Peer review reports
From: Screening with the double surprise question to predict deterioration and death: an explorative study
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
7 May 2019 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
14 Jun 2019 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Nicola White |
5 Jul 2019 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jun Hamano |
24 Sep 2019 | Author responded | Author comments - Carel Veldhoven |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
24 Sep 2019 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
29 Oct 2019 | Author responded | Author comments - Carel Veldhoven |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
29 Oct 2019 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
19 Nov 2019 | Author responded | Author comments - Carel Veldhoven |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
19 Nov 2019 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
3 Dec 2019 | Author responded | Author comments - Carel Veldhoven |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
3 Dec 2019 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
6 Dec 2019 | Author responded | Author comments - Carel Veldhoven |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
6 Dec 2019 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
Publishing | ||
9 Dec 2019 | Editorially accepted | |
27 Dec 2019 | Article published | 10.1186/s12904-019-0503-9 |