Peer review reports
From: Qualitative insights into general practitioners views on polypharmacy
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
8 Jan 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
29 Jan 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Sibyl Anthierens |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
29 Jan 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
1 Mar 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ulrike Junius-Walker |
23 Mar 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - David Lewis |
21 Apr 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Sibyl Anthierens |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
21 Apr 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
3 May 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ulrike Junius-Walker |
12 May 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - David Lewis |
2 Aug 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Sibyl Anthierens |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
2 Aug 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
11 Aug 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ulrike Junius-Walker |
27 Aug 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Sibyl Anthierens |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
27 Aug 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
6 Sep 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Sibyl Anthierens |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
6 Sep 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 8 | |
8 Sep 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Sibyl Anthierens |
Resubmission - Version 9 | ||
8 Sep 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 9 |
Publishing | ||
15 Sep 2010 | Editorially accepted | |
15 Sep 2010 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2296-11-65 |