Abstract
The prevalence and intensity of marine heatwaves is increasing globally, disrupting local environmental conditions. The individual and population-level impacts of prolonged heatwaves on marine species have recently been demonstrated, yet whole-ecosystem consequences remain unexplored. We leveraged time series abundance data of 361 taxa, grouped into 86 functional groups, from six long-term surveys, diet information from a new diet database, and previous modeling efforts, to build two food web networks using an extension of the popular Ecopath ecosystem modeling framework, Ecotran. We compare ecosystem models parameterized before and after the onset of recent marine heatwaves to evaluate the cascading effects on ecosystem structure and function in the Northeast Pacific Ocean. While the ecosystem-level contribution (prey) and demand (predators) of most functional groups changed following the heatwaves, gelatinous taxa experienced the largest transformations, underscored by the arrival of northward-expanding pyrosomes. We show altered trophic relationships and energy flux have potentially profound consequences for ecosystem structure and function, and raise concerns for populations of threatened and harvested species.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Marine heatwaves (MHWs) are periods of prolonged, unusually warm ocean temperatures that can have significant impacts on marine ecosystems1,2,3,4. In tropical systems, sustained periods of warm water can cause coral bleaching and mass mortality events, which likely affects entire communities that rely on the complex structure and ecosystem functions provided by live coral5. In temperate systems, ocean temperature increases can lead to harmful algal blooms that produce toxins that kill other marine organisms6,7. These algae blooms can also lead to widespread hypoxic events, contributing to recent increases in the occurrence of ecological ‘dead zones’ that affect a wide range of species8. MHWs can alter nutrient cycling and availability in the ocean, which can affect the growth of phytoplankton. These bottom-up processes can alter lower trophic level productivity, which may in turn lead to stress and starvation in top predators, ultimately affecting reproductive success9,10. Cumulative impacts can lead to poleward distribution shifts of many pelagic species11,12,13, resulting in disrupted or novel communities and changes in predator-prey relationships, which likely lead to changes in the overall structure of marine ecosystems as a consequence of MHWs. However, the full ecosystem-scale effects of MHWs have not been estimated within an impacted system to date, leaving substantial uncertainty in the short- and long-term consequences of MHWs on ecosystem structure and function.
The Northern California Current marine ecosystem extends from Vancouver Island, British Columbia, Canada to Cape Mendocino, California, United States. It is a highly productive upwelling marine ecosystem that supports high biomass of marine species, many of which are harvested in economically and socially important fisheries14. Sea surface temperatures in the ecosystem have been anomalously high in recent years, starting with the warm water blob in the winter of 2013-201415,16,17, which was among the largest and most intense MHWs ever recorded1,18,19, and continuing through the present (Fig. 1a). The initial MHW starting in 2013 included temperatures roughly 3 °C above normal (exceeding three standard deviations) and persisted in two prolonged pulses until 201518,19. Re-occurring MHWs, including the so called blob 2.0 in 2019, have since kept much of the North Pacific Ocean in a state of anomalously warm conditions over the past decade, indicating that these novel conditions are perhaps the new normal18,19,20.
These anomalously warm periods have led to documented changes in the abundance and distribution of diverse taxa including gelatinous invertebrates, copepods, krill, squid, fishes and sharks20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27, impacts to important fisheries28, declines in primary productivity29, increased abundance of relatively rare or non-existent Southern visitors (such as the sudden arrival of great abundances of a pelagic tunicate, Pyrosoma atlanticum)24,30,31, and mass mortality events for seabirds and marine mammals10,32. Extreme warming events within the Northern California Current are expected to be exacerbated by climate change in complex and potentially non-linear ways33,34. Yet the ecosystem-wide ramifications of such sudden events are likely to be far greater than the expected changes due to long-term warming alone35.
Here, we compare two end-to-end ecosystem food web models of the Northern California Current representing time periods immediately preceding (1999–2012) and following (2014–2022) the onset of a prolonged period of thermal anomalies (Fig. 1a) marked by at least two well-described marine heatwaves36,37,38 to make inferences about ecosystem-level changes that have occurred since the onset of these recent extreme warming events. We estimate the effects of MHWs on the energy flow between producers and consumers across scales from individual functional groups to the entire food web network. Accounting for energy flux within the entire ecosystem allows us to directly estimate the cascading, ecosystem-wide effects of temperature-induced changes through both direct and indirect food web pathways.
Results and discussion
Leveraging time series abundance data of 361 taxa (grouped into 86 functional groups, see Supplementary Data 1) from six long term surveys, diet information from a new diet database, and previous modeling efforts, we built two food web networks (pre- and post- onset of MHWs, hereafter pre-MHW and MHW) using an extension of the popular Ecopath ecosystem modeling framework (Ecotran36,37,39). Our comparative analysis of these two food web networks shows that lower trophic level biomass and energy pathways experienced greater changes after onset of MHWs than upper trophic levels (Figs. 1, 2), but that the energetic consumption (of lower trophic levels) and energetic contribution (to higher trophic levels) of many functional groups significantly changed between pre-MHW and MHW time periods (Figs. 3, S1–S5). Predators consumed prey both in different absolute quantities and proportions before compared with after the MHWs (Fig. 2).
By directly estimating changes in both biomass and trophic interactions across the entire ecosystem, we find that the largest perturbation to the energy flux of the Northern California Current ecosystem since the onset of multiple marine heatwaves is driven by a dramatic increase in the abundance of pyrosomes, Pyrosoma atlanticum (Fig. 1, Supplementary Data 1). This gelatinous species was essentially absent from the Northern California Current prior to recent MHWs24,30,31,40, and this rapid increase drove substantial changes throughout the food web at low and mid trophic levels as pyrosomes consumed energy that would have been available for other groups (Fig. 1). Species at the base of the food web, such as pteropods, pelagic amphipods, small invertebrate larvae, small mesh-feeding jellies, krill, and sardine all consumed less phytoplankton in the MHW period, which may have contributed to decreases in their abundances. This, in turn, possibly left less forage for the carnivorous and larger jellies, which also declined (Figs. 1, 3).
Further, our models suggest that the majority of this re-directed energy does not flow to higher trophic levels, with >98% of pyrosome biomass ending up in detritus pools (Figs. 1, 2). Although there is evidence that some predators have consumed pyrosomes and other abundant gelatinous taxa during the MHWs41,42, it is not clear what energetic benefits accrue to these predators compared to feeding on crustacean or fish prey. It has long been assumed that gelatinous prey are trophic dead ends, due to their low energy content43, although recent advances in methodology suggest that gelatinous prey might be more important than previously believed44. In the Northern California Current, it appears that pyrosomes are not consumed as readily as jellies36,41,42. This may be because they are more difficult to digest, offer lower energy content, or remain novel to the food web such that predators have not yet responded. Thus, while overall gelatinous biomass in the ecosystem increased, the boom in scarcely consumed pyrosomes along with the concurrent decrease in jelly abundance has led to a marked decrease in the overall consumption of gelatinous prey since the onset of MHWs (Figs. 1, 2). More generally, a persistent shift toward filter-feeding gelatinous zooplankton and away from omnivorous euphausiids could have major negative implications for higher trophic levels including commercially important fishes, and thus food security in many ecosystems45. This further highlights the importance of understanding the uncertainty in the trophic influence of pyrosomes in their recently expanded northward range shift, the outcome of which will have important consequences for the future of the Northern California Current ecosystem under intensifying global warming.
Despite large shifts in biomass and connections of lower trophic levels (Fig. 1), the average trophic level did not change across models (Table 1). A higher number of trophic levels across a food web may signal a less efficient, or more unstable, ecosystem46, while a low number of trophic levels can indicate a more efficient system as energy is lost at each level of consumption between the base of the food web and a higher trophic level species47,48. This may suggest that the efficiency of the Northern California Current food web is relatively robust, in the face of disruption by repeated MHWs. Various network metrics, such as connectance (the number of realized trophic links relative to the total possible number) and link density (the number of links per node) are measures of complexity that are also thought to relate to the robustness of food webs to disturbances48,49,50. Here, both network metrics were slightly higher in the MHW model, which might further suggest that the MHW ecosystem model is at least as robust to disturbance as the pre-MHW model was (Table 1). However, we show here that the pre-MHW ecosystem shifted considerably in response to repeated intense MHWs, despite also demonstrating metrics of network stability. As MHWs become more frequent and predictable on a global scale51, it remains unclear how the Northern California Current ecosystem will be impacted by further perturbations or temporary reversals to pre-MHW conditions.
The current state of the ecosystem, characterized by increased pyrosome biomass and decreased energy flux to and from other low trophic-level species, may have important implications for fishery management. Chinook salmon and cod for example, appear to have decreased since the onset of the marine heatwaves in the Northern California Current (Fig. 1)52. Chinook salmon commercial harvest has been reduced by nearly a factor of three (corresponding to a 67% decline) in the Northern California Current since the onset of the MHWs [PacFIN, http://pacfin.psmfc.org]36,37. Cod do not sustain a major fishery in the Northern California Current, but they are an important fished species in Alaska, where declines have similarly been documented during these recent North Pacific MHWs4. If these species do not return to their former abundance and biomass, commercial fisheries may have to shift their efforts towards more readily available species. The increased dominance of Pacific jack mackerel (Trachurus symmetricus) in the Northern California Current ecosystem is demonstrated by huge increases in their abundance in recent years24,53 (Fig. 1). The impact of jack mackerel on lower trophic levels has increased since the onset of recent marine heatwaves (Figs. 2, 3). Yet, despite this increase in abundance, commercial fisheries in the U.S. have not shown any change in jack mackerel landings [PacFIN, http://pacfin.psmfc.org/]36, which might suggest jack mackerel is an under-utilized resource that can support substantial fishery landings. Adapting harvest strategies to account for changes in ecosystem structure could represent a significant step towards climate-resilient fisheries. However, further work is needed to determine if changes in the abundance of these species are directly influenced by marine heatwaves. Pacific sardine (Sardinops sagax) have complicated population fluctuations in response to multiple factors, and are often thought to have a positive relationship with ocean temperatures54,55. Yet sardine collapsed just prior to the onset of the MHWs, and populations have not shown signs of rebuilding despite the warm ocean conditions persisting throughout the California Current Ecosystem56.
Ecosystem modeling tools remain under-utilized in exploring the impacts in large scale disturbances such as marine heatwaves. The work presented here is a static comparison across measured ecosystem model states, yet future dynamic modeling can include abiotic variables such as ocean temperatures and mechanistic links to physiological rates across members of the food web. A 2 °C change in water temperatures can lead to an estimated 3.7% increase in the rate of biomass flow to higher trophic levels (also known as the biomass turnover rate and the production to biomass ratio, P/B57). This means that climate change may be exacerbating the already global trend of faster biomass transfers due to fishing pressure58. Faster biomass flow can indicate lower overall biomass in an ecosystem as the biomass residence time within each trophic level is reduced58. Furthermore, using general Q10 scaling relationships59 a 2 °C increase in temperature can lead to an increase in metabolic rate of about 14.9% and a lower production efficiency (less energy is directed to production of new biomass as metabolic rates increase). This can result in a reduced trophic transfer efficiency, or the fraction of energy consumed by prey that is transferred to consumers at the next higher trophic level. The ecosystem then becomes less efficient at supporting higher trophic levels. Functional groups with particularly low initial production efficiencies in the pre-MHW model (e.g., jack and Pacific mackerels) would need to increase their consumption rates to maintain viable populations in a warmer, more metabolically costly environment. It is unclear, however, whether the production of lower trophic level species could support a sustained increase in predation pressure in combination with existing fishing pressures.
As marine heatwaves intensify and are increasingly common, these climate disturbances will have major impacts on marine ecosystems2 with both winners and losers as some species take advantage of changing conditions or expand their distribution whereas others struggle to adapt or are physiologically constrained60. Estimating changes to energy flow within ecosystems and the energetic consumption and contribution of individual functional groups provides an approach for quantifying ecosystem changes as global warming increasingly disrupts food webs and the sustainable use of such resources. Ecosystem models may provide a means for better predicting future winners and losers as we prepare for climate resiliency in ecosystem-based fisheries management and the recovery of threatened and protected species in ecologically and economically important ecosystems.
Methods
EcoTran
Pre-MHW and MHW were built and analyzed within the EcoTran end-to-end ecosystem model platform39. EcoTran builds upon the widely-used Ecopath food web modeling framework61. One NCC ecosystem model was parameterized from datasets collected prior to the 2014 onset of MHW37 and the other model was developed recently, which is based on datasets from 2014 onwards through multiple warm ocean years36. Both models represent 80 living functional groups, 3 nutrient pools, 5 detritus pools, and 2 fisheries, which are parameterized with multiple sea surveys (biomass)22,53,62,63,64,65,66, commercial and recreational fishery databases (landings)67,68, a trophic interaction database (diets)69, and various sources of literature, among other unpublished data (described in more detail in Gomes et al., 202236 and Ruzicka et al., 201237). The trophic interactions within each model are described as a production matrix defining the fate of all consumption by each group between its metabolic costs, non-assimilated egestion, biomass production that is consumed by each predator or fleet, and senescence36,37,70. For the analyses presented here we use static, steady-state ecosystem models, which has the advantage of allowing for a direct comparison across ecosystem time periods (parameterized with data collected within this system) without requiring a complete understanding of how MHW physical variables (e.g., temperatures) mechanistically affect each functional group’s physiology and trophic relationships.
Sea surface temperature (SST) anomalies
Monthly SST anomaly values for the North Pacific Ocean (Fig. 1a) are from the Met Office Hadley Centre HadSST data set71,72. Data were plotted in R73 with help from ‘ggplot2‘74.
Model adjustment details
The pre-MHW model, adapted from Ruzicka et al. (2012)37, was updated in several ways. First, Ruzicka et al. (2012) used Ecopath methods to estimate the biomass of euphausiids required to to maintain the pre-MHW food web in thermodynamic balance37. Since then, a longer and more precise euphausiid time series has been developed from the Joint U.S.-Canada Integrated Ecosystem and Pacific Hake Acoustic Trawl Survey and modeling efforts63. In the MHW model, Gomes et al. (2022)36 used euphausiid biomass densities from the 2015, 2017, and 2019 surveys63. The pre-MHW model was updated to use the earlier period of the time series (2007, 2009, 2011, and 2012). Similarly, Ecopath-based estimates of invertebrate egg biomasses were dramatically different between the pre-MHW and MHW models36,37. We used survey data from the Newport Hydrographic Line (NHL)65 to parameterize invertebrate eggs in the pre-MHW (NHL data: 2000–2012) and MHW (NHL data: 2014–2020) models. Due to the changes in biomass between the previously published pre-MHW model and the one used here we needed to re-balance the ecopath model because phytoplankton were slightly over-consumed by the increase in euphausiids. We accomplished this with small changes to the diet matrix of the pre-MHW model to move pressure off of phytoplankton (see supplemental preMHW_DietChanges.csv). See previous food web models for more information about data used, model-building, and mass-balancing procedures36,37.
Due to slight differences in the food web model structure between the pre-MHW and MHW ecosystem models, it was necessary to combine some functional groups to make comparisons across the models (see Supplementary Data 1). For all groups that were combined, diets were aggregated as a weighted averaging (weighted by biomass of individual components/species of the functional group). Total functional group biomasses (for mass-balancing) were summed across the constituent components/species within each functional group. Pyrosomes are not thought to have been present in the pre-MHW period in the NCC ecosystem31, but to make models directly comparable, we added a trace amount of pyrosomes to this pre-MHW model (0.00001 mt/km2). Marine mammals from Gomes et al. (2022) were combined to match that of Ruzicka et al. (2012); that is, Northern elephant seals and sea lion (California and Steller’s) functional groups were combined into a large pinniped group and other killer whales and southern resident killer whales were grouped into a killer whale functional group (as they both originally were in Ruzicka et al., 2012). Juvenile salmon groups also did not match between the two ecosystem models; for simplicity, they were combined into four groups within each model: yearling coho, yearling chinook, subyearling chinook, and other juvenile salmonids. Similarly, all commercial fleets were aggregated into one commercial fishery fleet due to recent changes in the PacFIN database fleet names (http://pacfin.psmfc.org/)67. To see expanded fleet information, please see Ruzicka et al. (2012) and Gomes et al. (2022).
Network analyses and metrics
To compare food web structures pre-MHW and MHW, we measured average (arithmetic mean) trophic level, average trophic level weighted by the biomass of each functional group, network connectance (the number of non-zero realized links relative to, i.e., divided by, the total number of possible links; 7396 in an 86 × 86 network), and link density (the average number of connecting links per functional group) (Table 1). The initial food web for the MHW model was built upon the pre-MHW model, such that pre-MHW trophic connections were included in the MHW along with new diet data36. To ensure that the network connectance and link densities were not artificially inflated in the MHW period, we removed all trophic connections within the MHW network that were originally carried over from the pre-MHW model (and which were not represented in the updated diet data; see supplemental code).
A difference network was calculated as the difference between the edges and node biomasses in the pre-MHW model and the MHW model (Fig. 1). Node and edge sizes and colors are dependent on the magnitude and direction of change, respectively. Blue signifies a decrease in (from pre-MHW to MHW) biomass density (nodes) or energy flow (edges) and red signifies an increase. Bigger circles indicate (on a log scale) higher differences in biomass and thicker and darker edges denote larger changes in energy flows. The network was visualized with help from the R package ‘qgraph‘75.
Energetic consumption and contributions
To make comparisons of ecosystem structure between pre-MHW and MHW years, steady-state models were used to estimate the relative importance of functional groups for transferring energy to higher trophic levels. We calculated the relevance of targeted functional groups as both consumer (consumption of lower trophic levels) and producer (contribution to next trophic level) with two non-dimensional metrics: footprint and reach, respectively.
A functional group’s trophic impact upon lower trophic levels is expressed by its footprint, which is the fraction of each producer group’s total production supporting focal consumer groups via all direct and indirect pathways (excluding detritus). The footprint, in other words, is the proportion of energy from lower trophic levels (relative to a focal group) consumed by that focal group. Conversely, the importance of a focal functional group to higher trophic levels was expressed by its reach: the fraction of consumers’ production that originated with (or passed through) that functional group via all direct and indirect pathways37. Thus, the reach is the proportion of energy consumed by higher trophic levels (relative to a focal group) that passed through that functional group.
Footprint and reach can be defined broadly (i.e., the footprint upon all lower trophic levels) or precisely (i.e., the footprint upon one specific producer). For our general ecosystem-wide comparison of the roles of phytoplankton, copepods, euphausiids, forage fishes, gelatinous zooplankton, rockfishes, and fish, seabird, and mammalian predators, we adopted the broadest definitions, considering footprint and reach relative to (proportions of) total system production and total consumer production, respectively.
The net uncertainty among physiological parameters, diet, and nutrient cycling terms are expressed as levels of uncertainty about each element of the production matrix. In our analyses, each element of the production matrix was randomly varied by drawing model parameters from a normal distribution with a mean of the originally parameterized value and a standard deviation [converted from conservative coefficient of variation (CV) values, which were based on the Ecopath pedigree strategy of assigning uncertainty based on the types of (i.e., survey type) and confidence in (quantity and quality) our data sources; see supplemental data and code repository readme]. For example, we used diet information from 39083 individual juvenile Chinook salmon, 2911 Pacific herring, and seven pyrosome colonies36. Thus, we set CV values for each element of their diet vectors to 0.1, 0.5, and 0.8, respectively to reflect differences in the robustness of the datasets (and the associated uncertainty). We drew 1000 possible Monte Carlo food web models to investigate the propagation of uncertainty for footprint and reach of each assessed functional group within each model (pre-MHW and MHW). Footprint and reach values were plotted with help from the R package ‘ggplot2‘74.
Estimates of biomass flow and trophic transfer efficiency changes due to temperature
The inverse of the residence time of biomass, or the speed of biomass flow, found in Maureaud et al. (2017)58 is defined as the production to biomass ratio (P/B) for any particular group and allows for the inclusion of temperature (T) as:
Assuming no change in the von Bertalanffy asymptotic growth rate parameter (K), the ratio between MHW (P/B) and pre-MHW (P/B) simplifies to:
Or more simply:
Using a hypothetical temperature change of 2 °C we calculated a scaling factor of 1.037 (increase in 3.7%) to convert P/B values parameterized during pre-MHW conditions to an ecosystem that is 2 °C warmer. To explore changes that might occur to trophic transfer efficiencies due to higher metabolic costs associated with higher temperature, we used classic Q10 scaling relationships. We estimate the proportional change in metabolic rate (M) as:
where ΔT is the change in temperature between MHW and pre-MHW ecosystems and Q10 is a temperature scaling coefficient76. We used a common and general Q10 value of two77 for calculations of the metabolic scaling factor of 1.149 (14.9%). As metabolic costs increase, trophic transfer efficiencies decrease.
Statistical analysis
Two-tailed t-tests in R73 were used to compare mean trophic levels, network connectance, link density, and the footprint and reach metrics (for each functional group) across pre-MHW and MHW models. Since we made multiple comparisons for footprint and reach metrics (each functional group × both footprint and reach metrics), we corrected p-values with conservative Bonferroni corrections. For network connectance and link density, we created 100 bootstrapped networks by randomly sampling, with replacement, which nodes to use, each iteration re-calculating connectance and density, which were then compared across models.
Reporting summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Portfolio Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Data availability
All data and materials used in the manuscript are available in a long-term data repository at: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8121889. Source data are provided with this paper.
Code availability
All MATLAB (R2021a) and R (v 4.2.2) code used in the analysis are available in a long-term repository at: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8121889.
References
Hobday, A. J. et al. Categorizing and naming marine heatwaves. Oceanography 31, 162–173 (2018).
Smale, D. A. et al. Marine heatwaves threaten global biodiversity and the provision of ecosystem services. Nat. Clim. Change 9, 306–312 (2019).
Smith, K. E. et al. Biological impacts of marine heatwaves. Annu. Rev. Mar. Sci. 15, 119–145 (2023).
Suryan, R. M. et al. Ecosystem response persists after a prolonged marine heatwave. Sci. Rep. 11, 1–17 (2021).
Hughes, T. P. et al. Spatial and temporal patterns of mass bleaching of corals in the Anthropocene. Science 359, 80–83 (2018).
McCabe, R. M. et al. An unprecedented coastwide toxic algal bloom linked to anomalous ocean conditions. Geophys. Res. Lett. 43, 10–366 (2016).
Trainer, V. L. et al. Pelagic harmful algal blooms and climate change: lessons from nature’s experiments with extremes. Harmful Algae 91, 101591 (2020).
Diaz, R. J. & Rosenberg, R. Spreading dead zones and consequences for marine ecosystems. Science 321, 926–929 (2008).
Oliver, E. C. et al. Longer and more frequent marine heatwaves over the past century. Nat. Commun. 9, 1–12 (2018).
Piatt, J. F. et al. Extreme mortality and reproductive failure of common murres resulting from the northeast Pacific marine heatwave of 2014–2016. PloS One 15, e0226087 (2020).
Jacox, M. G., Alexander, M. A., Bograd, S. J. & Scott, J. D. Thermal displacement by marine heatwaves. Nature 584, 82–86 (2020).
Morley, J. W. et al. Projecting shifts in thermal habitat for 686 species on the North American continental shelf. PLoS One 13, e0196127 (2018).
Perry, A. L., Low, P. J., Ellis, J. R. & Reynolds, J. D. Climate change and distribution shifts in marine fishes. Science 308, 1912–1915 (2005).
Checkley, D. M. Jr & Barth, J. A. Patterns and processes in the California current system. Prog. Oceanogr. 83, 49–64 (2009).
Bond, N. A., Cronin, M. F., Freeland, H. & Mantua, N. Causes and impacts of the 2014 warm anomaly in the NE Pacific. Geophys. Res. Lett. 42, 3414–3420 (2015).
Leising, A. W. et al. State of the California Current 2014-15: impacts of the warm-water “blob”. Calif. Coop. Ocean. Fish. Investig. Rep. 56, 31–68 (2015).
McClatchie, S. State of the California Current 2015–16: comparisons with the 1997–98 El Niño. Calif. Coop. Ocean. Fish. Investig. Rep. 57, 1–57 (2016).
Di Lorenzo, E. & Mantua, N. Multi-year persistence of the 2014/15 North Pacific marine heatwave. Nat. Clim. Change 6, 1042–1047 (2016).
Amaya, D. J., Miller, A. J., Xie, S.-P. & Kosaka, Y. Physical drivers of the summer 2019 North Pacific marine heatwave. Nat. Commun. 11, 1–9 (2020).
Weber, E. D. et al. State of the California Current 2019–2020: back to the future with marine heatwaves. Front. Mar. Sci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2021.709454 (2021).
Auth, T. D., Daly, E. A., Brodeur, R. D. & Fisher, J. L. Phenological and distributional shifts in ichthyoplankton associated with recent warming in the northeast Pacific Ocean. Glob. Change Biol. 24, 259–272 (2018).
Brodeur, R. D., Auth, T. D. & Phillips, A. J. Major shifts in pelagic micronekton and macrozooplankton community structure in an upwelling ecosystem related to an unprecedented marine heatwave. Front. Mar. Sci. 6, 212 (2019).
Daly, E. A., Brodeur, R. D. & Auth, T. D. Anomalous ocean conditions in 2015: impacts on spring Chinook salmon and their prey field. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 566, 169–182 (2017).
Morgan, C. A., Beckman, B. R., Weitkamp, L. A. & Fresh, K. L. Recent ecosystem disturbance in the Northern California Current. Fisheries 44, 465–474 (2019).
Peterson, W. T. et al. The pelagic ecosystem in the Northern California Current off Oregon during the 2014–2016 warm anomalies within the context of the past 20 years. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans 122, 7267–7290 (2017).
Sakuma, K. M. et al. Anomalous epipelagic micronekton assemblage patterns in the neritic waters of the California Current in spring 2015 during a period of extreme ocean conditions. Calif. Coop. Ocean. Fish. Investig. Rep. 57, 163–183 (2016).
Tanaka, K. R. et al. North Pacific warming shifts the juvenile range of a marine apex predator. Sci. Rep. 11, 3373 (2021).
Free, C. M. et al. Impact of the 2014–2016 marine heatwave on US and Canada West Coast fisheries: surprises and lessons from key case studies. Fish. Fish. https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.12753 (2023).
Whitney, F. A. Anomalous winter winds decrease 2014 transition zone productivity in the NE Pacific. Geophys. Res. Lett. 42, 428–431 (2015).
Miller, R. R. et al. Distribution of pelagic thaliaceans, Thetys vagina and Pyrosoma atlanticum, during a period of mass occurrence within the California Current. Calif. Coop. Ocean. Fish. Investig. Rep. 60, 94–108 (2019).
Sutherland, K. R., Sorensen, H. L., Blondheim, O. N., Brodeur, R. D. & Galloway, A. W. Range expansion of tropical pyrosomes in the northeast Pacific Ocean. Ecology 99, 2397–2399 (2018).
Jones, T. et al. Massive mortality of a Planktivorous Seabird in response to a marine heatwave. Geophys. Res. Lett. 45, 3193–3202 (2018).
Frölicher, T. L. & Laufkötter, C. Emerging risks from marine heat waves. Nat. Commun. 9, 1–4 (2018).
Pozo Buil, M. et al. A dynamically downscaled ensemble of future projections for the California current system. Front. Mar. Sci. 8, 612874 (2021).
Cheung, W. W. & Frölicher, T. L. Marine heatwaves exacerbate climate change impacts for fisheries in the northeast Pacific. Sci. Rep. 10, 1–10 (2020).
Gomes, D. G. E. et al. An updated end-to-end ecosystem model of the Northern California current reflecting ecosystem changes due to recent marine heat waves. PLoS One 19, e0280366 (2024).
Ruzicka, J. J. et al. Interannual variability in the Northern California current food web structure: changes in energy flow pathways and the role of forage fish, euphausiids and jellyfish. Prog. Oceanogr. 102, 19–41 (2012).
Ruzicka, J. J., Daly, E. A. & Brodeur, R. D. Evidence that summer jellyfish blooms impact Pacific Northwest salmon production. Ecosphere 7, e01324 (2016).
Steele, J. H. & Ruzicka, J. J. Constructing end-to-end models using ECOPATH data. J. Mar. Syst. 87, 227–238 (2011).
O’Loughlin, J. H. et al. Implications of Pyrosoma atlanticum range expansion on phytoplankton standing stocks in the Northern California current. Prog. Oceanogr. 188, 102424 (2020).
Brodeur, R. D., Hunsicker, M. E., Hann, A. & Miller, T. W. Effects of warming ocean conditions on feeding ecology of small pelagic fishes in a coastal upwelling ecosystem: a shift to gelatinous food sources. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 617, 149–163 (2019).
Brodeur, R. D. et al. Demersal fish predators of gelatinous zooplankton in the Northeast Pacific Ocean. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 658, 89–104 (2021).
Doyle, T. K., Houghton, J. D., McDevitt, R., Davenport, J. & Hays, G. C. The energy density of jellyfish: estimates from bomb-calorimetry and proximate-composition. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 343, 239–252 (2007).
Hays, G. C., Doyle, T. K. & Houghton, J. D. A paradigm shift in the trophic importance of jellyfish. Trends Ecol. Evol. 3, 874–884 (2018).
Heneghan, R. F., Everett, J. D., Blanchard, J. L., Sykes, P. & Richardson, A. J. Climate-driven zooplankton shifts cause large-scale declines in food quality for fish. Nat. Clim. Change 13, 470–477 (2023).
Borrelli, J. J. & Ginzburg, L. R. Why there are so few trophic levels: selection against instability explains the pattern. Food Webs 1, 10–17 (2014).
Funes, M., Saravia, L. A., Cordone, G., Iribarne, O. O. & Galván, D. E. Network analysis suggests changes in food web stability produced by bottom trawl fishery in Patagonia. Sci. Rep. 12, 1–10 (2022).
Olivier, P. et al. Exploring the temporal variability of a food web using long-term biomonitoring data. Ecography 42, 2107–2121 (2019).
Dunne, J. A. Food webs. Encycl. Complex. Syst. Sci. 1, 3661–3682 (2009).
Landi, P., Minoarivelo, H. O., Brännström, Å., Hui, C. & Dieckmann, U. Complexity and stability of ecological networks: a review of the theory. Popul. Ecol. 60, 319–345 (2018).
Jacox, M. G. et al. Global seasonal forecasts of marine heatwaves. Nature 604, 486–490 (2022).
Rogers, L. A., Wilson, M. T., Duffy-Anderson, J. T., Kimmel, D. G. & Lamb, J. F. Pollock and “the Blob”: impacts of a marine heatwave on walleye pollock early life stages. Fish. Oceanogr. 30, 142–158 (2021).
Stierhoff, K. L., Zwolinski, J. P. & Demer, D. A. Distribution, biomass and demography of coastal pelagic fishes in the California current ecosystem during summer 2019 based on acoustic-trawl sampling. NOAA https://doi.org/10.25923/nghv-7c40 (2020)
Lindegren, M., Checkley, D. M. Jr, Rouyer, T., MacCall, A. D. & Stenseth, N. C. Climate, fishing and fluctuations of sardine and anchovy in the California current. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 13672–13677 (2013).
Lluch-Belda, D. et al. World-wide fluctuations of sardine and anchovy stocks: the regime problem. South Afr. J. Mar. Sci. 8, 195–205 (1989).
Thompson, A. R. et al. State of the California current ecosystem in 2021: winter is coming. Front. Mar. Sci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2022.958727 (2022).
Gascuel, D., Morissette, L., Palomares, M. L. D. & Christensen, V. Trophic flow kinetics in marine ecosystems: toward a theoretical approach to ecosystem functioning. Ecol. Model. 217, 33–47 (2008).
Maureaud, A. et al. Global change in the trophic functioning of marine food webs. PLoS One 12, e0182826 (2017).
Clarke, A. & Fraser, K. P. P. Why does metabolism scale with temperature. Funct. Ecol. 18, 243–251 (2004).
Cavole, L. M. et al. Biological impacts of the 2013–2015 warm-water anomaly in the Northeast Pacific: winners, losers and the future. Oceanography 29, 273–285 (2016).
Christensen, V. & Walters, C. J. Ecopath with Ecosim: methods, capabilities and limitations. Ecol. Model. 172, 109–139 (2004).
de Blois, S. The 2019 Joint US–Canada Integrated Ecosystem and Pacific Hake Acoustic-Trawl Survey: Cruise Report SH-19-06. https://repository.library.noaa.gov (2020).
Phillips, E. M. et al. Spatiotemporal variability of euphausiids in the California current ecosystem: insights from a recently developed time series. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 79, 1312–1326 (2022).
Brodeur, R. D., Fisher, J. P., Emmett, R. L., Morgan, C. A. & Casillas, E. Species composition and community structure of pelagic nekton off Oregon and Washington under variable oceanographic conditions. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 298, 41–57 (2005).
Peterson, W. T., Keister, J. E. & Feinberg, L. R. The effects of the 1997–99 El Niño/La Niña events on hydrography and zooplankton off the central Oregon coast. Prog. Oceanogr. 54, 381–398 (2002).
Keller, A. A., Wallace, J. R. & Methot, R. D. The Northwest Fisheries Science Center’s West Coast groundfish bottom trawl survey: history, design and description. NOAA https://repository.library.noaa.gov (2017).
The Pacific Fisheries Information Network. PacFIN APEX Reporting System (PacFIN, 2023).
PSMFC. The Recreational Fisheries Information Network (RecFIN, 2023).
Bizzarro, J. J. et al. A multi-predator trophic database for the California current large marine ecosystem. Sci. Data 10, 496 (2023).
Ruzicka, J. J., Steele, J. H., Brink, K. H., Gifford, D. J. & Bahr, F. Understanding large-scale energy flows through end-to-end shelf ecosystems-the importance of physical context. J. Mar. Syst. 187, 235–249 (2018).
Kennedy, J. J., Rayner, N. A., Atkinson, C. P. & Killick, R. E. An ensemble data set of sea surface temperature change from 1850: the Met Office Hadley Centre HadSST.4.0.0.0 data set. JGR Atm. 124, 7719–7763 (2019).
Rayner, N. A. et al. Global analyses of sea surface temperature, sea ice, and night marine air temperature since the late nineteenth century. J. Geophys. Res. 108, 2002JD002670 (2003).
R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.gbif.org/tool/81287/r-a-language-and-environment-for-statistical-computing (2017).
Wickham, H. ggplot2. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Comput. Stat. 3, 180–185 (2011).
Epskamp, S., Cramer, A. O., Waldorp, L. J., Schmittmann, V. D. & Borsboom, D. qgraph: Network visualizations of relationships in psychometric data. J. Stat. Softw. 48, 1–18 (2012).
Mundim, K. C., Baraldi, S., Machado, H. G. & Vieira, F. M. Temperature coefficient (Q10) and its applications in biological systems: beyond the Arrhenius theory. Ecol. Model. 431, 109127 (2020).
Hochachka, P. W. & Somero, G. N. Biochemical Adaptation: Mechanism and Process in Physiological Evolution, Vol 30 (Oxford University Press, 2002).
Acknowledgements
We thank Mary Hunsicker and Andrew Thompson for feedback on earlier versions of this manuscript. We thank Elizabeth M. Phillips, Alicia Billings, Cheryl A. Morgan, Jen E. Zamon, Elizabeth A. Daly, Joseph. J. Bizzarro, Jennifer L. Fisher, and Toby Auth for access to biological survey data, and Isaac Schroeder for supplying SST anomaly data for Fig. 1a. The National Academy of Science’s National Research Council Postdoctoral Research Associateship Program provided funding to DGEG.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceptualization: D.G.E.G., J.J.R., L.G.C., D.D.H., R.D.B., J.D.S. Data curation: D.G.E.G., J.J.R. Formal analysis: D.G.E.G. Funding acquisition: L.G.C., D.D.H., D.G.E.G. Investigation: D.G.E.G. Methodology: D.G.E.G., J.J.R. Project administration: D.G.E.G., J.J.R., L.G.C., D.D.H. Software: D.G.E.G., J.J.R. Supervision: D.G.E.G., J.J.R., L.G.C., D.D.H., J.D.S. Validation: D.G.E.G. Visualization: D.G.E.G. Writing—original draft: D.G.E.G. Writing—review and editing: D.G.E.G., J.J.R., L.G.C., D.D.H., R.D.B., J.D.S.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Communications thanks Ryan Heneghan, Jeremy Lobry and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Source data
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Gomes, D.G.E., Ruzicka, J.J., Crozier, L.G. et al. Marine heatwaves disrupt ecosystem structure and function via altered food webs and energy flux. Nat Commun 15, 1988 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-46263-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-46263-2
- Springer Nature Limited
This article is cited by
-
Marine heatwaves in a shifting Southern Ocean induce dynamical changes in primary production
Communications Earth & Environment (2024)
-
Age, not growth, explains larger body size of Pacific cod larvae during recent marine heatwaves
Scientific Reports (2024)