Peer review reports
From: Scientific writing: a randomized controlled trial comparing standard and on-line instruction
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
9 Jul 2008 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
8 Aug 2008 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ana Marusic |
19 Aug 2008 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - James Wofford |
28 Aug 2008 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jorge Ruiz |
2 Sep 2008 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Patricia Reynolds |
14 Nov 2008 | Author responded | Author comments - Ricardo Pietrobon |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
14 Nov 2008 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
25 Nov 2008 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ana Marusic |
12 Dec 2008 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - James Wofford |
14 Dec 2008 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jorge Ruiz |
17 Jan 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Patricia Reynolds |
19 Feb 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Ricardo Pietrobon |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
19 Feb 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
30 Mar 2009 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - James Wofford |
20 Apr 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Ricardo Pietrobon |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
20 Apr 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
5 May 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Ricardo Pietrobon |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
5 May 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
14 May 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Ricardo Pietrobon |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
14 May 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
Publishing | ||
27 May 2009 | Editorially accepted | |
27 May 2009 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-6920-9-27 |