Peer review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
29 Jun 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
27 Sep 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Nerys Frances Woolacott |
24 Jan 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - valerie lawrence |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
12 Apr 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Nerys Frances Woolacott |
15 Apr 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - valerie lawrence |
12 Aug 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Susan Hanekom |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
12 Aug 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
26 Sep 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Nerys Frances Woolacott |
15 Nov 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Susan Hanekom |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
15 Nov 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
26 Jan 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Susan Hanekom |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
26 Jan 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
30 Jan 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Susan Hanekom |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
30 Jan 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 7 | |
31 Jan 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Susan Hanekom |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
31 Jan 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 8 |
Publishing | ||
6 Feb 2012 | Editorially accepted | |
6 Feb 2012 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-6947-12-5 |