Abstract
Spatiotemporal structured light has opened up new avenues for optics and photonics. Current spatiotemporal manipulation of light mostly relies on phase-only devices such as liquid crystal spatial light modulators to generate spatiotemporal optical fields with unique photonic properties. However, simultaneous manipulation of both amplitude and phase of the complex field for the spatiotemporal light is still lacking, limiting the diversity and richness of achievable photonic properties. In this work, a simple and versatile spatiotemporal holographic method that can arbitrarily sculpt the spatiotemporal light is presented. The capabilities of this simple yet powerful method are demonstrated through the generation of fundamental and higher-order spatiotemporal Bessel wavepackets, spatiotemporal crystal-like and quasi-crystal-like structures, and spatiotemporal flat-top wavepackets. Fully customizable spatiotemporal wavepackets will find broader application in investigating the dynamics of spatiotemporal fields and interactions between ultrafast spatiotemporal pulses and matters, unveiling previously hidden light-matter interactions and unlocking breakthroughs in photonics and beyond.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
With the rapid development of ultrafast lasers, the ability to sculpt spatiotemporal wavepackets has become increasingly important for both unveiling fundamental physics and fulfilling demanding industrial applications1,2. Fully customizable spatiotemporal light holds immense potential in diverse fields such as laser machining3, spatiotemporal edge detection4, nonlinear optics5,6, optical fiber propagation7, quantum optics8, and various light-matter interaction studies9,10. Traditionally, manipulating optical light fields has involved separate interventions in the spatial and temporal domains. For spatial light, holographic methods and programmable devices like liquid crystal spatial light modulators (LC-SLMs) have become prevalent tools for tailoring laser modes11,12, generating structured beams like nondiffracting beams13, and even achieving arbitrary spatial profiles14. Pulse shaping in the time domain, on the other hand, typically occurs in the spectral domain using a 4-f setup and involves strategically placing diffractive elements or 1D LC-SLMs in the focal plane15,16.
In 2020, the demonstration of photonic cyclones carrying transverse orbital angular momentum (OAM) opened a new avenue for manipulating spatiotemporal structured light17. Utilizing a 2D spatial light modulator (SLM) within a conventional pulse shaper, scientists have spearheaded the study of spatiotemporally coupled light fields, revealing their significant physical implications and promising applications. These include space-time wavepackets with intricate spatiotemporal correlations18,19, spatiotemporal optical vortices with transverse OAM17, and toroidal vortices of light20.
Researchers recently developed a 3D wavepacket generation method combining pulse shaping with multi-plane light conversion (MPLC)21. While this technology enables multi-dimensional light sculpting, it struggles with producing tight spatiotemporal structures like optical vortices due to its approach of modulating the spatial light profile at each time delay. However, relying solely on a conventional pulse shaper consisting of a grating, a cylindrical lens, and a 2D SLM as a spatiotemporal phase modulator presents a significant obstacle to efficiently and precisely manipulating spatiotemporal wavepackets on demand.
This paper introduces a novel method for shaping the spatiotemporal complex amplitude distribution of the light pulses, enabling the custom shaping of arbitrary 2D spatiotemporal optical fields. We achieve this by incorporating a computer-generated hologram (CGH) into a conventional pulse shaper. The capabilities of this device are showcased through the generation of diverse and unprecedented spatiotemporal light structures, including fundamental and higher-order spatiotemporal Bessel wavepackets, spatiotemporal crystal-like and quasi-crystal-like structures, and spatiotemporal top-hat wavepackets, highlighting its potential for applications in various fields.
Results
Figure 1a illustrates the schematic of the spatiotemporal (ST) holographic setup and the associated interferometric characterization system. The input mode-locked laser centered at 1030 nm is divided into two parts by the beam splitter (BS1). One part is compressed by a pair of gratings, serving as the probe pulse. The other one is modulated into the desired wavepacket using the ST complex amplitude modulator. The probe pulse and the generated wavepacket are recombined at the CCD camera with a small tilt angle. By changing their relative time delay, the three-dimensional information of the generated wavepacket is recorded and later reconstructed22.
The ST holographic setup consists of a grating, a cylindrical lens, and a phase-only LC-SLM. They are separated by the focal length of the cylindrical lens, forming a 4-f system. With such a configuration, LC-SLM encoded with a properly designed digital hologram can simultaneously modulate the spatial-spectral phase \(\varphi \left(x,\omega \right)\) and the amplitude \(A\left(x,\omega \right)\) of the incoming optical field in its spatial-spectral plane. The encoding technique utilizes a one-dimensional blazed phase grating with different modulation depths in order to diffract light into the first order with different light intensity23. Here, we use the technique conversely so that the undesired light is diffracted into the first order while the desired light is preserved in the zeroth order. The modulation depth of blazed grating phase can be engineered so that it controls the intensity of the zeroth order light. When the depth is 2\(\pi\), all the light energy will be diffracted. When the depth is 0, none of the light will be diffracted, and, therefore, all the energy will be preserved in the zeroth order. The change of grating phase depth can continuously tune the light intensity of the zeroth order from 0 to 100%. The results as shown in Fig. 1 and more information are given in the supplementary note 1.
To measure the power of the zeroth order light, we place a small iris after the ST complex amplitude modulator so that higher-order diffracted light is fully blocked by the iris. Figure 1b shows the phase patterns of such blazed phase grating when the modulation depth of the grating phase is at \({\phi }_{{\rm{depth}}}=0.8\pi,1.2\pi,2\pi\), respectively. Figure 1c shows the theoretical energy distribution from a 1D blazed phase grating when \({\phi }_{{\rm{depth}}}\) continuously varies from 0 to 2π. Figure 1d shows both theoretical and experimental intensity of the zeroth order light when \({\phi }_{{\rm{depth}}}\) varies. The experimental data obtained by the setup shown in Fig. 1a agrees well with the theoretical curve, indicating the possibility of precise control of the ST complex optical field. The measured extinction ratio of the light intensity (Imax/Imin) is about 125:1 in this figure. The overall efficiency of our devices thus depends on (1) the reflectance from the diffraction grating, (2) the reflectivity of the SLM device, and (3) the intensity pattern of the complex amplitude modulation (see more details in Supplementary Note 2). Moreover, the bandwidth and the spatial complexity of our devices mainly depend on the operating wavelength and spatial resolution of the SLM (see more details in Supplementary Note 3).
It is noteworthy that the intensity modulation of the light field in the zeroth order also accompanies an additional retardance phase that should be properly compensated. Their relationship is shown in Fig. 1e. The cause of this retardance phase is due to the change of the overall phase in the blazed phase grating.
The results we discussed above use blazed phase grating with spatially uniform modulation depth \({\phi }_{{{\rm{depth}}}}\). To achieve arbitrary ST complex amplitude modulation of the light field \(\Psi \left(x,\omega \right)=A\left(x,\omega \right)\exp \left[i\varphi \left(x,\omega \right)\right]\), the digital hologram loaded on SLM is (see more details in Supplementary Note 1)
In this expression, the first term represents the blazed phase grating with a period of Λ and a localized modulation depth of \({\phi }_{{{\rm{depth}}}}\left(x,\omega \right)\). \({\phi }_{{{\rm{depth}}}}\left(x,\omega \right)\) is related to the amplitude modulation factor \(A\left(x,\omega \right)\) given by \({\phi }_{{{\rm{depth}}}}=2\pi {{{\rm{sinc}}}}^{-1}\left(A\right)\). Figure 1d shows the experimental measured results for the relationship between A and \({\phi }_{{{\rm{depth}}}}\); the second term \({\phi }_{r}\left(x,\omega \right)\) is the phase compensation term for the phase retardance; and the last term \(\varphi \left(x,\omega \right)\) is the applied spatial-spectral phase modulation. More information including the completely complex modulation of the spatiotemporal hologram are discussed in Supplementary Note 4.
This encoding technique for ST complex amplitude modulation using programmable phase elements offers us a much wider range of applications as it can arbitrarily sculpt ST optical fields. In the process, the subtle interplay between dispersion and diffraction plays a crucial role in generating the ST optical field. Assuming paraxial approximation with group velocity dispersion, the evolution of the optical field \({E}_{0}\left({x}^{{\prime} },{\varOmega }^{{\prime} }\right)\) is determined by the second-order diffractive term and group delay dispersion (GDD) term. The spatiotemporal light field can be then expressed by \({E}_{0}\left({x}^{{\prime} },t ^{\prime} \right)=F\left\{G\left({x}^{{\prime} },{\varOmega }^{{\prime} }\right){e}^{i{\varphi }_{{{\rm{SLM}}}}}\right\}\), where \(G({x}^{{\prime} },\varOmega ^{\prime} )\) is the spatial-spectral field of the input laser and the operator \(F\left\{\cdot \right\}\) stands for 1-D Fourier transform from \(\varOmega ^{\prime}\) to t′. The evolution of the modulated spatiotemporal field can be then expressed by24
where \({w}_{\varOmega }\) and \({w}_{b}\) are the spectral and spatial width of the input field, respectively, \({x}^{{\prime} }\)/\({\Omega }^{{\prime} }\) are normalized spatial and spectral coordinates, \(f\) is the focal length from the applied phase in the spatial direction. The balance requires \({{\rm{GDD}}}\cdot {{{\rm{w}}}}_{\Omega }^{2}={k}_{0}{w}_{b}^{2}\big(\frac{1}{L}-\frac{1}{f}\big)\). An extra focusing or defocusing phase can determine the sign of GDD. By defining \(\cot \gamma={{\rm{GDD}}}\cdot {w}_{\varOmega }^{2}={k}_{0}{w}_{b}^{2}\big(\frac{1}{L}-\frac{1}{f}\big)\) and using the following substitution \(x=\frac{\left(X\cdot \cos \gamma \right)}{{w}_{b}} \, \cdot \big(1+\frac{L}{f-L}\big)\), \(t=-T\cdot {w}_{\Omega }\cdot \sin \gamma\), Eq. (2) can be simplified to the following expression
where \({{\rm{C}}}\) is the field constant. Equation (3) is called fractional Fourier transform when \(0 \, < \, \gamma \, < \, \pi /2\) and becomes a complete Fourier transform when \(\gamma=\pi /2\). Therefore, a proper selection of the focusing/defocusing phase, GDD, and propagation distance \(L\) can achieve such “balance” between dispersion and diffraction, leading to an effective modulation of the complex field in the reciprocal plane (Fourier space).
To demonstrate the ST complex amplitude modulation capacity, we first use the device to generate Bessel spatiotemporal wavepackets (BeSTWP) and higher-order Bessel spatiotemporal optical vortex (BeSTOV) wavepackets. Compared with previous work24, the generation of these wavepackets relies upon controlling the complex amplitude in the reciprocal plane (Fourier space) where these wavepackets have an annular ring distribution and a spiral phase structure. Figure 2a–d presents the generation of the fundamental BeSTWP based on an annular ring mask in the spatial-spectral domain. The applied phase mask is shown in Fig. 2a. The desired hologram is generated using a blazed grating to preserve the light field located on the ring mask while diffracting the light field elsewhere. The spatial width \({w}_{b}\) and spectral width \({w}_{\Omega }\) of the ring are 90 μm and 1 THz, respectively. At the propagating length L = 1.25 m, the calculated γ is around 87.7o, indicating the ST field is close to the full Fourier transform form. Figure 2e–l shows higher-order BeSTOV results by applying additional ST spiral phases. BeSTOVs carrying transverse OAM with topological charges from −2 to +2 are generated and they are confirmed by the measurement.
The generations of the fundamental BeSTWP and BeSTOV have proven the capability of the ST holographic setup. As two-dimensional localized optical fields, BeSTWP and BeSTOV wavepackets are radially symmetric. There also exists another kind of localized state called an optical lattice with translational and rotational symmetries. Using the ST holographic technique, spatiotemporal optical lattices can be realized in the spatiotemporal domain by selecting proper pinhole patterns in the spatial-spectral domain. Figure 3a–e illustrates several configurations to generate ST crystal-like and quasi-crystal-like structures in simulation. Each pinhole is uniformly located on a circle and the number of pinholes q represents q-fold rotational symmetry. The second two rows of the figure show the spatiotemporal intensity and phase profile of the simulated wavepacket. When the number of pinholes q = 4 and q = 6, the spatiotemporal optical time crystals have translational symmetry shown in Fig. 3f, h. Especially, the spatiotemporal optical quasi-time crystal with rotational symmetry is generated at q = 5 in Fig. 3g. It is worth noting that the five-fold rotation is preserved even with a gradient phase shown in Fig. 3i, j. The transverse spiral phase can be also preserved in the spatiotemporal domain together with the five-fold rotational symmetry, forming a ST quasi-crystal structure carrying transverse OAM.
Following the simulations shown in Figs. 3 and 4 presents experimentally generated periodic and aperiodic spatiotemporal crystal structure light fields. Figure 4a, c shows the reconstructed spatiotemporal crystals with 4-fold rotational symmetry and 6-fold rotational symmetry, respectively. Figure 4b shows spatiotemporal quasi-crystals with 5-fold rotational symmetry. Figure 4d, e shows the effect of the transverse spiral phase on the spatiotemporal quasi-crystals. The extra transverse OAM results in zero intensity in the center of spatiotemporal quasi-crystals and a phase singularity in the spatiotemporal domain. The spatiotemporal quasi-crystal structure maintains 5-fold rotational symmetry as predicted in Fig. 3.
Using the spatiotemporal holographic technique, we can dynamically generate two-dimensional spatiotemporal wavepackets of arbitrary shape. As discussed above, all results are products of diffraction and dispersion in dynamic equilibrium. However, especially in optical materials processing, static and higher power beam shaping is more important. Hence, we use an extra lens and de-chirped phase on the SLM to compensate for diffraction and dispersion to form spatiotemporal flat-top wavepackets in full Fourier transform. Unlike flat-top beams in the spatial domain and the flat-top pulses only in the time domain, the spatiotemporal flat-top wavepackets have both homogenous intensity distribution in \(x-t\) domain. Figure 5a shows the 3D intensity map and projections view of the reconstructed spatiotemporal flat-top pulses. Figure 5b shows the accumulated intensity in the X and T-direction, respectively. The spatial width (full-width at half-maximum(FWHM)) is 1 mm and the FWHM temporal width is around 2 ps. Just as flat-top beams and flat-top pulses play an important role in the field of optical processing and optical computing, spatiotemporal flat-top pulses with uniform intensity in both the \(x-t\) domain synthesized with this spatiotemporal holographic technique have broad potential applications in ultrafast laser machining as well as generating uniformly distributed electron wavepackets.
To conclude, we introduce a novel spatiotemporal hologram that enables control over the complex field (both amplitude and phase) of optical spatiotemporal wavepackets. Both theoretical and experimental results demonstrate the capability of this technique for generating complex spatiotemporal wavepackets with arbitrary amplitude-phase profiles. Examples include fundamental and higher-order spatiotemporal Bessel wavepackets, spatiotemporal crystal and quasi-crystal structures, and spatiotemporal flat-top wavepackets. This manipulation of spatiotemporal complex amplitude expands the range of achievable optical properties in spatiotemporal wavepackets and promises broad applications in ultrafast processing, ultrafast imaging, optical communication, and exploring novel light-matter interactions.
Methods
Parameters for spatiotemporal holographic pulse shaper
The laser source for seeding the system is a home-built Yb:fiber laser with an all-normal-dispersion (ANDi) configuration. The laser spectrum centered at 1030 nm has a 3 dB bandwidth of 10 nm. At the output, the laser beam is expanded to a beam diameter of 2 mm to accommodate the long propagation distance in this experiment.
In the spatiotemporal pulse shaper, the diffraction grating has a grating density of 1200 lines/mm. The incident angle for the grating is about 45°. The first-order diffracted light is collimated by a cylindrical lens with a focal length of 100 mm. The spatial-spectral (\(x-\omega\)) component of the light is then projected to a liquid crystal spatial light modulator with a 3840 × 2160 resolution and a pixel size of 3.74 μm (Model: Holoeye GAEA-2.1-NIR-069). The spatiotemporal hologram can be then defined by the following expression,
where \({\phi }_{{{\rm{depth}}}}\left(x,\omega \right)\) is the modulation depth for the blazed grating phase that is related to the amplitude modulation factor \(A\left(x,\omega \right)\) given by \({\phi }_{{{\rm{depth}}}}=2\pi {{{\rm{sinc}}}}^{-1}\left(A\right)\); \(\varLambda\) is the period of the blazed phase grating. We set it to 119.68 μm so that each period of the grating covers 32 pixels in the x-direction; \({\phi }_{r}\left(x,\omega \right)\) is the phase compensation term for the phase retardance; and the last term \(\varphi \left(x,\omega \right)\) is the applied spatial-spectral phase modulation.
The final component of the spatiotemporal holographic pulse shaper is the iris that is put about 55 cm after the pulse shaper (from the diffraction grating). The iris can fully block first-order and higher-order light so that the transmitted zeroth-order light can have the spatiotemporal complex amplitude modulation applied by the shaper.
Data availability
The data related to this study are available under restricted access for data privacy law. Access can be obtained by request to the corresponding author.
Code availability
The code related to this study is available upon request.
References
He, C., Shen, Y. & Forbes, A. Towards higher-dimensional structured light. Light Sci. Appl. 11, 205 (2022).
Shen, Y. et al. Roadmap on spatiotemporal light fields. J. Opt. 25, 093001 (2023).
Kraus, M. et al. Microdrilling in steel using ultrashort pulsed laser beams with radial and azimuthal polarization. Opt. Express 18, 22305–22313 (2010).
Huang, J., Zhang, J., Zhu, T. & Ruan, Z. Spatiotemporal differentiators generating optical vortices with transverse orbital angular momentum and detecting sharp change of pulse envelope. Laser Photon. Rev. 16, 2100357 (2022).
Gui, G., Brooks, N. J., Kapteyn, H. C., Murnane, M. M. & Liao, C. T. Second-harmonic generation and the conservation of spatiotemporal orbital angular momentum of light. Nat. Photon. 15, 608–613 (2021).
Malomed, B. A., Mihalache, D., Wise, F. & Torner, L. Spatiotemporal optical solitons. J. Opt. B 7, R53–R72 (2005).
Cao, Q., Chen, Z., Zhang, C., Chong, A. & Zhan, Q. Propagation of transverse photonic orbital angular momentum through few-mode fiber. Adv. Photon. 5, 036002 (2023).
Roux, F. S. Nonlinear interferometry in all spatiotemporal degrees of freedom. Phys. Rev. A 105, 043701 (2022).
Barkana, Y. & Belkin, M. Laser eye injuries. Surv. Ophthalmol. 44, 459–478 (2000).
Jiao, J. & Guo, Z. Thermal interaction of short-pulsed laser focused beams with skin tissues. Phys. Med. Biol. 54, 4225 (2009).
Arlt, J., Dholakia, K., Allen, L. & Padgett, M. J. The production of multiringed Laguerre–Gaussian modes by computer-generated holograms. J. Mod. Opt. 45, 1231–1237 (1998).
Kimel, I. & Elias, L. R. Relations between Hermite and Laguerre Gaussian modes. IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 29, 2562–2567 (1993).
Vasara, A., Turunen, J. & Friberg, A. T. Realization of general nondiffracting beams with computer-generated holograms. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 6, 1748–1754 (1989).
Rubinsztein-Dunlop, H. et al. Roadmap on structured light. J. Opt. 19, 013001 (2017).
Weiner, A. M., Leaird, D. E., Patel, J. S. & Wullert, J. R. Programmable femtosecond pulse shaping by use of a multielement liquid-crystal phase modulator. Opt. Lett. 15, 326–328 (1990).
Wefers, M. M. & Nelson, K. A. Programmable phase and amplitude femtosecond pulse shaping. Opt. Lett. 18, 2032–2034 (1993).
Chong, A., Wan, C., Chen, J. & Zhan, Q. Generation of spatiotemporal optical vortices with controllable transverse orbital angular momentum. Nat. Photon. 14, 350–354 (2020).
Kondakci, H. E. & Abouraddy, A. F. Diffraction-free space–time light sheets. Nat. Photon. 11, 733–740 (2017).
Kondakci, H. E. & Abouraddy, A. F. Optical space-time wave packets having arbitrary group velocities in free space. Nat. Commun. 10, 929 (2019).
Wan, C., Cao, Q., Chen, J., Chong, A. & Zhan, Q. Toroidal vortices of light. Nat. Photon. 16, 519–522 (2022).
Cruz-Delgado, D. et al. Synthesis of ultrafast wavepackets with tailored spatiotemporal properties. Nat. Photon. 16, 686–691 (2022).
Li, H., Bazarov, I. V., Dunham, B. M. & Wise, F. W. Three-dimensional laser pulse intensity diagnostic for photoinjectors. Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 14, 112802 (2011).
Davis, J. A., Cottrell, D. M., Campos, J., Yzuel, M. J. & Moreno, I. Encoding amplitude information onto phase-only filters. Appl. Opt. 38, 5004–5013 (1999).
Cao, Q. et al. Non-spreading Bessel spatiotemporal optical vortices. Sci. Bull. 67, 133–140 (2022).
Acknowledgements
We acknowledge financial support from National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [Grant Nos. 92050202, 12434012 (Q.Z.) and 12104309, 12474336 (Q.C.)], the Shanghai Science and Technology Committee [Grant No. 19060502500 (Q.Z.)], the Shanghai Sailing Program [Grant No. 21YF1431500 (Q.C.)], National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) [Grant No. 2022R1A2C1091890 (A.C.)], and Global - Learning & Academic research institution for Master’s·PhD students, and Postdocs (LAMP) Program of the National Research Foundation of Korea(NRF) grant funded by the Ministry of Education[Grant No. RS-2023-00301938 (A.C.)]. Q.Z. also acknowledges support by the Key Project of Westlake Institute for Optoelectronics (Grant No. 2023GD007).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Q.C. and Q.Z. proposed the original idea and initiated this project. Q.C. and N.Z. designed and performed the experiments. Q.C., N.Z. and Q.Z. analyzed the data. Q.C., N.Z., A.C. and Q.Z. prepared the manuscript. Q.C. and Q.Z. supervised the project. All authors contributed to the discussion and writing of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Communications thanks Haoran Ren and the other anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Cao, Q., Zhang, N., Chong, A. et al. Spatiotemporal hologram. Nat Commun 15, 7821 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-52268-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-52268-8
- Springer Nature Limited