Abstract
Wildfires are increasing in size and severity and fire seasons are lengthening, largely driven by climate and land-use change. Many plant species from fire-prone ecosystems are adapted to specific fire regimes corresponding to historical conditions and shifts beyond these bounds may have severe impacts on vegetation recovery and long-term species persistence. Here, we conduct a meta-analysis of field-based studies across different vegetation types and climate regions to investigate how post-fire plant recruitment, reproduction and survival are affected by fires that occur outside of the historical fire season. We find that fires outside of the historical fire season may lead to decreased post-fire recruitment, particularly in obligate seeding species. Conversely, we find a general increase in post-fire survival in resprouting species. Our results highlight the trade-offs that exist when considering the effects of changes in the seasonal timing of fire, an already present aspect of climate-related fire regime change.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Global fire regimes are shifting1,2, driven by a combination of climate change and other anthropogenic pressures including accelerated land-use change3,4. In the last five years, megafires have burnt at unprecedented scales and intensities across many continents5,6,7, commonly starting and ending outside the historical fire season8,9,10. This shift is frequently driven by early onset drought conditions, resulting in fuels that are dry enough to burn6,7. Fire regime elements include season, intensity, severity and fire return interval11. Within fire-prone ecosystems, plants are broadly adapted to relatively stable fire regimes12 shaped by long term climate trends13. Therefore, substantial or prolonged modifications to fire regimes may affect plant life-cycles, with differential impacts likely dependent on plant functional type14,15.
The frequency and extent of wildfires is influenced by the intersection of climate, weather, ignitions and landscape fuels13, and their temporal variation drives patterns of fire season timing and length. In some ecosystems, the conditions conducive to wildfires can occur at any time, while in others they are predictable and typically persist for just a few to several months (e.g., Mediterranean climate regions within California3,6,10 and Australia5,7). However, as a result of decreased rainfall and the increased frequency of severe fire weather associated with climate change1, the length of fire seasons are extending in many regions3,4, which is driving a substantial increase in the amount of vegetation burnt outside the historically predominate fire seasons1.
Both the short-term characteristics of fire events and long-term, interval-related elements of fire regimes can shape species distributions. The characteristics of individual fire events can filter plant functional types in the short-term, leading to local mortality or recruitment failures14,15,16,17,18, while the overall fire regime can impart selective pressures on species and traits within ecosystems over generations14,19,20,21. Research on how fire season influences fundamental life-cycle stages is surprisingly limited22,23,24 and often focuses on the local scale. Fire seasonality is a component of the fire regime25 and shapes plant responses to fire26,27. How plants respond to fire season variation is linked to seasonal phenological cycles of growth, dormancy, flowering, and reproduction22, meaning that when fire occurs during vulnerable phenological stages, post-fire population recovery responses can be negatively impacted22. Whether these effects can have significant measurable influence over functional population processes is yet to be examined at a broad scale but is essential for informed interpretation of how local-scale outcomes are related to landscape-scale distributions. How plant species and their populations respond to shifts in fire seasonality is likely to differ between plant functional types and the environmental conditions in which species persist28,29,30. Identifying similar patterns across functional groups or ecosystems in different regions can allow greater predictive power beyond single-species studies. Fundamental to species resilience in fire-prone ecosystems is the development of traits to support population persistence that ensure survival, recruitment and reproduction following fire15 and we hypothesise that different fire response traits may be differently affected by changes in the seasonal timing of fire.
There are two broad mechanisms by which plant populations recover following fire in fire-prone ecosystems: resprouting from protected buds and recruitment from seeds31. Some species use a combination of both resprouting and recruitment from seeds. For species that respond to fire by resprouting31, the timing of fire relative to their active growing season may impact energy storage, resprouting vigour and survival22. Other elements of the fire regime, such as fire intervals, may also deplete their ability to resprout32, potentially by interacting with season. Some resprouting species can also reproduce via fire-stimulated flowering (also known as post-fire flowering, PFF) to help ensure long-term population persistence33. In some fire-prone ecosystems, fire-stimulated flowering is the dominant fire response type34. The timing of fire relative to the peak flowering season may impact the flowering intensity and reproductive output35.
Species unable to resprout and thus typically killed by fire, termed obligate seeders, often maintain long-lived, fire-tolerant seed banks within soils or canopy-stored woody fruit (serotiny) that allow for post-fire germination and recruitment36. As adult plants of obligate seeding species are typically killed by fire, they rely solely on regeneration from seeds to persist37. Often, seeds of obligate seeders from fire-prone ecosystems have dormancy breaking and germination stimulation cues associated with fire. These fire cues lead to obligate seeding species frequently recruiting in even-aged cohorts in the first few years after fire31. Yet, due to their sometimes-complex dormancy and germination requirements, seasonal changes in fire may lead to mismatches between dormancy release cues and germination stimulation cues, resulting in delayed emergence, loss of seedling vigour, or ultimately reduced or failed recruitment24.
To understand how changes in fire season impacts plant population persistence in fire-prone ecosystems, we asked the fundamental question: How do changes in fire season affect post-fire plant survival, recruitment and reproductive output in fire-prone ecosystems? To test this, we conducted a systematic meta-analysis, collating evidence from English-language articles spanning, Europe, North and Central and South America, Australia and South Africa (as well as single articles from Asia, the Middle East). We examined how reproduction, recruitment and survival of plant species are affected by changes in fire season. We explicitly tested whether their response is differentially affected by fires that occur outside the historical fire season or at different times within their historical fire season. We also examined how different plant functional groups within a range of climate and vegetation types respond to fires outside the historical fire season. Changes in the seasonal timing of fire are hypothesised to have the greatest impact on plant responses that are integrally linked to seasonally varying environmental cues, such as flowering phenology33 and reproduction33; resprouting function22; and seed dormancy and germination dynamics24.
Results and discussion
Fires out of their historical temporal range affect plant species recruitment
Across our analysis, the modelled effects of fires outside the historical fire season resulted in significantly reduced recruitment compared to fires that occurred within the historical season (Hedges’ g: mean = −3.03, 95%; CI = −4.58; −1.47), whereas fires occurring outside the historical fire season had no significant impact on reproduction (Hedges’ g: mean = −0.04; CI = −1.51; 0.60; Fig. 1a). Conversely, fires outside their historical season resulted in higher survival (Hedges’ g: mean = 2.89, CI = 1.94; 3.84; Fig. 1a). Negative recruitment effects were most evident in hot desert climates (Hedges’ g: mean = − 1.66, CI = −2.59; −0.73), woodland-type vegetation (Hedges’ g: mean = −2.13, CI = −2.76; −1.49) and obligate seeder species (Hedges’ g: mean = −1.69, CI = −2.51; −0.88, Fig. 2a).
Recruitment processes within the plant life cycle, including dormancy and germination, are uniquely temperature and moisture dependant38. Thus, changes in the season of fire can alter how seeds receive the cues required to initiate germination, and, in some cases, changes in fire season lead to mismatched dormancy and germination cues, resulting in delayed or failed emergence39,40. Reduced recruitment following fires out of the historical range may also be a result of a reduction in the availability or survival of seed banks41. This reduction could be driven by increased seed bank mortality during fires (due to increased seed moisture23), a loss in seed viability between fire and the subsequent germination period17, reduced opportunity for germination17 or increased pre-germination seed predation41. Given that seedling recruitment is essential for the persistence of obligate seeders following lethal fires, reductions in the recruitment processes (germination, emergence and establishment) have the potential to cause the abrupt local loss of obligate seeding species.
Reduced recruitment as a result of changes in fire season is supported by previous work describing the theoretical framework of plant response to fire seasonality. Miller, Tangney22 and Keith, Dunker42 collectively identified eight mechanisms which can impact how plants respond to out of season fires, and seven of these theoretical mechanisms are directly associated with recruitment processes.
On average, there was a neutral effect on reproduction by fires outside their historical season (Fig. 1a). However, results within subgroups varied widely. For instance, the mean pooled effect size corresponding to the impact on reproduction within grassland vegetation types varied from a lower estimate of −2.16, to an upper estimate of 0.69 (Fig. 2b), however, upper effect sizes sourced from studies extended up to an estimated hedge’s g of between 16 and 17 (Fig. 2b). Grasslands are frequently comprised of a proportionally large number of post-fire flowering species34, which are inherently resprouting species. These same grasslands may be under the influence of short fire intervals (e.g., 1–4 years between fires26), and therefore, reproduction in PFF species in grasslands may be less contingent on the timing of fire and more influenced by variables not captured by this analysis, such as, local differences in environmental conditions that impact post-fire reproduction success43.
On average, survival increased following fires outside their historical seasons (Fig. 1a). Studies from four out of five tested climate regions showed significantly higher survival following fires outside compared to within their historical seasons, and post-fire survival of resprouting species was significantly higher for the same comparison (Fig. 2c). These responses may be correlated with a decrease in fire severity during fires outside the historical fire season, leading to higher plant survival44,45. Higher plant survival outside of the historical fire season may also be because many plant species may be in their resistant (dormant) state at this time owing to temperature- or moisture-limited growing phenology22,46. That is, some resprouting species may be actively growing during the historical fire season where this aligns to the growing season. Resprouting plants that experience high severity fire during or shortly after their growing season may suffer increased mortality and resprouting failure as their carbohydrate reserves are depleted and their ability to resprout is limited22. Thus, the combined effect of higher severity fires occurring during periods when resprouting plants are actively growing may explain why there is increased mortality following fires within the historical fire season.
In general, natural plant populations maintain substantial levels of genetic diversity which provides a source for adaptive capacity, allowing them to adapt to changes in their environment, which may potentially include changes in fire season47. Phenotypic plasticity within populations can also provide avenues for quick adaptation to changing conditions, for example, flowering phenology has been demonstrated in several studies to be highly plastic in response to warming, resulting in plants flowering earlier and, in some cases, flowering longer48. However, the ability of species and plant populations to adapt to changes in fire season may be dependent on whether fire seasons shift slowly via gradual changes in the timing of fire, or rapidly via extreme out-of-season fires47. Obligate seeding species are particularly vulnerable to abrupt changes in fire regimes14 as they maintain long-lived seed banks either in the soil or within woody fruits in the canopy of adult plants and are often unable to recruit between fire events49. Therefore, abrupt shifts in the recurrent seasonal timing of fire may outpace the adaptive capacity of long-lived obligate seeding species.
Early season fires have a neutral affect on post-fire recruitment, reproduction and survival
Changes in the timing of fires within the historical fire season had a muted effect on recruitment, reproduction and survival (Fig. 1b). The mean pooled effect size for reproduction was higher following early season fires compared to late season fires; although it was not significant, and the sample size was small (N = 4 pairwise comparisons; Fig. 1b). Reduced reproduction in late season fires may be due to the direct effect of fire occurring during flower or ovule development and interrupting subsequent seed production50, a correlation with generally higher fire severity in late season fires, or a mismatch between the timing of late season fire and post-fire flowering cues. Fewer available flowers following fire can result in fewer seeds produced, which may have flow-on effects for post-fire recruitment in subsequent years51.
Despite small sample sizes for many subgroup comparisons, including an insufficient number of studies describing the effects of fire season on reproduction (i.e., <3), there were no significant effects on recruitment across any of the subgroups (Fig. 3a). In the case of Setterfield52, recruitment following fires in tropical eucalypt savannas were similar despite changes in fire season; however, there was a delay in seedling emergence until the following year. As seeds have seasonal dormancy and germination requirements (acknowledging some seeds may cycle through dormancy51), timing of fire relative to these dormancy states may be critical to stimulate germination during the non-dormant phase24,40. Plant survival was higher in early season fires compared to late season fires in studies which did not specify fire-response type (‘unspecified’, Fig. 3b). Early season fires in many ecosystems tend to be lower in intensity and severity53, thus allowing higher plant survival.
The tropical savannas of Australia present an example of consistent widespread early season burning. Early season burning is undertaken as part of an annual fire management programme and incidentally contributes to the income of regional landowners54. The foundation of the programme aims to reduce large scale, high intensity, late season fires, which results in lower annual carbon emissions by reducing the total amount of biomass consumed by late season fires. In addition, plant survival in these systems may derive a benefit from early season fires owing to reduced fire intensity as less grassy understorey biomass is available53. However, as noted by Prior, Williams55, in systems that are subjected to annual burning regimes, survival of young trees is critically important; yet in some cases, younger age classes suffer high mortality during fire regardless of fire severity or season55.
Notwithstanding the strength of evidence from individual case studies, there remains a fundamental need for further research into the effects of changes in fire season to adequately assess the risks posed under future fire regimes. Specifically, there is a need for a greater understanding of how changes in the timing of fire within historical fire seasons may impact plant populations across a broader scope of climate, vegetation types and functional groups, evident from the small sample sizes in this study. Future research into the effects of changes in the seasonal timing of fire should endeavour to assess interactions with other fire regime elements, especially fire severity, and strive for consistent metrics, including documenting underlying fire history (e.g., fire intervals) and spatial measures of fire severity (linked with plot-based measurements). Furthermore, while we were able to show the immediate impacts of changes in fire season (~1-year post-fire), we critically need robust and well-designed studies that attempt to separate immediate fire effects from on-going climate and compound disturbance effects to assess the long-term response of plant populations to changes in fire season.
Conclusion
Changes in the seasonal timing of fire can have significant effects on plant reproduction, survival and recruitment in fire-prone ecosystems. Our results indicate that post-fire recruitment is, on average, reduced by fires outside their historical temporal range, with the effect being particularly notable for obligate seeding species, which wholly rely on post-fire recruitment for population recovery. Conversely, survival of resprouting species is, on average, higher under the same changes in fire timing. Therefore, there is an inherent trade-off between the success of these key post-fire recovery strategies, with the potential to impact species composition under persistent changes in fire seasonality. Climate change is shifting the timing and length of global fire seasons56,57,58, and the findings of this meta-analysis indicate that such shifts may have broad and interacting effects across many regions and across a range of major plant functional types.
Methods
Literature search
We identified relevant literature using keyword searches of Web of Science and Scopus databases in September 2020 and September 2021. We targeted all available papers published before September 2021. We conducted one search for each of the key responses, (1) Fire AND season AND plant recruitment, resulting in 550 papers, of which 370 were unique. (2) Fire AND season AND plant reproduction, resulting in 329 papers, of which 245 were unique; and (3) Fire AND season AND plant survival, resulting in 426 papers, of which 291 were unique. We also included 90 papers identified in a previous publication22. Combined, 996 papers were identified for screening. The first screening determined if each paper was relevant to the topic, through the reading of the title and abstract; 667 were removed at this stage. The remaining 329 were thoroughly examined, of which 277 were excluded based on criteria outlined below, leaving 52 articles included in this meta-analysis19,43,50,52,55,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85,86,87,88,89,90,91,92,93,94,95,96,97,98,99,100,101,102,103,104,105, which produced a data set of 133 pairwise comparisons. PRIMSA diagram included as Supplementary Fig. 1.
To be included in this analysis, studies needed to (1) measure plant species response following fire in the field; (2) have comparisons between at least two different fires in two different months measured once following fire at similar post-fire ages (Supplementary Fig. 2); (3) report on plant survival, reproduction or recruitment (articles that measured diversity, richness or evenness were discarded); and (4) contain data on means (or pairwise F-statistics reported within ANOVA tables), estimation of variation (including standard deviation or standard error > 0) and a clearly defined and stated sample size for each experimental group. Reported statistics were extracted from each relevant paper, either from text and tables or from figures using the ‘metadigitise’ package106 within the R statistical programme107. From each of the papers, we also extracted secondary characteristics that we aimed to examine as correlates of plant response to fire season. These included fire metrics (e.g., fire severity, fire intensity, flame height or soil temperature; Fig. 4) and inter-fire metrics (e.g., time since last fire; Fig. 4), historical fire season, climate type, vegetation type and functional plant groups. Due to limited and inconsistent reporting of fire and inter-fire metrics (Fig. 4), these potential correlates of fire season effects were unable to be included in further analysis. Historical fire season, climate type, vegetation type and functional plant groups were sufficiently represented in the literature to be included further in the analysis.
Historical fire season was defined as a period of the year that historically had the highest level of fire activity and was either defined within the paper itself or derived from a combination of secondary literature associated with the target region or local reviews on fire season (e.g., Knapp, Estes26).
For comparisons between the historical and non-historical season fires, we classed fires that occurred within the historical season as the control group, and fires that occurred during the non-historical fire season as the treatment group. Where there were multiple treatment group (non-historical season) fires (e.g., spring and autumn fires) compared to a single historical season fire (e.g., summer), we split the N of the historical season fire to avoid double counting of control groups108. For each pairwise comparison we did not separate whether non-historical season fires occurred before or after the historical fire season.
For comparisons between two different periods within the historical fire season, the control group was defined as the period of the year that is driest (lowest rainfall and/or highest temperature). This is because drier periods are more likely to result in relatively higher burnt area than wetter time periods, defined here as the treatment group13, thus, having a larger effect on plant responses across ecosystems.
Categorisation of effect size
We created pairwise comparisons to examine the effects of fire season across two levels of inference: (1) between historical and non-historical fire seasons, and (2) between two different periods within the historical fire season (e.g., early and late season fires, Fig. 1a, b). For each pairwise comparison, Hedges’ g was calculated, along with an estimated standard error and 95% confidence bounds around the mean effect using the “esc” package109 within the R statistical programme110.
We categorised the effect size measures from each article into three different topics based on the ecological process examined: (1) post-fire recruitment (measured by seedling density, seedling abundance, or germination %); (2) post-fire reproduction (measured by number of flowering stems, % of individuals flowering, or flowering density); and (3) post-fire plant survival (measured by survival %, plant density or number of resprouting stems).
Random effects model and subgroup analysis
We implemented three random effects models over each of the three topics of interest (i.e., recruitment, reproduction and survival). We chose a random effects model because we believe that there will be no single fixed effect size111. Instead, we assumed that effect size will differ between climate types, vegetation communities and plant functional groups. Therefore, a random effects model was deemed most appropriate and allowed us to investigate any drivers of differences in effect size between studies108. Using the ‘meta’ package in R, we implemented the meta-analysis using the “metagen()” function, applying the inverse variance method111 paired with the Hartung-Knapp method to refine the variance estimate around the mean treatment estimate110. This was implemented only when Hartung-Knapp confidence intervals were narrower than CIs from classic random effects models that used DerSimonian-Laird estimations111. As part of a conservative approach, we excluded outliers from this analysis. To identify outliers, we used the ‘dmetar’ package112 within the R statistical programme107. We defined outliers as pairwise comparisons where the 95% confidence interval of the effect size from the individual study is beyond the bounds of the 95% confidence interval of the pooled effect size112. We report pooled effects without the influence of outliers112.
To further understand differences within and between fire seasons for each topic, we assigned each pairwise comparison to a subgroup based on the climate type and vegetation type of the study ecosystem and the plant functional group to which each species belongs that was reported within the comparisons. Using the calculated effect sizes for each pairwise comparison and assigned subgroups, we conducted a subgroup analysis which examines the variance within topics based on similar subgroup characteristics (e.g., climate type, vegetation type and functional group). Subgroup analysis was conducted using the ‘update.meta’ function in the ‘meta’ package110 in R107 and where there were less than subgroups with <3 pairwise comparisons were discarded from further analysis. All analyses are visualised using ggplot2113 in R107.
Below, we briefly explain the variables used to define subgroups and the role they play in defining ecosystem characteristics and plant responses to fire.
Climate Type
Climate plays an integral role in defining the fire season of many ecosystems56,114,115. Climate type, defined by the Köppen climate classifications, allows us to analyse how differences in climate regime may influence plant responses to changes in seasonal timing of fire7. Specifically, we can gain insights into how plant responses vary between seasonal climates (e.g., hot-summer Mediterranean climate (Csa)) and aseasonal climates (e.g., humid subtropical climate (Cfa)116). For each article, climate type was extracted directly from the paper or derived from location data using the Köppen climate map provided by Peel, Finlayson117.
Of the 53 articles we examined, 18 described research conducted in humid subtropical climates (Cfa), eight in Tropical savanna with dry-winter climates (Aw), six in Oceanic climates (Cfb), five in Hot-summer Mediterranean climates (Csa) and five in Cold semi-arid (BSk) climates. The other 11 articles were comprised of research from Hot-summer humid continental climates (Dfa, three articles), Hot semi-arid (Bsh, two articles), Warm-summer Mediterranean (Csb, two articles), Warm-summer humid continental (Dfb, two articles), Subtropical highland (Cwb, one article), and Warm dry-winter continental (Dwa, one article) climates.
Vegetation type
Vegetation type can be broadly described as forest, woodland, savanna, shrubland or grassland, and reflects variation in local geological and climate interactions that define the extent of distinct ecosystems. Vegetation type influences the fuel dynamics and fire regime of an ecosystem118, and thus, the typical fire severity (e.g., stand-replacing versus surface fire), season, interval and extent. For example, dry forests may be characterised by surface or mixed severity fire regimes, whereas shrublands typically experience canopy (stand-replacing) fire regimes118,119,120. Including vegetation type in this analysis allows us to evaluate the sensitivity of different ecosystems to fire seasonality effects and provides a means to indirectly assess potentially interacting fire metrics inconsistently reported in the literature (e.g., fire severity). All papers defined the vegetation type of their study region.
From the 53 articles we examined, 51 articles focused on a single vegetation type, while two articles included plant responses from multiple vegetation types99,104. Forest was the most frequently studied vegetation type (21 articles), followed by savanna and grassland-type vegetation (13 and 10 articles, respectively) while the last 12 articles examined seasonal responses to fire in Woodlands (8), Shrublands (four) and Wetlands (one).
Functional group
Many plant species that inhabit fire-prone ecosystems have developed traits that support recruitment, reproduction and survival under historical fire regimes15,29,31. Adaptive traits influence how plants respond and recover following fire15. The distribution of these fire-adapted traits within and between ecosystems is driven, at least in part, by the long-term characteristics of the fire regime29,120,121. Thus, we hypothesise that different traits may be differently affected by changes in the seasonal timing of fire. In this analysis, we focused on three functional traits best represented in the literature relating to recruitment, reproduction and survival. These traits were post-fire resprouting, obligate seeding (synonymous with fire-killed or post-fire non-sprouting) and fire induced flowering (post-fire flowering, PFF29).
Six articles compared the response of multiple functional groups to changes in fire season, with the remaining 47 articles focused solely on individual functional groups. The most common functional group analysed in our data set was resprouting plants, occurring in 29 articles. The other two functional groups had equal representation with ten articles examining both obligate seeding species and ten articles examining post-fire flowering species. In ten articles, responses of obligate seeding and resprouting species were combined, thus representing a collective response to changes in fire season.
The data set, publication bias and p-hacking
From the 53 reviewed articles, the resulting data set contained122 pairwise comparisons, with effect sizes (Hedges’ g) ranging from −37 to 80. Using a random effects model resulted in a global mean, excluding outliers, reported in Hedges’ g of 0.3505 (95% CI: 0.0005; 0.7005, P-value = 0.04). These data comprise research from six continents, including a large representation from North America, Australia, Mediterranean Europe and South Africa, and across 10 climate regions, including 42 comparisons from humid subtropical (Cfa) climate regions.
Data were dominated by comparisons between historical fire season and fires outside the historical fire season (N = 104). From these 104 pairwise comparisons, articles that examined the effects of fire season on plant survival were most frequent (N = 56 comparisons), followed by comparisons that examined reproduction (N = 29), and least represented were papers that examined how changes in fire season impact recruitment (N = 19). There were 29 pairwise comparisons between fires at different times within the historical fire seasons with a large proportion of these comparisons (N = 12, ~40%) coming from climates with predictable seasonal rainfall, e.g., tropical savannas (Aw).
For each of the three topics (i.e., survival, reproduction and recruitment), we assessed each set of responses for publication bias and p-hacking. Tests for publication bias assume that studies that report low effect size (Hedges’ g ~ 0) are less likely to be published compared to papers with large effect sizes123. However, publication bias may also arise as a result of P-hacking, where researchers selectively collect data or apply statistical analyses until nonsignificant results become significant, thus resulting in P-values close to significance thresholds (e.g., P-value = 0.05)124. Publication bias was assessed by visually identifying asymmetry in funnel plots and applying Egger’s regressions125. Egger’s regression is a linear regression model that tests for asymmetry in the data set, using the standardised effect score as the response variable, and the inverse standard error for each study as the predictor variable125. An intercept overlapping zero suggests that there is no significant asymmetry. Egger’s test and funnel plots were constructed using the ‘meta’ package110 within R statistical programme107. P-hacking was tested using the P-curve technique within the ‘dmetar’ package112 in R107. The P-curve can provide evidence of P-hacking if there is an overrepresented and skewed proportion of P-values close to 0.05126.
There was no evidence of asymmetry for any of the three groups (recruitment: Egger test: t = −1.62, P = 0.11; reproduction: Egger test: t = 0.71, P = 0.48; or survival: Egger test: t = 1.41, P = 0.13) and no evidence of P-hacking from any of the groups. All three P-curves displayed strong left-skewness (recruitment: 58.62 % of comparisons are P < 0.025; reproduction: 53.12% of comparisons are P < 0.025; and survival: 72.22% of comparisons are P < 0.025; Power Estimate ranged from 97–99%). Combined, the P-curve analysis and the Egger’s regression show no evidence of publication bias or P-hacking.
Reporting summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Data availability
Data used, generated or analysed during this study are available for download from Dryad Digital Repository (https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.7sqv9s4t5)122. All data is presented in tabulated comma delimited format accompanied by a html file which describes each data file including metadata of each column.
Code availability
All R script and Rmarkdown outputs generated during analysed this study are available for download (https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.7sqv9s4t5) from Dryad Digital Repository122. Within the Markdown.html file are descriptions of all packages used within R statistical programme and their version numbers used for this analysis. No custom functions were created for this analysis.
References
Canadell, J. G. et al. Multi-decadal increase of forest burned area in Australia is linked to climate change. Nat. Commun. 12, 6921 (2021).
Jolly, W. M. et al. Climate-induced variations in global wildfire danger from 1979 to 2013. Nat. Commun. 6, 7537 (2015).
Jain, P., Wang, X. & Flannigan, M. D. Trend analysis of fire season length and extreme fire weather in North America between 1979 and 2015. Int. J. Wildland Fire 26, 1009–1020 (2017).
Wotton, B. M. & Flannigan, M. D. Length of the fire season in a changing climate. For. Chronicle 69, 187–192 (1993).
Collins, L. et al. The 2019/2020 mega-fires exposed Australian ecosystems to an unprecedented extent of high-severity fire. Environ. Res. Lett. 16, 044029 (2021).
Higuera, P. E. & Abatzoglou, J. T. Record‐setting climate enabled the extraordinary 2020 fire season in the western United States. Glob. Change Biol. 27, 1–2 (2021).
Nolan, R. H. et al. Limits to post-fire vegetation recovery under climate change. Plant Cell Environ. 44, 3471–3489 (2021).
Abram, N. J. et al. Connections of climate change and variability to large and extreme forest fires in southeast Australia. Commun. Earth Environ. 2, 8 (2021).
Dickman, C. R. Ecological consequences of Australia’s “Black Summer” bushfires: managing for recovery. Int. Environ. Assess. Manag. 17, 1162–1167 (2021).
Swain, D. L. A shorter, sharper rainy season amplifies California wildfire risk. Geophys. Res. Lett. 48, e2021GL092843 (2021).
Keeley, J. E. Fire intensity, fire severity and burn severity: a brief review and suggested usage. Int. J. Wildland Fire 18, 116–126 (2009).
He, T., Pausas, J. G., Belcher, C. M., Schwilk, D. W. & Lamont, B. B. Fire-adapted traits of Pinus arose in the fiery Cretaceous. New Phytol. 194, 751–759 (2012).
Bradstock, R. A. A biogeographic model of fire regimes in Australia: current and future implications. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 19, 145–158 (2010).
Bowman, D. M., Murphy, B. P., Neyland, D. L., Williamson, G. J. & Prior, L. D. Abrupt fire regime change may cause landscape-wide loss of mature obligate seeder forests. Glob. Change Biol. 20, 1008–1015 (2014).
Keeley, J. E., Pausas, J. G., Rundel, P. W., Bond, W. J. & Bradstock, R. A. Fire as an evolutionary pressure shaping plant traits. Trends Plant Sci. 16, 406–411 (2011).
Barrett, K. et al. Postfire recruitment failure in Scots pine forests of southern Siberia. Remote Sens. Environ. 237, 111539 (2020).
Miller, R. G., Fontaine, J. B., Merritt, D. J., Miller, B. P. & Enright, N. J. Experimental seed sowing reveals seedling recruitment vulnerability to unseasonal fire. Ecol. Appl. 31, e02411 (2021).
Prior, L. D., Williamson, G. J. & Bowman, D. M. Impact of high-severity fire in a Tasmanian dry eucalypt forest. Austral. J. Bot. 64, 193–205 (2016).
Brewer, J. S. Long-term population changes of a fire-adapted plant subjected to different fire seasons. Nat. Areas J. 26, 267–273 (2006).
Keith, D. A., Holman, L., Rodoreda, S., Lemmon, J. & Bedward, M. Plant functional types can predict decade‐scale changes in fire‐prone vegetation. J. Ecol. 95, 1324–1337 (2007).
Savage, M., Mast, J. N. & Feddema, J. J. Double whammy: high-severity fire and drought in ponderosa pine forests of the Southwest. Can. J. For. Res. 43, 570–583 (2013).
Miller, R. G. et al. Mechanisms of fire seasonality effects on plant populations. Trends Ecol. Evol. 34, 1104–1117 (2019).
Tangney, R., Merritt, D. J., Fontaine, J. B. & Miller, B. P. Seed moisture content as a primary trait regulating the lethal temperature thresholds of seeds. J. Ecol. 107, 1093–1105 (2019).
Tangney, R. et al. Seed dormancy interacts with fire seasonality mechanisms. Trends Ecol. Evol. 35, 1057–1059 (2020).
Bowman, D. M. et al. The human dimension of fire regimes on Earth. J. Biogeogr. 38, 2223–2236 (2011).
Knapp, E. E., Estes, B. L. & Skinner, C. N. Ecological effects of prescribed fire season: a literature review and synthesis for managers. Gen. Tech. Rep. https://doi.org/10.2737/PSW-GTR-224 (2009).
Miller, R. G. et al. Fire seasonality mechanisms are fundamental for understanding broader fire regime effects. Trends Ecol. Evol. 35, 869–871 (2020).
Keeley, J. E. & Syphard, A. D. Twenty-first century California, USA, wildfires: fuel-dominated vs. wind-dominated fires. Fire Ecol. 15, 24 (2019).
Lamont, B. B., Enright, N. J. & He, T. Fitness and evolution of resprouters in relation to fire. Plant Ecol. 212, 1945–1957 (2011).
Pausas, J. G. & Bradstock, R. A. Fire persistence traits of plants along a productivity and disturbance gradient in mediterranean shrublands of south‐east Australia. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 16, 330–340 (2007).
Pausas, J. G. & Keeley, J. E. Evolutionary ecology of resprouting and seeding in fire-prone ecosystems. New Phytol. 204, 55–65 (2014).
Fairman, T. A., Bennett, L. T. & Nitschke, C. R. Short-interval wildfires increase likelihood of resprouting failure in fire-tolerant trees. J. Environ. Manag. 231, 59–65 (2019).
Pyke, G. H. Fire-stimulated flowering: a review and look to the future. Critic. Rev. Plant Sci. 36, 179–189 (2017).
Zirondi, H. L., Ooi, M. K. J. & Fidelis, A. Fire-triggered flowering is the dominant post-fire strategy in a tropical savanna. J. Veg. Sci. 32, e12995 (2021).
Howe, H. F. Response of Zizia aurea to seasonal mowing and fire in a restored Prairie. Am. Midl. Nat. 141, 373–380 (1999).
Thompson, K. Seeds and seed banks. New Phytol. 106, 23–34 (1987).
Baskin, C. C. & Baskin, J. M. Seeds: Ecology, Biogeography, and Evolution of Dormancy and Germination 2nd edn (Academic Press, 2001).
Alvarado, V. & Bradford, K. J. A hydrothermal time model explains the cardinal temperatures for seed germination. Plant Cell Environ. 25, 1061–1069 (2002).
Mackenzie, B. D. E., Auld, T. D., Keith, D. A., Hui, F. K. C. & Ooi, M. K. J. The effect of seasonal ambient temperatures on fire-stimulated germination of species with physiological dormancy: a case study using boronia (Rutaceae). PLoS One 11, e0156142 (2016).
Ooi, M. K. J. Delayed emergence and post-fire recruitment success: effects of seasonal germination, fire season and dormancy type. Austral. J. Bot. 58, 248–256 (2010).
Bond, W. Fire survival of Cape Proteaceae-influence of fire season and seed predators. Vegetatio 56, 65–74 (1984).
Keith, D. A., Dunker, B. & Driscoll, D. A. Dispersal: the eighth fire seasonality effect on plants. Trends Ecol. Evol. 35, 305–307 (2020).
Paroissien, R. & Ooi, M. K. J. Effects of fire season on the reproductive success of the post-fire flowerer Doryanthes excelsa. Environ. Exp. Bot. 192, 104634 (2021).
Furlaud, J. M., Prior, L. D., Williamson, G. J. & Bowman, D. M. J. S. Bioclimatic drivers of fire severity across the Australian geographical range of giant Eucalyptus forests. J. Ecol. 109, 2514–2536 (2021).
Thomsen, A. M. & Ooi, M. K. J. Shifting season of fire and its interaction with fire severity: Impacts on reproductive effort in resprouting plants. Ecol. Evol. 12, e8717 (2022).
Fill, J. M. & Crandall, R. M. Stronger evidence needed for global fire season effects. Trends Ecol. Evol. 35, 867–868 (2020).
Jump, A. S. & Peñuelas, J. Running to stand still: adaptation and the response of plants to rapid climate change. Ecol. Lett. 8, 1010–1020 (2005).
Inouye, D. W. Climate change and phenology. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Clim. Change n/a, e764 (2022).
Enright, N. J., Marsula, R., Lamont, B. B. & Wissel, C. The ecological significance of canopy seed storage in fire-prone environments: a model for non-sprouting shrubs. J. Ecol. 86, 946–959 (1998).
Setterfield, S. A. The impact of experimental fire regimes on seed production in two tropical eucalypt species in northern Australia. Austral. J. Ecol. 22, 279–287 (1997).
Collette, J. C. & Ooi, M. K. J. Evidence for physiological seed dormancy cycling in the woody shrub Asterolasia buxifolia and its ecological significance in fire-prone systems. Plant Biol. 22, 745–749 (2020).
Setterfield, S. A. Seedling establishment in an Australian tropical savanna: effects of seed supply, soil disturbance and fire. J. Appl. Ecol. 39, 949–959 (2002).
Russell-Smith, J. & Edwards, A. C. Seasonality and fire severity in savanna landscapes of monsoonal northern Australia. Int. J. Wildland Fire 15, 541–550 (2006).
Whitehead, P. J., Purdon, P., Russell-Smith, J., Cooke, P. M. & Sutton, S. The management of climate change through prescribed Savanna burning: Emerging contributions of indigenous people in Northern Australia. Public Adm. Dev. 28, 374–385 (2008).
Prior, L. D., Williams, R. J. & Bowman, D. M. Experimental evidence that fire causes a tree recruitment bottleneck in an Australian tropical savanna. J. Tropical Ecol. 26, 595–603 (2010).
Abatzoglou, J. T., Williams, A. P. & Barbero, R. Global emergence of anthropogenic climate change in fire weather indices. Geophys. Res. Lett. 46, 326–336 (2019).
Ferreira, L. N., Vega-Oliveros, D. A., Zhao, L., Cardoso, M. F. & Macau, E. E. N. Global fire season severity analysis and forecasting. Comput. Geosci. 134, 104339 (2020).
Flannigan, M. et al. Global wildland fire season severity in the 21st century. For. Ecol. Manag. 294, 54–61 (2013).
Ansley, R. J. & Castellano, M. J. Prickly pear cactus responses to summer and winter fires. Rangel. Ecol. Manag. 60, 244–252 (2007).
Ansley, R. J., Kramp, B. A. & Jones, D. L. Honey mesquite (Prosopis glandulosa) seedling responses to seasonal timing of fire and fireline intensity. Rangel. Ecol. Manag. 68, 194–203 (2015).
Armstrong, G. & Legge, S. The post-fire response of an obligate seeding Triodia species (Poaceae) in the fire-prone Kimberley, north-west Australia. Int. J. Wildland Fire 20, 974–981 (2012).
Bellows, R. S., Thomson, A. C., Helmstedt, K. J., York, R. A. & Potts, M. D. Damage and mortality patterns in young mixed conifer plantations following prescribed fires in the Sierra Nevada, California. For. Ecol. Manag. 376, 193–204 (2016).
Beyers, J. L. & Wakeman, C. D. Season of burn effects in southern California chaparral. In Second interface between ecology and land development in California 45–55 (Occidental College, CA, 2000).
Bowen, B. J. & Pate, J. S. Effect of season of burn on shoot recovery and post‐fire flowering performance in the resprouter Stirlingia latifolia R. Br.(Proteaceae). Austral Ecol. 29, 145–155 (2004).
Casals, P., Valor, T., Rios, A. & Shipley, B. Leaf and bark functional traits predict resprouting strategies of understory woody species after prescribed fires. For. Ecol. Manag. 429, 158–174 (2018).
Céspedes, B., Torres, I., Luna, B., Pérez, B. & Moreno, J. M. Soil seed bank, fire season, and temporal patterns of germination in a seeder-dominated Mediterranean shrubland. Plant Ecol. 213, 383–393 (2012).
Clabo, D. C. & Clatterbuck, W. K. Shortleaf pine (Pinus echinata, Pinaceae) seedling sprouting responses: Clipping and burning effects at various seedling ages and seasons. J. Torrey Bot. Soc. 146, 96–110 (2019).
Drewa, P. B. Effects of fire season and intensity on Prosopis glandulosa Torr. var. glandulosa. Int. J. Wildland Fire 12, 147–157 (2003).
Drewa, P. B., Platt, W. J. & Moser, E. B. Fire effects on resprouting of shrubs in headwaters of southeastern longleaf pine savannas. Ecology 83, 755–767 (2002).
Drewa, P. B., Thaxton, J. M. & Platt, W. J. Responses of root‐crown bearing shrubs to differences in fire regimes in Pinus palustris (longleaf pine) savannas: exploring old‐growth questions in second‐growth systems. Appl. Veg. Sci. 9, 27–36 (2006).
Ellsworth, L. M. & Kauffman, J. B. Seedbank responses to spring and fall prescribed fire in mountain big sagebrush ecosystems of differing ecological condition at Lava Beds National Monument, California. J. Arid Environ. 96, 1–8 (2013).
Fairfax, R. et al. Effects of multiple fires on tree invasion in montane grasslands. Landsc. Ecol. 24, 1363–1373 (2009).
Fill, J. M., Welch, S. M., Waldron, J. L. & Mousseau, T. A. The reproductive response of an endemic bunchgrass indicates historical timing of a keystone process. Ecosphere 3, 1–12 (2012).
Grant, C. Post-burn vegetation development of rehabilitated bauxite mines in Western Australia. For. Ecol. Manag. 186, 147–157 (2003).
Hajny, K. M., Hartnett, D. C. & Wilson, G. W. Rhus glabra response to season and intensity of fire in tallgrass prairie. Int. J. Wildland Fire 20, 709–720 (2011).
Holmes, P. A comparison of the impacts of winter versus summer burning of slash fuel in alien-invaded fynbos areas in the Western Cape. Southern African For. J. 192, 41–50 (2001).
Jasinge, N., Huynh, T. & Lawrie, A. Consequences of season of prescribed burning on two spring-flowering terrestrial orchids and their endophytic fungi. Austr. J. Bot. 66, 298–312 (2018).
Jasinge, N., Huynh, T. & Lawrie, A. Changes in orchid populations and endophytic fungi with rainfall and prescribed burning in Pterostylis revoluta in Victoria, Australia. Ann. Bot. 121, 321–334 (2018).
Kauffman, J. & Martin, R. Sprouting shrub response to different seasons and fuel consumption levels of prescribed fire in Sierra Nevada mixed conifer ecosystems. For. Sci. 36, 748–764 (1990).
Keyser, T. L., Greenberg, C. H. & McNab, W. H. Season of burn effects on vegetation structure and composition in oak-dominated Appalachian hardwood forests. For. Ecol. Manag. 433, 441–452 (2019).
Knox, K. & Clarke, P. J. Fire season and intensity affect shrub recruitment in temperate sclerophyllous woodlands. Oecologia 149, 730–739 (2006).
Lamont, B. B. & Downes, K. S. Fire-stimulated flowering among resprouters and geophytes in Australia and South Africa. Plant Ecol. 212, 2111–2125 (2011).
Lesica, P. & Martin, B. Effects of prescribed fire and season of burn on recruitment of the invasive exotic plant, Potentilla recta, in a semiarid grassland. Restoration Ecol. 11, 516–523 (2003).
Moreno, J. M. et al. Rainfall patterns after fire differentially affect the recruitment of three Mediterranean shrubs. Biogeosciences 8, 3721–3732 (2011).
Mulligan, M. K. & Kirkman, L. K. Burning influences on wiregrass (Aristida beyrichiana) restoration plantings: natural seedling recruitment and survival. Restor. Ecol. 10, 334–339 (2002).
Nield, A. P., Enright, N. J. & Ladd, P. G. Fire-stimulated reproduction in the resprouting, non-serotinous conifer Podocarpus drouynianus (Podocarpaceae): the impact of a changing fire regime. Popul. Ecol. 58, 179–187 (2016).
Norden, A. H. & Kirkman, L. K. Persistence and prolonged winter dormancy of the federally endangered Schwalbea Americana L.(Scrophulariaceae) following experimental management techniques. Nat. Areas J. 24, 129–134 (2004).
Olson, M. S. & Platt, W. J. Effects of habitat and growing season fires on resprouting of shrubs in longleaf pine savannas. Vegetatio 119, 101–118 (1995).
Ooi, M. K. The importance of fire season when managing threatened plant species: a long-term case-study of a rare Leucopogon species (Ericaceae). J. Environ. Manag. 236, 17–24 (2019).
Pavlovic, N. B., Leicht-Young, S. A. & Grundel, R. Short-term effects of burn season on flowering phenology of savanna plants. Plant Ecology 212, 611–625 (2011).
Payton, I. J. & Pearce, H. G. Fire-Induced Changes to the Vegetation of Tall-Tussock (Chionochloa rigida) Grassland Ecosystems. (Department of Conservation Wellington, New Zealand, 2009).
Peguero, G. & Espelta, J. M. Disturbance intensity and seasonality affect the resprouting ability of the neotropical dry-forest tree Acacia pennatula: do resources stored below-ground matter? J. Tropical Ecol. 28, 539–546 (2011).
Risberg, L. & Granström, A. Exploiting a window in time. Fate of recruiting populations of two rare fire-dependent Geranium species after forest fire. Plant Ecol. 215, 613–624 (2014).
Rodríguez-Trejo, D. A., Castro-Solis, U. B., Zepeda-Bautista, M. & Carr, R. J. First year survival of Pinus hartwegii following prescribed burns at different intensities and different seasons in central Mexico. Int. J. Wildland Fire 16, 54–62 (2007).
Russell, M., Vermeire, L., Ganguli, A. & Hendrickson, J. Fire return interval and season of fire alter bud banks. Rangel. Ecol. Manag.72, 542–550 (2019).
Russell-Smith, J., Whitehead, P. J., Cook, G. D. & Hoare, J. L. Response of Eucalyptus‐dominated savanna to frequent fires: lessons from Munmarlary, 1973–1996. Ecol. Monogr. 73, 349–375 (2003).
Schmidt, I. B., Sampaio, A. B. & Borghetti, F. Effects of the season on sexual reproduction and population structure of Heteropterys pteropetala (Adr. Juss.), Malpiguiaceae, in areas of Cerrado sensu stricto submitted to biennial fires. Acta Bot. Brasilica 19, 927–934 (2005).
Shepherd, B. J., Miller, D. L. & Thetford, M. Fire season effects on flowering characteristics and germination of longleaf pine (Pinus palustris) savanna grasses. Restor. Ecol. 20, 268–276 (2012).
Spier, L. P. & Snyder, J. R. Effects of wet-and dry-season fires on Jacquemontia curtisii, a south Florida pine forest endemic. Nat. Areas J. 18, 350–357 (1998).
Tsafrir, A. et al. Fire season modifies the perennial plant community composition through a differential effect on obligate seeders in eastern Mediterranean woodlands. Appl. Veg. Sci. 22, 115–126 (2019).
Vander Yacht, A. L. et al. Vegetation response to canopy disturbance and season of burn during oak woodland and savanna restoration in Tennessee. For. Ecol. Manag. 390, 187–202 (2017).
Vidaller, C., Dutoit, T., Ramone, H. & Bischoff, A. Fire increases the reproduction of the dominant grass Brachypodium retusum and Mediterranean steppe diversity in a combined burning and grazing experiment. Appl. Veg. Sci. 22, 127–137 (2019).
Williams, P. R., Congdon, R. A., Grice, A. C. & Clarke, P. J. Soil temperature and depth of legume germination during early and late dry season fires in a tropical eucalypt savanna of north‐eastern Australia. Austral Ecol. 29, 258–263 (2004).
Williams, P. R., Congdon, R. A., Grice, A. C. & Clarke, P. J. Germinable soil seed banks in a tropical savanna: seasonal dynamics and effects of fire. Austral Ecol. 30, 79–90 (2005).
Zhao, H. et al. Ecophysiological influences of prescribed burning on wetland plants: a case study in Sanjiang Plain wetlands, northeast China. Fresenius Environ. Bull 20, 2932–2938 (2011).
Pick, J. L., Nakagawa, S. & Noble, D. W. Reproducible, flexible and high‐throughput data extraction from primary literature: The metaDigitise r package. Methods in Ecol. Evol. 10, 426–431 (2019).
Team, R. C. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/ (2020).
Higgins, J. P. et al. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. (John Wiley & Sons, 2019).
Lüdecke, D., Lüdecke, M. D. & David, B. W. Package ‘esc’. https://strengejacke.github.io/esc (2017).
Schwarzer, G. meta: An R package for meta-analysis. R news 7, 40–45 (2007).
Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. & Rothstein, H. R. A basic introduction to fixed‐effect and random‐effects models for meta‐analysis. Res. Synth. Methods 1, 97–111 (2010).
Harrer, M., Cuijpers, P., Furukawa, T. A. & Ebert, D. D. Doing Meta-Analysis with R: a Hands-on Guide. (Chapman and Hall, 2019).
Wilke, C. O., Wickham, H. & Wilke, M. C. O. Package ‘cowplot’. Streamlined Plot Theme and Plot Annotations for ‘ggplot2 (Cowplot, 2019).
Fill, J. M., Davis, C. N. & Crandall, R. M. Climate change lengthens southeastern USA lightning‐ignited fire seasons. Glob. Change Biol. 25, 3562–3569 (2019).
Halofsky, J. E., Peterson, D. L. & Harvey, B. J. Changing wildfire, changing forests: the effects of climate change on fire regimes and vegetation in the Pacific Northwest, USA. Fire Ecol. 16, 4 (2020).
Kraaij, T., Cowling, R. M., van Wilgen, B. W., Rikhotso, D. R. & Difford, M. Vegetation responses to season of fire in an aseasonal, fire-prone fynbos shrubland. PeerJ 5, e3591 (2017).
Peel, M. C., Finlayson, B. L. & McMahon, T. A. Updated world map of the Köppen-Geiger climate classification. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 11, 1633–1644 (2007).
Murphy, B. P. et al. Fire regimes of Australia: a pyrogeographic model system. J. Biogeogr. 40, 1048–1058 (2013).
McColl-Gausden, S. C., Bennett, L. T., Duff, T. J., Cawson, J. G. & Penman, T. D. Climatic and edaphic gradients predict variation in wildland fuel hazard in south-eastern Australia. Ecography 43, 443–455 (2020).
Pausas, J. G. & Keeley, J. E. Evolutionary ecology of resprouting and seeding in fire‐prone ecosystems. New Phytol. 204, 55–65 (2014).
Lamont, B. B., Maitre, D. C. L., Cowling, R. M. & Enright, N. J. Canopy seed storage in woody plants. Bot. Rev. 57, 277–317 (1991).
Tangney, R. et al. Data supporting: Success of post-fire plant recovery strategies varies with shifting fire seasonality. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.7sqv9s4t5 (2022).
Rothstein, H. R., Sutton, A. J. & Borenstein, M. Publication Bias in Meta-Analysis: Prevention, Assessment and Adjustments (John Wiley & Sons, 2006).
Head, M. L., Holman, L., Lanfear, R., Kahn, A. T. & Jennions, M. D. The extent and consequences of P-hacking in science. PLoS Biol. 13, e1002106 (2015).
Egger, M., Smith, G. D., Schneider, M. & Minder, C. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 315, 629–634 (1997).
Simonsohn, U., Nelson, L. D. & Simmons, J. P. P-curve: a key to the file-drawer. J. Exp. Psychol.Gen. 143, 534 (2014).
Acknowledgements
Support for this work was received from Australian Research Council (ARC) Linkage Grant LP180100741 to M.K.J.O. and B.P.M. supporting R.T. We acknowledge the New South Wales Government’s Department of Planning, Industry & Environment for providing support for this research via the NSW Bushfire Risk Management Research Hub. Additionally, we acknowledge the Traditional Owners of country where this research was undertaken and their continuing connection to land, sea and community. We pay our respects to them, their culture and to their Elders past and present.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
R.T., R.P., T.D.L.B., A.T., C.A.T.D., M.O. extracted and compiled the data from literature. R.T. designed the collection criteria and methodology. R.T. analysed the data and R.T. led the writing of the manuscript. R.T., R.G.M., B.P.M. and M.K.J.O. conceived the ideas, helped develop the contextual framework and designed methodology.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interest.
Peer review
Peer review information
Communications Earth & Environment thanks L. Felipe Daibes, [name] and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Primary Handling Editors: Clare Davis. Peer reviewer reports are available.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Tangney, R., Paroissien, R., Le Breton, T.D. et al. Success of post-fire plant recovery strategies varies with shifting fire seasonality. Commun Earth Environ 3, 126 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-022-00453-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-022-00453-2
- Springer Nature Limited
This article is cited by
-
Principles of fire ecology
Fire Ecology (2024)
-
Spatial heterogeneity in post-fire vegetation productivity recovery and its drivers
Nature Geoscience (2024)
-
Global patterns and drivers of post-fire vegetation productivity recovery
Nature Geoscience (2024)
-
The impacts of inter- and intra-seasonal burns on the terrestrial orchid Pterostylis curta
Plant Ecology (2024)
-
Experimentally determined traits shape bacterial community composition one and five years following wildfire
Nature Ecology & Evolution (2023)