Peer review reports
From: Evaluation of shaping ability of different glide path instruments: a micro-computed tomography study
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
5 Mar 2023 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
5 Apr 2023 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
17 Jun 2023 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
29 Jun 2023 | Author responded | Author comments - Merve Yeniçeri Özata |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
29 Jun 2023 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
9 Jul 2023 | Author responded | Author comments - Merve Yeniçeri Özata |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
9 Jul 2023 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
25 Jul 2023 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
6 Aug 2023 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
7 Aug 2023 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
14 Aug 2023 | Author responded | Author comments - Merve Yeniçeri Özata |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
14 Aug 2023 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
23 Aug 2023 | Author responded | Author comments - Merve Yeniçeri Özata |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
23 Aug 2023 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
30 Aug 2023 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
4 Sep 2023 | Author responded | Author comments - Merve Yeniçeri Özata |
4 Sep 2023 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
4 Sep 2023 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
13 Sep 2023 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
19 Sep 2023 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 8 | |
Publishing | ||
11 Oct 2023 | Editorially accepted | |
24 Oct 2023 | Article published | 10.1186/s12903-023-03529-3 |