Skip to main content
Account

Table 2 Study Characteristics and Key Findings of the Included Articles

From: The Vaginal Microbiota, Human Papillomavirus Infection, and Cervical Carcinogenesis: A Systematic Review in the Latina Population

ID#

First Author (Publication Year)

NParticipants

NOutcomeGrp

NCtrlGrp

Age range

Location

HPV outcome

Abnormal cytology outcome

Cervical cancer outcome

Sample collections

Bacteria identified

Other findings

1

Nieves-Ramirez et al. (2021)

228

121

107

21 + 

Mexico City, Mexico

✓

✓

⎽

Vaginal swab

⎽

Alpha diversity: individuals with SILs had significantlty higher species richness and evenness compared to non-SILs; beta diversity: SILs explains 1.4% of the variation in vaginal bacterial community structure

2

Mosmann et al. (2021)

100

50

50

18–67

Córdoba, Argentina

⎽

✓

⎽

Cytobrush

Chlamydia trachomatis

⎽

3

Carrillo-Ng et al. (2021)

833

200

633

27–43

Cajamarca, Peru

✓

⎽

⎽

Cytobrush

Eubacterium, Actinobacteria, Fusobacterium, Bacteroides, Bifidobacterium, Enterococcus

⎽

4

Hernandez-Rosas et al. (2021)

1000

272

728

18–65

Sonora, Mexico

✓

⎽

⎽

Cytobrush

Actinomyces

⎽

5

Conde-Ferráez et al. (2017)

233

63

170

15–49

Merida, Yucatan, Mexico

✓

⎽

⎽

Cytobrush

Chlamydia trachomatis

⎽

6

Vargas-Robles et al. (2020)

111

74

21

12–53

Venezuela

✓

⎽

⎽

Vaginal swab

Anaerococcus tetradius, Coriobacteriaceae, Prevotella spp., Prevotella amnii

Lactobacillus dominance: L. iners was the most abundant taxa; alpha diversity: no associations were detected for any of the HPV types; beta diversity: microbiota diversity did not differ significantly according to HPV status

7

Torres-Poveda et al. (2019)

115,651

15,040

100,611

25–64

Mexico

✓

⎽

⎽

Biopsy

⎽

⎽

8

Bristow et al. (2019)

300

35

265

18 + 

Tijuana, Mexico

⎽

✓

⎽

Vaginal swab

Chlamydia trachomatis

⎽

9

Romero-Morelos et al. (2018)

177

73

104

⎽

Guerrero, Mexico

✓

✓

⎽

Cytobrush

⎽

⎽

10

Melo et al. (2016)

151

57

94

18–24

Temuco, Chile

✓

⎽

⎽

Cytobrush

Chlamydia trachomatis

⎽

11

Mongelos et al. (2015)

181

42

139

23–41

Paraguay

✓

⎽

⎽

Cytobrush

Chlamydia trachomatis, Mycoplasma hominis

⎽

12

Lippman et al. (2010)

386

135

251

18–40

Sao Paulo, Brazil

✓

⎽

⎽

Vaginal swab

⎽

⎽

13

Soto et al. (2007)

60

30

30

⎽

Havana, Cuba

✓

✓

⎽

Ecto/endocervical scrapings

Mycoplasma spp.

⎽

14

DeLuca et al. (2006)

189

89

100

15–58

Resistencia, Argentina

✓

✓

⎽

Cytobrush

Chlamydia trachomatis

⎽

15

Tonon et al. (2004)

207

133

74

12–64

Misiones, Argentina

✓

✓

⎽

Cytobrush

Gardnerella vaginalis

⎽

16

Somesh-Vikramdeo et al. (2022)

11

7

4

20–62

Mobile, Alabama

✓

✓

⎽

Biopsy

Rubellimicrobium, Pedobacter, Brevibacterium, Paracoccus, Fannyhessea, Brevundimonous, Comamonas, Novosphingobium

Lactobacillus depletion: decreased abundance of Lactobacillus in Hispanic compared to Non-Hispanic White suggests an increased risk of colonization of the pathogenic microbes; alpha diversity: no difference in species richness and evenness according to CIN or HPV status

17

Manzanares-Leal et al. (2022)

120

60

60

21–71

Mexico

⎽

⎽

✓

Vaginal swab

Corynebacterium amycolatum, Staphylococcus epidermidis

⎽

18

Sanchez-Garcia et al. (2019)

201

78

123

18–50

Tabasco, Mexico

✓

⎽

⎽

Vaginal swab

Chlamydia trachomatis

⎽

19

de Oliveira Ignacio et al. (2018)

150

68

82

19–50 + 

Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil

✓

⎽

⎽

Vaginal swab, Cytobrush

⎽

⎽

20

Godoy-Vitorino et al. (2018)

62

52

10

21–50

San Juan, Puerto Rico

✓

✓

⎽

Vaginal swab

Lactobacillus kitasatonis, Tissierella praeacuta, Lactobacillus acidophilus, Gardnerella vaginalis, Prevotella timonensis, Lactobacillus fornicalis, Prevotella amnii, Parvimonas micra, Lactobacillus crispatus

Lactobacillus dominance: L. iners was the most common high-abundance bacterial taxon, present in more than 83% of the samples, regardless of HPV risk and lesions; alpha—Shannon bacterial diversity was significantly higher in introitus and cervix of CIN 3 compared to CIN 1 patients (P = 0.033 and P = 0.031)

21

Łaniewski et al. (2018)

100

49

51

⎽

Phoenix, Arizona

✓

✓

✓

Vaginal swab, Cervicovaginal lavage

Lactobacillus iners, Sneathia spp., Fannyhessea spp., Parvimonas spp., Gardnerella vaginalis, Prevotella spp., Megasphaera spp., Lactobacillus crispatus, Shuttleworthia spp.

Lactobacillus depletion: Hispanic ethnicity was associated with depletion of lactobacilli

22

Gomes de Oliveira et al. (2017)

1346

1192

154

17–81

Fortaleza, Brazil

✓

✓

⎽

Not specified

⎽

⎽

23

Audirac-Chalifour et al. (2016)

32

12

20

22–61

Morelos, Mexico & Mexico City, Mexico

✓

✓

✓

Not specified

Sneathia spp., Megasphaera elsdenii, Shuttleworthia satelles, Lactobacillus iners, Lacobacillus crispatus, Fusobacterium necrophorum

Beta diversity: the CC samples showed the highest variation among groups (HPV, cervical dysplasia, and CC); phylogenetic diversity—significant difference in SIL vs. CC where microbiota diversity in CC cases is higher than in the non-cervical lesions group

24

Clarke et al. (2012)

9165

3065

6100

18–100

Guanacaste, Costa Rica

✓

⎽

⎽

Vaginal swab

⎽

⎽

25

Escarcega-Tame et al. (2020)

189

107

82

18–50

Mexico City, Mexico

✓

✓

✓

Endocervical brush

Chlamydia trachomatis

⎽

  1. The data extraction table reports study authors and publication year, number of participants, number of participants in the outcome and control group, the age range of participants, the location of the study, the types of outcomes studied: HPV, abnormal cytology or dysplasia, and cervical cancer, sample collection method, bacteria identified in outcome or control groups, and other microbiome metrics, such as Lactobacillus dominance, depletion, and diversity