Peer review reports
From: Animal derived products may conflict with religious patients’ beliefs
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
22 Jul 2012 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
27 Jul 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Axelina Eriksson |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
27 Jul 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 3 | |
10 Dec 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Lorraine Corfield |
4 Apr 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Hossein Hatami |
9 Apr 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Daniel Cook |
3 Aug 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Axelina Eriksson |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
3 Aug 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
11 Sep 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Lorraine Corfield |
24 Sep 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Hossein Hatami |
24 Sep 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Daniel Cook |
30 Oct 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Axelina Eriksson |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
30 Oct 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
Publishing | ||
21 Nov 2013 | Editorially accepted | |
1 Dec 2013 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-6939-14-48 |