Peer review reports
From: Developing criteria for Cesarean Section using the RAND appropriateness method
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
14 Apr 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
16 Apr 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Arash Rashidian |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
16 Apr 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
23 May 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Simona Di Mario |
25 May 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Y Tony Yang |
3 Jul 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Arash Rashidian |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
3 Jul 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
27 Jul 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Simona Di Mario |
5 Aug 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Y Tony Yang |
23 Aug 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Arash Rashidian |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
23 Aug 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
5 Sep 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Arash Rashidian |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
5 Sep 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
12 Sep 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Arash Rashidian |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
12 Sep 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
Publishing | ||
14 Sep 2010 | Editorially accepted | |
14 Sep 2010 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2393-10-52 |