Abstract
The transcription factor CCAAT-enhancer binding factor alpha (C/ebpα) is a master controller of myeloid differentiation that is expressed as long (p42) and short (p30) isoform. Mutations within the CEBPA gene selectively deleting p42 are frequent in human acute myeloid leukemia. Here we investigated the individual genomics and transcriptomics of p42 and p30. Both proteins bound to identical sites across the genome. For most targets, they induced a highly similar transcriptional response with the exception of a few isoform specific genes. Amongst those we identified early growth response 1 (Egr1) and tribbles1 (Trib1) as key targets selectively induced by p42 that are also underrepresented in CEBPA-mutated AML. Egr1 executed a program of myeloid differentiation and growth arrest. Oppositely, Trib1 established a negative feedback loop through activation of Erk1/2 kinase thus placing differentiation under control of signaling. Unexpectedly, differentiation elicited either by removal of an oncogenic input or by G-CSF did not peruse C/ebpα as mediator but rather directly affected the cell cycle core by upregulation of p21/p27 inhibitors. This points to functions downstream of C/ebpα as intersection point where transforming and differentiation stimuli converge and this finding offers a new perspective for therapeutic intervention.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
A block of hematopoietic differentiation is a hallmark of myeloid leukemia [1]. While gain-of-function oncogenes have been intensely studied, less is known about the details of genetic control elements that are perturbed by loss of-function mutations in AML. An example is the transcription factor C/ebpα that is frequently mutated in myeloid malignancies [2]. Normal C/ebpα plays a dual role. It cooperates with other transcription factors, including HOX-homeobox proteins, to establish a hematopoietic enhancer landscape necessary for the development of myeloid precursor cells [3, 4]. Consequently, leukemic transformation through HOX mediated pathways is not possible in the absence of C/ebpα [5]. On the other side, it is also essential for differentiation. Forced overexpression of C/ebpα causes terminal maturation. This dualism is reflected by the presence of two C/ebpα isoforms. By use of alternative translation initiation codons, either a long p42 isoform associated with differentiation, or a shorter p30 version connected to proliferation can be produced [6]. Both retain DNA binding functionality but they differ in the extent and activity of an N-terminal transactivation domain. Interestingly, biallelic CEBPA mutations in AML are common. However, in all cases at least one allele capable of producing p30 is retained [7, 8]. In mouse models, specific deletion of p42 causes fully penetrant leukemia [9]. This has been interpreted as an oncogenic gain of p30 activity and hitherto studies mostly concentrated on the genetic network downstream of p30 [10,11,12]. Here, we investigated C/ebpα isotype-specific genomics and transcriptomics in primary hematopoietic precursor cells and its relation to HoxA9 mediated transformation. Our findings suggest a particular role for p42 in establishing a signaling-dependent differentiation program. The oncogenic activity of HoxA9 perturbs this program downstream of C/ebpα itself. Our results emphasize the importance of a loss of-function for leukemogenesis and give potential perspectives how to bypass this defect for therapeutic purposes.
Methods
DNA, cells, inhibitors, antibodies, degron constructs
Retroviral plasmids were constructed in pMSCV (Clontech, Palo Alto, CA) vectors. All insert sequences were either derived from laboratory stocks or amplified from cDNA isolated from murine cells and confirmed by sequencing. Degron constructs were adapted to a murine environment by PCR-based introduction of a F36V mutation into the FKBP moiety. This creates a unique binding surface for the heterobifunctional dimerizer dTAG13 that is not present in any other murine protein. This allows specific dimerization with the endogenous E3-ligase cereblon and therefore degradation of the FKBPF36V tagged proteins without any appreciable effect on endogenous proteins as demonstrated previously by mass spectrometry [13]. For simplicity FKBPF36V will be denoted FKBP throughout the text. HPSCs were isolated from C57/BL6 mice with a triple-ko for Elane, Prtn3, and Ctsg [14]. Transduction was done with CD117 (Kit) selected cells enriched with magnetic beads (Miltenyi, Bergisch-Gladbach, Germany) essentially as recommended by the manufacturer. To generate transformed lines, cells were cultivated in methylcellulose (M3534, StemCellTechnologies, Cologne, Germany) for two rounds under antibiotics selection, then explanted and maintained in RPMI1640 (Thermo-Scientifc, Germany) supplemented with 10% FCS, penicillin-streptomycin, 5 ng/ml recombinant murine IL-3, IL-6, GM-CSF, and 50 ng/ml recombinant murine SCF (Miltenyi, Bergisch-Gladbach, Germany). dTAG13 was from Tocris (NobleParkNorth, Australia). All other chemicals were provided either by Sigma (Taufkirchen, Germany) or Roth (Karlsruhe, Germany). Antibodies were purchased either from Thermo Scientific (Darmstadt, Germany) or from Cell Signaling Technologies (Leiden, Netherlands).
ChIP-Seq, cell lysis, nascent-RNA isolation
ChIP was performed as described in [15] applying a 10 min crosslink in 1% formaldehyde @ RT followed by lysis in deoxycholate buffer (50 mM Tris/HCl pH 8.0, 10 mM EDTA, 100 mM NaCl, 1 mM EGTA, 0.1% sodium-deoxycholate, 0.5% N-lauroylsarcosine 1 mM PMSF and 1% HALT complete protease inhibitor cocktail) (Pierce, Thermo-Fisher, Germany). Precipitation for all samples was performed with protein G coupled paramagnetic beads (Cell Signaling Technologies). Antibodies used for ChIP: anti-HA rabbit monoclonal, Cell Signaling Technologies (#3724) 5 µl per 5 x 10e6 cells; anti-C/ebpα rabbit monoclonal, Cell Signaling Technologies (#8178) 5 µl per 5 x 10e6 cells.
Cell lysis for western was done in 20 mM HEPES pH 7.5, 10 mM KCl, 0.5 mM EDTA, 0.1% triton-X100 and 10% glycerol supplemented with 1 mM PMSF and 1% HALT complete protease inhibitor (triton lysis) or in hot (95 °C) 50 mM Tris–HCl pH 6.8, 0.2% SDS followed by a 2 min nucleic acid digestion at RT with 10 units of benzonase after supplementation with 0.5 mM MgCl2 (SDS lysis). Nascent-RNA isolation was done exactly as described in [16].
NGS and bioinformatics
ChIP sequencing libraries were prepared using NEBNext® Ultra™ II DNA Library Prep Kit reagents (NEB, Ipswitch, MA) according to the procedure recommended by the manufacturer. Size selection was done after final PCR amplification with Illumina index primers for 14 cycles. Nascent RNA was converted into Illumina compatible libraries with NEBNext® Single Cell/Low Input RNA Library Prep reagents according to the standard protocol. Sequencing was done at the in house core facility yielding 100 bp single- or paired-end reads.
Data were mapped with BWA mem (0.7.17) [17] to the Mus musculus mm10 genome. Reads mapping more than once were excluded by filtering for sequences with a mapping quality score > 4. For visualization BAM files were normalized and converted to TDF format with IGV-tools of the IGV browser package [18]. Peak finding, motif analysis and peak annotation was done with Homer (4.9.1) [19]. BAM files were converted to bigwig by Deeptools (3.0.0, bamCoverage) [20]. Metagene plots were created with Deeptools (3.0.0). Matrices were calculated with calculateMatrix and plotted with plotHeatmap from the Deeptools suite. RNA derived reads were aligned with STAR (v020201) [21] to the reference genome mm10 and reads derived from repetitive sequences were excluded by samtools (view)1.8 [22]. Transcripts were quantified by Homer analyzeRNA routines and further analyzed with standard spreadsheet tools.
Statistics
Where appropriate two-tailed T-test statistics were applied.
Results
Isoform specific expression in primary hematopoietic precursors
The wt Cebpa cDNA is preceded by a short upstream reading frame that affects the choice of the start codon within the main coding sequence. To achieve isotype-specific expression and detection we replaced this feature with an optimized Kozak initiation site and supplied an N-terminal HA-tag. This allowed exclusive production of p42 without generation of additional p30 protein (Fig. 1A). In transient luciferase assays, transactivation capacity of the modified p42 was retained while, as expected, p30 was largely transcriptionally inactive in this setting (supplementary Fig. 1A). Preliminary experiments showed that we could not achieve stable expression of p42 in hematopoietic precursors due to strong induction of terminal differentiation. Therefore, we additionally modified the constructs with a C-terminal FKBP degron moiety to enable a “stealth” approach (Fig. 1B). In the presence of the small molecule dTAG13, FKBP modified proteins are dimerized with and degraded by the endogenous E3-ubiquitin ligase cereblon. Target cells grown in dTAG13 can be retrovirally transduced with the respective construct and protein expression is initiated after release from degradation by removing the dimerizer. We also noticed that p42 is selectively cleaved by myeloid granule proteases (predominantly by cathepsinG) after cell lysis (supplementary Fig. 1B). As we have described before for HoxA9 and Meis1 [23, 24] that are similarly sensitive to granule proteases, this precludes efficient chromatin immunoprecipitation. Therefore all experiments were done in cells harvested from mice with a triple knockout of elastase, proteinase 3, and cathepsinG (Elane, Prtn3, Ctsg triple k.o.) [14]. As these animals have no hematological abnormalities, there is no indication that this gene deficiency affects normal blood development.
Induction of p42 expression in primary hematopoietic cells pre-immortalized with HoxA9 induced strong morphological differentiation. This was accompanied by growth arrest and downregulation of Myc as well as induction of the differentiation sentinel gene Ngp coding for neutrophilic granule protein (Fig. 1C). In a similar setting, p30 was mostly inactive (supplementary Fig. 1C) with only a minor induction of myeloid maturation still observed after expression of p30. To conduct the following experiments independently in two different cell types, we introduced the p42-FKBP/p30-FKBP constructs also in protease-negative HSPCs pre-immortalized with a MLLENL oncogene (supplementary Fig. 1D).
p42 and p30 colocalize on chromatin
Genome wide binding sites specific for p42 and p30 were determined by ChIP with anti-HA antibodies 24 h after release of C/ebpα production. Additionally ChIP for endogenous C/ebpα with an antibody recognizing both isoforms was done in immortalized parental cells before transduction with p42-FKBP or p30-FKBP (Fig. 2A). All binding profiles were highly superimposable for all binding events observed (Fig. 2B). Across the genome, p42 occupied 33067 sites in HoxA9- and 53098 sites in MLLENL cells that were congruent with p30 and total-C/ebpα peaks (Fig. 2C). A global analysis revealed a remarkable correlation between p42 occupation density and endogenous C/ebpα as well as with p30 binding. Spearman correlation coefficients of p42/p30 pairs reached 0.91 in HoxA9 and 0.85 in MLLENL cells respectively. Values in this range are usually seen only for direct technical replicates, indicating that p42 and p30 bind to identical sites on chromatin. We could also confirm colocalization of p42/p30 with HoxA9 (supplementary Fig. 2A). Finally, we verified the known dimerization of p42 and p30 by bidirectional co-immunoprecipitation as biochemical correlate for the colocalization on chromatin (supplementary Fig. 2B).
p42 and p30 induce a similar transcriptional program
Next, we wanted to investigate how individual isoforms affect gene expression. As transcription factors primarily affect transcription rates while total RNA amounts are subject to additional controls, we applied nascent RNA sequencing to determine p42 and p30 targets (Fig. 3A). For this purpose p42 and p30 were induced in HoxA9 and MLLENL cells and nascent RNA was isolated before (0 h) as well as 16 h and 24 h after dTAG13-release. Plotting log2-fold changes for both isoforms revealed an overall similar gene regulatory pattern for both isoforms, with the exception of a small group of genes that showed a selective response either to p42 or p30 (supplementary table 1, supplementary Fig. 3). For further analysis we intersected the gene expression programs of HoxA9 and MLLENL cells and selected common differentially regulated genes with a difference of log2-fold change for p42 versus p30 of 0.75 and greater (for a graphical explanation see Fig. 3B). Plotting these genes according to their averaged expression across the two cell systems in response to p42/p30 identified a small group of outliers preferentially under control of p42 (Fig. 3C). Amongst those, two genes Egr1 and Trib1 stood out because of their known involvement in leukemia. In humans the EGR1 (early growth response) gene coding for a transcription factor, is located at 5q right in the center of the genomic region that is deleted in 5q- MDS and AML [25]. In contrast, TRIB1 (tribbles1) acts as an oncogene and encodes a protein that has been shown to negatively feedback on C/ebpα [26]. Screening public databases (www.bioportal.org) confirmed our results, as both genes were significantly underrepresented in AML with CEBPA mutations compared to cases with a CEBPA wt configuration (Fig. 3C, inset). Interestingly, in contrast to TRIB1, EGR1 transcripts were also underrepresented in a considerable number of CEBPA wt cases suggesting selective pressure in leukemia to suppress EGR1 but to retain TRIB1.
Egr1 is a master regulator of myeloid differentiation
To study the physiological implications of Egr1 expression we devised another degron system (Fig. 4A), because continuous constitutive expression of Egr1 could not be achieved in our myeloid precursors. Indeed, upon release from dTAG13 mediated degradation Egr1 caused growth arrest similar to p42 (Fig. 4B). Genomic binding of Egr1 was observed by ChIP mainly at putative enhancer and promoter regions (example in Fig. 4C). Nascent RNA sequencing of cells after Egr1 induction revealed a gene expression program highly characteristic for myeloid maturation (Fig. 4D). Most notably the cell cycle inhibitor p21 encoded by Cdkn1a was under direct control of Egr1 as well as many other key genes involved in differentiation. Outstanding examples for these were Id2 (inhibitor of DNA binding) and Matk. The Id2 protein displaces E-proteins, which are HSPC-specific bHLH transcription factors from DNA [27]. Matk is a kinase that induces the nuclear lobulation characteristic for granulocytes [28]. In GSEA (gene set enrichment analysis), the Egr1-controlled expression program was highly similar to a prototypical myeloid differentiation signature and inverse to a transformation pattern induced by oncogenic HOXA9/MEIS1 (Fig. 4E).
Trib1 allows control of differentiation by signaling
Trib1 has been extensively characterized because of its transforming properties. It has been shown that Trib1 binds MEK and induces activation of the MAP-kinase Erk1/2 and it is also involved in a feedback loop curbing C/ebpα activity by inducing specific proteasomal degradation of p42 [29, 30]. To investigate the paradoxical finding that a transforming gene is amongst the targets of a clearly differentiation-inducing protein, we created Trib1 expressing HSPC lines (Fig. 5A). In contrast to our experiments with p42 and Egr1, HoxA9 immortalized precursors constitutively expressing Trib1 could be easily produced. Concomitant to published data demonstrating that Trib1 has a short half-live and therefore cannot be detected by conventional immunoblot [31], we could not identify Trib1 expression in western blotting, despite considerable over-expression at the RNA level. We also confirmed that it is possible to directly immortalize HSPCs with Trib1 alone. Retroviral transduction of precursors with Trib1 followed by standard replating assays readily yielded immortalized-cell lines. Although cells transformed by Trib1 served well as biochemical controls, they were phenotypically different from the apparently normal myeloid precursor cell lines created by HoxA9 or MLLENL. While Trib1 cells were morphologically myeloid, they were largely devoid of common myeloid surface markers making their classification difficult (supplementary Fig. 4). Both known activities of Trib1 could be verified. Elevated Trib1 caused increased phosphorylation of Erk1/2 in HoxA9+Trib1 cells and in cells directly transformed by Trib1. A specific reduction of p42 was only observed in the latter cell type (Fig. 5B). Increased Erk1/2 activity resulted in phosphorylation of Myc a central HoxA9 target protein and a known substrate for Erk-kinases. This modification, however, did not cause a change in Myc protein amount or Myc RNA levels. To investigate the impact of Trib1 on differentiation in our cell system, maturation was induced in HoxA9 and HoxA9+Trib1 cells. This was done either by replacing normal cytokines with G-CSF, or by removing the oncogenic stimulus in cells pretransformed with a degradable HoxA9-FKBP through supplementation with dTAG13 (see also next paragraph). RNA was isolated before treatment after 48 h and 24 h after a recovery period where cells were returned to normal growth conditions without G-CSF/dTAG13. Expression of the differentiation sentinel gene Ngp was determined by qPCR thus allowing a quantitative assessment of differentiation (Fig. 5C). Trib1 strongly impeded differentiation in both conditions, confirming its pro-transformation activity. Thus, p42 induces Trib1 to introduce a signaling controlled feedback loop to regulate maturation.
Normal myeloid differentiation intersects downstream of C/ebpα
To further investigate the process of myeloid maturation, we investigated the behavior of HoxA9 immortalized cells during G-CSF/dTAG13 elicited differentiation. Both regimens induced a maturation program generating morphologically normal granulocytes and monocytes/macrophages (Fig. 6A). This was accompanied by growth arrest, downregulation of Myc and induction of Ngp-expression. To examine if this differentiation process is contingent on C/ebpα we followed C/ebpα isoform expression in a time course during treatment (Fig. 6B). Contrary to expectations, both p30 and p42 expression was rapidly extinguished and there was also no significant shift in isoform ratios. Rather, cell cycle inhibitor proteins p21 and p27 of the Cip/Kip-family increased early after removal of HoxA9 but without detectable Tp53 activation. G-CSF effectively bypassed HoxA9 induced transformation. Concomitant with a previous report [32], this was accompanied by a selective upregulation of p27 without affecting p21. These experiments strongly suggest that mechanisms downstream of C/ebpα crucially determine the proliferation/differentiation balance.
Discussion
Here we show evidence that p42 establishes a “latent” differentiation program that is held in check by signaling. This allows C/ebpα to be expressed in normal precursors without inducing premature maturation. The high pro-proliferative signaling environment during early hematopoietic development enhanced by Trib1 mediated kinase activation enables C/ebpα to cooperate with HoxA9 to establish HSPC-specific enhancers without concomitantly pushing the cells into terminal development. Overall, this allows a more precise control of cellular development as would be possible by transcriptional control alone. As our transcriptomics experiments suggest, p30 can functionally replace p42 at most loci. As C/ebpα proteins localize to classical hematopoietic enhancers (in contrast to the artificial situation in luciferase assays) in combination with a multitude of other transcription factors (e.g. HoxA9) it is likely that the remaining transactivation activity of p30 is sufficient to allow normal regulation of most targets except a few that are hypersensitive towards C/ebpα activity. Interestingly, this phenomenon seems to be more frequent and very recently a similar situation has been discovered for the cartilage master regulator Sox9. Reduction of Sox9 protein had very little effect on chromatin accessibility for most bound loci whereas only a few were hypersensitive towards Sox9 concentrations [33]. The remaining activity of p30 would explain why precursor cells are able to survive with p30 only. The observed mutational pattern of C/EBPA in AML creating a functional deletion of p42 while retaining the essential p30 indicates an important role for the loss of function of p42 in cellular transformation. While our results do not exclude a gain of function for the remaining p30, leukemia could well be the consequence of a simple loss of differentiation capacity driven by the absence of p42. This is consistent also with clinical observations as CEBPA biallelic mutant AML has a better prognosis in treatment than CEBPA wt disease [34]. In these cases p21 induced by TP53 activation during chemotherapy would substitute for the loss p42/Egr1 activation and bypass the differentiation block similar to experimentally administered G-CSF. Next to cytotoxic effects, neoadjuvant treatment directly elicits differentiation which gives cells with TP53 mutations an extra survival advantage adding to the dismal prognosis of this type of genetic alteration. Previous reports emphasized the importance of aberrant p30 activity for transformation [12]. Yet, these studies compared steady state wild-type cells that contained both, p42 and p30 to Cebpa mutants with p30 only. Here we manipulate each isoform directly and individually, although with the caveat that this always occurs on top of wt-expression.
Interestingly, HoxA9 did not rely on repression of Cebpa to achieve transformation. Rather, proliferation and differentiation pathways seem to intersect further downstream directly at the level of the cell cycle machinery. This is supported by G-CSF induced production of p27 that bypassed transformation directly and induced a state of forced differentiation even in the continuous presence of the transforming event. Generally, the core cell cycle machinery seems to possess a more extended regulatory potential than anticipated. Beyond its role as cell cycle regulator Cdk6 has a nuclear function as transcription factor [35, 36] and it is, next to Myc, also a central downstream target of HoxA9 [24]. In addition Cdk6 is a direct target of MLL fusion proteins where it is essential for the transformation process [37]. Ccnd1 coding for CyclinD1 is one of the longest known target genes of Myc that is responsible at least in part for the cell cycle promoting activity of this oncogenic transcription factor [38]. Mechanistically, Cdk6/CyclinD1 dimers bind and neutralize p21 protein. In addition, Myc actively suppresses transcription of Cdkn1a, the p21 parental gene (Fig. 6C). Additional cross-connections exist as Cdk6 has been shown to block Egr1 transcription in conjunction with the transcription factor AP1 [39] while active Stat3 in combination with Cdk6 induces Cdkn2a [40] coding for p16/Ink4a, another cell cycle inhibitor. In summary, these findings point to cell cycle regulators as unexpected major players that coordinate differentiation control by C/ebpα and transforming inputs through Hox-proteins to determine cellular fate.
Data availability
Raw NGS reads were submitted to the European Nucleotide Archive under accession number PRJEB62028.
References
Kelly LM, Gilliland DG. Genetics of myeloid leukemias. Annu Rev Genom Hum Genet. 2002;3:179–98.
Pulikkan JA, Tenen DG, Behre G. C/EBPalpha deregulation as a paradigm for leukemogenesis. Leukemia. 2017;31:2279–85.
Collins C, Wang J, Miao H, Bronstein J, Nawer H, Xu T, et al. C/EBPalpha is an essential collaborator in Hoxa9/Meis1-mediated leukemogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2014;111:9899–904.
Radomska HS, Huettner CS, Zhang P, Cheng T, Scadden DT, Tenen DG. CCAAT/enhancer binding protein alpha is a regulatory switch sufficient for induction of granulocytic development from bipotential myeloid progenitors. Mol Cell Biol. 1998;18:4301–14.
Wesolowski R, Kowenz-Leutz E, Zimmermann K, Dorr D, Hofstatter M, Slany RK, et al. Myeloid transformation by MLL-ENL depends strictly on C/EBP. Life Sci Alliance. 2021;4. https://doi.org/10.26508/lsa.202000709.
Lin FT, MacDougald OA, Diehl AM, Lane MD. A 30-kDa alternative translation product of the CCAAT/enhancer binding protein alpha message: transcriptional activator lacking antimitotic activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1993;90:9606–10.
Mueller BU, Pabst T. C/EBPalpha and the pathophysiology of acute myeloid leukemia. Curr Opin Hematol. 2006;13:7–14.
Ohlsson E, Schuster MB, Hasemann M, Porse BT. The multifaceted functions of C/EBPalpha in normal and malignant haematopoiesis. Leukemia. 2016;30:767–75.
Kirstetter P, Schuster MB, Bereshchenko O, Moore S, Dvinge H, Kurz E, et al. Modeling of C/EBPalpha mutant acute myeloid leukemia reveals a common expression signature of committed myeloid leukemia-initiating cells. Cancer Cell. 2008;13:299–310.
Adamo A, Chin P, Keane P, Assi SA, Potluri S, Kellaway SG, et al. Identification and interrogation of the gene regulatory network of CEBPA-double mutant acute myeloid leukemia. Leukemia. 2023;37:102–12.
Heyes E, Schmidt L, Manhart G, Eder T, Proietti L, Grebien F. Identification of gene targets of mutant C/EBPalpha reveals a critical role for MSI2 in CEBPA-mutated AML. Leukemia. 2021;35:2526–38.
Schmidt L, Heyes E, Grebien F. Gain-of-function effects of N-terminal CEBPA mutations in acute myeloid leukemia. Bioessays. 2020;42:e1900178.
Nabet B, Roberts JM, Buckley DL, Paulk J, Dastjerdi S, Yang A, et al. The dTAG system for immediate and target-specific protein degradation. Nat Chem Biol. 2018;14:431–41.
Guyot N, Wartelle J, Malleret L, Todorov AA, Devouassoux G, Pacheco Y, et al. Unopposed cathepsin G, neutrophil elastase, and proteinase 3 cause severe lung damage and emphysema. Am J Pathol. 2014;184:2197–210.
Milne TA, Zhao K, Hess JL. Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) for analysis of histone modifications and chromatin-associated proteins. Methods Mol Biol. 2009;538:409–23.
Garcia-Cuellar MP, Buttner C, Bartenhagen C, Dugas M, Slany RK. Leukemogenic MLL-ENL fusions induce alternative chromatin states to drive a functionally dichotomous group of target genes. Cell Rep. 2016;15:310–22.
Li H, Durbin R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:1754–60.
Robinson JT, Thorvaldsdottir H, Winckler W, Guttman M, Lander ES, Getz G, et al. Integrative genomics viewer. Nat Biotechnol. 2011;29:24–26.
Heinz S, Benner C, Spann N, Bertolino E, Lin YC, Laslo P, et al. Simple combinations of lineage-determining transcription factors prime cis-regulatory elements required for macrophage and B cell identities. Mol Cell. 2010;38:576–89.
Ramirez F, Ryan DP, Gruning B, Bhardwaj V, Kilpert F, Richter AS, et al. deepTools2: a next generation web server for deep-sequencing data analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44:W160–165.
Dobin A, Davis CA, Schlesinger F, Drenkow J, Zaleski C, Jha S, et al. STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics. 2013;29:15–21.
Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, Fennell T, Ruan J, Homer N, et al. The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:2078–9.
Garcia-Cuellar MP, Prinz A, Slany RK. Meis1 supports leukemogenesis through stimulation of ribosomal biogenesis and Myc. Haematologica. 2022;107:2601–16.
Zhong X, Prinz A, Steger J, Garcia-Cuellar MP, Radsak M, Bentaher A, et al. HoxA9 transforms murine myeloid cells by a feedback loop driving expression of key oncogenes and cell cycle control genes. Blood Adv. 2018;2:3137–48.
Royer-Pokora B, Trost D, Muller N, Hildebrandt B, Germing U, Beier M. Delineation by molecular cytogenetics of 5q deletion breakpoints in myelodyplastic syndromes and acute myeloid leukemia. Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 2006;167:66–69.
Liang KL, Rishi L, Keeshan K. Tribbles in acute leukemia. Blood. 2013;121:4265–70.
Ghisi M, Kats L, Masson F, Li J, Kratina T, Vidacs E, et al. Id2 and E proteins orchestrate the initiation and maintenance of MLL-rearranged acute myeloid leukemia. Cancer Cell. 2016;30:59–74.
Nakayama Y, Yamaguchi N. Multi-lobulation of the nucleus in prolonged S phase by nuclear expression of Chk tyrosine kinase. Exp Cell Res. 2005;304:570–81.
Dedhia PH, Keeshan K, Uljon S, Xu L, Vega ME, Shestova O, et al. Differential ability of Tribbles family members to promote degradation of C/EBPalpha and induce acute myelogenous leukemia. Blood. 2010;116:1321–8.
Yokoyama T, Kanno Y, Yamazaki Y, Takahara T, Miyata S, Nakamura T. Trib1 links the MEK1/ERK pathway in myeloid leukemogenesis. Blood. 2010;116:2768–75.
Soubeyrand S, Martinuk A, Lau P, McPherson R. TRIB1 is regulated post-transcriptionally by proteasomal and non-proteasomal pathways. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e0152346.
de Koning JP, Soede-Bobok AA, Ward AC, Schelen AM, Antonissen C, van Leeuwen D, et al. STAT3-mediated differentiation and survival and of myeloid cells in response to granulocyte colony-stimulating factor: role for the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p27(Kip1). Oncogene. 2000;19:3290–8.
Naqvi S, Kim S, Hoskens H, Matthews HS, Spritz RA, Klein OD, et al. Precise modulation of transcription factor levels identifies features underlying dosage sensitivity. Nat Genet. 2023;55:841–51.
Tarlock K, Lamble AJ, Wang YC, Gerbing RB, Ries RE, Loken MR, et al. CEBPA-bZip mutations are associated with favorable prognosis in de novo AML: a report from the Children’s Oncology Group. Blood. 2021;138:1137–47.
Nebenfuehr S, Kollmann K, Sexl V. The role of CDK6 in cancer. Int J Cancer. 2020;147:2988–95.
Tigan AS, Bellutti F, Kollmann K, Tebb G, Sexl V. CDK6-a review of the past and a glimpse into the future: from cell-cycle control to transcriptional regulation. Oncogene. 2016;35:3083–91.
Placke T, Faber K, Nonami A, Putwain SL, Salih HR, Heidel FH, et al. Requirement for CDK6 in MLL-rearranged acute myeloid leukemia. Blood. 2014;124:13–23.
Daksis JI, Lu RY, Facchini LM, Marhin WW, Penn LJ. Myc induces cyclin D1 expression in the absence of de novo protein synthesis and links mitogen-stimulated signal transduction to the cell cycle. Oncogene. 1994;9:3635–45.
Scheicher R, Hoelbl-Kovacic A, Bellutti F, Tigan AS, Prchal-Murphy M, Heller G, et al. CDK6 as a key regulator of hematopoietic and leukemic stem cell activation. Blood. 2015;125:90–101.
Kollmann K, Heller G, Schneckenleithner C, Warsch W, Scheicher R, Ott RG, et al. A kinase-independent function of CDK6 links the cell cycle to tumor angiogenesis. Cancer Cell. 2013;24:167–81.
Acknowledgments
We thank Renate Zimmermann for technical assistance. This work was supported by research funding from Deutsche Krebshilfe grant 70114166 and in part by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft grant SL27/9-2 both awarded to RKS.
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
MPGC, SA, and RKS performed and analyzed experiments. RKS performed NGS data analysis, conceived and supervised experiments, RKS wrote the manuscript. All authors read and discussed the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Garcia-Cuellar, MP., Akan, S. & Slany, R.K. A C/ebpα isoform specific differentiation program in immortalized myelocytes. Leukemia 37, 1850–1859 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41375-023-01989-8
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41375-023-01989-8
- Springer Nature Limited