Peer review reports
From: A randomized controlled trial of simulation training in teaching coronary angiographic views
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
29 Oct 2021 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
5 Mar 2022 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
10 Mar 2022 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Issam Tanoubi |
20 Mar 2022 | Author responded | Author comments - Julia H. Indik |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
20 Mar 2022 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
27 Mar 2022 | Author responded | Author comments - Julia H. Indik |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
27 Mar 2022 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
29 Mar 2022 | Author responded | Author comments - Julia H. Indik |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
29 Mar 2022 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
4 Apr 2022 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Issam Tanoubi |
4 May 2022 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
2 Jul 2022 | Author responded | Author comments - Julia H. Indik |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
2 Jul 2022 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
10 Jul 2022 | Author responded | Author comments - Julia H. Indik |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
10 Jul 2022 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
2 Aug 2022 | Author responded | Author comments - Julia H. Indik |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
2 Aug 2022 | Submitted | Manuscript version 8 |
16 Aug 2022 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
Resubmission - Version 9 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 9 | |
Publishing | ||
17 Aug 2022 | Editorially accepted | |
26 Aug 2022 | Article published | 10.1186/s12909-022-03705-z |