Table 2 Quality score assessment of the studies
From: Sport Injuries Sustained by Athletes with Disability: A Systematic Review
Study | (1) Definition of injury described in each study (yes/no) | (2) Study with prospective designs that presented incidence or prevalence data (yes/no) | (3) Description of the population of athletes (e.g. sport, disability, classification) or the player positions (e.g. goalkeepers or forward players) that participated in the study (yes/no) | (4) Was the process of inclusion of athletes in the study at random (i.e. not by convenience) or was the data collection was performed with the entire target population (yes/no) | (5) Data analysis was performed with at least 80 % of the athletes included in the study (‘yes’ or ‘no’) | (6) Were data regarding the injuries were reported by a healthcare professional (yes/no) | (7) Was the same mode of data collection (e-mail, telephone, interview, etc.) was used (yes/no) | (8) Was the diagnosis was conducted by medical doctors (yes/no) | (9) Follow-up period of at least 6 months for prospective studies (assessed by ‘yes’ or ‘no’) | (10) Incidence or prevalence rates of injury expressed by a ratio that represents both the number of injuries as well as the exposure to sport (e.g. IR/1000 hours of sport exposure, and this criterion was assessed by ‘yes’ or ‘no’) | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gawronski et al. 2013 [18] | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 9/10 |
Magno e Silva et al. 2013 [19] | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 9/10 |
Willick et al. 2013 [20] | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 6/10 |
Magno e Silva et al. 2013 [21] | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 9/10 |
Magno e Silva et al. 2013 [22] | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 8/10 |
Webborn et al. 2012 [23] | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | N/R | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4/10 |
Chung et al. 2012 [24] | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 8/10 |
Ramirez et al. 2009 [25] | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 7/10 |
Webborn et al., 2006 [26] | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | N/R | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3/10 |
Sobiecka. 2005 [27] | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6/10 |
Ferrara et al. 2000 [28] | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4/10 |
Nyland et al. 2000 [29] | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6/10 |
Burnham et al. 1991 [29] | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5/10 |
Robson. 1990 [30] | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5/10 |
McCormick et al. 1990 [31] | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 7/10 |