinese). Zhongguo Nongshi 1:3–19
Yang W, Jiang ZL, Yao A, Chen XX (2021) Yunnan Dianchi diqu Shizhaishan wenhua shiqi de nongyejiegou yanjiu— yi jinning hebosuo yizhi zhiwuyicun fenxi weili [A study on the agricultural structure of the Shizhaishan culture in Dian lake area, Yunnan Province, China: from the perspective of the plant remains at Hebosuo site]. Zhongguo Nongshi 2:36–47+102
Yang Y (2011) Zhanguo Qinhan shiqi Yungui gaoyuan kaoguxue wenhua yanjiu [A study on the archaeological culture of Yunnan-Guizhou Plateau during the Zhanguo, Qin and Han dynasties] (in Chinese). China Science Press, Beijing
Yao A (2005) Scratching beneath iconographic and textual clues: a reconsideration of the social hierarchy in the Dian culture of southwestern China. J Anthropol Archaeol 24(4):378–406
Yao A (2016) The ancient highlands of Southwest China: an archaeological history from the Bronze Age to the Han Empire. Oxford University Press, New York
Yao A, Jiang ZL, Chen XX, Liang Y (2015) Bronze Age wetland/scapes: complex political formations in the humid subtropics of Southwest China, 900–100 BC. J Anthropol Archaeol 40:213–229
Yao A, Darré V, Jiang ZL, Lam WC, Yang W (2020) Bridging the time gap in the Bronze Age of Southeast Asia and Southwest China. Archaeol Res Asia 22:100189
YPICRA, Yunnan Province Institute for Cultural Relics and Archaeology, University of Chicago (2019) Yunnan Jinning Hebosuo he Xiwangmiao yizhi qingtong shidai beiqiu yizhi shijue jianbao [Preliminary report on the excavation of the sites of Xiwangmiao and Hebosuo in Jinning, Yunnan] (in Chinese). Jianghan Kaogu 2:17–29
YPICRA, Yunnan Province Institute of Cultural Relics and Archaeology, University of Chicago, University of Michigan, Michigan Museum of Anthropology (2014) Yunnan Dianchi pendi 2010 nian juluo kaogu diaocha jianbao [Preliminary findings from the 2010 archaeological survey in Lake Dian Basin, Yunnan] (in Chinese). Kaogu 5:29–36
YPICRA, Yunnan Province Institute of Cultural Relics and Archaeology, University of Michigan, Michigan Museum of Anthropology (2012) Yunnan Dianchi pendi juluo yizhi 2008 nian diaocha jianbao [Preliminary findings from the 2008 archaeological survey in Lake Dian Basin, Yunnan] (in Chinese). Kaogu 1:23–33
YPM, Yunnan Provincial Museum (1975) Yunnan Jiangchuan Lijiashan gumuqun fajue baogao [Excavation report of Lijiashan ancient tombs in Jiangchuan, Yunnan Province]. Kaogu Xuebao 2:97–156+192-215
YPM, Yunnan Provincial Museum (1981) Yunnan Binchuan Baiyangcun yizhi Report on excavation of Baiyangcun site, Binchuan, Yunnan Province. Kaogu Xuebao 3:349–368+417-422
YPM, Yunnan Provincial Museum (1959). Yunnan Jinning Shizhaishan gumuqun fajue baogao [Excavation report of Shizhaishan ancient tombs in Jinning, Yunnan Province] (in Chinese). Cultural Relics Press, Beijing
Yu SW (1996) Jiagu wenzi gulin [Explain the oracle bone script in popular language] (in Chinese). Cultural Relics Press, Beijing
Zeng JJ (2000) Woguo huajiao de zaipei qiyuan he dili fenbu [Cultural origin and geographical distribution of Zanthoxylum in China] (in Chinese). Zhongguo Nongshi 4:68–75
Zhang CL (1992) Dali faxian donghan jinianmu [Discovery of the Eastern Han Dynasty tomb in Dali] (in Chinese). Yunnan Wenwu 31:84
Zhang Z (1997) Dianguo yu Dianwenhua [Dian kingdom and Dian culture] (in Chinese). Yunnan Arts Press, Kunming
Zhao ZJ, Chen J (2011) Sichuan Maoxian Yingpanshan yizhi fuxuan jieguo ji fenxi [Flotation results and analysis of plant remains from Yingpanshan site, Maoxian, Sichuan]. Nanfang Wenwu 3:60–67+59
Zheng YF, Crawford GW, Chen XG (2014) Archaeological evidence for peach Prunus persica cultivation and domestication in China. Plos One 9(9):e106595. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0106595
Acknowledgements
The authors are thankful to Zhengxiong Liu, Zongpin Dai, Ranchao Zhou, and Xiaorui Li of the Yunnan Provincial Institute of Cultural Relics and Archaeology; Zhongquan Zhou, director of the Jinning District Cultural Relics Management Institute; Xiaoxu Tai, Curator of Ning District Museum; and Zhenzhen Wang of Shandong University Museum for the support received during excavation and research.
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL. The work presented in this article was supported by the National Social Science Fund of China, Number 22XKG002, awarded to WY; by the National Key R&D Program of China, Number 2022YFF0903500, awarded to XXC; by the “2014–2018 Archaeological Work Plan for the Shizhaishan Ancient Tombs,” funded by the Cultural Relics Grant (2014) no. 2077 and awarded to ZLJ; and by the National Science Foundation Grant Number BCS-1357347, awarded to AY. RDM contribution to this study was supported by FEDD (Fruits of Eurasia: Domestication and Dispersal) project (ERC no. 851102), awarded to Dr. Robert Spengler.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
WY, XXC, ZLJ, and AY contributed to the study conception and design. AY directed the excavation at Hebosuo in 2014. ZLJ directed the excavation in 2016. JMJ and HMX excavated the site and contributed to sampling. WY with support from XXC prepared the material and undertook data collection and analysis. The first draft of the manuscript was written by WY and RDM, AY edited the introduction and the discussion sections, and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Ethics approval
Not applicable.
Consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Yang, W., Jiang, Z., Yao, A. et al. Food production and agricultural systems on the southwestern frontier of the Han Empire: archaeobotanical remains from the 2016 excavation of Hebosuo, Yunnan. Archaeol Anthropol Sci 15, 71 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12520-023-01766-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12520-023-01766-9