Abstract
Because of the low mutational burden and consequently, fewer potential neoantigens, children with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) are thought to have a T cell-depleted or ‘cold’ tumor microenvironment and may have a low likelihood of response to T cell-directed immunotherapies. Understanding the composition, phenotype, and spatial organization of T cells and other microenvironmental populations in the pediatric AML bone marrow (BM) is essential for informing future immunotherapeutic trials about targetable immune-evasion mechanisms specific to pediatric AML. Here, we conducted a multidimensional analysis of the tumor immune microenvironment in pediatric AML and non-leukemic controls. We demonstrated that nearly one-third of pediatric AML cases has an immune-infiltrated BM, which is characterized by a decreased ratio of M2- to M1-like macrophages. Furthermore, we detected the presence of large T cell networks, both with and without colocalizing B cells, in the BM and dissected the cellular composition of T- and B cell-rich aggregates using spatial transcriptomics. These analyses revealed that these aggregates are hotspots of CD8+ T cells, memory B cells, plasma cells and/or plasmablasts, and M1-like macrophages. Collectively, our study provides a multidimensional characterization of the BM immune microenvironment in pediatric AML and indicates starting points for further investigations into immunomodulatory mechanisms in this devastating disease.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
The abundance and phenotype of intratumoral T cells are crucial for the effectiveness of T cell-directed immunotherapies such as immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and bispecific T cell-engagers [1,2,3,4]. Because of the low mutational burden and consequently, fewer potential neoantigens, children with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) are thought to have a T cell-depleted or ‘cold’ tumor microenvironment and therefore may have a low likelihood of response to ICIs and bispecific T cell-engagers [5,6,7,8]. Although clinical trials in adult AML patients treated with ICIs and bispecific T cell-engagers, whether as mono- or combination therapy, have largely been unsuccessful, a small subset of patients showed exceptional responses [4, 9,10,11,12,13,14,15]. This suggests that there may be specific subgroups that could benefit from these T cell-directed immunotherapies. To pave the way for successful ICI- and bispecific T cell-engager immunotherapies in both adult and pediatric AML, a better understanding of the heterogenous landscape of bone marrow (BM)-infiltrating T cells and the surrounding tumor microenvironment is needed. While recent studies have provided insights on this matter in adult AML, such as the identification of a relatively low presence of exhausted CD8+ T cells in the tumor microenvironment compared to cancers that respond well to ICIs [16, 17], there is a paucity of data on the BM immune microenvironment in pediatric AML [11, 18,19,20]. In addition to the need for a quantitative and qualitative assessment of the pediatric AML BM immune microenvironment, emerging research in solid cancers has shown that the spatial organization of the immune response is highly relevant for ICI efficacy [21]. For instance, ‘excluded’ tumors, where the immune response cannot invade the tumor bed, show poor responses to ICI [22]. Furthermore, the presence of intratumoral immune aggregates, such as tertiary lymphoid structures (TLSs), is associated with improved ICI responses in many solid cancers [23,24,25,26,27,28]. Despite its potential importance, the spatial organization of the immune response in hematological cancers remains understudied. Therefore, we generated a multidimensional view of the tumor immune microenvironment in treatment-naïve de novo pediatric AML, to inform future immunotherapeutic trials about potentially targetable immune-evasion mechanisms specific to this patient population. We identified distinct BM immune phenotypes and dissected the composition of immune aggregates in the BM of pediatric AML, which encourage further investigations into immunomodulatory mechanisms in this devastating disease.
Materials/subjects and methods
Ethical regulation
This study complies with all relevant ethical regulations and was approved by the Institutional Review Boards of the Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology (PMCLAB2021.207 & PMCLAB2021.238), the Scientific Committee of the Dutch Nationwide Pathology Databank (PALGA: lzv2021-82) [29] and at participating sites of the ETCTN/CTEP 10026 study [12, 13]. All patients treated at the Princess Máxima Center, Aarhus University Hospital, and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute provided written consent for banking and research use of these specimens, according to the Declaration of Helsinki.
Human patient samples
Formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded (FFPE) BM biopsies taken from the crista of children with treatment-naïve de novo AML and non-leukemic controls (Supplementary Methods) were obtained from the Princess Máxima Center Biobank (n = 15), biobanks of 10 other Dutch hospitals (n = 28; mediated by the Dutch National Tissue Portal) and the biobank of Aarhus University Hospital (n = 29). BM biopsies of adult AML cases treated on the ETCTN/CTEP 10026 study (n = 6) were collected at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute [13, 17]. Details on other pediatric AML datasets, immunohistochemistry/immunofluorescence, digital image analysis, immune-related gene expression profiling, and spatial transcriptomics are provided in the Supplementary Methods.
Statistical analyses
Statistical analyses were performed with GraphPad Prism V.9.3.0 (GraphPad Software, LA Jolla, CA, USA). Details on the various statistical tests used are provided in the Supplementary Methods. For spatial transcriptomics data, P < 0.01 was considered statistically significant to correct for measuring multiple regions from the same biopsy. For all other comparisons, P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
A subset of pediatric AML patients has high T cell infiltration in the bone marrow
To determine whether the BM microenvironment in pediatric AML is characterized by high (‘hot’) or low (‘cold’) T cell infiltration, we performed immunohistochemistry (IHC) with antibodies against CD3 and CD8 on 82 FFPE BM biopsies from pediatric patients with treatment-naïve de novo AML (n = 72), and age- and sex-matched non-leukemic individuals (n = 10; Fig. 1A; representative images shown in Fig. 1B, C; collectively referred to as ‘primary study cohort’). Patient characteristics are depicted in Table S1. We found a trend towards a decreased abundance of the number of T cells and a significant decrease in CD8+ T cells in pediatric AML cases in comparison to non-leukemic controls (P = 0.11 and P = 0.011, respectively; Fig. 1D, E), similar to other observations in adult and pediatric AML [20, 30, 31]. The T- and CD8+ T cell infiltration ranged from 55 to 9832 cells/mm2 between individual pediatric AML cases, with a subset showing high T- and CD8+ T cell infiltration in the BM (above median of non-leukemic controls; n = 22 and n = 18, respectively; Fig. 1D, E).
We next explored whether this heterogeneity in T cell infiltration reflected inherent differences in disease biology. Notably, eleven out of nineteen patients with KMT2A-rearranged AML (58%) and five out of eight patients with complex karyotype AML (63%) had high BM T cell infiltration (Fig. 1F). However, substantial heterogeneity in T cell infiltration was also present within both the KMT2A-rearranged and complex karyotype AML groups (Fig. 1F, G). Thus, both high and low levels of BM T cell infiltration were noted among KMT2A-rearranged and complex karyotype AML patients. Most cases in the other cytogenetic subgroups had low overall T- and CD8+ T cell infiltration (Fig. 1F, G). Specifically, twelve out of thirteen cases (92%) with normal karyotype AML had low total T- and CD8+ T cell infiltration. Among these thirteen cases, nine (69%) had both low T cell infiltration and a FLT3-ITD and/or NPM1 mutation (Table S1), which have been associated with low T- and NK cell infiltration in adult AML [32]. Using diagnostic flow cytometry data of an independent cohort of 20 pediatric cases with normal karyotype AML (n = 12 wildtype, n = 8 FLT3-ITD and/or NPM1 mutation), we confirmed this association (P = 0.013; Fig. S1A).
Given the relatively small number of samples in some cytogenetic subgroups, we also reanalyzed a large bulk RNA-sequencing dataset of treatment-naïve pediatric AML BM aspirates (TARGET-AML cohort, n = 159 patients; Fig. 1H) [33]. Using the immune deconvolution tool CIBERSORTx [17, 34, 35], we estimated the absolute abundance scores of T- and CD8+ T cells, which ranged from 0.15 to 5.15 and 0 to 1.43, respectively (Fig. 1H-J). We categorized patients into overall T- and CD8+ T cell-high and -low groups based on the median estimated BM T- and CD8+ T cell abundance in four non-leukemic pediatric controls (BM bulk RNA-sequencing data [36]). The TARGET-AML cohort showed substantial heterogeneity in overall T- and CD8+ T cell levels across all cytogenetic subgroups, with only nine out of 27 KMT2A-rearranged AML cases (33%) having high T cell infiltration (Fig. 1I, J). Consequently, we hypothesized that specific KMT2A-rearrangements may be associated with different levels of T cell infiltration in the BM. We therefore compared the levels of T- and CD8+ T cells among cases with KMT2A-rearrangements with at least three samples per group (TARGET-AML cohort). This analysis suggested a lower abundance of CD8+ T cells in KMT2A::ELL AML compared to KMT2A::MLLT3 AML (P = 0.044; Fig. S1B, C), although the small sample size precluded firm conclusions. Among cases with complex karyotype AML, thirteen out of 24 cases (54%) had high T cell infiltration (Fig. 1I). However, we were not able to identify any commonalities between those with high or low T cell infiltration. Other clinical factors including the abundance of leukemic blasts and AML differentiation stage showed no or only marginal correlation with T- and CD8+ T cell infiltration (Fig. S1D–K).
To further characterize the immune profiles of pediatric AML cases with a high abundance of T cells in the BM, we categorized AML cases in the primary study cohort into two groups using the non-leukemic controls’ median CD3+ T cell abundance as the cut-off value (1133 cells/mm2; Fig. 2A). Focused IHC analyses of CD20 expression showed that patients in the CD3+ T cell-high group also had a significantly higher abundance of CD20+ B cells in comparison to the CD3+ T cell-low group (P < 0.001; Fig. 2B). Accordingly, we termed the two groups ‘immune-infiltrated’ and ‘immune-depleted’ (n = 22 and n = 50, respectively). We subsequently investigated whether these groups demonstrated differences in clinical outcomes upon standard chemotherapy treatment (Supplementary Methods), as seen in many other cancer types [1]. In our cohort, we did not detect differences in overall survival (OS) between the immune-infiltrated and immune-depleted group (Fig. S2A). To increase statistical power, we repeated the analysis in the TARGET-AML cohort. Again, we did not detect differences in OS between the immune-infiltrated (CD3+ T cell-high, n = 66) and immune-depleted (CD3+ T cell-low, n = 93) groups (Fig. S2B), together suggesting that the extent of T cell infiltration in the BM at diagnosis is not critical for patient survival in pediatric AML cases treated with standard chemotherapy regimens. Taken together, we identified wide heterogeneity in T cell infiltration in the BM of pediatric AML with nearly one-third of cases (31%) showing notably high T cell infiltration. In addition, our findings suggest that specific genetic alterations may be linked to the extent of T cell infiltration in the BM of pediatric AML, although the exact underlying mechanisms remain to be unraveled [37, 38].
The ratio of M2- to M1-like macrophages is linked to the extent of T cell infiltration in the pediatric AML bone marrow
To elucidate mechanisms driving high- and low immune infiltration in the BM of pediatric AML, we examined the expression of immune-related genes in a cytogenetically representative subset of immune-infiltrated (n = 6) and immune-depleted cases (n = 17) using the NanoString PanCancer IO 360TM panel (Fig. 2A). Using differential gene expression analysis, we identified genes related to T- and/or NK cells to be significantly upregulated in immune-infiltrated compared to immune-depleted pediatric AML (Fig. 2C), confirming our categorization of cases into these two groups. Regarding factors that either promote or restrict T cell infiltration, we found that immune-infiltrated cases demonstrated significantly higher expression of genes related to T cell-attracting chemokines (CXCL9, CXCL10), and their corresponding receptor (CXCR3; Fig. 2C). In line with this, pathway analysis using the GO biological processes and WikiPathways gene sets indicated that immune-infiltrated cases were enriched in T cell migration and chemokine signaling, suggesting that immune-depleted cases lack signals that attract T cells to the BM (Fig. 2D; full list of pathways in Table S2). In solid cancers, macrophages have been described as key players in attracting T cells [39]. Specifically, pro-inflammatory M1-like macrophages are known to be a primary source of T cell-attracting chemokines, while anti-inflammatory M2-like macrophages restrict T cell infiltration into the tumor [39, 40]. Previously, a gene expression-based score that reflects the ratio between M2- and M1-like macrophages (a score > 0 indicates M2-predominance, while a score < 0 indicates M1-predominance; collectively termed M2-predominance score) has been developed for five cancer types including AML [41]. We applied this score to our cohort and found that the M2-predominance score was negatively correlated with the BM T- and CD8+ T cell abundance (r = –0.75 [95% CI: –0.89 to –0.48], P < 0.001; r = –0.50 [95% CI: –0.76 to –0.12], P = 0.014, respectively; Fig. 2E, F and Fig. S2C). Concordantly, we identified a significantly decreased M2-predominance score in immune-infiltrated compared to immune-depleted cases (P = 0.001; Fig. 2G). Likewise, in the TARGET-AML cohort, we detected a (subtle) negative correlation between the M2-predominance score and the T- and CD8+ T cell abundance in the BM (r = –0.25 [95% CI: –0.39 to –0.10], P = 0.002; r = –0.20 [95% CI: –0.35 to –0.05], P = 0.011, respectively; Fig. 2H and Fig. S2D), and a significantly decreased M2-predominance score in the immune-infiltrated compared to the immune-depleted group (P < 0.001.; Fig. 2I). Altogether, our data suggest that the M2-:M1-like macrophage ratio is linked to the extent of T cell infiltration in the BM of pediatric AML, in line with data from (preclinical) studies in other cancers [39, 41].
T cells cluster into aggregates in the bone marrow of pediatric AML
Several studies in solid cancers have identified the presence of immune aggregates in the tumor microenvironment, such as T- and B cell-rich structures resembling secondary lymphoid organs (TLSs) and T cell-rich structures lacking B cells [23,24,25, 42, 43]. These aggregates may represent sites of priming or re-activation of anti-tumor immune responses and have been associated with better responses to ICIs in many cancer types [23,24,25,26,27,28, 44, 45]. As TLSs and other immune aggregates often develop at sites of chronic inflammation [23,24,25], we next asked whether similar structures were present in the BM of immune-infiltrated pediatric AML cases. Accordingly, we first investigated the number of T cell networks in pediatric immune-infiltrated (n = 22), immune-depleted (n = 50), and non-leukemic BM biopsies (n = 10). In this analysis, T cell networks were defined as at least ten directly interacting T cells (≤10 μm between adjacent nuclei), to avoid classifying randomly dispersed T cells as networks (Fig. 3A) [43]. We found that T cell networks were present in both AML groups and controls, although they were significantly more frequent in the BM of immune-infiltrated compared to immune-depleted cases (P < 0.001; Fig. 3B and Table S1; representative image of a T cell network shown in Fig. 3C). Moreover, controls had significantly more T cell networks in comparison to immune-depleted cases (P = 0.027; Fig. 3B; representative images of immune-depleted biopsies shown in Fig. S3A, B).
In addition, we identified large T cell networks, defined as at least 100 directly interacting T cells (Fig. 3D), to be more abundant in the BM of immune-infiltrated compared to immune-depleted cases (P < 0.001; Fig. 3E; representative image shown in Fig. 3F). KMT2A-rearranged (9/17 cases; 53%) and complex karyotype AML (3/17 cases; 18%) were the most common cytogenetic subgroups among cases with large T cell networks (n = 17 in total; Table S1). These large networks often colocalized with a dense network of B cells in immune-infiltrated cases (termed ‘lymphoid aggregates’; LAs; Fig. 3G; 9/15 cases; 60%); representative images shown in Fig. 3H–I, Fig. S3C, D; 0/2 immune-depleted cases. However, the LAs identified in pediatric AML patients were not organized in a fashion seen in mature TLSs with an inner zone of B cells surrounded by T cells [23,24,25]. Instead, T- and B cells appeared to be mixed throughout the aggregate, as seen in immature TLSs and other immune aggregates (representative images shown in Fig. 3H–I and Fig. S3C, D) [25, 42]. In the BM of non-leukemic control biopsies, we did not identify LAs or large T cell-dominant networks with no or sparse B cells (representative image shown in Fig. S3E). Taken together, these data show that large networks of T cells, both with and without colocalizing B cells, are frequent in the BM of treatment-naïve immune-infiltrated pediatric AML cases.
Given that TLSs and other immune aggregates may function as sites of intratumoral immune priming that can lead to successful anti-tumor immunity in solid cancers [23,24,25,26,27,28, 44,45,46,47], they may also serve as markers of leukemia-specific immune responses in hematological malignancies. Consequently, we performed pilot work to explore whether responses to immune checkpoint inhibitors were associated with the presence of LAs and/or large T cell-dominant networks in the AML BM. As data from pediatric AML cases treated with such therapies were not available, we applied multiplex immunofluorescence to pre- and post-treatment BM biopsies of transplant-naïve and post-transplant adult AML cases (three responders and three non-responders) treated with both ipilimumab and decitabine in the context of a clinical trial (NCT02890329 [13, 17]; Fig. S4A). Accordingly, BM biopsies collected at baseline, time of best response, and end of treatment were stained with antibodies against CD3, CD20, and CD34 (n = 17 in total; representative images of LAs and large T cell-dominant networks are shown in Fig. S4B–D; patient characteristics are depicted in Table S3). LAs were only observed in responders (response definitions in Supplementary Methods), although their time of appearance differed (Fig. S4E–J). Large T cell-dominant networks were present in two responders at baseline and at time of best response (AML1002 + AML1006; Fig. S4E,G). Among non-responders, one patient had large T cell-dominant networks at baseline (AML1010; Fig. S4I). Like pediatric AML, T- and B cells in lymphoid aggregates were not organized in distinct zones (Fig. S4B, C). Thus, in this exploratory analysis, we found that large T cell-dominant networks were present both at baseline and at time of best response in two out of three responders, whereas LAs were present in all three responders but at different time points. Although the patient heterogeneity and small cohort size preclude conclusions regarding the predictive utility of LAs and T cell-dominant networks, our preliminary findings encourage future investigations into the association between immune aggregates and ICI response in both adult and pediatric AML, as done in solid cancers [26,27,28, 44].
Spatial transcriptomics unravels the composition of lymphoid aggregates in the bone marrow of pediatric AML
The identification of LAs prompted us to explore whether the profiles of these aggregates shared similarities with TLSs in solid cancers (i.e. several T cell subsets, germinal center B cells, plasma cells, dendritic cells) [23,24,25]. To accurately identify TLSs, several transcriptomic signatures have been proposed [25]: a 12-gene chemokine signature [48] (‘12chem’; reflective of TLSs independent of their maturation stage), an 8-gene follicular helper T cell signature [49] (‘Tfh’; reflective of mature TLSs), and a 29-gene TLS imprint signature [27] (reflective of mature TLSs). We aimed to examine the expression of these signatures in both LA and BM regions without such aggregates. Towards this aim, we performed spatial transcriptomics using the GeoMx spatial transcriptomics platform [50] on eight BM biopsies: four immune-infiltrated AML biopsies with LAs, and four reference biopsies (two immune-infiltrated AML biopsies without LAs and two non-leukemic control biopsies; patient characteristics are depicted in Table S1). Regions of interest (ROIs) included areas with LAs, ‘mixed’ areas containing leukemic cells and various other populations, and ‘control’ areas in the non-leukemic BM (region types are illustrated in Fig. 4A–C; representative images of ROI selection are shown in Fig. S5A). In total, we successfully sequenced 143 regions with an average of 335 cells per region (range: 126 to 826 cells): 35 LA regions, 92 mixed regions, and 16 control regions. Our analysis revealed two main clusters of regions in the UMAP: cluster 1 contained both regions with LAs and mixed regions from biopsies with LAs, while cluster 2 consisted of mixed regions from biopsies without these aggregates, and control regions (Fig. 4D). Consequently, we divided mixed regions in two distinct groups: areas from biopsies with LAs (MIXED1, N = 48), and those from biopsies without such aggregates (MIXED2, N = 44). All three TLS-specific gene signatures were significantly enriched in LA regions in comparison to both mixed- and control regions (Fig. 4E, F and S5B). Thus, while the identified LAs lacked the typical organization of mature TLS, we did identify enrichment of the Tfh- and TLS imprint signatures representative of mature TLSs.
To gain insight into differences in immune and stromal cell types between LA and other BM regions, we performed immune deconvolution by integrating spatial transcriptomic data with single-cell (sc) and flow-sorted bulk RNA-sequencing data of microenvironmental cell populations [51]. This analysis revealed that LA regions had an increased abundance of CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, non-plasma B cells, plasma cells, and macrophages (Fig. 4G–K). In both LA and MIXED1-regions, the CD4+:CD8+ T cell ratio was lower compared to MIXED2- and control regions (approximately 1:1 in both vs. 2:1 and 3:1, respectively; Fig. S5C), indicating a relatively higher abundance of CD8+ T cells in the former regions. When considering macrophage polarization, we noted a significantly lower M2-predominance score in LA regions compared to both mixed regions, consistent with the negative correlation between M2-predominance and BM T cell infiltration observed above (Figs. 4L, 2F). Moreover, endothelial cells and fibroblasts were enriched in LA regions compared to MIXED1-regions (Fig. S5D, E). Additionally, NK- and dendritic cells were distributed evenly across AML biopsies, while MIXED2 regions had a significantly higher abundance of neutrophils compared to both LA and MIXED1-regions (Fig. S5F–H). To confirm our deconvolution results, we performed differential gene expression analysis between LA, mixed, and control regions. In LA regions compared to non-aggregate regions within the same biopsies (MIXED1), we found upregulation of many T- and B cell genes (e.g., CD3D, CD8B, CD79A), as well as genes associated with TLS formation in solid cancers (LTB, CCL19) and B cell recruitment (CXCL13; Fig. S6A). Furthermore, immunoglobulin-related genes (IGHG1, IGHG3, IGHG4, IGKC) were significantly enriched in LA compared to MIXED1-regions, consistent with an increased abundance of plasma and/or memory B cells (Fig. S6A). Similar results were observed when comparing LA regions with MIXED2- and control regions (Table S4).
Given the combination of a lack of distinct T- and B cell zones and an increased estimated abundance of plasma cells in these LAs, we next sought to perform a more in-depth characterization of the B cells in these regions. To do so, we again applied immune deconvolution by integrating our spatial transcriptomic data with another scRNA-sequencing reference dataset (Fig. 5A). In this case, we used a comprehensive scRNA-sequencing dataset of pediatric tonsillar B cells [52], which included naïve B cells, germinal center B cells, plasmablasts, and memory B cells, as a reference. In line with the lack of a follicle-like morphology of LAs, we did not identify germinal center B cells in these regions (Fig. 5B). Similarly, naïve B cells were absent. The most abundant B cells were memory B cells, while a smaller fraction consisted of plasmablasts, together indicating the presence of differentiated B cell subsets in these aggregates (Fig. 5B). Since LA regions showed increased expression of the cytotoxicity-related genes GZMA and GZMK compared to neighboring regions (Fig. S6A), we also aimed to investigate the cytotoxic capacity of CD8+ T cells in these regions. Accordingly, we performed immune deconvolution of our spatial transcriptomic dataset using a scRNA-sequencing dataset of BM CD8+ T cells from adult AML patients [16]. This reference dataset included naïve-, memory-, cytotoxic- (CTL), mucosal-associated invariant T- (MAIT), and ‘dysfunctional’ CD8+ T cells. The CD8+ T cells classified as dysfunctional were characterized by increased expression of multiple immune checkpoint receptor (IR) genes, such as PDCD1, LAG3, and HAVCR2, and reduced expression of cytotoxicity-related genes such as GZMB, GNLY, and PRF1. Notably, deconvolution revealed that these potentially dysfunctional CD8+ T cells were enriched in LA regions compared to mixed- and control regions, at the expense of both naïve- and cytotoxic CD8+ T cells (Fig. 5C, D). Moreover, memory CD8+ T cells were not identified in any of the biopsies. The increased proportion of potentially dysfunctional CD8+ T cells in LA regions prompted us to investigate whether these T cells were truly dysfunctional (i.e. no cytotoxic potential). Accordingly, we examined the expression of the cytotoxicity marker granzyme B (GZMB) in CD8+ T cells that expressed at least two immune checkpoint receptor markers (IR++/+++; PD-1, LAG3, and/or TIM-3) in a subset of the LA-rich biopsies that had been characterized using spatial transcriptomics (n = 2 biopsies with six LAs in total). Using multiplex immunofluorescence with antibodies against CD3, CD8, PD-1, LAG3, TIM-3, and GZMB, in combination with standard IHC for CD20, we identified that 58% (range: 30–100%) of CD3+CD8+IR++/+++ T cells in LAs expressed GZMB (representative images shown in Fig. 5E; Fig. 5F), suggesting that more than half of the potentially dysfunctional CD8+ T cells still had cytotoxic capacity. In addition, since TLS-associated regulatory T cells (Tregs) have been found to attenuate the positive prognostic effect of TLS-associated CD8+ T cells in human non-small cell lung cancer, colorectal cancer, and soft tissue sarcoma [44, 53, 54], we assessed the presence of putative Tregs (CD3+FOXP3+) in LAs in the same subset of biopsies (n = 2). In the six examined LAs, we observed very few Tregs (<1%), suggesting that Tregs are hardly present in LAs in pediatric AML (representative image shown in Fig. S6B; Fig. S6C). Taken together, our integrative spatial analyses demonstrate that LAs in the BM of pediatric AML are specifically enriched for CD8+ T cells, memory B cells, plasma cells and/or plasmablasts, and M1-like macrophages. Despite the lack of germinal center B cells and separate T- and B cell zones, the presence of memory B cells, plasma cells and/or plasmablasts, and immunoglobulin gene expression suggests that LAs in pediatric AML are sites of B cell differentiation. Furthermore, the presence of CD8+ T cells expressing multiple immune checkpoint markers, yet not fully exhausted, within LAs, encourages future investigations into the potential of leveraging these LA-associated T cells for immunotherapeutic efficacy.
Discussion
In this study, we performed a multidimensional assessment of the tumor immune microenvironment in pediatric AML. We demonstrated that nearly one-third of pediatric AML cases has an immune-infiltrated BM, which is characterized by a decreased M2-:M1-like macrophage ratio. Furthermore, we detected the presence of large T cell networks, both with and without colocalizing B cells, in the BM and dissected the cellular composition of T- and B cell-rich aggregates using spatial transcriptomics. These analyses revealed that these LAs are hotspots of CD8+ T cells, memory B cells, plasma cells and/or plasmablasts, and M1-like macrophages. Collectively, our study provides a multidimensional characterization of the BM immune microenvironment in pediatric AML and indicates starting points for further investigations into immunomodulatory mechanisms in this devastating disease.
Understanding the prevalence of distinct immune phenotypes and associated targetable immune-evasion mechanisms in the BM of pediatric AML is key for better prospective selection of patients in future immunotherapy trials [32, 44]. Although we identified a subset with high abundance of T cells, many pediatric AML cases had an immune-depleted BM microenvironment. We observed that FLT3-ITD and/or NPM1 mutations were associated with low T cell infiltration in the BM of pediatric AML, consistent with data in adult AML [32]. Although we did not investigate the direct consequences of these molecular alterations, such as alterations in the expression of immunomodulatory surface molecules [37, 38], we identified M2-like macrophage predominance in immune-depleted cases. The observed negative correlation between the M2-:M1-like macrophage ratio and the extent of T cell infiltration is consistent with data from (preclinical) studies in other cancers, suggesting a role for M2-like macrophages (or a lack of M1-like macrophages) in limiting T cell infiltration to the leukemic BM [39, 40]. Consequently, targeting M2-like macrophages (e.g., using checkpoint blockade) to overcome their immunosuppressive functions could be an attractive therapeutic strategy for immune-depleted AML [55, 56].
In addition, our integrative spatial analyses showed that T cells in the BM can be organized into multicellular aggregates. Although T- and B cell-rich LAs did not contain distinct T- and B cell zones and germinal center B cells typically seen in mature TLSs in solid cancers, the localized enrichment of memory B cells, plasma cells and/or plasmablasts, and immunoglobulin gene expression suggests that these aggregates are sites of B cell maturation. Moreover, the 1:1 ratio of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells observed in LAs has also been associated with mature TLSs [57]. Notably, CD8+ T cells in LAs were found to be in different cell states, including a subset that expressed multiple immune checkpoint markers. GZMB-expression was identified in more than half of these cells, suggesting that these CD8+ T cells are not fully exhausted and may be susceptible to ICI therapy [58]. In addition to T- and B cell-rich immune aggregates, we detected large T cell networks with sparse B cells. Since these networks have also been associated with ICI response in solid cancers, further investigations into the different types of immune aggregates in AML and their relevance for immunotherapy response are needed [42, 45, 59, 60]. For instance, do large T cell-dominant networks relate to LAs, and do they (differentially) associate with ICI efficacy in AML? Since TLS are considered to be sites where tumor-specific T- and B cell immune responses may be generated [23,24,25], future research also needs to investigate whether immune aggregates in AML are tumor-directed.
Altogether, our analyses deepen the understanding of the BM immune microenvironment in AML and provides an impetus to explore how intratumoral immune aggregates could be exploited for improving immunotherapy outcomes. Further, our work provides a framework for leveraging spatial transcriptomics to interrogate the spatial organization of the leukemic BM. Advances in spatial transcriptomic techniques now allow for investigating the spatial dimension of hematological malignancies at subcellular resolution, opening an exciting path towards new discoveries in the field of AML [61, 62].
Data availability
Normalized sequencing data can be accessed from the Gene Expression Omnibus (nCounter data: GSE228481; GeoMx data: GSE248597). Requests for raw sequencing data should be addressed to and will be fulfilled by the corresponding author (OH).
References
Bruni D, Angell HK, Galon J. The immune contexture and Immunoscore in cancer prognosis and therapeutic efficacy. Nat Rev Cancer. 2020;20:662–80.
Havel JJ, Chowell D, Chan TA. The evolving landscape of biomarkers for checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy. Nat Rev Cancer. 2019;19:133–50.
Belmontes B, Sawant DV, Zhong W, Tan H, Kaul A, Aeffner F, et al. Immunotherapy combinations overcome resistance to bispecific T cell engager treatment in T cell-cold solid tumors. Sci Transl Med. 2021;13:eabd1524.
Vadakekolathu J, Rutella S. Escape from T-cell-targeting immunotherapies in acute myeloid leukemia. Blood. 2024;143:2689–700.
Gröbner SN, Worst BC, Weischenfeldt J, Buchhalter I, Kleinheinz K, Rudneva VA, et al. The landscape of genomic alterations across childhood cancers. Nature. 2018;555:321–7.
Majzner RG, Heitzeneder S, Mackall CL. Harnessing the immunotherapy revolution for the treatment of childhood cancers. Cancer Cell. 2017;31:476–85.
Pfister SM, Reyes-Múgica M, Chan JKC, Hasle H, Lazar AJ, Rossi S, et al. A summary of the inaugural WHO classification of pediatric tumors: transitioning from the optical into the molecular era. Cancer Discov. 2022;12:331–55.
Koedijk JB, van der Werf I, Calkoen FG, Nierkens S, Kaspers GJL, Zwaan CM, et al. Paving the way for immunotherapy in pediatric acute myeloid leukemia: current knowledge and the way forward. Cancers (Basel). 2021;13:4364.
Daver N, Garcia-Manero G, Basu S, Boddu PC, Alfayez M, Cortes JE, et al. Efficacy, safety, and biomarkers of response to azacitidine and nivolumab in relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia: a nonrandomized, open-label, phase II study. Cancer Discov. 2019;9:370–83.
Uy GL, Aldoss I, Foster MC, Sayre PH, Wieduwilt MJ, Advani AS, et al. Flotetuzumab as salvage immunotherapy for refractory acute myeloid leukemia. Blood. 2021;137:751–62.
Vadakekolathu J, Minden MD, Hood T, Church SE, Reeder S, Altmann H, et al. Immune landscapes predict chemotherapy resistance and immunotherapy response in acute myeloid leukemia. Sci Transl Med. 2020;12:eaaz0463.
Davids MS, Kim HT, Bachireddy P, Costello C, Liguori R, Savell A, et al. Ipilimumab for patients with relapse after allogeneic transplantation. N Engl J Med. 2016;375:143–53.
Garcia JS, Flamand Y, Penter L, Keng M, Tomlinson BK, Mendez LM, et al. Ipilimumab plus decitabine for patients with MDS or AML in posttransplant or transplant-naïve settings. Blood. 2023;141:1884–8.
Ravandi F, Subklewe M, Walter RB, Vachhani P, Ossenkoppele G, Buecklein V, et al. Safety and tolerability of AMG 330 in adults with relapsed/refractory AML: a phase 1a dose-escalation study. Leuk Lymphoma. 2024:1-11. https://doi.org/10.1080/10428194.2024.2346755 Epub ahead of print.
Zeidner JF, Vincent BG, Ivanova A, Moore D, McKinnon KP, Wilkinson AD, et al. Phase II trial of pembrolizumab after high-dose cytarabine in relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia. Blood Cancer Discov. 2021;2:616–29.
Desai PN, Wang B, Fonseca A, Borges P, Jelloul FZ, Reville PK, et al. Single-cell profiling of CD8+ T cells in acute myeloid leukemia reveals a continuous spectrum of differentiation and clonal hyperexpansion. Cancer Immunol Res. 2023:CIR-22-0961. https://doi.org/10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-22-0961. Epub ahead of print.
Penter L, Liu Y, Wolff JO, Yang L, Taing L, Jhaveri A, et al. Mechanisms of response and resistance to combined decitabine and ipilimumab for advanced myeloid disease. Blood. 2023;141:1817–30.
Bailur JK, McCachren SS, Pendleton K, Vasquez JC, Lim HS, Duffy A, et al. Risk-associated alterations in marrow T cells in pediatric leukemia. JCI Insight. 2020;5:e140179.
Rutella S, Vadakekolathu J, Mazziotta F, Reeder S, Yau TO, Mukhopadhyay R, et al. Immune dysfunction signatures predict outcomes and define checkpoint blockade-unresponsive microenvironments in acute myeloid leukemia. J Clin Invest. 2022;132:e159579.
Lasry A, Nadorp B, Fornerod M, Nicolet D, Wu H, Walker CJ, et al. An inflammatory state remodels the immune microenvironment and improves risk stratification in acute myeloid leukemia. Nat Cancer. 2023;4:27–42.
Galon J, Bruni D. Approaches to treat immune hot, altered and cold tumours with combination immunotherapies. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2019;18:197–218.
Tumeh PC, Harview CL, Yearley JH, Shintaku IP, Taylor EJ, Robert L, et al. PD-1 blockade induces responses by inhibiting adaptive immune resistance. Nature. 2014;515:568–71.
Schumacher TN, Thommen DS. Tertiary lymphoid structures in cancer. Science. 2022;375:eabf9419.
Fridman WH, Meylan M, Petitprez F, Sun CM, Italiano A, Sautès-Fridman C. B cells and tertiary lymphoid structures as determinants of tumour immune contexture and clinical outcome. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2022;19:441–57.
Fridman WH, Meylan M, Pupier G, Calvez A, Hernandez I, Sautès-Fridman C. Tertiary lymphoid structures and B cells: An intratumoral immunity cycle. Immunity. 2023;56:2254–69.
Helmink BA, Reddy SM, Gao J, Zhang S, Basar R, Thakur R, et al. B cells and tertiary lymphoid structures promote immunotherapy response. Nature. 2020;577:549–55.
Meylan M, Petitprez F, Becht E, Bougoüin A, Pupier G, Calvez A, et al. Tertiary lymphoid structures generate and propagate anti-tumor antibody-producing plasma cells in renal cell cancer. Immunity. 2022;55:527–41.e5.
Vanhersecke L, Brunet M, Guégan JP, Rey C, Bougouin A, Cousin S, et al. Mature tertiary lymphoid structures predict immune checkpoint inhibitor efficacy in solid tumors independently of PD-L1 expression. Nat Cancer. 2021;2:794–802.
Casparie M, Tiebosch AT, Burger G, Blauwgeers H, van de Pol A, van Krieken JH, et al. Pathology databanking and biobanking in The Netherlands, a central role for PALGA, the nationwide histopathology and cytopathology data network and archive. Cell Oncol. 2007;29:19–24.
van Galen P, Hovestadt V, Wadsworth Ii MH, Hughes TK, Griffin GK, Battaglia S, et al. Single-cell RNA-Seq reveals AML hierarchies relevant to disease progression and immunity. Cell. 2019;176:1265–81.e24.
Brück O, Dufva O, Hohtari H, Blom S, Turkki R, Ilander M, et al. Immune profiles in acute myeloid leukemia bone marrow associate with patient age, T-cell receptor clonality, and survival. Blood Adv. 2020;4:274–86.
Dufva O, Pölönen P, Brück O, Keränen MAI, Klievink J, Mehtonen J, et al. Immunogenomic landscape of hematological malignancies. Cancer Cell. 2020;38:380–99.e13.
Bolouri H, Farrar JE, Triche T Jr, Ries RE, Lim EL, Alonzo TA, et al. The molecular landscape of pediatric acute myeloid leukemia reveals recurrent structural alterations and age-specific mutational interactions. Nat Med. 2018;24:103–12.
Newman AM, Steen CB, Liu CL, Gentles AJ, Chaudhuri AA, Scherer F, et al. Determining cell type abundance and expression from bulk tissues with digital cytometry. Nat Biotechnol. 2019;37:773–82.
Wang Y, Cai YY, Herold T, Nie RC, Zhang Y, Gale RP, et al. An immune risk score predicts survival of patients with acute myeloid leukemia receiving chemotherapy. Clin Cancer Res. 2021;27:255–66.
Koedijk JB, van Beek TB, Vermeulen MA, Kester LA, Schweighart EK, Nierkens S, et al. Case report: immune dysregulation associated with long-lasting regression of a (pre)leukemic clone. Front Immunol. 2023;14:1280885.
Austin RJ, Straube J, Halder R, Janardhanan Y, Bruedigam C, Witkowski M, et al. Oncogenic drivers dictate immune control of acute myeloid leukemia. Nat Commun. 2023;14:2155.
Straube J, Janardhanan Y, Haldar R, Bywater MJ. Immune control in acute myeloid leukemia. Exp Hematol. 2024:104256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exphem.2024.104256 Epub ahead of print.
House IG, Savas P, Lai J, Chen AXY, Oliver AJ, Teo ZL, et al. Macrophage-Derived CXCL9 and CXCL10 Are Required for Antitumor Immune Responses Following Immune Checkpoint Blockade. Clin Cancer Res. 2020;26:487–504.
Italiani P, Boraschi D. From monocytes to M1/M2 macrophages: phenotypical vs. functional differentiation. Front Immunol. 2014;5:514.
Jiang P, Gu S, Pan D, Fu J, Sahu A, Hu X, et al. Signatures of T cell dysfunction and exclusion predict cancer immunotherapy response. Nat Med. 2018;24:1550–8.
Laumont CM, Nelson BH. B cells in the tumor microenvironment: Multi-faceted organizers, regulators, and effectors of anti-tumor immunity. Cancer Cell. 2023;41:466–89.
Gaglia G, Burger ML, Ritch CC, Rammos D, Dai Y, Crossland GE, et al. Lymphocyte networks are dynamic cellular communities in the immunoregulatory landscape of lung adenocarcinoma. Cancer Cell. 2023;41:871–86.e10.
Italiano A, Bessede A, Pulido M, Bompas E, Piperno-Neumann S, Chevreau C, et al. Pembrolizumab in soft-tissue sarcomas with tertiary lymphoid structures: a phase 2 PEMBROSARC trial cohort. Nat Med. 2022;28:1199–206.
Siddiqui I, Schaeuble K, Chennupati V, Fuertes Marraco SA, Calderon-Copete S, Pais Ferreira D, et al. Intratumoral Tcf1(+)PD-1(+)CD8(+) T cells with stem-like properties promote tumor control in response to vaccination and checkpoint blockade immunotherapy. Immunity. 2019;50:195–211.e10.
Cottrell TR, Thompson ED, Forde PM, Stein JE, Duffield AS, Anagnostou V, et al. Pathologic features of response to neoadjuvant anti-PD-1 in resected non-small-cell lung carcinoma: a proposal for quantitative immune-related pathologic response criteria (irPRC). Ann Oncol. 2018;29:1853–60.
van Dijk N, Gil-Jimenez A, Silina K, Hendricksen K, Smit LA, de Feijter JM, et al. Preoperative ipilimumab plus nivolumab in locoregionally advanced urothelial cancer: the NABUCCO trial. Nat Med. 2020;26:1839–44.
Coppola D, Nebozhyn M, Khalil F, Dai H, Yeatman T, Loboda A, et al. Unique ectopic lymph node-like structures present in human primary colorectal carcinoma are identified by immune gene array profiling. Am J Pathol. 2011;179:37–45.
Gu-Trantien C, Loi S, Garaud S, Equeter C, Libin M, de Wind A, et al. CD4+ follicular helper T cell infiltration predicts breast cancer survival. J Clin Invest. 2013;123:2873–92.
Merritt CR, Ong GT, Church SE, Barker K, Danaher P, Geiss G, et al. Multiplex digital spatial profiling of proteins and RNA in fixed tissue. Nat Biotechnol. 2020;38:586–99.
Danaher P, Kim Y, Nelson B, Griswold M, Yang Z, Piazza E, et al. Advances in mixed cell deconvolution enable quantification of cell types in spatial transcriptomic data. Nat Commun. 2022;13:385.
King HW, Orban N, Riches JC, Clear AJ, Warnes G, Teichmann SA, et al. Single-cell analysis of human B cell maturation predicts how antibody class switching shapes selection dynamics. Sci Immunol. 2021;6:eabe6291.
Devi-Marulkar P, Fastenackels S, Karapentiantz P, Goc J, Germain C, Kaplon H, et al. Regulatory T cells infiltrate the tumor-induced tertiary lymphoïd structures and are associated with poor clinical outcome in NSCLC. Commun Biol. 2022;5:1416.
Schweiger T, Berghoff AS, Glogner C, Glueck O, Rajky O, Traxler D, et al. Tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte subsets and tertiary lymphoid structures in pulmonary metastases from colorectal cancer. Clin Exp Metastasis. 2016;33:727–39.
Brauneck F, Fischer B, Witt M, Muschhammer J, Oelrich J, da Costa Avelar PH, et al. TIGIT blockade repolarizes AML-associated TIGIT(+) M2 macrophages to an M1 phenotype and increases CD47-mediated phagocytosis. J Immunother Cancer. 2022;10:e004794.
Perzolli A, Koedijk JB, Zwaan CM, Heidenreich O. Targeting the innate immune system in pediatric and adult AML. Leukemia. 2024;38:1191–201.
Vaccaro A, Yang F, van de Walle T, Franke S, Lugano R, Dénes A, et al. Cellular and molecular events organizing the assembly of tertiary lymphoid structures in glioblastoma. bioRxiv. 2024:2024.07.04.601824. https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.07.04.601824v1.
Philip M, Schietinger A. CD8(+) T cell differentiation and dysfunction in cancer. Nat Rev Immunol. 2022;22:209–23.
Chen JH, Nieman LT, Spurrell M, Jorgji V, Richieri P, Xu KH, et al. Human lung cancer harbors spatially organized stem-immunity hubs associated with response to immunotherapy. Nat Immunol. 2024;25:644–58.
Jansen CS, Prokhnevska N, Master VA, Sanda MG, Carlisle JW, Bilen MA, et al. An intra-tumoral niche maintains and differentiates stem-like CD8 T cells. Nature. 2019;576:465–70.
He S, Bhatt R, Brown C, Brown EA, Buhr DL, Chantranuvatana K, et al. High-plex imaging of RNA and proteins at subcellular resolution in fixed tissue by spatial molecular imaging. Nat Biotechnol. 2022;40:1794–806.
Janesick A, Shelansky R, Gottscho AD, Wagner F, Williams SR, Rouault M, et al. High resolution mapping of the tumor microenvironment using integrated single-cell, spatial and in situ analysis. Nat Commun. 2023;14:8353.
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank all patients and/or their families for their generous consent for the research use of these samples; the staff of the University Medical Center Utrecht Tissue Facility for their excellent immunohistochemistry service (Domenico Castigliego, Petra van der Weide, Petra van der Kraak, Erica Siera, Karina Timmer, Sven van Kempen), and the team at Utrecht Sequencing Facility for performing the NanoString experiments (nCounter and GeoMx) and for providing assistance with data-analysis (dr. Ies Nijman, Robin Geene, Pim Kloosterman); dr. Thierry van den Bosch, dr. Ravian van Ineveld, Ella de Boed, Nienke van Herk, Thijs van den Broek, Maurice de Haan, and Susanne Gamas Vis provided help with imaging experiments and/or analysis; Dr. Matthew S. Davids for clinical data of patients treated on ETCTN/CTEP 9204; Dr. Ivette Deckers and dr. Annette Gijsbers (PALGA) performed essential work for the acquisition of bone biopsies from other hospitals; prof. dr. Gertjan Kaspers and dr. Bianca Goemans aided with identifying potential patients, the biobank staff (Jantien Woudstra, Marion Koopmans, dr. Edwin Sonneveld) helped to identify patient material, and Arie Maat aided with the sectioning of bone biopsy sections; dr. Caroline Lindemans, members from the Heidenreich group (dr. Katarzyna Szoltysek, dr. Farnaz Barneh, dr. Mauricio Ferrao-Blanco, Elizabeth Schweighart, Nina van der Wilt), the Van Heesch group (dr. Ana Pinheiro-Lopes), and the single-cell sequencing facility (dr. Lindy Visser) at the Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology for carefully reading the manuscript and/or fruitful discussions. Figures have been created using BioRender.com.
Funding
This work has been funded in part by a KIKA (329) program grant to OH. LP was a Scholar of the American Society of Hematology, is participant in the BIH Charité Digital Clinician Scientist Program funded by the DFG, the Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, and the Berlin Institute of Health at Charité (BIH) and is supported by the Max-Eder program of the German Cancer Aid (Deutsche Krebshilfe), by the Else Kröner-Fresenius-Stiftung (2023_EKEA.102), and the DKMS John Hansen Research Grant. JSG is supported by the Conquer Cancer Foundation Career Development Award, Leukemia and Lymphoma Society Translational Research Program Award, and NIH K08CA245209. NCI CTEP provided study drug (Ipilimumab) support. This work was supported by National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute grant P01CA229092 (CJW), UM1CA186709 (Principal Investigator: Geoffrey Shapiro), National Cancer Institute Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and LLS Therapy Accelerator Program. This work was further supported by KIKA (TM) and the CIMAC-CIDC Network. Scientific and financial support for the CIMAC-CIDC Network is provided through National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute Cooperative Agreements U24CA224319 (to the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai CIMAC), U24CA224331 (to the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute CIMAC), U24CA224285 (to the MD Anderson Cancer Center CIMAC), U24CA224309 (to the Stanford University CIMAC), and U24CA224316 (to the CIDC at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute). The CIMAC-CIDC website is found at https://cimac-network.org/.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceptualization: JBK, IW, MAV, SN, MB, CMZ, OH. Methodology: JBK, IW, MAV, MF, SN, MB, CMZ, OH. Data acquisition: JBK, MAV, FB, JIM-E, DEM, TM, HG-K, RM, KBC, BP, KP, HH. Data analysis and interpretation: JBK, IW, LP, FB, AP, JIM-E, DSM, TM, JSG, SJR, CJW, HH. Writing—Original Draft: JBK; Writing—Reviewing & Editing: all authors; Supervision: SN, MB, CMZ, OH.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
JSG reports serving on steering committee and receiving personal fees from AbbVie, Astellas Pharma, Genentech, and Servier and institutional research funds from AbbVie, Genentech, Pfizer, and AstraZeneca. SJR receives research support from Affimed, Merck, Bristol-Myers-Squibb, and is a member of the Scientific Advisory Board for Immunitas Therapeutics. CJW is an equity holder of BioNtech, Inc, receives research support from Pharmacyclics, and is a Scientific Advisory Board member of Repertoire, Aethon Therapeutics, and Adventris. CMZ receives institutional research support from Pfizer, Abbvie, Takeda, Jazz, Kura Oncology, Gilead, and Daiichi Sankyo, provides consultancy services for Kura Oncology, Bristol-Myers-Squibb, Novartis, Gilead, Incyte, Beigene, and Syndax, and serves on advisory committees for Novartis, Sanofi, and Incyte. O.H. receives institutional research support from Syndax and Roche. The remaining authors declare no competing financial interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Koedijk, J.B., van der Werf, I., Penter, L. et al. A multidimensional analysis reveals distinct immune phenotypes and the composition of immune aggregates in pediatric acute myeloid leukemia. Leukemia (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41375-024-02381-w
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41375-024-02381-w
- Springer Nature Limited