Peer review reports
From: EOS® is reliable to evaluate spinopelvic parameters: a validation study
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
1 Sep 2023 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
17 Sep 2023 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Hong Jin Kim |
24 Sep 2023 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
1 Nov 2023 | Author responded | Author comments - Seyedehsan Daneshmand |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
1 Nov 2023 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
2 Nov 2023 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Hong Jin Kim |
11 Nov 2023 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
27 Nov 2023 | Author responded | Author comments - Seyedehsan Daneshmand |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
27 Nov 2023 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
28 Nov 2023 | Author responded | Author comments - Seyedehsan Daneshmand |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
28 Nov 2023 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
9 Dec 2023 | Author responded | Author comments - Seyedehsan Daneshmand |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
9 Dec 2023 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
Publishing | ||
11 Dec 2023 | Editorially accepted | |
6 Feb 2024 | Article published | 10.1186/s12880-023-01178-0 |