Skip to main content
Account

Table 3 Are victim-offenders unique? Comparing victim-offenders to three groups (individuals who are neither victims nor offenders, victims-only, and offenders-only)

From: The Developmental Nature of the Victim-Offender Overlap

 

Victim-offender status

p < .05 compared to victim-offendera

Neither (N)

n = 659

Victim-only (V)

n = 312

Offender-only (O)

n = 380

Victim-offender

n = 546

Victimization and offending

 Victimization, mean (SD)

0.00 (0.00)

2.39 (2.09)

0.00 (0.00)

3.85 (2.91)

N, V, O

 Offending, mean (SD)

0.00 (0.00)

0.00 (0.00)

2.64 (2.36)

4.07 (3.03)

N, V, O

Personal risk factors

 Low self-control z-score, mean (SD)

−0.37 (0.88)

−0.10 (0.89)

0.05 (0.99)

0.36 (1.02)

N, V, O

 Cognitive ability, mean (SD)

99.9 (15.4)

98.4 (14.8)

100.2 (15.6)

98.1 (15.5)

–

 Early puberty, mean (SD)

2.60 (1.08)

2.73 (1.13)

2.59 (1.11)

2.70 (1.12)

–

 Conduct disorder diagnosis, N (%)

35 (5.3%)

35 (11.2%)

65 (17.1%)

151 (27.7%)

N, V, O

 Childhood self-reported delinquency, mean (SD)

1.14 (1.39)

1.46 (1.52)

2.24 (2.25)

2.84 (2.11)

N, V, O

 Childhood substance use, mean (SD)

0.54 (0.89)

0.70 (0.98)

0.88 (1.13)

1.30 (1.43)

N, V, O

Total of all ACEs (up to 19 ACEs), mean (SD)

2.30 (2.18)

3.31 (2.53)

2.97 (2.34)

4.15 (2.87)

N, V, O

 Conventional ACEs (up to 9 ACEs), mean (SD)

1.09 (1.28)

1.66 (1.56)

1.34 (1.37)

2.00 (1.69)

N, V, O

  Physical abuse, N (%)

17 (2.6%)

11 (3.5%)

11 (2.9%)

52 (9.5%)

N, V, O

  Sexual abuse, N (%)

2 (0.3%)

2 (0.6%)

3 (0.8%)

9 (1.6%)

–

  Emotional abuse or neglect, N (%)

6 (0.9%)

11 (3.5%)

8 (2.1%)

24 (4.4%)

N

  Physical neglect, N (%)

3 (0.5%)

7 (2.2%)

2 (0.5%)

18 (3.3%)

N, O

  Domestic violence exposure, N (%)

80 (12.1%)

54 (17.3%)

60 (15.8%)

127 (23.3%)

N, O

  Parental antisocial behavior, N (%)

103 (15.6%)

95 (30.4%)

85 (22.5%)

183 (33.6%)

N, O

  Family history of substance abuse, N (%)

94 (14.3%)

77 (24.7%)

73 (19.2%)

163 (30.0%)

N, O

  Family history of mental health disorders, N (%)

167 (25.4%)

99 (32.0%)

96 (25.3%)

204 (38.2%)

N, O

  Parental separation or divorce, N (%)

245 (38.0%)

163 (52.8%)

173 (46.0%)

310 (58.1%)

N, O

 Expanded ACEs (up to 10 ACEs)

1.21 (1.38)

1.65 (1.51)

1.63 (1.51)

2.16 (1.84)

N, V, O

  Bullying victim, N (%)

34 (5.2%)

41 (13.1%)

23 (6.1%)

65 (11.9%)

N, O

  Lived in foster care, N (%)

2 (0.3%)

3 (1.0%)

1 (0.3%)

9 (1.6%)

–

  Low socioeconomic status, N (%)

94 (14.3%)

56 (17.9%)

67 (17.6%)

135 (24.7%)

N, O

  Peer substance abuse, N (%)

70 (10.6%)

53 (17.0%)

82 (21.7%)

169 (31.1%)

N, V, O

  Low parental monitoring (mother), N (%)

86 (13.1%)

52 (16.7%)

80 (21.1%)

125 (22.9%)

N

  Low parental monitoring (participant), N (%)

96 (14.6%)

52 (16.7%)

89 (23.4%)

165 (30.2%)

N, V, O

  Participant-perceived unsafe neighborhood, N (%)

50 (7.6%)

43 (13.9%)

40 (10.6%)

99 (18.2%)

N, O

  High neighbor victimization, N (%)

131 (20.5%)

90 (29.7%)

86 (23.4%)

156 (30.1%)

N

  Neighborhood rated unsafe, N (%)

85 (14.4%)

56 (19.4%)

67 (19.4%)

124 (25.9%)

N

  High-crime neighborhood, N (%)

148 (23.5%)

69 (22.8%)

84 (22.7%)

131 (25.4%)

–

Summary scale of all risk factors

1.57 (1.14)

1.95 (1.23)

2.14 (1.35)

2.66 (1.45)

N, V, O

  1. SD standard deviation, N number of Study members
  2. aSignificant pairwise two-tailed tests between the victim-offender group and each of the other groups are noted by the single letter abbreviation of the group for which the significant difference was found: N = neither victim nor offender, V = victim-only, and O = offender-only. Mean differences tested with Tukey’s test. Proportion differences tested with chi-square or Fisher’s exact test with p values adjusted for multiple comparisons within rows using the method described by Benjamini and Hochberg (1995)