Abstract
The control of the camel tick, Hyalomma dromedarii is very crucial. This study evaluated the novel toxicity of photosensitizers and Phoxim insecticide against H. dromedarii males using the adult immersion tests. Ticks were subjected to sunlight for 10 min post-treatment (PT). The optical characters of the applied materials were determined by UV–Vis spectroscopy (250–900 nm wavelengths). The intensity of spectra decreased as dye concentration decreased. The optical bandgap energies of the dyes at different concentrations were not changed as the concentration changed and decreased as the absorption peak of individual dyes red-shifted. The mortalities 72 h PT reached 42.2%, 44.4%, 51.1%, 71.1%, 46.7%, 48.9%, 44.4%, and 55.6% for chlorophyllin, echinochrome, field stain, methylene blue, phthalocyanine, rhodamine 6G, riboflavin, and safranin, respectively. Methylene blue recorded the highest median lethal concentration (LC50 = 127 ppm) followed by safranin, field stain, rhodamine 6G, phthalocyanine, echinochrome riboflavin, and chlorophyllin (LC50 = 209, 251, 271, 303, 324, 332, and 362 ppm, respectively, 72 h PT). Their median lethal time, LT50, values PT with 240 ppm were 45, 87, 96, 72, 129, 115, 131, and 137 h, respectively. The relative toxicities of the LC50 values 72 h PT showed that chlorophyllin, echinochrome, field stain, methylene blue, phthalocyanine, rhodamine 6G, riboflavin, and safranin were 3.2, 3.6, 4.6, 9.1, 3.8, 4.3, 3.5, and 5.6 times, respectively, more effective than Phoxim. Methylene blue, safranin, and field stain showed a broad absorbance area indicating a large photoactivity and better phototoxicity and could be used as alternative agents to synthetic acaricides.
Graphical Abstract
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
Camel, Camelus dromedaries, is raised for milk and meat production, tourism, and transportation and has a significant role in the economy, especially in the Arabian cultures. Ticks are major vectors of diseases of economic importance as they transmit a variety of pathogens affecting humans, livestock, and domestic animals [1, 2]. Ticks also cause discomfort through annoying bites, anorexia, skin spoilage, blood loss, and growth reduction [3]. The camel tick, Hyalomma (H.) dromedarii (Ixodidae), is spread throughout the northern regions of West, Central and East Africa, the Middle East, Asia Minor, and Central and South Asia [4]. It is the dominant species infesting camel in Egypt [5, 6]. H. dromedarii is the vector of Babesia spp. (B. caballi, B. ovis, and B. bigemina), Theileria spp. (Theileria ovis and Th. annulata), and Anaplasma spp. [7,8,9,10].
The arbitrary expenditure of organic chemical pesticides led to the development of tick resistance and environmental pollution; there are great challenges to using affordable alternatives to reduce the risks to humans, non-target organisms and the environment [11,12,13,14,15]. Plant-based pesticides [16] and photosensitizer are efficient substitutes to the ordinary conventional pesticides and might be environmentally sound [17, 18]. Photoactive materials are not toxic in absence of light, but they are activated in light and transform into a reactive semi-stable triplet-excited state [19]. This semi-stable triplet-excited state can accommodate and support photochemical reactions; as the oxygen (3O2) reactive singlet oxygen is gene substantial challenges rated (1O2) and induced a high toxic effect [20].
The optical parameters implement the effect of light energy at a broad range of wavelengths and find out the peak absorption and optical bandgap energy. The absorption UV–Vis spectroscopy is an appropriate method for investigating the efficacy of light on the dyes [21,22,23]. Therefore, using photosensitizers for tick management protocols against H. dromedarii could start a new generation of acaricides.
Phoxim is a potential organophosphorus acaricide [24] licensed for use in the presence of animals in most European countries [25, 26]. This study aimed to evaluate the optical properties and the novel acaricidal efficacy of eight photoactive compounds and Phoxim and to evaluate their lethal concentration and time values against male H. dromedarii, as well as their toxicity indices and relative toxicities.
2 Materials and methods
2.1 Ticks collection
Hyalomma dromedarii (males) were collected from places around camels (5–15 years) at Toukh city, Qalyubiya Governorate, Egypt (30° 21′ 11.6″ N and 31° 11′ 31.5″ E). Ticks were morphologically identified.
2.2 Photoactive compounds
Seven photosensitizers were purchased from Alfa Aesar, (Kandel, Germany): chlorophyllin, Natural green (3, E141-C34H31CuN4Na3O6); field Stain (Methylene blue–potassium phosphate–disodium hydrogen phosphate–fresh distilled water); methylene blue (C16H18ClN3S); phthalocyanine (C8H4N2)4H2); rhodamine 6G, Basic Red (C28H31N2O3Cl); riboflavin (Vit B2, C17H20N4O6), and safranin [a fluorescent dye (C20H19ClN4)].
Phoxim (50%, an analogous dimethyl ester, C12H15N2O3PS), is a commercial acaricide purchased from CURE VET (Pharmaceutical Company, Alexandria Governorate, Egypt).
2.3 Chemical extraction of sea urchin pigments
The Red Sea urchin, Strongylocentrotus franciscanus pigments (echinochrome extract) was freshly prepared according to a previously described protocol [27] with little modification. Urchins were collected by divers from the Mediterranean shoreline of Alexandria (Egypt) and shipped in iceboxes and kept at − 20 °C until used. After thawing the ice, testes were cut, and the internal organs were evacuated. The spines and shells were washed with water and left to dry in the dark at a temperature > 10 °C for 24 h, then spines and shells are ground to powder, vacuum-packed in plastic bags, and kept at − 20 °C. The final extract included polyhydroxylated naphthoquinone pigments and stored in the darkness at − 30 °C as a stock solution until used and we would refer to it as echinochrome.
2.4 Optical properties
The absorption spectra as a function of wavelengths (250–900 nm) using a double beam Jasco spectrophotometer (Model V-670, Japan) were measured for the applied materials. The absorption spectra were useful in estimating transmittance, reflectance, absorption coefficient, and optical bandgap energy. The optical absorption coefficient (α) as a function of wavelength was determined from the absorption spectra according to the following formula [28]:
where A is a function of I and I0 (the intensity of the transmitted and incident beam, respectively) A = log (I/I0), d is the film thickness.
To measure the energy absorbed or accomplished, during dye exposure time (to sunlight), the optical indirect bandgap energy was determined according to Makuła work [29]. The indirect optical bandgap \((\alpha h\upsilon )^{1/2}\) can be acquired from the relation between the incident photon energy and the absorption coefficient in different electronic transitions [29]:
where Eg is the optical bandgap energy, β is a constant and γ determines the type of electronic transition which is equal to 1/2 or 2 for the direct and indirect transition bandgaps, respectively. h is the Planck constant, ν is the photon’s frequency.
2.5 Adult immersion test
The efficacy of the applied materials against H. dromedarii was evaluated through an adult immersion test, according to a previously described protocol, with the exception that ticks were subjected to direct sunlight for 10 min instead of a light source. Five concentrations of photosensitizers (240, 180, 120, 60, and 30 ppm) were freshly prepared in distilled water.
Each treatment group containing three replicates, 15 males/each (45 ticks/concentration) was placed in a piece of mesh and immersed for 60 s in 100 mL solution of each concentration, and then the solution was constantly whiskered during the procedure. The immersed ticks were added to a Petri dish containing filter paper. The negative control group was immersed in distilled water and the positive control group was treated with Phoxim (700, 500, 300, 50, and 25 ppm).
Petri dishes containing ticks were exposed to direct sunlight, between 12.00 and 2.00 PM for 10 min Petri dishes were left at 27 ± 2 °C and 80 ± 5% relative humidity. Tick mortalities (MOs) were recorded 0.5, 1, 24, 48, and 72 h post-treatment (PT).
2.6 Statistical analysis
The mortality data were evaluated using Probit analysis through SPSS V23 (IBM, USA) to calculate lethal concentration (LC) and lethal time (LT) values. The relative toxicity and toxicity indices were determined [30] for a comparison of the tested photosensitizers, where the most toxic photosensitizer has given 100 units on the toxicity index scale.
Toxicity index = LC50 of the most toxic photosensitizer × 100/LC50 of each tested photosensitizer.
Relative toxicity = LC50 (or LC90) of the least toxic photosensitizer/LC50 (or LC90) of each tested photosensitizer.
Times potency = LT50 of the least toxic photosensitizer/LT50 of each tested photosensitizer.
3 Results
3.1 Optical properties
The absorption peaks of dyes were determined as follows; chlorophyllin (408 and 638 nm), echinochrome (634 nm), field stain (302 and 666 nm), methylene blue (292, and 666 nm), phthalocyanine (652 and 322 nm), rhodamine 6G (530 nm), riboflavin (450, 378 and 288 nm), and safranin (522 nm).
The tested photosensitizers exhibited various absorption spectra in near ultraviolet, visible, and near infrared regions (250–700 nm). The absorption spectrum of methylene blue, phthalocyanine, and echinochrome appeared in the visible to near infra-red regions (550–680 nm). Safranin and rhodamine 6G showed absorption in the middle visible light region, whereas field stain, chlorophyllin, and riboflavin showed absorption in the near ultraviolet region (250–440 nm) (Fig. 1).
The UV–Vis absorption spectra of the dyes as a function of various photosensitizer concentrations (30, 60, 120, 180, and 240 ppm) were measured. The optical absorbance of tested dyes follows Beer’s Law, where the absorbance intensity decreased with decreasing dye concentration (Fig. 2). The experimental data show smooth linear fitting, which means that as the concentration decreases, the value of photon energy was decreased linearly. The solution of each dye was diluted to be readable within the spectrophotometer manufacture limit and the factor of dilution for each dye as relative absorption intensity was presented (Fig. 3).
3.2 Optical bandgap energy
The optical bandgap energy of Phthalocyanine at the two peak values was very small compared to the rest of the dyes. Most dyes showed more than one bandgap energy except safranin and filed stain. Methylene blue, field stain, and phthalocyanine showed low optical bandgap energies (1.75, 1.70, and 0.95 eV, respectively). Echinochrome showed two optical bandgap energies (1.72 and 3.40 eV). Chlorophyllin, rhodamine 6G, and riboflavin optical bandgap energies were 2.60, 2.20, and 2.40 eV, respectively (Table 1). Safranin showed moderate optical bandgap energy (2.09 eV) (Fig. 4).
3.3 Adult immersion test
All dyes in this study showed moderate toxic effects against camel tick H. dromedarii after 72 h PT, where the mortality percent (MO%) reached 42.2%, 44.4%, 51.1%, 71.1%, 46.7%, 48.9%, 44.4%, and 55.6% for chlorophyllin, echinochrome, field stain, methylene blue, phthalocyanine, rhodamine 6G, riboflavin, and safranin, respectively (Fig. 5). The acaricidal efficacy represented by the LC50 values of chlorophyllin, echinochrome, field stain, methylene blue, phthalocyanine, rhodamine 6G, riboflavin, and safranin 24 h PT were 648, 704, 521, 340, 589, 614, 631, and 520 ppm, respectively. On the other hand, the corresponding values 72 h PT were 362, 324, 251, 127, 303, 271, 332, and 209 ppm, respectively (Table 2). The data of the positive control group showed that all tested materials were more effective than Phoxim and its LC50 values 24, 48, and 72 h PT were 924, 1690, and 1161 ppm, respectively (Table 2).
The relative toxicities 24 h PT indicated that chlorophyllin, field stain, methylene blue, phthalocyanine, rhodamine 6G, riboflavin, and safranin were 1.1, 1.4, 2.1, 1.2, 1.2, 1.1, and 1.4 folds, respectively, as toxic as echinochrome. The relative toxicities 48 h PT for chlorophyllin, echinochrome, field stain, methylene blue, rhodamine 6G, riboflavin, and safranin were 1.1, 1.1, 1.3, 2.4, 1.2, 1.1, and 1.5-folds, respectively, as potent as phthalocyanine. While the relative toxicity 72 h PT with echinochrome, field stain, methylene blue, phthalocyanine, rhodamine 6G, riboflavin, and safranin were 1.1, 1.4, 2.9, 1.2, 1.3, 1.1, and 1.7 folds, respectively, more toxic than chlorophyllin (Table 3).
The relative toxicities 24 h PT with methylene blue showed a high toxic effect, followed by safranin, field stain, and phthalocyanine (toxicity indices = 100, 65.4%, 65.3%, and 57.7%, respectively). Meanwhile, the toxicity indices of chlorophyllin, echinochrome, rhodamine 6G, and riboflavin were 52.5%, 48.3%, 55.4%, and 53.9%, respectively (Table 3).
The toxicity indices 48 h and 72 h PT pointed out that methylene blue was the most effective photosensitizer with 100% toxicity index followed by safranin (62% and 60%, respectively), then field stain (52.6% and 50.6%, respectively). Such values were also recorded for chlorophyllin (44.3% and 35.1%) echinochrome (47.5% and 39.2%), phthalocyanine (41.8% and 74.3%), rhodamine 6G (48.5% and 46.8%), and riboflavin (42.9% and 38.3%) (Table 3).
Regarding the relative toxicities of the LC50 values 72 h PT, chlorophyllin, echinochrome, field stain, methylene blue, phthalocyanine, rhodamine 6G, riboflavin, and safranin were 3.2, 3.6, 4.6, 9.1, 3.8, 4.3, 3.5, and 5.6, respectively, times more toxic than Phoxim. On the other hand, 24 h PT, relative toxicities were 1.4, 1.3, 1.8, 2.7, 1.6, 1.5, 1.5, and 1.8-folds, respectively (Table 4).
According to their speed of killing ticks, the LT50 values PT with 240 ppm of chlorophyllin, echinochrome, field stain, methylene blue, phthalocyanine, rhodamine 6G, riboflavin, and safranin were 137, 131, 87, 45, 115, 96, 129, and 72 h, respectively (Table 5). The matching values PT with 180 ppm, chlorophyllin, echinochrome, stain, methylene blue, phthalocyanine, rhodamine 6G, riboflavin, and safranin were 150, 188, 117, 52, 166, 129, 194, and 100 h, respectively. While LT50 values PT with 120 ppm were 264, 434, 227, 103, 212, 182, 205, and 203 h, respectively (Table 5). It worth to mention that LT50 values PT with 300, 500, and 700 ppm were 246, 190, and 81 h, respectively (Table 6).
According to time potency, PT with 240 ppm, echinochrome, field stain, methylene blue, phthalocyanine, rhodamine 6G, riboflavin, and safranin were 1.04, 1.6, 3, 1.2, 1.4, 1.1, and 1.9 times, respectively, faster than chlorophyllin. On other hand and PT with 180 ppm, the time potency of chlorophyllin, echinochrome, field stain, methylene blue, phthalocyanine, rhodamine 6G, riboflavin, and safranin were 1.3, 1.03, 1.7, 3.7, 1.2, 1.5, and 1.9 times, respectively, faster than riboflavin (Table 5).
4 Discussion
The camel tick, H. dromedarii, is infesting camels worldwide [5, 6, 31] and considerable efforts are needed to evaluate new ecofriendly acaricides [32, 33]. Photosensitizer accumulates in the pest body and stimulates lethal photochemical reactions [17, 18]. Photosensitizers use light (natural or artificial) at specific absorption wavelengths to be fully functional and enhance their capability as pesticides [19, 34].
In the current study, the toxicity of eight photosensitizers against H. dromedarii male as alternative tick control methods was evaluated for the first time, according to our knowledge, except for safranin which was applied in our previous study against another stage, engorged females, of H. dromedarii [32, 35], but this study evaluated its effect against H. dromedarii males.
This study showed that ticks were highly susceptible to all tested photosensitizers, as mortalities indicated a time and dose-dependent relationship. The susceptibility of Phoxim as a synthetic acaricide was made to compare its efficacy against the applied photosensitizer. The data showed that LC50 of Phoxim was very high, 1161 ppm, 72 h PT and its LC90 values 48 and 72 h PT were very high 25,614 and 13,379 ppm, respectively. As the recommended dose of Phoxim is 1 mL/L (1000 ppm), H. dromedarii has acquired resistance as it needs doses of Phoxim, 5 and 98 times, respectively, more than the recommended dose is to be effective.
This study indicated that the toxicity indices of tested photosensitizers 72 h PT with chlorophyllin, echinochrome, field stain, methylene blue, phthalocyanine, rhodamine 6G, riboflavin, and safranin were 3.2, 3.6, 4.6, 9.1, 3.8, 4.3, 3.5, and 5.6, respectively, more toxic than Phoxim.
Methylene blue was the most effective photosensitizer followed by safranin and field stain (LC50 = 127, 209, and 251 ppm, respectively); their toxicity indices were 100%, 60%, and 50.6%, respectively; their relative toxicities were 2.9, 1.7, and 1.4 times, respectively, more effective than chlorophyllin.; and their LT50 values were 45, 72 and 87 h, respectively. Analogous to our results, methylene blue was more toxic than hmatomporphyrin (a photosensitizer) against the cotton leafworm, Spodoptera littoralis, as MO% PT with 10–2, 10–3, and 10–4 mg/L were 64%, 34%, and 18%, respectively, which decreased to 33.7%, 21%, and 5.7%, respectively, 10 days PT [36].
Our results are in harmony with former studies that displayed that the toxicity indices of methylene blue and eosin yellow lactone were 35.78% and 45.68%, respectively, as potent as rose Bengal against the cotton leafworm [37]. Methylene blue could be attached easily to the biological membrane [37]; therefore, it is considered a good pesticide in the presence of light.
This study indicated that safranin is a highly potent acaricide against male H. dromedarii (LC50, 24 h PT = 520 ppm, respectively). Similar to our finding, safranin is a highly effective acaricide against the engorged females of H. dromedarii in Egypt (MO% = 100 PT with 4% for 8 h), and its LC50 after 24 h was 0.78% (7800 ppm). At the LC50 and LC90 levels 24 h PT, safranin was six and 73 times more effective than tetramethrin. LT50 of safranin was 0.80 h PT with 4% [32]. Male H. dromedarii in this study is highly susceptible to safranin than the engorged females of the same species [32].
Alike our results, safranin and methylene blue were effective acaricides against the fourth larval instars of the black cutworm, Agrotis ipsilon, as poison baits and induced stomach and contact toxicities (LC50 = 0.107 and 0.125%, respectively, 72 h PT). Sublethal concentrations of both photosensitizers adversely affected the developmental stages of A. ipsilon [37]. Sublethal concentrations of safranin [32] and rose Bengal [35] adversely affected the reproductive potential of treated engorged females of H. dromedarii by reducing the number of ovipositing females, fecundity, and egg hatchability.
Some other dyes (photosensitizers) act as effective pesticides; rose Bengal was 100 times more toxic than chlorpyrifos against the common house mosquito, Culex pipiens [38].
As far as we know, there is a patent related to the superior toxic effects of some photosensitizers as safranin O, auramine O, eosine Y; erythrosine B, D, and C; orange 5; and thioflavine T against arthropods and reported that they exhibit far toxic efficacy compared to phloxine B, once used with an optimal adjuvant. Without the specific adjuvant, such dyes have little or no lethal effect [39]. Unluckily, this patent did not specify which arthropods or the adjuvant was used.
In the present work, the least effective photosensitizers were echinochrome and chlorophyllin (LC50 = 332 and 324 ppm, respectively). In contrary to our finding, copper and magnesium chlorophyllin photosensitizers have also toxic effect against the cotton leafworm, Spodoptera littoralis, as they reduced the number of larvae 15 days post-spraying and in the second season, 74–90% and 65–95%, respectively [40]. Furthermore, chlorophyllin had high toxicity against Culex and Chaoborus (LD50 = 6.88 and 24 mg/L, respectively [41]; LD50 values of chlorophyllin were 2.34 and 5.88 mg/L against Aedes and Anopheles species, respectively [42] and a lethal dose of 8 mg per Chaoborus crystallinus larvae [43]. Chlorophyll derivatives can be effectively used against malaria, filarial, and dengue vector-borne diseases [44]. Echinochrome had high antibacterial, anti-inflammatory [45] and antiviral effects [46]. After treatment for 3 days in the present study, Rhodamine 6G, riboflavin, and phthalocyanine were the least effective photosensitizers (LC50 = 271, 332, and 303 ppm, respectively).
Other than the pesticidal effect, photosensitizers are efficacious photodynamic materials against many pathogens such as fungi, protozoa, and bacteria and resolve many environmental problems, such as water disinfection, sterilization, prohibition of water-borne diseases [47], purification of wastewaters, and preservation of animal species [48]. The photoactive characteristic counts on several factors, such as photostability, irradiation time, concentration, fluency rate of light delivered, and the other biological, physical and chemical features [49, 50].
Dyes are inactive in the dark and no insect mortalities were recorded in the dark [51]; therefore, sunlight is very important for dye activation. Exposure of a photosensitizer to sunlight as in this study would be more effective and viable than an artificial light source due to the fact that sunlight possesses all wavelengths from UV to visible light [32, 35]. This study revealed that methylene blue exhibited absorption peaks at wavelengths of visible to near infra-red region (560–665 nm). Similar finding was recorded [52, 53]. In addition, the absorbance of safranin and rhodamine 6G in the present study showed peaks at wavelengths of visible light at (450–550 nm: and 485–540 nm, respectively). Analogous data were reported [54,55,56,57]. Echinochrome showed absorption peaks of 294 and 550–650 nm. The present work indicated that field stain and chlorophyllin showed absorption peaks at low wavelengths, which means higher photon energy. Phthalocyanine showed a peak at 630 in this study; like finding was recorded [58, 59]. Riboflavin also shows a broad range of absorption at low values of wavelengths (342–480 nm) in this study; comparable range was reported [60].
Photosensitizer molecules absorb photon energy with the appropriate wavelength, which excites an electron into a higher energy orbital according to the Jablonski diagram [61]. The more absorption wavelengths, the more energy participates in the photosensitizer molecule. Therefore, dyes such as methylene blue, phthalocyanine, rhodamine 6G, safranin, and echinochrome are likely to acquire higher energy, because they exhibit absorption wavelengths peaks in the visible light range from 400 to 700 nm [54, 59]. Because of listed variations of the absorption ranges, these dyes are good candidates as pest control. Similar findings were recorded for safranin [32].
Optical measurements of the tested photosensitizers were recorded immediately and a few days after treatment of the ticks show high absorbance, especially for methylene blue owing to their photostability and photoliability which suggested they can be used in sunlight for a long time. Methylene blue is stable enough to be used in sunlight and not easily degraded and needs additional help for its degradation as titanate nanoparticles [62] and graphene oxide or tin oxide [63,64,65].
Phthalocyanine and echinochrome, as well as methylene blue, exhibit absorption peaks in the visible to near-infrared spectral region (between 640 and 700 nm) and they have a wide optical bandgap which does not provide enough energy to the photon to excite [19]. This also supports their stability in long storage and for their application in the presence of sunlight.
The optical bandgap energy determines how much energy of the light or sun is needed for the photon to excite. The behavior of the applied dyes is assumed to be of indirect bandgap (n = 1/2). It is interesting to note that the optical bandgap was not altered with increasing dye concentration as expected because of the absorption peak was not shifted because of concentration change. This was explained by the linear relationship between photon energy and concentration.
Optical bandgap energies of phthalocyanine, chlorophyllin, echinochrome, rhodamine 6G, and Riboflavin in this investigation showed more than one optical bandgap energy indicating more activity over a broad range of photon frequencies, representing higher lethal capability. These data agree with the phototoxicity of tested photosensitizers [66,67,68].
Although safranin and phthalocyanine in this work have one bandgap energy and energies were still low, indicating that they could be applied as a potent pesticide. Low values of optical bandgap, as well as the broadening of the absorption spectra, were pointing out good photoactive dye [69].
Photosensitizers’ toxicity mechanisms against arthropods pest were summed up [70]. The membranes of the midgut wall seem to be the first susceptible sites to be photo damaged. The symptoms appeared in membrane permeability as well as alteration of potassium levels in the hemolymph. Photosensitizers affect water level, weight, and protein mass, leading to fatal energy compression in the treated pests. A reduction in the fertility rate has been exhibited as a secondary effect. Photosensitizers also induce morphological and physiological mutations. They also affected the immature stages and the reproductive outcome of the treated pests [32, 35,36,37].
5 Conclusions
This study revealed that H. dromedarii had acquired resistance against phoxim and evaluated a novel approach of using photosensitizers against ticks as an alternative control strategy [31]. Methylene blue was the most efficient photosensitizer followed by safranin and field stain. They exhibit rather much broader absorption spectra, higher absorption intensity compared to the other dyes. Whereas the phthalocyanine, rhodamine 6G, and riboflavin exhibited almost equal toxic effects with almost comparable optical properties. While echinochrome and chlorophyllin have the least toxic effect, which was supported by their lowest relative absorption intensity. The optical parameters together with results of the toxicity measurements suggested that the phototoxicity of the tested photosensitizer dyes was strongly related to their photoactivity and can be correlated. Methylene blue, safranin, and field stain showed better stability and a broad absorption range. Therefore, it is recommended to use methylene blue followed by safranin and field stain for field application (on hosts and the environment) after revealing their ecotoxicological profile to avoid pest resistance and reduce the reliance on chemical acaricides.
Data availability
Not applicable.
Code availability
Not applicable.
Material availability
Not applicable.
Change history
01 November 2022
A Correction to this paper has been published: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43630-022-00329-6
References
Dantas-Torres, F., Chomel, B. B., & Otranto, D. (2012). Ticks and tick-borne diseases: A One Health perspective. Trends in Parasitology, 28, 437–446.
Pfäffle, M., Littwin, N., Muders, S. V., & Petney, T. N. (2013). The ecology of tick-borne diseases. International Journal for Parasitology, 43, 1059–1077.
Guglielmone, A. A., Apanaskevich, D. A., Estrada-Peña, A., Robbins, R. G., Petney, T. N., & Horak, I. G. (2014). The hard ticks of the world: (Acari: Ixodida: Ixodidae). Springer.
Apanaskevich, D. A., Schuster, A. L., & Horak, I. G. (2008). The genus Hyalomma: VII. Redescription of all parasitic stages of H. (Euhyalomma) dromedarii and H. (E.) schulzei (Acari: Ixodidae). Journal of Medical Entomology, 45, 817–831.
van Straten, M., & Jongejan, F. (1993). Ticks (Acari: Ixodidae) infesting the Arabian camel (Camelus dromedarius) in the Sinai, Egypt with a note on the acaricidal efficacy of ivermectin. Experimental & Applied Acarology, 17, 605–616.
Ramadan, M. Y. (1997). Studies on some ectoparasites of camels. (MSc. thesis, Zagazig University (Benha Branch), Egypt).
Bhattacharyulu, Y., Chaudhri, R. P., & Gill, B. S. (1975). Transstadial transmission of Theileria annulata through common ixodid ticks infesting Indian cattle. Parasitology, 71, 1–7.
Al-Deeb, M. A., Bin Muzaffar, S., Abu-Zeid, Y. A., Enan, M. R., & Karim, S. (2015). First record of a spotted fever group Rickettsia sp. and Theileria annulata in Hyalomma dromedarii (Acari: Ixodidae) ticks in the United Arab Emirates, Florida. Entomology, 98, 135–139.
Alanazi, A., Abdullah, S., Helps, C. R., Wall, R., Puschendor, R., Alharbi, S., Abdel-Shafy, S., & Shaapan, R. (2018). Tick-borne pathogens in ticks and blood samples collected from camels in Riyadh Province, Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Zoological Research, 14, 30–36.
Barghash, S., Hafez, A., Darwish, A., & El-Naga, T. (2016). Molecular detection of pathogens in ticks infesting camels in Matrouh Governorate, Egypt. Journal of Bacteriology & Parasitology. https://doi.org/10.4172/2155-9597.1000269
Khater, H. F., & Ramadan, M. Y. (2007). The acaricidal effect of peracetic acid against Boophilus annulatus and Argas persicus. Acta Scientiae Veterinariae, 35, 29–40.
Khater, H. (2012). Advances in integrated pest management (pp. 17–61). IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/27852
Seddiek, S. A., Khater, H. F., El-Shorbagy, M. M., & Ali, A. M. (2013). The acaricidal efficacy of aqueous neem extract and ivermectin against Sarcoptes scabiei var. cuniculi in experimentally infested rabbits. Parasitology Research, 112, 2319–2330.
Abbas, R. Z., Zaman, M. A., Colwell, D. D., Gilleard, J., & Iqbal, Z. (2014). Acaricide resistance in cattle ticks and approaches to its management: The state of play. Veterinary Parasitology, 203, 6–20.
El-Ghobary Asmaa, M., Khafagy, I. F., & Ibrahim, A. S. M. (2018). Potency of some photosensitizing compounds against the cotton leaf worm, Spodoptera littoralis (Boisduval) in relation to some biochemical aspects. Journal of Plant Protection and Pathology, 9, 187–193.
Baz, M. M., Selim, A. M., Radwan, I. T., & Khater, H. F. (2022). Plant oils in the fight against the West Nile Vector, Culex pipiens. International Journal of Tropical Insect Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42690-022-00762-1
Lukšienė, Ž, Būda, V., & Radžiutė, S. (2005). Effects of visible-light-activated hematoporphyrin dimethyl ether on the survival of leafminer Liriomyza bryoniae. Ekologija, 2005, 17–21.
Lukšienė, Ž, Kurilčik, N., Juršėnas, S., Radžiutė, S., & Būda, V. (2007). Towards environmentally and human friendly insect pest control technologies: Photosensitization of leafminer flies Liriomyza bryoniae. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology, B: Biology, 89, 15–21.
Abrahamse, H., & Hamblin, M. R. (2016). New photosensitizers for photodynamic therapy. The Biochemical Journal, 473, 347–364.
DeRosa, M. C., & Crutchley, R. J. (2002). Photosensitized singlet oxygen and its applications. Coordination Chemistry Reviews, 233–234, 351–371.
Antonov, L., Gergov, G., Petrov, V., Kubista, M., & Nygren, J. (1999). UV–Vis spectroscopic and chemometric study on the aggregation of ionic dyes in water. Talanta, 49, 99–106.
Mphuthi, N. G., Adekunle, A. S., Fayemi, O. E., Olasunkanmi, L. O., & Ebenso, E. E. (2017). Phthalocyanine doped metal oxide nanoparticles on multiwalled carbon nanotubes platform for the detection of dopamine. Science and Reports, 7, 43181.
Zhuang, Y., Zhu, Q., Li, G., Wang, Z., Zhan, P., Ren, C., Si, Z., Li, S., Cai, D., & Qin, P. (2022). Photocatalytic degradation of organic dyes using covalent triazine-based framework. Materials Research Bulletin, 146, 111619.
Pugliese, N., Circella, E., Cocciolo, G., Giangaspero, A., Horvatek Tomic, D., Kika, T. S., Caroli, A., & Camarda, A. (2019). Efficacy of λ-cyhalothrin, amitraz, and phoxim against the poultry red mite Dermanyssus gallinae De Geer, 1778 (Mesostigmata: Dermanyssidae): An eight-year survey. Avian Pathology, 48, S35–S43.
Sigognault Flochlay, A., Thomas, E., & Sparagano, O. (2017). Poultry red mite (Dermanyssus gallinae) infestation: A broad impact parasitological disease that still remains a significant challenge for the egg-laying industry in Europe. Parasites & Vectors, 10, 357.
Brauneis, M. D., Zoller, H., Williams, H., Zschiesche, E., & Heckeroth, A. R. (2017). The acaricidal speed of kill of orally administered fluralaner against poultry red mites (Dermanyssus gallinae) on laying hens and its impact on mite reproduction. Parasites & Vectors, 10, 594.
Zhou, D.-Y., Qin, L., Zhu, B.-W., Wang, X.-D., Tan, H., Yang, J.-F., Li, D.-M., Dong, X.-P., Wu, H.-T., Sun, L.-M., Li, X.-L., & Murata, Y. (2011). Extraction and antioxidant property of polyhydroxylated naphthoquinone pigments from spines of purple sea urchin Strongylocentrotus nudus. Food Chemistry, 129(4), 1591–1597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2011.06.014
Saini, I., Rozra, J., Chandak, N., Aggarwal, S., Sharma, P. K., & Sharma, A. (2013). Tailoring of electrical, optical and structural properties of PVA by addition of Ag nanoparticles. Materials Chemistry and Physics, 139, 802–810.
Makuła, P., Pacia, M., & Macyk, W. (2018). How to correctly determine the band gap energy of modified semiconductor photocatalysts based on UV–Vis spectra. Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters, 9, 6814–6817.
Zidan, Z. H., & Abdel-Megeed, M. I. (1988). New approaches in pesticides and insect control. Arabian Publishing House and Delivery.
Elghali, A., & Hassan, S. M. (2009). Ticks (Acari: Ixodidae) infesting camels (Camelus dromedarius) in Northern Sudan. Onderstepoort Journal of Veterinary Research, 76, 177–185.
Khater, H., Hendawy, N., Govindarajan, M., Murugan, K., & Benelli, G. (2016). Photosensitizers in the fight against ticks: Safranin as a novel photodynamic fluorescent acaricide to control the camel tick Hyalomma dromedarii (Ixodidae). Parasitology Research, 115, 3747–3758.
Aboelhadid, S. M., Arafa, W. M., Mahrous, L. N., Fahmy, M. M., & Kamel, A. A. (2018). Molecular detection of Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) annulatus resistance against deltamethrin in middle Egypt. Veterinary Parasitology: Regional Studies and Reports, 13, 198–204.
Tuite, E. M., & Kelly, J. M. (1993). New trends in photobiology: Photochemical interactions of methylene blue and analogues with DNA and other biological substrates. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology, B: Biology, 21, 103–124.
Khater, H., & Hendawy, N. (2014). Photoxicity of rose bengal against the camel tick, Hyalomma dromedarii. International Journal of Veterinary Science, 3, 78–86.
Abd El-Naby, S. M. (2007). Photodynamic insecticides: Investigation of the effect of selected photosensitizers on different life stages of cotton leaf worm (Doctoral dissertation, Ph. D. Thesis, National Institute of Laser Enhanced Science. Cairo Univ., Egypt).
Abd-El-Aziz, H. S. (2021). The toxicity effect of certain photosensitizing compounds on some biological aspects of field strain of Agrotis ipsilon (Hufnagel) Larvae. Egyptian Academic Journal of Biological Sciences, F. Toxicology & Pest Control, 13, 195–208.
Heitz, J., Mangan, R. L., & Moreno, D. S. (1997). Phototoxic insecticidal composition and method for controlling insect populations. United States Department of Agriculture patents.
Muehler, D., Brandl, E., Hiller, K.-A., Cieplik, F., & Maisch, T. (2022). Membrane damage as mechanism of photodynamic inactivation using methylene blue and TMPyP in Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus. Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences, 21, 209–220.
Ahmed, S. S., El-Rahman, S. F. A., & Kader, M. H. A. (2018). Field evaluation of some photosensitizers and nanocomposites against cotton leaf worm, Spodoptera littoralis (Bois.) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Middle East Journal of Applied Sciences, 8, 1471–1479.
Wohllebe, S., Richter, R., Richter, P., & Häder, D. P. (2009). Photodynamic control of human pathogenic parasites in aquatic ecosystems using chlorophyllin and pheophorbid as photodynamic substances. Parasitology Research, 104, 593–600.
Erzinger, G. S., Wohllebe, S., Vollrath, F., Souza, S. C., Richter, P., Lebert, M., & Häder, D.-P. (2011). Optimizing conditions for the use of chlorophyll derivatives for photodynamic control of parasites in aquatic ecosystems. Parasitology Research, 109, 781–786.
Wohllebe, S., Ulbrich, C., Grimm, D., Pietsch, J., Erzinger, G., Richter, R., Lebert, M., Richter, P. R., & Häder, D.-P. (2011). Photodynamic treatment of Chaoborus crystallinus larvae with chlorophyllin induces necrosis and apoptosis. Photochemistry and Photobiology, 87, 1113–1122.
Roguai, S., & Djelloul, A. (2021). Structural, microstructural and photocatalytic degradation of methylene blue of zinc oxide and Fe-doped ZnO nanoparticles prepared by simple coprecipitation method. Solid State Communications, 334–335, 114362.
Sadek, S. A., Hassanein, S. S., Mohamed, A. S., Soliman, A. M., & Fahmy, S. R. (2021). Echinochrome pigment extracted from sea urchin suppress the bacterial activity, inflammation, nociception, and oxidative stress resulted in the inhibition of renal injury in septic rats. Journal of Food Biochemistry, 46, e13729.
Fedoreyev, S. A., Krylova, N. V., Mishchenko, N. P., Vasileva, E. A., Pislyagin, E. A., Iunikhina, O. V., Lavrov, V. F., Svitich, O. A., Ebralidze, L. K., & Leonova, G. N. (2018). Antiviral and antioxidant properties of echinochrome A. Marine Drugs. https://doi.org/10.3390/md16120509
Jori, G., Magaraggia, M., Fabris, C., Soncin, M., Camerin, M., Tallandini, L., Coppellotti, O., & Guidolin, L. (2011). Photodynamic inactivation of microbial pathogens: Disinfection of water and prevention of water-borne diseases. Journal of Environmental Pathology, Toxicology and Oncology, 30(3), 261–271.
Baptista, M. S., & Wainwright, M. (2011). Photodynamic antimicrobial chemotherapy (PACT) for the treatment of malaria, leishmaniasis and trypanosomiasis. Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research (Revista brasileira de pesquisas médicas e biológicas), 44, 1–10.
Hasan, T., Ortel, B., Moor, A. C. E., & Pogue, B., et al. (2003). Photodynamic therapy of cancer. In D. W. Kufe, R. E. Pollock, & R. R. Weichselbaum (Eds.), Holland-Frei cancer medicine (6th ed.). BC Decker.
Tonnesen, H. H. (2004). Photostability of drugs and drug formulations (2nd ed.). CRC.
Eltaly, R. I., Mohammed, S. H., Alakeel, K. A., Salem, H. H. A., Abdelfattah, A., Ahmed, A. E., El-Tahan, A. M., El-Saadony, M. T., Saad, A. M., El-Hassan, G. M. M. A., & Farag, S. M. (2022). Phototoxicity of eosin yellow lactone and phloxine B photosensitizers against mosquito larvae and their associated predators. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2022.01.042
Aravind, M., Ahmad, A., Ahmad, I., Amalanathan, M., Naseem, K., Mary, S. M. M., Parvathiraja, C., Hussain, S., Algarni, T. S., Pervaiz, M., & Zuber, M. (2021). Critical green routing synthesis of silver NPs using jasmine flower extract for biological activities and photocatalytical degradation of methylene blue. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 9, 104877.
Maliszewska, I., Wanarska, E., Thompson, A. C., Samuel, I. D. W., & Matczyszyn, K. (2021). Biogenic gold nanoparticles decrease methylene blue photobleaching and enhance antimicrobial photodynamic therapy. Molecules, 26(3), 623.
El-Berry, M. F., Sadeek, S. A., Abdalla, A. M., & Nassar, M. Y. (2021). Microwave-assisted fabrication of copper nanoparticles utilizing different counter ions: An efficient photocatalyst for photocatalytic degradation of safranin dye from aqueous media. Materials Research Bulletin, 133, 111048.
Kong, F., Jia, X., Zhang, S., Lin, M., & Cheng, Y. (2021). Ratiometric fluorescent chemosensor based on the block copolymer of poly(N-isopropylacrylamide)-b-poly(N-vinylcarbazole) containing rhodamine 6G and 1,8-naphthalimide moieties. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 138, 50949.
MacAleese, L., Chan, B., Bouakil, M., Dugourd, P., & O’Hair, R. A. J. (2021). Photo-control of bimolecular reactions: Reactivity of the long-lived Rhodamine 6G triplet excited state with ˙NO. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics: PCCP, 23, 25038–25047.
Plekhova, N., Rad’kova, L., Korshunova, O., & Shevchenko, O. (2021). Photosensitizer chlorophyllin in the treatment of oncopathologies. In Presented at the 1st international electronic conference on biomedicine (pp. 300).
Joseph, B., & Menon, C. (2007). Studies on the optical properties and surface morphology of nickel phthalocyanine thin films. E-journal of Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1155/2007/643834
Staicu, A., Pascu, A., Nuta, A., Ana-Alexandra, S., Raditoiu, V., & Pascu, M. L. (2013). Studies about phthalocyanine photosensitizers to be used in photodynamic therapy. Romanian Reports in Physics, 65, 1032–1051.
Miquel Becker, E., Christensen, J., Frederiksen, C. S., & Haugaard, V. K. (2003). Front-face fluorescence spectroscopy and chemometrics in analysis of yogurt: Rapid analysis of riboflavin. Journal of Dairy Science, 86, 2508–2515.
Frackowiak, D. (1988). The Jablonski diagram. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology, B: Biology, 2, 399.
Vasiljevic, Z. Z., Dojcinovic, M. P., Vujancevic, J. D., Jankovic-Castvan, I., Ognjanovic, M., Tadic, N. B., Stojadinovic, S., Brankovic, G. O., & Nikolic, M. V. (2020). Photocatalytic degradation of methylene blue under natural sunlight using iron titanate nanoparticles prepared by a modified sol–gel method. Royal Society Open Science, 7, 200708.
Reddy, P. R., Shireesha, V., Malapat, V., Rao, K. V., & Aparna, Y. (2015). Degradation of methylene blue from water under sunlight using SnO2/graphene oxide composite. International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology, 4, 146–151.
Azim, M. B., Tanim, I. A., Rezaul, R. M., Tareq, R., Rahul, A. H., Kurny, A. S., & Gulshan, F. (2018). Degradation of methylene blue using graphene oxide-tin oxide nanocomposite as photocatalyst. arXiv preprint: arXiv:1806.06481
Van Tuan, P., Tuong, H. B., Tan, V. T., Thu, L. H., Khoang, N. D., & Khiem, T. N. (2022). SnO2/reduced graphene oxide nanocomposites for highly efficient photocatalytic degradation of methylene blue. Optical Materials (Amst), 123, 111916.
Hamam, K. J., & Alomari, M. I. (2017). A study of the optical band gap of zinc phthalocyanine nanoparticles using UV–Vis spectroscopy and DFT function. Applied Nanoscience, 7, 261–268.
Ma, H., Brennan, A., & Diamond, S. A. (2012). Photocatalytic reactive oxygen species production and phototoxicity of titanium dioxide nanoparticles are dependent on the solar ultraviolet radiation spectrum. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 31, 2099–2107.
Li, S., Erickson, R. J., Wallis, L. K., Diamond, S. A., & Hoff, D. J. (2015). Modeling TiO2 nanoparticle phototoxicity: The importance of chemical concentration, ultraviolet radiation intensity, and time. Environmental Pollution, 205, 327–332.
Lee, J. S., You, K. H., & Park, C. B. (2012). Highly photoactive, low bandgap TiO2 nanoparticles wrapped by graphene. Advanced Materials, 24, 1084–1088.
Ben Amor, T., & Jori, G. (2000). Sunlight-activated insecticides: Historical background and mechanisms of phototoxic activity. Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 30, 915–925.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the Science, Technology, and Innovation Funding Authority for funding this study, Project title: “Eco-friendly Pesticides against Pests of Medical, Veterinary, and Agricultural Importance” ID: 41608. The authors appreciated the partial support of LEAP-Agri (A Long-term EU-Africa Research and Innovation Partnership on Food and Innovation on Food and Nutrition Security and Sustainable Agriculture), Project No: 220-MeTVAC, as well as Science, Technology and Innovation Funding Authority (STIFA), Egypt, Project ID: 13520-220. Project title: “Ecosmart Alternative Control Strategies against Theileria annulata and its Tick Vectors”
Funding
Open access funding provided by The Science, Technology & Innovation Funding Authority (STDF) in cooperation with The Egyptian Knowledge Bank (EKB). This work was supported by the Science, Technology, and Innovation Funding Authority, Project title: “Eco-friendly Pesticides against Pests of Medical, Veterinary, and Agricultural Importance” ID: 41608. Financial support for this study was partially provided for echinochrome extraction by LEAP-Agri (A Long-term EU-Africa Research and Innovation Partnership on Food and Innovation on Food and Nutrition Security and Sustainable Agriculture), Project No: 220-MeTVAC, as well as Science, Technology and Innovation Funding Authority (STIFA), Egypt, Project ID: 13520-220. Project title: “Ecosmart Alternative Control Strategies against Theileria annulata and its Tick Vectors”.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
HK, MB: helped with lab work and writing; MI, AD: helped with the physics part; AS: helped with referencing; IR: helped with extraction process; SH: helped with writing and editing; HT, SA: helped with software and referencing. AD, HA, and SA helped with data measurements and discussion.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
Ethics approval
Not applicable.
Informed consent
Not applicable.
Additional information
The original online version of this article was revised: the name of co-author Hanan A.A. Taie was not correct.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Mohammed, S.H., Baz, M.M., Ibrahim, M. et al. Acaricide resistance and novel photosensitizing approach as alternative acaricides against the camel tick, Hyalomma dromedarii. Photochem Photobiol Sci 22, 87–101 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43630-022-00301-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43630-022-00301-4