Peer review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
29 Aug 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
23 Oct 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Fabio Feldman |
28 Oct 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - James Ashton-Miller |
17 Nov 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Douglas Kelly |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
17 Nov 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
24 Nov 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Fabio Feldman |
5 Dec 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - James Ashton-Miller |
19 Dec 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Douglas Kelly |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
19 Dec 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
23 Jan 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Douglas Kelly |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
23 Jan 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
24 Jan 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Douglas Kelly |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
24 Jan 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
26 Jan 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Douglas Kelly |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
26 Jan 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
28 Jan 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Douglas Kelly |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
28 Jan 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
28 Jan 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Douglas Kelly |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
28 Jan 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 8 |
28 Jan 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Douglas Kelly |
Resubmission - Version 9 | ||
28 Jan 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 9 |
Publishing | ||
2 Feb 2012 | Editorially accepted | |
29 May 2012 | Article published | 10.1186/1752-1947-6-136 |