Peer review reports
From: Determining correspondences between high-frequency MedDRA concepts and SNOMED: a case study
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
20 Nov 2009 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
20 Nov 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Prakash Nadkarni |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
20 Nov 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
1 Dec 2009 | Author responded | Author comments - Prakash Nadkarni |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
1 Dec 2009 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
18 Jan 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Rachel Richesson |
6 Feb 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Olivier Bodenreider |
20 Feb 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Alan Rector |
28 Feb 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Prakash Nadkarni |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
28 Feb 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
20 Apr 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Olivier Bodenreider |
10 Aug 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Prakash Nadkarni |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
10 Aug 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
1 Sep 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Olivier Bodenreider |
7 Sep 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Prakash Nadkarni |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
7 Sep 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
20 Sep 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Prakash Nadkarni |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
20 Sep 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 8 |
Resubmission - Version 9 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 9 | |
21 Sep 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Prakash Nadkarni |
Resubmission - Version 10 | ||
21 Sep 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 10 |
Publishing | ||
28 Oct 2010 | Editorially accepted | |
28 Oct 2010 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-6947-10-66 |