Abstract
Kitaev interactions, arising from the interplay of frustration and bond anisotropy, can lead to strong quantum fluctuations and, in an ideal case, to a quantum-spin-liquid state. However, in many nonideal materials, spurious non-Kitaev interactions typically promote a zigzag antiferromagnetic order in the d-orbital transition-metal compounds. Here, by combining neutron scattering with muon-spin rotation and relaxation techniques, we provide mechanism insights into the exotic properties of Na2Co2TeO6, a candidate material of the Kitaev model. Below TN, the zero-field muon-spin relaxation rate becomes almost constant (~0.45 μs−1). We attribute this temperature-independent relaxation rate to the strong quantum fluctuations, as well as to the frustrated Kitaev interactions. As the magnetic field increases, neutron scattering data indicate a broader spin-wave excitation at the K-point. Therefore, quantum fluctuations seem not only robust but are even enhanced by the applied magnetic field. Our findings provide valuable hints for understanding the onset of the quantum-spin-liquid state in Kitaev materials.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
The Kitaev model, describing a spin-1/2 two-dimensional (2D) honeycomb lattice as an exactly solvable 2D spin model that achieves a quantum-spin-liquid (QSL) ground state1, has attracted considerable attention. Numerous theoretical and experimental attempts have been made in search for a QSL candidate with dominant bond-dependent anisotropic-exchange interactions K, namely, the Kitaev interactions2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19. To date, the Kitaev model has been successfully realized in several 3d, 4d, and 5d transition-metal families8,9,10,11,12,13,18,19,20,21,22. Unfortunately, owing to the ubiquitous presence of non-Kitaev interactions6,7,13,15, e.g., Heisenberg exchanges, or off-diagonal symmetric interactions Γ and Γ′, at low temperatures and in the absence of magnetic fields, most of these materials fail to realize a QSL state and exhibit instead a zigzag antiferromagnetic (AFM) order6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,18,19,20,21,22.
Compared to the previously discovered 4d/5d Ru/Ir systems, characterized by a strong spin-orbit coupling (SOC)15,16,17,19, the 3d Co-based Kitaev QSL candidate materials remain highly controversial12,13,20,23,24,25,26,27,28,29. A good example of such materials is Na2Co2TeO6 (NCTO), originally thought as one of the most promising cases for studying Kitaev physics12,13,15,20,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36. Although the evidence of a field-induced QSL is available in NCTO13,20,37,38, the magnetic structure of its ground state remains an open and intriguing question13,20,27,28,32,34,39, whose answer should help to understand the role of the competitors of K, such as the nearest-neighbor (NN) Heisenberg coupling J1 and the third NN Heisenberg coupling J3.
Recently, by using various experimental methods, such as single-crystal or powder neutron diffraction, nuclear magnetic resonance, and electrical polarization measurements, researchers have attempted to understand the magnetic structure of NCTO27,28,30,31,32,40,41, yet an undisputed conclusion has not been reached. i) Powder neutron diffraction experiments suggest a zigzag AFM order, with the magnetic moments lying in the ab plane [see Fig. 1a], accompanied by a Néel-type canting along the c axis below TN ~ 26 K40,41. However, single-crystal neutron diffraction suggests a triple-q order (or multi-k structure) in the absence of a magnetic field12,28,29,32. ii) Although the field dependence of the characteristic magnetic reflections (0.5, 0, 1) and (0, 0.5, 1) demonstrates the magnetic multi-domain effect of the zigzag AFM order28, the temperature dependence of the (0.5, 0, 0) magnetic reflection cannot rule out a triple-q order12,28,32. iii) The spin dynamics were analyzed by a generalized Heisenberg–Kitaev model with five symmetry-allowed terms: K, Γ and Γ′, J1, and J313,34,35,36,42, and two different exchange frustrations: Kitaev and J1-J3. However, such a complex model made the determination of the ground state rather difficult. To distinguish the two possible magnetic structures, i.e., multi-domain or multi-k, a good strategy consists in measuring the field- and temperature-dependent magnetic reflections and the related dynamics at the M-points lying in the ab-plane, such as M (0.5, 0, L), M1 (−0.5, 0.5, L), and M2(0, 0.5, L), where L is an arbitrary integer [see Fig. 1b].
In this paper, we investigate the magnetic order and dynamics of NCTO single crystals via neutron scattering and muon-spin rotation and relaxation (μSR) techniques. Changes of the characteristic magnetic reflections of M (0.5, 0, 1) and M1 (−0.5, 0.5, 1) with temperature and magnetic field indicate that the magnetic ground state has a multi-domain structure, rather than a multi-k structure. Below TN, the modulation of the magnetic domains induces two other transitions at TF and T*, reflected also by the temperature-dependent weak transverse-field (wTF) μSR asymmetry. Furthermore, the estimated static magnetic volume fraction (~90%) confirms the homogeneous nature of the ordering of NCTO single crystals. The relatively large and temperature-independent muon-spin relaxation rate in the AFM state suggests the presence of strong quantum spin fluctuations in NCTO.
Results and discussion
Single-crystal neutron diffraction
To determine whether the magnetic ground state of NCTO is a multi-domain structure or a multi-k structure, both the temperature- and magnetic-field dependence of the magnetic reflections M (0.5, 0, 1) and M1 (−0.5, 0.5, 1) were measured for the wave vectors k = (0.5, 0, 0) and (−0.5, 0.5, 0), respectively [see Fig. 1c, d]. The integrated intensity was calculated by fitting the raw data with a Gaussian function, as illustrated in Fig. S1 of the Supplementary materials. The differences in the non-normalized scattering intensity at the M and M1 points may be due to the non-spherical sample morphology (see sample photo in Fig. S1 of Supplemental materials). The temperature-dependent intensity curves I(T) at both M and M1 points can be well fitted using a phenomenological model: I(T) = I0·[1-(T/TN)]2β43, yielding a magnetic ordering temperature TN ≈ 26 K and β ≈ 0.22. The I(T) curves for both M and M1 show similar behaviors, but a small bump near TF ≈ 15 K only appears for the M1 point, implying that the anomaly at TF may not be attributed to a magnetic phase transition. Interestingly, the spin-wave-excitation gap at the M-point which is ~1 meV vanishes at a temperature close to TF = 15 K ~ 1.3 meV32. Furthermore, the appearance of spin-wave-excitation gap can be attributed to the SOC inducing magnetic anisotropic-exchange interactions K and Γ terms in NCTO13. Therefore, the weak anomaly at TF can be interpreted as the modulation of anisotropy. Apparently, the M1 point is responsive to variations in anisotropy, whereas the M point is not. This implies that the ground-state magnetic structure is not a multi-k structure, as such a structure would require the various arms of the k vector to respond uniformly to the external perturbations44,45,46,47,48. Hence, the subtle differences between these two magnetic reflections indicate that the magnetic ground state is a multi-domain structure, that is, the domains corresponding to the k vectors of (0.5, 0, 0) and (−0.5, 0.5, 0) are not equally populated. In addition, the estimated β ≈ 0.22 is neither consistent with the ideal 2D Ising (β = 0.125) nor the 3D Ising (β = 0.326) system49, but it is more consistent with quasi-2D magnetic correlations13,20,32.
As shown in Fig. 1d, the multi-domain structure is further supported by the field-dependent intensity I(B) at the magnetic reflections M and M1 for B // [−1, 1, 0]. The M and M1 reflections exhibit completely opposite field dependence. When increasing the magnetic field, the intensity of the M reflection decreases, while that of M1 increases. Such opposite field dependence implies that the macroscopic symmetry is broken by the applied magnetic field and, thus, that the magnetic domains along the field direction gradually grow, while the domains in other directions are suppressed44. With the application of an external constraint (magnetic field or uniaxial stress), each arm of the k vector would exhibit a different response in the case of a multi-domain scenario, while they would show similar behavior in the case of a multi-k scheme45,46,47,48. Clearly, our neutron data support a multi-domain structure rather than a multi-k structure in NCTO single crystal. It is worth mentioning that, in the zigzag AFM state, NCTO exhibits a twofold symmetry in the angular dependence of the magnetic torque20, which might be related to the different I(B) field responses at the magnetic reflections M and M1.
Inelastic neutron scattering
Another feature of quantum fluctuations in certain strong quantum magnets is a broadening of the spin-wave-excitation spectra50,51,52. To search for the quantum fluctuations in an external magnetic field, we performed single-crystal inelastic-neutron-scattering measurements by applying various magnetic fields up to 4 T along the [−1,1,0] direction. As shown in Fig. 2a, b, a spin-wave band can be identified at 0 and 4 T along the high symmetry momentum directions Γ-K-M (see the arrows in the inset of Fig. 2). As expected, in the zero-field case, the gapped magnon band at the M-point reaches the minimum energy value and has the largest intensity, thus supporting a zigzag AFM order driven by the non-Kitaev interactions12,20. The spin-wave band at 4 T shows similar features to the lowest-energy spin-wave-excitation spectra at 0 T [see Fig. 2b], but it is significantly broadened by the external field. Note that, in NCTO, we do not observe a splitting of the spin-wave band into multiple branches under an applied magnetic field. Hence, such broadening is most likely caused by the field-induced quantum fluctuations, which can be further evidenced by constant-Q scans at the K-point. As shown in Fig. 2c, at 0 T, the excitation gap is centered around 3 meV12,20. Upon increasing the magnetic field to 4 T, the zigzag AFM order is still present [see I(B) curves in Fig. 1d], but the excitation broadens continuously. The full width at half maximum (FWHM) of the excitation vs the magnetic field is shown in the inset of Fig. 2c. These results indicate that quantum fluctuations in NCTO are enhanced by an applied magnetic field. This is highly consistent with the field-induced magnetically disordered state with strong quantum fluctuations observed between 7.5 and 10 T with B // a*-axis and such strong quantum fluctuations are more intuitively reflected in our μSR data13,20,38.
Muon-spin rotation and relaxation
As an extremely sensitive probe of complex quantum magnetism, μSR is regularly used to investigate the magnetic order and dynamics at a microscopic level. Here, the combination of a long-range (neutron scattering) and a short-range (μSR) technique helped us to confirm the multi-domain magnetic structure and the quantum fluctuations in a NCTO single crystal.
The analysis of wTF-μSR spectra allowed us to establish the temperature evolution of the magnetic volume fraction and to determine the magnetic transition temperatures. Here, an external field of B = 2.3 mT, applied perpendicular to the initial muon-spin direction, leads to a precession of the muon spins with a frequency γµB (where γµ/2π = 135.53 MHz/T is the muon’s gyromagnetic ratio), as shown in Fig. 3a. Note that a field of 2.3 mT is much smaller than the internal fields created by the long-range magnetically ordered state in the NCTO single crystal (see Fig. 4). Therefore, the muon-spin precession reflects only the non-magnetic part of the sample, since in its long-range magnetically order state NCTO exhibits a very fast muon-spin depolarization, here, in less than a few tenths of μs. Consequently, without considering this very fast relaxation, the wTF-μSR spectra can be described by the function:
where ANM is the initial muon-spin asymmetry reflecting the muons implanted in the nonmagnetic (NM) or paramagnetic (PM) fraction of NCTO single crystal; Bint is the local field sensed by muons (here almost identical to the applied magnetic field); φ is an initial phase and λ is the muon-spin relaxation rate.
Figure 3b presents the temperature dependence of the asymmetry for the wTF-μSR spectra. Below TN, a static spin component leads to a fast reduction of asymmetry. Hence, ANM starts to decrease quickly as one approaches the AFM ordering temperature, consistently with the magnetic susceptibility data. Another broad and weak peak was observed in the wTF-5mT data at temperatures close to TF during an independent experiment (see Fig. S3 of Supplemental materials). Although NCTO undergoes three successive AFM transitions [indicated by dashed lines in Fig. 3b], the ANM(T) curve does not capture the possible phase transition at T*13. In the case of a fully magnetically ordered material, the magnetic volume fraction Vmag at temperatures below the magnetic ordering temperature is close to 100%53,54. Here, the temperature dependence of the magnetic volume fraction was estimated from Vmag(T) = 1 − ANM(T)/ANM (T > TN) [see Fig. 3c]. In our case, the static magnetic volume fraction is up to 90% and possible spin-glass behavior, typically revealed by ac susceptibility measurements, is absent in our NCTO single crystal27. These results indicate that, below TN, NCTO can be considered as fully magnetically ordered, ruling out heterogeneous behavior.
If the electronic magnetic moments fluctuate very fast (typically above 1012 Hz in the PM state), the muon-spin polarization would not be influenced. When the system starts to enter the magnetically ordered state, such fluctuations slow down significantly. This scenario gives rise to a fast depolarization with superimposed oscillations, reflected in the appearance of static magnetic moments and the coherent precession of the muon-spin polarization, respectively. Figure 4a, b shows the ZF-μSR time spectra for both Sμ // a and Sμ // c-axis (see also Fig. S4 of Supplementary materials). Such fast depolarization (within 50 ns) with superimposed oscillations below TN, has been observed in other antiferromagnets with strong frustration54,55, thus suggesting that the exotic frustrated state in NCTO might originate from the Kitaev-type frustration13,34,35,36,42. To track the evolution of the muon asymmetry across the whole temperature range, the ZF-µSR spectra were modeled by:
Here, α and 1 − α are the oscillating (i.e., transverse) and non-oscillating (i.e., longitudinal) fractions of the µSR signal, λT and λL represent the transverse and longitudinal muon-spin relaxation rates, A1 and A2 represent the asymmetries of two nonequivalent muon-stopping sites. The muons stopping at the second site do not undergo any precession but show only a weak relaxation, which can be described by an exponential relaxation λtail. The ZF-µSR spectra show only a weak relaxation at temperatures above TN. Here, GKT is the static Kubo-Toyabe relaxation function, normally used to describe the muon-spin relaxation due to the nuclear moments. In the magnetically ordered state, the muon-spin relaxation due to the electronic moments is significantly larger than the contribution from the nuclear moments. Therefore, below TN, the GKT term can be safely ignored. In our analysis, we set GKT to 1 at temperatures below TN (see details in Fig. S5 of Supplemental materials).
Usually, changes in the magnitude of the magnetic moment can be detected by the temperature-dependent internal magnetic field Bint(T). However, the modulation of magnetic domains is related to the distribution of internal magnetic fields. The fit parameters of the ZF-µSR spectra, here summarized in Fig. 4c–f, help us to distinguish the origin of these complex magnetic orders. It is worth mentioning that, as the temperature changes, α was allowed to vary, to ensure a more reasonable parameter set below TN. Indeed, the complex competition between the two different exchange frustrations of Kitaev- and J1-J3-type13,34,35,36,42, can trigger significant spin fluctuations accompanied by changes in spin directions, as shown in Fig. S6c of Supplemental materials. The temperature-dependent parameter α shows weak anomalies near TF, most likely indicating that the modulation of the magnetic domains and the change of electronic moment directions are moderate.
The Bint(T) curves for Sμ // a and Sμ // c exhibit similar features [see Fig. 4c], reflecting the local ordered magnetic moment of the Co2+ ions and provide one distinct phase transition temperature TN. Both curves are consistent with the temperature evolution of the magnetic moments obtained from powder40 and single-crystal neutron diffractions (see details in Fig. 1). A phenomenological equation \({{{{\rm{B}}}}}_{{{\mathrm{int}}}}(T)={B}_{{{\mathrm{int}}}}(T=0)\cdot {[1-{(T/{T}_{N})}^{\gamma }]}^{\delta }\) describes very well the Bint(T) curves shown in Fig. 4c. Here, Bint(T = 0) is the internal magnetic field at 0 K, γ and δ are two empirical parameters. The fitted parameters are summarized in Table SI in the Supplementary materials.
Interestingly, a tiny anomaly was observed at TF in the temperature-dependent λT(T) curve with Sμ // a. We recall that the decay rate λT reflects the width of the static magnetic field distribution at the muon-stopping site [see Fig. 4d]. The observed anomalies at TF are consistent with previous magnetic susceptibility and neutron scattering results, and this might suggest a possibility of redistribution of the magnetic domains originating from three different k-vectors of the zigzag AFM order. Hence, the multi-domain structure is compatible with both the ZF-µSR results and the single-crystal neutron diffraction data.
Spin fluctuations can be traced by the longitudinal relaxation rate λL. As shown in Fig. 4e, both λL(T) curves diverge near TN, but also drop significantly below TN, indicating that spin fluctuations are the strongest close to the onset of the AFM order. Such strong spin fluctuations were further confirmed by the longitudinal-field (LF) µSR measurements [see Fig. S8 of Supplemental materials]. In NCTO, λL becomes approximately constant (0.45 μs-1) at low temperatures below TN. In YbMgGaO4, another promising QSL candidate material, similar T-independent behavior, with a low-temperature value of 0.3 μs-1, has been suggested to reflect its very strong quantum fluctuations56. Hence, the temperature independence of λL might also indicate strong quantum fluctuations in NCTO as thermal fluctuations are almost absent at extremely low temperatures. Incidentally, below TN, the temperature-dependent λtail(T) is nearly zero [see Fig. 4f], here reflecting a simple exponential correction originating from the low background.
We now discuss the zigzag AFM ground state with a multi-domain structure, accompanied by strong quantum fluctuations in NCTO. By using the same fitted parameters, TN ≈ 26 K and β ≈ 0.22, the power-law function I(T) = I0·[1-(T/TN)]2β gives similar I(T) curves at the M and M1 points [see Fig. 1c]. However, the small bump at TF, corresponding to an opening of the spin-wave-excitation gap32, was observed only in the I(T) curve measured at the M1 point. The absence of anomaly at TF in the I(T) curve of the M point is consistent with the scenario of multi-domain structure, wherein distinct domains exhibit different behaviors. The field-dependent intensities of the magnetic reflections further confirm that the magnetic domains oriented along the magnetic field direction grow, while those along other directions are suppressed. At the same time, the subtle feature observed in the λT(T) curves is also consistent with previous results and might indicate a domain reorientation occurring at TF, coinciding with the multi-domain scenario. Such consistent experimental observations support a multi-domain structure rather than a multi-k structure.
Based on the generalized Heisenberg–Kitaev model13,20,29,34,35,36,42, many previous studies have revealed a complex competition between the two types of exchange frustrations: Kitaev and J1-J3, which may lead to strong quantum fluctuations in the ground state of NCTO. Such quantum fluctuations are clearly evidenced by our ZF-μSR measurements: (1) NCTO exhibits a very fast depolarization (within 50 ns), typical of strongly frustrated antiferromagnets54,55 [Fig. 4a, b]; (2) The temperature independence of λL, here close to 0.45 μs−1 [Fig. 4e] at low temperatures, is similar to that observed in FeTe2O5Br, where strong spin fluctuations coexist with a fully magnetically ordered state57. Taken together, our µSR data indicate that the spin dynamics at low temperatures is strongly influenced by quantum effects57, with the opening of a spin-wave-excitation gap below TF further eliminating the contribution of thermal fluctuations32. The zero-field quantum fluctuations inevitably remind us of the recently reported field-induced Kitaev QSL between 7.5 T and 10 T in NCTO13,20,27,38. Further, the broadening at the K-point, where the FWHM gradually increases in a magnetic field [see inset in Fig. 2c], suggests that quantum fluctuations are enhanced by the applied magnetic fields. These results indicate that the applied magnetic fields could quickly suppress the magnetically ordered states and highlight the contribution of Kitaev interactions to quantum fluctuations.
Conclusions
In summary, we investigated both the magnetic structure and the ground-state dynamics in NCTO. Our most significant finding is that NCTO hosts a multi-domain zigzag AFM order with strong quantum fluctuations. Our results provide experimental evidence in favor of the Heisenberg–Kitaev model, where the coexistence of static magnetic order (from the non-Kitaev interactions) with dynamic quantum fluctuations (from the frustrated K term) suggests a highly frustrated magnetic structure.
Note added. While preparing the present manuscript, we noticed that µSR experiments, with a lower early-time resolution (here up to 50 ns), were presented independently58.
Methods
Sample preparation and characterization
The measurements were performed on high-quality single crystals grown by the flux method, as described elsewhere in ref. 20.
Single-crystal neutron diffraction and inelastic neutron scattering
A piece of NCTO single crystal was used for the neutron diffraction experiments [see the inset in Fig. S1a of Supplemental materials], performed at the thermal single-crystal diffractometer ZEBRA at the Swiss Spallation Neutron Source SINQ, Paul Scherrer Institut (PSI), Switzerland. A neutron wavelength of 1.383 Å, obtained by a Ge monochromator, was used for all the measurements at ZEBRA. In-field data were collected using a lifting arm normal-beam geometry, where the crystal was inserted in a 10-T vertical magnet. The magnetic states of NCTO were investigated with B // [−1 1 0] (equivalent to a*-axis). Spin-wave excitation spectra were measured using the SEQUOIA time-of-flight spectrometer at the Spallation Neutron Source, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, USA59,60. Measurements at 2 K with applied field B = 0 T and 4 T were performed by rotating the sample around the vertical axis (sample a*-axis) in steps of 1° with Ei = 18 meV with high energy resolution (∆E) of 0.41 meV (full width at half maximum of the elastic peak). In order to subtract the background, the INS data were collected at 90 K. The constant-Q scans of the K-point (1/3, 1/3, 0) at 1.5 K with applied field B up to 4 T and B // [-1,1,0] direction were measured on the Cold Triple Axis Spectrometer SIKA at the ANSTO, Australia61. Data on SIKA were collected using a fixed final-energy mode with Ef = 5.0 meV, achieving a resolution of 0.13 meV.
μSR
The ZF-, LF-, and wTF-μSR experiments were performed on the M20D surface muon beamline at TRIUMF in Vancouver, Canada using the LAMPF spectrometer. In addition, wTF-μSR experiments were also carried out at the general-purpose surface-muon (GPS) instrument at the πM3 beamline of the Swiss muon source (SμS) at PSI in Villigen, Switzerland. For the experiments on the M20D surface muon beamline at TRIUMF, four layers of aligned NCTO crystals were positioned on aluminum backed mylar tape, Fig. S2a, b of Supplemental materials, with their c axis parallel to the incident muon spin direction. We aimed to study the temperature evolution of the magnetically ordered phase and the dynamics of spin fluctuations. For the experiments on the GPS instrument, since NCTO is thin and flat, we simply used two layers of crystals and then wrapped them with Kapton foil, Fig. S2c, d of Supplemental materials. The incident muon spin direction was always parallel to the c-axis of the crystal. The muon spin could be rotated into the ab-plane (TRAN mode) or be left along the c-axis (LONG mode). Based on the wTF-μSR data taken at TRIUMF, we could determine the temperature evolution of the magnetic volume fraction. For the wTF-μSR measurements, the applied magnetic field was perpendicular to the incident muon spin direction. All the μSR spectra were analyzed using the musrfit software package62.
Data availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding authors upon request.
References
Kitaev, A. Anyons in an exactly solved model and beyond. Ann. Phys. 321, 2–111 (2006).
Jackeli, G. & Khaliullin, G. Mott insulators in the strong spin-orbit coupling limit: from Heisenberg to a quantum compass and Kitaev models. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 017205 (2009).
Chaloupka, J., Jackeli, G. & Khaliullin, G. Kitaev-Heisenberg model on a honeycomb lattice: possible exotic phases in iridium oxides A2IrO3. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 027204 (2010).
Xu, C. et al. Possible Kitaev quantum spin liquid state in 2D materials with S=3/2. Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 087205 (2020).
Tanaka, O. et al. Thermodynamic evidence for a field-angle-dependent Majorana gap in a Kitaev spin liquid. Nat. Phys. 18, 429–435 (2022).
Takagi, H., Takayama, T., Jackeli, G., Khaliullin, G. & Nagler, S. E. Concept and realization of Kitaev quantum spin liquids. Nat. Rev. Phys. 1, 264–280 (2019).
Maksimov, P. A. & Chernyshev, A. L. Rethinking α−RuCl3. Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 033011 (2020).
Yokoi, T. et al. Half-integer quantized anomalous thermal Hall effect in the Kitaev material candidate α-RuCl3. Science 373, 568–572 (2021).
Kasahara, Y. et al. Majorana quantization and half-integer thermal quantum Hall effect in a Kitaev spin liquid. Nature 559, 227–231 (2018).
Banerjee, A. et al. Neutron scattering in the proximate quantum spin liquid α-RuCl3. Science 356, 1055–1059 (2017).
Hwan Chun, S. et al. Direct evidence for dominant bond-directional interactions in a honeycomb lattice iridate Na2IrO3. Nat. Phys. 11, 462–466 (2015).
Yao, W., Iida, K., Kamazawa, K. & Li, Y. Excitations in the Ordered and Paramagnetic States of Honeycomb Magnet Na2Co2TeO6. Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 147202 (2022).
Lin, G. et al. Field-induced quantum spin disordered state in spin−1/2 honeycomb magnet Na2Co2TeO6. Nat. Commun. 12, 5559 (2021).
Broholm, C. et al. Quantum spin liquids. Science 367, 263 (2020).
Liu, H., Chaloupka, J. & Khaliullin, G. Kitaev spin liquid in 3d transition metal compounds. Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 047201 (2020).
Sano, R., Kato, Y. & Motome, Y. Kitaev-Heisenberg Hamiltonian for high-spin d7 Mott insulators. Phys. Rev. B. 97, 014408 (2018).
Liu, H. & Khaliullin, G. Pseudospin exchange interactions in d7 cobalt compounds: Possible realization of the Kitaev model. Phys. Rev. B. 97, 014407 (2018).
Kitagawa, K. et al. A spin-orbital-entangled quantum liquid on a honeycomb lattice. Nature 554, 341–345 (2018).
Ma, J. Spins don’t align here. Nat. Phys. 19, 922–923 (2023).
Lin, G. et al. Evidence for field induced quantum spin liquid behavior in a spin−1/2 honeycomb magnet. Res. Square. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2034295/v1 (2022).
Do, S.-H. et al. Majorana fermions in the Kitaev quantum spin system α-RuCl3. Nat. Phys. 13, 1079–1084 (2017).
Choi, S. K. et al. Spin waves and revised crystal structure of honeycomb iridate Na2IrO3. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 127204 (2012).
Halloran, T. et al. Geometrical frustration versus Kitaev interactions in BaCo2(AsO4)2. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 120, e2215509119 (2023).
Zhang, X. et al. A magnetic continuum in the cobalt-based honeycomb magnet BaCo2(AsO4)2. Nat. Mater. 22, 58–63 (2023).
Winter, S. M. Magnetic couplings in edge-sharing high-spin d7 compounds. J. Phys. Mater. 5, 045003 (2022).
Li, X. et al. Giant Magnetic In-Plane Anisotropy and Competing Instabilities in Na3Co2SbO6. Phys. Rev. X. 12, 041024 (2022).
Zhang, S. et al. Electronic and magnetic phase diagrams of the Kitaev quantum spin liquid candidate Na2Co2TeO6. Phys. Rev. B. 108, 064421 (2023).
Yao, W. et al. Magnetic ground state of the Kitaev Na2Co2TeO6 spin liquid candidate. Phys. Rev. Res. 5, L022045 (2023).
Kruger, W. G. F., Chen, W., Jin, X., Li, Y. & Janssen, L. Triple-q Order in Na2Co2TeO6 from proximity to hidden-SU(2)-symmetric point. Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 146702 (2023).
Xiao, G., Xia, Z., Song, Y. & Xiao, L. Magnetic properties and phase diagram of quasi-two-dimensional Na2Co2TeO6 single crystal under high magnetic field. J. Phys. Condens. Matter. 34, 075801 (2021).
Lee, C. H. et al. Multistage development of anisotropic magnetic correlations in the Co-based honeycomb lattice Na2Co2TeO6. Phys. Rev. B. 103, 214447 (2021).
Chen, W. et al. Spin-orbit phase behavior of Na2Co2TeO6 at low temperatures. Phys. Rev. B. 103, L180404 (2021).
Yao, W. & Li, Y. Ferrimagnetism and anisotropic phase tunability by magnetic fields in Na2Co2TeO6. Phys. Rev. B. 101, 085120 (2020).
Kim, C. et al. Antiferromagnetic Kitaev interaction in Jeff=1/2 cobalt honeycomb materials Na3Co2SbO6 and Na2Co2TeO6. J. Phys. Condens. Matter. 34, 045802 (2022).
Samarakoon, A. M., Chen, Q., Zhou, H. & Garlea, V. O. Static and dynamic magnetic properties of honeycomb lattice antiferromagnets Na2M2TeO6, M=Co and Ni. Phys. Rev. B. 104, 184415 (2021).
Songvilay, M. et al. Kitaev interactions in the Co honeycomb antiferromagnets Na3Co2SbO6 and Na2Co2TeO6. Phys. Rev. B 102, 224429 (2020).
Hong, X. et al. Strongly scattered phonon heat transport of the candidate Kitaev material Na2Co2TeO6. Phys. Rev. B. 104, 144426 (2021).
Pilch, P. et al. Field- and polarization-dependent quantum spin dynamics in the honeycomb magnet Na2Co2TeO6: magnetic excitations and continuum. Phys. Rev. B 108, L140406 (2023).
Li, N. et al. Magnon-polaron driven thermal Hall effect in a Heisenberg-Kitaev antiferromagnet. Phys. Rev. B 108, L140402 (2023).
Bera, A. K., Yusuf, S. M., Kumar, A. & Ritter, C. Zigzag antiferromagnetic ground state with anisotropic correlation lengths in the quasi-two-dimensional honeycomb lattice compound Na2Co2TeO6. Phys. Rev. B 95, 094424 (2017).
Lefrançois, E. et al. Magnetic properties of the honeycomb oxide Na2Co2TeO6. Phys. Rev. B 94, 214416 (2016).
Sanders, A. L. et al. Dominant Kitaev interactions in the honeycomb materials Na3Co2SbO6 and Na2Co2TeO6. Phys. Rev. B. 106, 014413 (2022).
Garlea, V. O. et al. Magnetic and orbital ordering in the spinel MnV2O4. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 066404 (2008).
Rodríguez-Carvajal, J. & Villain, J. Magnetic structures. C. R. Physique 20, 770–802 (2019).
Saito, H. et al. In-plane anisotropy of single-q and multiple-q ordered phases in the antiferromagnetic metal CeRh2Si2. Phys. Rev. B 108, 094440 (2023).
Khanh, N. D. et al. Zoology of multiple-Q spin textures in a centrosymmetric tetragonal magnet with itinerant electrons. Adv. Sci. 9, 2105452 (2022).
Takagi, R. et al. Multiple-q noncollinear magnetism in an itinerant hexagonal magnet. Sci. Adv. 4, eaau3402 (2018).
Park, P. et al. Tetrahedral triple-Q magnetic ordering and large spontaneous Hall conductivity in the metallic triangular antiferromagnet Co1/3TaS2. Nat. Commun. 14, 8346 (2023).
Collins, M. F. Magnetic Critical Scattering (ed Lovesey, S. W.) (Oxford Univ. Press, 1989).
Ma, J. et al. Static and dynamical properties of the spin-1/2 equilateral triangular-lattice antiferromagnet Ba3CoSb2O9. Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 087201 (2016).
Shen, Y. et al. Evidence for a spinon Fermi surface in a triangular-lattice quantum-spin-liquid candidate. Nature 540, 559–562 (2016).
Shen, Y. et al. Fractionalized excitations in the partially magnetized spin liquid candidate YbMgGaO4. Nat. Commun. 9, 4138 (2018).
Zhu, X. Y. et al. Spin order and fluctuations in the EuAl4 and EuGa4 topological antiferromagnets: A μSR study. Phys. Rev. B 105, 014423 (2022).
Rovers, M. T. et al. Muon-spin-relaxation investigation of the spin dynamics of geometrically frustrated chromium spinels. Phys. Rev. B 66, 174434 (2002).
Kenney, E. M. et al. Novel magnetic ordering in LiYbO2 probed by muon spin relaxation. Phys. Rev. B 106, 144401 (2022).
Li, Y. et al. Muon spin relaxation evidence for the U(1) quantum spin-liquid ground state in the triangular antiferromagnet YbMgGaO4. Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 097201 (2016).
Pregelj, M. et al. Persistent spin dynamics intrinsic to amplitude-modulated long-range magnetic order. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 227202 (2012).
Miao, P. et al. Persistent spin dynamics in magnetically ordered honeycomb cobalt oxides. arXiv: 2307.16451v1 (2023).
Stone, M. B. et al. A comparison of four direct geometry time-of-flight spectrometers at the Spallation Neutron Source. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 85, 045113 (2014).
Granroth, G. E. et al. SEQUOIA: a newly operating chopper spectrometer at the SNS. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 251, 012058 (2010).
Wu, C. M. et al. SIKA—the multiplexing cold-neutron triple-axis spectrometer at ANSTO. J. Inst. 11, P10009 (2016).
Suter, A. & Wojek, B. M. Musrfit: a free platform-independent framework for μSR data analysis. Phys. Procedia. 30, 69–73 (2012).
Acknowledgements
G.T.L., T.S., and J.M. thank the financial support from the National Key Research and Development Program of China (No. 2022YFA1402702), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. U2032213, 12004243, 12374105). G.T.L. acknowledges support from the Startup Fund for Young Faculty at SJTU (24×010500168). J.M. thanks the interdisciplinary program Wuhan National High Magnetic Field Center (No. WHMFC 202122), Huazhong University of Science and Technology. T.S. acknowledges support from the Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai (Grant Nos. 21ZR1420500 and 21JC1402300), Natural Science Foundation of Chongqing (Grant No. CSTB-2022NSCQ-MSX1678). X.Y.L. was supported by the National Science Foundation through grant NSF-DMR−1807451. Work at UBC (X.Y.L., M.C.A.) was supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC), and through the Stewart Blusson Quantum Matter Institute by the Canada First Research Excellence Fund (CFREF). M.S. thanks the support from Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Extreme Conditions (Grant No. 2023B1212010002). The work performed in the University of Tennessee (crystal growth) was supported by NSF-DMR-2003117. We acknowledge the neutron beam time from SINQ with Proposal 20222504, SNS with Proposal No. IPTS-27393.1, and ANSTO with Proposal No. P15604. We thank ACNS for the beam time and the sample environment group at ACNS for the support. This research used resources at the Spallation Neutron Source, a DOE Office of Science User Facility operated by the Oak Ridge National Laboratory. Part of this work is based on experiments performed at the Swiss spallation neutron source SINQ, and the Swiss muon source at the Paul Scherrer Institut, Villigen, Switzerland.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
J.J. and G.L. conceived the experimental measurements with supervision from J.M.; H.Z. and J.M. synthesized the crystalas. J.J. and O.Z. conducted the single crystal neutron scattering experiment, and J.J. processed the data. T.H., A.K., G.D., G.L., J.J., and J.M. carried out the inelastic neutron scattering experiment, with data analysis conducted by G.L., J.J., J.M., M.S., and X.W. Additionally, X.L., T.S., S.D., M.A., G.L., and J.M. performed the μSR experiment. X.L., G.L., T.S., and J.M. analyzed the μSR data. J.J. prepared the manuscript, with contributions from X.L., W.X., G.L., T.S., and J.M. All authors participated in discussions regarding the data and its interpretation.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Communications materials thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Primary Handling Editor: Aldo Isidori. A peer review file is available.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Jiao, J., Li, X., Lin, G. et al. Static magnetic order with strong quantum fluctuations in spin-1/2 honeycomb magnet Na2Co2TeO6. Commun Mater 5, 159 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s43246-024-00594-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s43246-024-00594-1
- Springer Nature Limited