Abstract
Introduction
Older people are on average more susceptible to the adverse effects of psychotropic drugs, but addressing older people as a homogenous group based on age alone can be misleading when exploring psychotropic drug use. This study aimed to describe psychotropic drug use and associated factors among community-dwelling older people who had been acutely admitted to hospital.
Methods
This cross-sectional study was based on a sample of 300 community-dwelling people 75 years or older who had been admitted to the acute medical ward at Umeå University Hospital at any time from September 2018 to October 2021. Data on medication use were obtained from electronic medical charts, and psychotropic drug use was presented as user proportions, both in terms of individual substances and drug classes. Associations between psychotropic drug use and factors comprising sex, age, cohabitation, comorbidities and multi-dose dispensing (MDD) of medicines were analysed through logistic regression.
Results
Approximately 50% of the individuals used at least one psychotropic drug, and 18% used two or more such medicines. Zopiclone displayed the highest user proportion of all psychotropics (18.3%), followed by mirtazapine (11.3%) and zolpidem (9.7%). Of note, zolpidem was more prevalent among the females than among the males (p = 0.006). Regarding other sex differences, 55 and 38% of the females and males, respectively, used at least one psychotropic drug (p = 0.004). A similar pattern was observed regarding sedatives and hypnotic drugs exclusively (p = 0.048). In the regression analysis, female sex (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 2.05 [95% confidence interval {CI} 1.22–3.42]) and MDD (adjusted OR 2.20 [95% CI 1.23–3.93]) were positively associated with psychotropic drug use.
Conclusion
The most common psychotropic drugs used by community-dwelling older people admitted to the acute medical ward were hypnotic drugs and antidepressants. Regarding patient factors, female sex and MDD system were positively associated with psychotropic drug use. Further studies concerning those two factors in relation to potential overprescribing could provide a better picture on how to optimize psychotropic drug use among acutely admitted vulnerable older people.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Almost half of community-dwelling older people used one or more psychotropic drug. |
Despite a limited sample, we found notable sex differences in psychotropic drug use. |
Psychotropic drug use was also associated with multi-dose dispensing. |
1 Introduction
Older people are on average more susceptible to the adverse effects of psychotropic drugs; for example, many psychotropics are associated with drug-induced cognitive impairment [1, 2], and antipsychotic drugs increase the mortality risk [3, 4]. However, addressing older people as a homogenous group based on age alone can be misleading since there are many patient factors that could predict psychotropic drug use. There are well-documented differences related to sex and gender, as females use more psychotropic medicines than do males in various countries and settings [5,6,7]. Among other factors, multi-dose dispensing (MDD) is commonly used by older people and has previously been associated with poor quality of drug treatment in terms of psychotropic polypharmacy [8]. Excessive use of psychotropics has previously been documented in various nursing home settings [9,10,11], and the association with that type of residency is notably strong in comparison with other factors [12]. Still, older people in ordinary private homes are a loosely defined group where psychotropic drug use may also be extensive. One example of such individuals is people who are the subjects of hospital-based care, since somatic disease has a detrimental impact on mental health [13].
This study aimed to describe psychotropic drug use and associated factors among community-dwelling older people who have been admitted to hospital. Our primary objective was to show the prevalence of psychotropic drug users in this study population. A second objective was to analyse patient factors associated with psychotropic use.
2 Method
2.1 Study Population and Data Sources
The study comprised a sample of 300 community-dwelling people 75 years or older who had been admitted to the acute medical ward at Umeå University Hospital from September 2018 to November 2021. The full eligibility criteria are available in a published version of the study protocol for the clinical trial in which the study participants were enrolled [14]. During that period, other people had either been given the opportunity to participate but declined (n = 71) or withdrawn their consent to participate after enrolment (n = 19). Data for the study were extracted from electronic medical charts, using the epicrisis, the overview of diagnoses and the list of medicines based on the day before hospital admission. For each participant, personal information was pseudo-anonymized.
2.2 Statistics
Psychotropic drugs were categorized according to the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification system [15] as (1) N05A, antipsychotics; (2) N05B, anxiolytics; (3) N05C, sedatives and hypnotics; (4) N06A, antidepressants; and (5) N06D, antidementia drugs. Associations between psychotropic drug use and independent variables comprising sex, age, cohabitation, cardiovascular disease, diabetes type 2, major neurocognitive disorder (NCD) and MDD were analysed through logistic regression. In this analysis, psychotropic drug use functioned as a dependent variable and was treated as one single category that excluded antidementia drugs. We performed separate sensitivity analyses of antidepressants and sedatives or hypnotic drugs. We used IBM SPSS Statistics, Version 28.0 for all descriptive and analytical statistics. For all inferential statistical tests, p values < 0.05 were considered significant. We used variance inflation factor (VIF) to assess multicollinearity in our model; variables with values < 5 were not further checked.
2.3 Ethical Considerations
All study participants gave their consent to provide data for the study, and in cases of confirmed diagnosis of major NCD, the next of kin also approved. Personal data handling was performed within the framework of the concurrent clinical trial. The study was approved by the Swedish Ethical Review Authority (registration numbers 2020-05426, 2020-03699, 2017-69-31, 2018-254-32, 2018-83-32 and 2024-03795-02).
3 Results
The sample of 300 individuals was predominantly female and had a mean age of 84 years (Table 1). More than 60% of the patients had at least one recorded cardiovascular disease, here defined as coronary heart disease, heart failure or stroke, and almost one-third had records of diabetes type 2. There were 29 confirmed cases of major NCD, of which 20 were females. Alzheimer’s disease (n = 11) was the most common NCD subtype, followed by vascular dementia (n = 10) and Lewy body dementia (n = 3). In the subgroup diagnosed with major NCD, 71% of the people were female.
Almost half of the 300 patients had at least one psychotropic drug on their list of medicines, and 17.7% of the whole sample used two or more psychotropics (Table 2). In that respect, we observed that the proportions of individuals using two or more psychotropics were 24.7 and 14.9% among people with and without MDD service, respectively (p = 0.044). Sedatives and hypnotics where the most common drugs at the subgroup level, of which zopiclone was the individual drug displaying the highest user proportion of all psychotropics. Antidepressants comprised the second most prevalent drug class, whereas the user proportions of anxiolytics and antipsychotics were relatively low in comparison.
Regarding notable patterns of drug use between the sexes, 54.8% of the females used at least one psychotropic drug compared with 37.5% of the males (p = 0.004). A similar observation (34.6 vs 23.2%, p = 0.048) was observed at the ATC subgroup level for sedatives and hypnotic drugs. When exploring the user proportions of sedatives and hypnotics further, zolpidem was notably more prevalent among the females than among the males, with percentages of 13.3 and 3.6%, respectively (p = 0.006). As a final notion about drug treatments, eight of the 14 individuals who had been diagnosed with either Alzheimer’s disease or Lewy body dementia used antidementia drugs.
Among the factors analysed (Table 3), female sex and MDD were positively associated with psychotropic drug use, both in simple and multiple logistic regression models. In the sensitivity analysis, we could not confirm an association between female sex and antidepressants (see eTable 1 in the electronic supplementary material), but female sex was positively associated with use of sedatives and hypnotics (eTable 2). Regarding MDD, on the other hand, there was an association with antidepressants (eTable 1) but not sedatives or hypnotics (eTable 2).
4 Discussion
4.1 Findings
This cross-sectional study was based on a sample of 300 community-dwelling people 75 years or older admitted to the acute medical ward. We found that approximately half of the sample used at least one psychotropic drug, and the use of such medicine was positively associated with female sex and MDD system.
As seen in Table 1, the study sample represented a multimorbid population with an extensive use of medicines, including psychotropics. For example, the user proportion of sedatives and hypnotics was higher than the percentages reported at the national level for older people in general [12]. This is concerning since hypnotic drug use (e.g. zolpidem and zopiclone) in older people is associated with apparent risks [16,17,18], even though there is no evidence pointing at hypnotic drugs being a common cause of hospital admission in this specific study population [19]. Previous research has reported on associations between poor mental health and somatic diseases, for example, cardiovascular disease [20] and diabetes type 2 [21]. In that respect, no associations between psychotropics and somatic comorbidities could be statistically confirmed in our study. Neither could we see any significant differences in psychotropic drug use in relation to major NCD, perhaps due to the limited study sample.
This study showed a pronounced difference between the sexes, with female and male user proportions of 54.8 and 37.5%, respectively (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 2.05 [95% confidence interval {CI} 1.22–3.42]). According to the sensitivity analysis, this result was likely due to a pronounced sex difference regarding sedatives and hypnotic drugs (eTable 2; see the electronic supplementary material). This dissimilarity between the sexes has, as mentioned, been observed before across various countries [5,6,7] and also in different subgroups of older people at the national level [12], and the explanation behind this pattern is likely multifactorial. According to previous research, women have a more positive help-seeking attitude regarding mental health problems compared with men, which in turn contributes to the higher rates of psychotropic drug use [22]. Furthermore, women live on average longer than do men and have more disabling chronic conditions [23]. Major NCD is one such example, and management of neuropsychiatric symptoms could have been a plausible indication for treatment that contributed to our observed discrepancy between the sexes.
Among the different ATC subgroups, sedatives and hypnotics were the most prevalent psychotropic medications among both males and females; however, females used them to a larger extent. This result was expected given that women seem to have a higher occurrence of troublesome sleep disorders (e.g. insomnia) compared with men [24, 25]. The greatest sex difference at the substance level was found among zolpidem users, since the use of zolpidem was 3.7 times more common among females compared with males (p = 0.006). These findings regarding hypnotics, and zolpidem specifically, are in line with a registry-based study from Sweden on gender and hypnotic drug use [26] and, although of uncertain relevance, important from a safety perspective since the plasma concentration resulting from a given dose of zolpidem is generally higher in females than in males [27, 28]. Taken together, our observed sex differences in combination with the high user proportions of hypnotic drugs are an indication to further study sex and gender differences in psychotropic drug use to increase knowledge about possible over- or undertreated symptoms within this vulnerable patient group.
Finally, the odds of using psychotropic drugs were more than twice as high among patients who had an MDD system compared with those who did not receive that service (adjusted OR 2.20 [95% CI 1.23–3.93]), and were even higher when analysing antidepressants separately (eTable 1). We also found that using two or more psychotropics was more common among those with an MDD system (p = 0.044). The latter observation was similar to observations from an earlier registry-based Swedish study [8], in which the burden of disease could not fully explain why many patients with an MDD system had multiple psychotropic drugs. Similar results have also been reported for MDD users and potentially inappropriate medicines in a Norwegian context [29]. Moreover, MDD has been associated with fewer changes compared with ordinary prescriptions, although that Swedish study did not specifically target psychotropic drugs [30]. Hence, our observation is in line with the possible explanation that renewing all prescriptions together as a single package might, over time, impede re-evaluation and withdrawal of psychotropics. Still, cross-sectional comparisons have limitations, and it could also be that polypharmacy inevitably increases the need for MDD. Longitudinal studies that investigate MDD systems in relation to number of medicines over time might provide further clues to the exact direction of the association.
4.2 Strengths
The broad inclusion criteria applied in this study enabled us to study a clinical sample of patients with high representativeness of vulnerable community-dwelling older people who are encountered within acute medical care. Moreover, the information on medicines, living situation and diseases was based on up-to-date medical records, matching the date of the index hospital admission.
4.3 Limitations and Risk of Bias
A limitation of the dataset was that there was no exact information on indication for treatment; hence, it is difficult to draw any conclusions concerning medication appropriateness. For example, the results do associate female sex with psychotropic drug use, but it does not say whether psychotropics are overprescribed or if there are underlying differences in disease occurrence and severity that ultimately warrants the current pharmacological approach. Second, the patients’ medication lists might not reflect drug use in practice; psychotropic drug use could consequently have been under- and overestimated, most likely the latter due to possible adherence issues.
5 Conclusions
The most common psychotropic drugs used by community-dwelling older people admitted to the acute medical ward were antidepressants and hypnotic drugs. Female sex and MDD system were positively associated with psychotropic drug use. Further studies concerning those two factors in relation to potential overprescribing could provide a better picture on how to optimize psychotropic drug use among vulnerable older people.
References
Moore AR, O’Keeffe ST. Drug-induced cognitive impairment in the elderly. Drugs Aging. 1999;15(1):15–28.
Hanlon JT, Horner RD, Schmader KE, Fillenbaum GG, Lewis IK, Wall WE Jr, et al. Benzodiazepine use and cognitive function among community-dwelling elderly. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1998;64(6):684–92.
Schwertner E, Secnik J, Garcia-Ptacek S, Johansson B, Nagga K, Eriksdotter M, et al. Antipsychotic treatment associated with increased mortality risk in patients with dementia. A registry-based observational cohort study. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2019;20(3):323-9.e2.
Langballe EM, Engdahl B, Nordeng H, Ballard C, Aarsland D, Selbaek G. Short- and long-term mortality risk associated with the use of antipsychotics among 26,940 dementia outpatients: a population-based study. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2014;22(4):321–31.
Boyd A, Van de Velde S, Pivette M, Ten Have M, Florescu S, O’Neill S, et al. Gender differences in psychotropic use across Europe: results from a large cross-sectional, population-based study. Eur Psychiatry. 2015;30(6):778–88.
Moga DC, Taipale H, Tolppanen AM, Tanskanen A, Tiihonen J, Hartikainen S, et al. A comparison of sex differences in psychotropic medication use in older people with Alzheimer’s disease in the US and Finland. Drugs Aging. 2017;34(1):55–65.
Estancial Fernandes CS, de Azevedo RCS, Goldbaum M, Barros MBA. Psychotropic use patterns: are there differences between men and women? PLoS ONE. 2018;13(11): e0207921.
Sjöberg C, Edward C, Fastbom J, Johnell K, Landahl S, Narbro K, et al. Association between multi-dose drug dispensing and quality of drug treatment—a register-based study. PLoS ONE. 2011;6(10): e26574.
Ruths S, Straand J, Nygaard HA. Psychotropic drug use in nursing homes—diagnostic indications and variations between institutions. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2001;57(6–7):523–8.
Selbaek G, Kirkevold O, Engedal K. The course of psychiatric and behavioral symptoms and the use of psychotropic medication in patients with dementia in Norwegian nursing homes—a 12-month follow-up study. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2008;16(7):528–36.
Gustafsson M, Karlsson S, Gustafson Y, Lövheim H. Psychotropic drug use among people with dementia—a six-month follow-up study. BMC Pharmacol Toxicol. 2013;14:56.
Kindstedt J, Glader EL, Lövheim H, Lindkvist M, Gustafsson M. The impact of nursing home residency on psychotropic drug use in major neurocognitive disorder: a nationwide comparison. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2023;38(11): e6018.
Thombs BD, Bass EB, Ford DE, Stewart KJ, Tsilidis KK, Patel U, et al. Prevalence of depression in survivors of acute myocardial infarction. J Gen Intern Med. 2006;21(1):30–8.
Kindstedt J, Svahn S, Sjölander M, Glader EL, Lövheim H, Gustafsson M. Investigating the effect of clinical pharmacist intervention in transitions of care on drug-related hospital readmissions among the elderly: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2020;10(4): e036650.
WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology. ATC: structures and principles. WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology; 2018. Available from: https://www.whocc.no/atc/structure_and_principles/.
van Strien AM, Koek HL, van Marum RJ, Emmelot-Vonk MH. Psychotropic medications, including short acting benzodiazepines, strongly increase the frequency of falls in elderly. Maturitas. 2013;74(4):357–62.
Scharner V, Hasieber L, Sönnichsen A, Mann E. Efficacy and safety of Z-substances in the management of insomnia in older adults: a systematic review for the development of recommendations to reduce potentially inappropriate prescribing. BMC Geriatr. 2022;22(1):87.
Richardson K, Loke YK, Fox C, Maidment I, Howard R, Steel N, et al. Adverse effects of Z-drugs for sleep disturbance in people living with dementia: a population-based cohort study. BMC Med. 2020;18(1):351.
Kindstedt J, Andersson P, Westberg A, Glader EL, Lövheim H, Gustafsson M. Exploring medication-related hospital admissions and their association with cognitive impairment among acutely admitted older people. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2023;19(7):1048–53.
Penninx BW, Beekman AT, Honig A, Deeg DJ, Schoevers RA, van Eijk JT, et al. Depression and cardiac mortality: results from a community-based longitudinal study. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2001;58(3):221–7.
Engum A. The role of depression and anxiety in onset of diabetes in a large population-based study. J Psychosom Res. 2007;62(1):31–8.
Mackenzie CS, Gekoski WL, Knox VJ. Age, gender, and the underutilization of mental health services: the influence of help-seeking attitudes. Aging Ment Health. 2006;10(6):574–82.
Crimmins EM, Shim H, Zhang YS, Kim JK. Differences between men and women in mortality and the health dimensions of the morbidity process. Clin Chem. 2019;65(1):135–45.
Foley DJ, Monjan AA, Brown SL, Simonsick EM, Wallace RB, Blazer DG. Sleep complaints among elderly persons: an epidemiologic study of three communities. Sleep. 1995;18(6):425–32.
Giron MS, Forsell Y, Bernsten C, Thorslund M, Winblad B, Fastbom J. Sleep problems in a very old population: drug use and clinical correlates. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2002;57(4):M236–40.
Johnell K, Fastbom J. Gender and use of hypnotics or sedatives in old age: a nationwide register-based study. Int J Clin Pharm. 2011;33(5):788–93.
Greenblatt DJ, Harmatz JS, Singh NN, Steinberg F, Roth T, Moline ML, et al. Gender differences in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of zolpidem following sublingual administration. J Clin Pharmacol. 2014;54(3):282–90.
Roehrs TA, Roth T. Gender differences in the efficacy and safety of chronic nightly zolpidem. J Clin Sleep Med. 2016;12(3):319–25.
Josendal AV, Bergmo TS, Granas AG. Potentially inappropriate prescribing to older patients receiving multidose drug dispensing. BMC Geriatr. 2020;20(1):272.
Sjöberg C, Ohlsson H, Wallerstedt SM. Association between multi-dose drug dispensing and drug treatment changes. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2012;68(7):1095–101.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Funding
This study was supported financially by grants from Region Västerbotten, Umeå University Foundation for Medical Research, Forte (ref: 2017-01438) and the Swedish Research Council (ref: 2019-01078). The funders have no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish or preparation of the manuscript.
Conflict of interest
Maria Gustafsson is an Editorial Board member of Drugs – Real World Outcomes. Maria Gustafsson was not involved in the selection of peer reviewers for the manuscript nor any of the subsequent editorial decisions. Ema Gasi and Jonas Kindstedt declare no conflicts of interest.
Ethical approval
The study was approved by the Swedish Ethical Review Authority (registration numbers 2020-05426, 2020-03699, 2017-69-31, 2018-254-32, 2018-83-32 and 2024-03795-02) and performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.
Consent to participate
All study participants gave their consent to provide data for the study, and in cases of confirmed diagnosis of major NCD, the next of kin also approved.
Availability of data and material
The datasets generated during and/or analysed in the present study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Code availability
Not applicable.
Author contributions
EG and JK wrote this manuscript. EG and JK performed the descriptive and analytical statistics. All listed authors provided feedback regarding the final study design, contributed to the revision of the study protocol, were involved in the review process of the manuscript, approved the final version and will ensure that issues related to the accuracy or integrity of the work are investigated and resolved.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Gasi, E., Gustafsson, M. & Kindstedt, J. Psychotropic Drug Use and Associated Factors Among Acutely Admitted Older People: A Cross-Sectional Study of a Clinical Sample. Drugs - Real World Outcomes (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40801-024-00455-w
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40801-024-00455-w